(08-21-2018, 11:38 AM)sushi521 Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon, how is the testing on the mystery sub going?
Have put that sub down for the time being. It got bogged down, then I took my birthday trip and gave myself time to step away from work, and refresh my mind. Now I am choosing to work on DMSI for the time being.
I had an insight the other day on how to make that sub work, and I will be applying it shortly, but not today. Today I will be working on DMSI 3.3. And work on that is going well and quickly - so far. This part of the job is relatively easy. I can't start the hard parts until I get home.
(08-21-2018, 11:36 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 11:31 AM)Leo1990 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped.
A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again.
Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something?
Thanks
It's a resistance reaction that overrides the execution response over time. It is most likely resistance to putting in the effort required, or a delayed resistance to achieving the goals of the program. I have not had anyone report this type of resistance before, to the best of my recollection.
How many loops were you using when this happened?
I seemed to see more results at the beginning with many versions. Especially I remember V1.0, 2.2, 3.1 and 3.2. Don't remember other versions that well. I still have the theory that with the time the subs put too much pressure on me and I start to low perform - like with different other things in real life when too much pressure was there. But I seem to need a bit of of pressure to perform well.
(08-21-2018, 11:55 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 11:36 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 11:31 AM)Leo1990 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped.
A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again.
Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something?
Thanks
It's a resistance reaction that overrides the execution response over time. It is most likely resistance to putting in the effort required, or a delayed resistance to achieving the goals of the program. I have not had anyone report this type of resistance before, to the best of my recollection.
How many loops were you using when this happened?
I seemed to see more results at the beginning with many versions. Especially I remember V1.0, 2.2, 3.1 and 3.2. Don't remember other versions that well. I still have the theory that with the time the subs put too much pressure on me and I start to low perform - like with different other things in real life when too much pressure was there. But I seem to need a bit of of pressure to perform well.
I'm working on something that should balance this out for you guys.
Hey Shannon, does DMSI do anything regarding expanding specific chakras / energy centers of the body that concerns attracting sex? Specifically the heart region? Thanks.
(08-21-2018, 11:36 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 11:31 AM)Leo1990 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped.
A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again.
Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something?
Thanks
It's a resistance reaction that overrides the execution response over time. It is most likely resistance to putting in the effort required, or a delayed resistance to achieving the goals of the program. I have not had anyone report this type of resistance before, to the best of my recollection.
How many loops were you using when this happened?
Two loops both times. The execution would start maybe 10-20m into listening and then after the second loop, be 90% gone.
I forgot to mention that the first time, I was not listening to the sub, but just right after finishing the two runs. The second time, I was actively listening to side A.
I hope this helps.
So in summary, the first execution diminished more slowly over time, but also took more time to get it going. The second time was much faster onset with faster dissipation.
So I was wondering when dmsi 3.3 comes out, is it going to be side B only again in the beginning? After recently moving back to A I've realized those self esteem modules are really important for me and without them it's even harder to execute the goals of dmsi.
(08-21-2018, 12:00 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon, does DMSI do anything regarding expanding specific chakras / energy centers of the body that concerns attracting sex? Specifically the heart region? Thanks.
There is not a universal awareness of what chakras are, not a universal agreement that they even exist. It is therefore not scripted to use that system of wording. What I use is universally understandable, and will achieve the same goals.
(08-21-2018, 12:08 PM)Leo1990 Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 11:36 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 11:31 AM)Leo1990 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped.
A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again.
Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something?
Thanks
It's a resistance reaction that overrides the execution response over time. It is most likely resistance to putting in the effort required, or a delayed resistance to achieving the goals of the program. I have not had anyone report this type of resistance before, to the best of my recollection.
How many loops were you using when this happened?
Two loops both times. The execution would start maybe 10-20m into listening and then after the second loop, be 90% gone.
I forgot to mention that the first time, I was not listening to the sub, but just right after finishing the two runs. The second time, I was actively listening to side A.
I hope this helps.
So in summary, the first execution diminished more slowly over time, but also took more time to get it going. The second time was much faster onset with faster dissipation.
You know what that means, right? It means you are resisting that script at that number of loops, and you should try using more loops.
(08-21-2018, 01:02 PM)mat422 Wrote: [ -> ]So I was wondering when dmsi 3.3 comes out, is it going to be side B only again in the beginning? After recently moving back to A I've realized those self esteem modules are really important for me and without them it's even harder to execute the goals of dmsi.
It is very useful for me to understand what needs to be done still by only releasing B side for the first month. So it's probable that that is how all future releases will be rolled out. But don't convince yourself that X or Y is going to happen if you only use B, because you don't know what parts of the script are active in each, and you don't know what goodies and surprises I may have included in the latest version.
Ultimately, I want to have B so good that nobody needs A anymore -- if that is possible.
Besides, the self esteem modules are active in both A and B of 3.2.
(08-21-2018, 11:36 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 11:31 AM)Leo1990 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi @Shannon when I first tried 3.2A I immediately got effects and executed (to the best of my knowledge) for approx 1-2hrs. However, after more runs and more time elapsed, this stopped.
A few weeks ago, I stopped for 2 weeks and tried side A again and immediately started to execute, but after the 1st run this diminished once again.
Can you help me understand what is going on? Is it diminishing returns or something?
Thanks
It's a resistance reaction that overrides the execution response over time. It is most likely resistance to putting in the effort required, or a delayed resistance to achieving the goals of the program. I have not had anyone report this type of resistance before, to the best of my recollection.
How many loops were you using when this happened?
It happens to me too each time. 1 loop as instructed at first.
@
Shannon Hi Shannon this may be way out of the way but! once 6g technology is done, could you please consider upgrading MHS 5.5g to 6g after the ones in your priority list are done, I truly believe this will be a BEAST! As I am currently doing mhs 5.5g
(08-21-2018, 08:21 AM)NoLimit Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 04:06 AM)kingpill Wrote: [ -> ]You gotta 'risk creepy'. Girls like having sex with 'badboys' or 'f**kboys' with not 'cool respectable guys'. Those are the ones they will settle down with after having all their fun.
Basically you gotta be abit of a ***** to them in a funny/cocky way and tease them a little bit while being sexually confident.
Without an element of danger, seduction isn't seduction.
You can risk creepy and be a badboy when you have look, I'm living proof of that. But if you are old and balding she will just call the cops dude 
I think Jake and Thor are spot on on this one, for exemple when I was young I had acne and no girls would sleep with me.
Then It cleared when I grew up and same girls I was asking some years ago were up for sex when we met again.
Later I got muscular, grew a beard and got some good tattoos on my body and now I'm getting a lot more women, it's simple as that.
My attitude toward girls did not really change during this time, I just improoved my look. If only I now know better how to manage relationships (my harem).
Give us some physical change sub demand is high, I'm tired of this DMSI gentleness.
@
NoLimit
That is some awesome news!
I’m reasonably ripped and have a beard, so it is great to hear that some women are really attracted to that.
Where did you find these women?
Hey Shannon, hope you had a great time on Vacation and on your birthday.
Just wanted to ask this again since I know you were busy when I posted it. I know you said that we can snipe someone by looking at a picture of them. Have you considered putting in the reverse? Having someone getting sniped by them seeing a picture of yourself? Or do you think that would be too energy draining? I could see it being beneficial for online dating and maybe other things. Like say some girl has a picture she took with you on her phone then she shows it off to all her girlfriends later, could potentially have all of them being snipe as well. I do have a selfish reason of wondering if this could work as well seeing as if I did eventually still get into acting it might help out tremendously. As in your picture getting shown to female producers as a candidate to get them sniped or just having females seeing your picture and after getting sniped becoming fans lol.
Also, another thing I wanted to ask is after me and Mr.Anderson found out we had similar problems of this thing about not finding sex as en-joyful as say porn due to performance issues, etc (or in my case lack of real sensitivity for some reason) will there be anything in 3.3 to counter this? Will perhaps the fear removal module and key 2 be enough in theory to take care of this issue?
Anyway, just wanted to ask that question and see if that other suggestion would be worth pursuing if it is doable and a productive addition to the sub.
(08-21-2018, 01:14 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-21-2018, 01:02 PM)mat422 Wrote: [ -> ]So I was wondering when dmsi 3.3 comes out, is it going to be side B only again in the beginning? After recently moving back to A I've realized those self esteem modules are really important for me and without them it's even harder to execute the goals of dmsi.
It is very useful for me to understand what needs to be done still by only releasing B side for the first month. So it's probable that that is how all future releases will be rolled out. But don't convince yourself that X or Y is going to happen if you only use B, because you don't know what parts of the script are active in each, and you don't know what goodies and surprises I may have included in the latest version.
Ultimately, I want to have B so good that nobody needs A anymore -- if that is possible.
Besides, the self esteem modules are active in both A and B of 3.2.
Ah must have misunderstood the product page then. I was under the impression B was just the aura with none of the self esteem script.
Regarding not needing A anymore. If we can get to that point it would be amazing. Is your research pointing towards eventually eliminating the need to have a healing and clearing process for all subs in the future?