(08-21-2018, 01:11 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 12:08 PM)Leo1990 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 11:36 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 11:31 AM)Leo1990 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped.
A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again.
Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something?
Thanks
It's a resistance reaction that overrides the execution response over time. It is most likely resistance to putting in the effort required, or a delayed resistance to achieving the goals of the program. I have not had anyone report this type of resistance before, to the best of my recollection.
How many loops were you using when this happened?
Two loops both times. The execution would start maybe 10-20m into listening and then after the second loop, be 90% gone.
I forgot to mention that the first time, I was not listening to the sub, but just right after finishing the two runs. The second time, I was actively listening to side A.
I hope this helps.
So in summary, the first execution diminished more slowly over time, but also took more time to get it going. The second time was much faster onset with faster dissipation.
You know what that means, right? It means you are resisting that script at that number of loops, and you should try using more loops.
Hi @
Shannon thanks for replying back.
After seeing some success with running two loops (aura) and then loosing it, I increased my loops to 7 for a week (masked w/ headphones) but saw no effect. I suppose it was not long enough? It was hard to make time for 7 on headphones.
(08-21-2018, 02:11 PM)DarkTempatation Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon Hi Shannon this may be way out of the way but! once 6g technology is done, could you please consider upgrading MHS 5.5g to 6g after the ones in your priority list are done, I truly believe this will be a BEAST! As I am currently doing mhs 5.5g 
MHS, like all other programs, will be upgraded to 6G.
And because of how important this program is, it will have some priority.
MHS 5.5G is currently the ONLY thing that can reduce or stop my cough, even though I have created two different programs that were designed specifically to do it better than MHS. I guess I was going the wrong direction with how they work.
Since my health determines my productivity, as I said, this program will have some priority. Not first, second, or perhaps even third, but somewhere up there.
(08-21-2018, 03:00 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon, hope you had a great time on Vacation and on your birthday.
Thank you, I did.
Quote:Just wanted to ask this again since I know you were busy when I posted it. I know you said that we can snipe someone by looking at a picture of them. Have you considered putting in the reverse? Having someone getting sniped by them seeing a picture of yourself? Or do you think that would be too energy draining? I could see it being beneficial for online dating and maybe other things. Like say some girl has a picture she took with you on her phone then she shows it off to all her girlfriends later, could potentially have all of them being snipe as well. I do have a selfish reason of wondering if this could work as well seeing as if I did eventually still get into acting it might help out tremendously. As in your picture getting shown to female producers as a candidate to get them sniped or just having females seeing your picture and after getting sniped becoming fans lol.
The amount of energy that would require would absolutely be an issue. One I'm not sure could be overcome no matter what I did. But I'll see what the models say, and if it is a possibility, I will try to add that feature after I figure out the energy sourcing support.
Quote:Also, another thing I wanted to ask is after me and Mr.Anderson found out we had similar problems of this thing about not finding sex as en-joyful as say porn due to performance issues, etc (or in my case lack of real sensitivity for some reason) will there be anything in 3.3 to counter this? Will perhaps the fear removal module and key 2 be enough in theory to take care of this issue?
I had noted that while reading through the thread, and made a note of it in my "to do" list, but there is no guarantee I will be able to put it in in 3.3. I am going to try, though, and it is an issue of enough importance to go in regardless. We just have a LOT to add in 3.3.
Quote:Anyway, just wanted to ask that question and see if that other suggestion would be worth pursuing if it is doable and a productive addition to the sub.
I'm thinking not, but the models have proven me wrong before, so we will see.
(08-21-2018, 03:10 PM)mat422 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 01:14 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 01:02 PM)mat422 Wrote: [ -> ]So I was wondering when dmsi 3.3 comes out, is it going to be side B only again in the beginning? After recently moving back to A I've realized those self esteem modules are really important for me and without them it's even harder to execute the goals of dmsi.
It is very useful for me to understand what needs to be done still by only releasing B side for the first month. So it's probable that that is how all future releases will be rolled out. But don't convince yourself that X or Y is going to happen if you only use B, because you don't know what parts of the script are active in each, and you don't know what goodies and surprises I may have included in the latest version.
Ultimately, I want to have B so good that nobody needs A anymore -- if that is possible.
Besides, the self esteem modules are active in both A and B of 3.2.
Ah must have misunderstood the product page then. I was under the impression B was just the aura with none of the self esteem script.
SE is part of the standard skeleton script, as it is universally helpful in achieving the goals of the programs in so many cases that it's not considered H&C. It is simply a standard feature, unless it would detract from the goals of the program (for instance, the sleep aid).
Quote:Regarding not needing A anymore. If we can get to that point it would be amazing. Is your research pointing towards eventually eliminating the need to have a healing and clearing process for all subs in the future?
I am seeing that it is a possibility, but I do not have enough data yet to see definitively if it will be possible. I am trying for that, however.
(08-21-2018, 03:30 PM)Leo1990 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 01:11 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 12:08 PM)Leo1990 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 11:36 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 11:31 AM)Leo1990 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped.
A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again.
Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something?
Thanks
It's a resistance reaction that overrides the execution response over time. It is most likely resistance to putting in the effort required, or a delayed resistance to achieving the goals of the program. I have not had anyone report this type of resistance before, to the best of my recollection.
How many loops were you using when this happened?
Two loops both times. The execution would start maybe 10-20m into listening and then after the second loop, be 90% gone.
I forgot to mention that the first time, I was not listening to the sub, but just right after finishing the two runs. The second time, I was actively listening to side A.
I hope this helps.
So in summary, the first execution diminished more slowly over time, but also took more time to get it going. The second time was much faster onset with faster dissipation.
You know what that means, right? It means you are resisting that script at that number of loops, and you should try using more loops.
Hi @Shannon thanks for replying back.
After seeing some success with running two loops (aura) and then loosing it, I increased my loops to 7 for a week (masked w/ headphones) but saw no effect. I suppose it was not long enough? It was hard to make time for 7 on headphones.
Okay, so what about 3, 4, 5,and 6 loops? Try doing those at +1 per week. Of course 3.3 is going to come out before you get done, but if you got partial execution at 2 loops and none at 7, then it is likely that 2 is too few and 7 is too many.
Quote:The amount of energy that would require would absolutely be an issue. One I'm not sure could be overcome no matter what I did. But I'll see what the models say, and if it is a possibility, I will try to add that feature after I figure out the energy sourcing support.
That's what I thought when I seen the question. I'd rather have the energy sustainable around girls I see in person to a point where it's just there and i'm not getting fatigued or drained. Like on 3.2 I just seen 1 woman where it was briefly executing who I talked to. It was like 2 minutes and I was so drained after that.
(08-21-2018, 05:14 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:The amount of energy that would require would absolutely be an issue. One I'm not sure could be overcome no matter what I did. But I'll see what the models say, and if it is a possibility, I will try to add that feature after I figure out the energy sourcing support.
That's what I thought when I seen the question. I'd rather have the energy sustainable around girls I see in person to a point where it's just there and i'm not getting fatigued or drained. Like on 3.2 I just seen 1 woman where it was briefly executing who I talked to. It was like 2 minutes and I was so drained after that.
That's what I was thinking too but thought I would ask anyway. There's always that slight chance that is possible without being too draining. Though I wonder if that were the case if it wouldn't be "possible" til 3.4. Maybe it could be possible if after Shannon gets that tech that I think messed with time/space a bit, I forgot specifically. I know he needed to get the 3 pieces of the Magnus engine in before that though.
(08-21-2018, 05:14 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:The amount of energy that would require would absolutely be an issue. One I'm not sure could be overcome no matter what I did. But I'll see what the models say, and if it is a possibility, I will try to add that feature after I figure out the energy sourcing support.
That's what I thought when I seen the question. I'd rather have the energy sustainable around girls I see in person to a point where it's just there and i'm not getting fatigued or drained. Like on 3.2 I just seen 1 woman where it was briefly executing who I talked to. It was like 2 minutes and I was so drained after that.
This would definitely help with online dating... I swear DMSI is working over online with ver. 3.2 anyways due to my brief successes, but it would be nice if there were more power behind the aura.
Also, the part of the script where the girl wants to keep having sex with you repeatedly as much as you'd allow doesn't seem to be working for me. More likely I just need to be better at sex but if it's possible to upgrade that bit too, it would be great!
If energy and being drained is a problem, I would be happy with a 5ft radius.
Hi Shannon, im currently upto 8 loops a day on 3.2a with no changes internally with myself that i can tell no improved confidence since starting dmsi and externally can be in short distance of women and remain invisible and looks wise im in good shape decent looking yet dont get any signs of interest. When i do talk to someone that will briefly chat but also in a hurry to go back to what they are doing or going somewhere.
Should i stop dmsi and wait till 3.3 is released since it appears nothing has happened that i can tell maybe something has changed but self improvement, confidence, self esteem hasnt improved, so its hard to know what has changed.
Ben, Shannon
The instructions for SM say listen to whilst sleeping. If I do not get the 8 hours listening whilst sleeping. Will it be an issue just listening whilst I am at the gym ? Out shopping ?.
More gay dreams on DMSI 3.2A.
At this point I don't know what they are. Healing? Resistance? Execution?
I have to report there is also disturbing thoughts coming up around men. It's almost like their minds crossing mine. In waves. It's hard to put it into words but like when I am around men suddenly pictures of penis would start to flash up which is extremely disturbing to a straight guy. This is only one example, of course there are other cases. Are these my thoughts? Or others thoughts? Who's thought?
"yes Shannon I understand the not everyone is 100% straight"
But this issue was reported many times by other members. If this continues it would be really sad for me as I will have to stop using DMSI. And I really do not want to stop because I have seen the power of DMSI when I slept with a 9/10 girl.
(08-22-2018, 01:10 AM)thor2014 Wrote: [ -> ]Ben, Shannon
The instructions for SM say listen to whilst sleeping. If I do not get the 8 hours listening whilst sleeping. Will it be an issue just listening whilst I am at the gym ? Out shopping ?.
There is no ASRB in 5G so you can listen whenever you want.
Quote:Ben, Shannon
The instructions for SM say listen to whilst sleeping. If I do not get the 8 hours listening whilst sleeping. Will it be an issue just listening whilst I am at the gym ? Out shopping ?.
That's fine, as long as you get atleast 8 hours in a 24 hour period you can make some up during the day. It's only the latest 5.5g programs that are required to not have a pause with listening.