(10-01-2018, 07:44 PM)Cyanide Wrote: [ -> ]Huh it's like they didn't even read my post... Weird...
I tend to reply on my phone most the time. I can’t seem to work out how to reply (on mobile) to a post, without all the blue wall text being quoted.
But I agree that huge blue walls of text are annoying at times.
Hi Shannon, i have been off dmsi for 42 days now so far since you mentioned when to stop and see if any bloom happens, no effects like that has happened while on the break.
Will dmsi be a november release or potentially could be released this month?
(10-01-2018, 07:37 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]I actually agree with this. Darkness put it very well and you too k-train. It’s like the anti sniper argument. We can always make sure we’re using protection during sex.
That's pretty much my thoughts as well. If its not going to do any harm, then just let it be. If a guy does sleep with a woman without protection (which we on this board on several occasions have said he should be using) that's honestly on him and if he falls for the old line of "I can't get pregnant, blah, blah, blah" then that's also on him if he buys that line. Obviously, there are women who can't have kids but I can't tell you how many times I've heard of guys falling for that when the woman knows full well she can get pregnant.
Use protection to stay away from a deadly or inconvenient disease.
For those of us that are men remember how awful we felt with a simple sore throat and realise how worse a disease would be for us.
Respect her and wear protection and yourself atleast until you're both tested and want to remain in a monogamous faithful relationship.
Quick question to all:
How would you get 11hours listening of a sub into your day if you had to or could?
Trying to figure it out and failing so asking you all which has always helped me in the past.
Thank you all.
Ps: without using a phone as its not the most effective.
(10-02-2018, 03:06 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ]Quick question to all:
How would you get 11hours listening of a sub into your day if you had to or could?
Trying to figure it out and failing so asking you all which has always helped me in the past.
Thank you all.
Ps: without using a phone as its not the most effective.
I would get 4 hours in the evening when I`m chilling at home. And the remaining 7 hours while I sleep.
(10-01-2018, 06:07 PM)KingDavid93 Wrote: [ -> ]Out of curiosity, how do you go about putting an individual through the models without actually knowing them?
Can't tell you that without giving away secrets about the models I don't want to give away.
Quote:Are you truly able to learn enough about them through their posts to model their results? [quote]
Apparently I can.
[quote]
What exactly do you need to know about someone in order to put them through your models?
Those specific factors that I need to plug in are in part already in place because they have been pre-calculated using certain other factors which when properly manipulated in the right algorithm result in certain of the factors necessary. This only works after a very large number of runs of the models and the resulting refining of the database it uses.
There are a lot of variables and factors necessary, but the models can directly calculate or indirectly calculate a lot of them at this point.
Specifically what I need to know, can't reveal that.
(10-02-2018, 02:47 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote: [ -> ] (10-01-2018, 07:37 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]I actually agree with this. Darkness put it very well and you too k-train. It’s like the anti sniper argument. We can always make sure we’re using protection during sex.
That's pretty much my thoughts as well. If its not going to do any harm, then just let it be. If a guy does sleep with a woman without protection (which we on this board on several occasions have said he should be using) that's honestly on him and if he falls for the old line of "I can't get pregnant, blah, blah, blah" then that's also on him if he buys that line. Obviously, there are women who can't have kids but I can't tell you how many times I've heard of guys falling for that when the woman knows full well she can get pregnant.
While I'm not worried about getting manipulated into having more kids, my concern is the women we're disqualifying b/c they have no interest in having kids, ever, with anyone. A lot of women are just looking to have a good time. At the least, adding in "fun" instead of going full-court-press on "baby rabies" seems like the better route to me.
I'm for whatever Shannon deems best after modeling the options.
(10-02-2018, 06:01 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ] (10-02-2018, 02:47 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote: [ -> ] (10-01-2018, 07:37 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]I actually agree with this. Darkness put it very well and you too k-train. It’s like the anti sniper argument. We can always make sure we’re using protection during sex.
That's pretty much my thoughts as well. If its not going to do any harm, then just let it be. If a guy does sleep with a woman without protection (which we on this board on several occasions have said he should be using) that's honestly on him and if he falls for the old line of "I can't get pregnant, blah, blah, blah" then that's also on him if he buys that line. Obviously, there are women who can't have kids but I can't tell you how many times I've heard of guys falling for that when the woman knows full well she can get pregnant.
While I'm not worried about getting manipulated into having more kids, my concern is the women we're disqualifying b/c they have no interest in having kids, ever, with anyone. A lot of women are just looking to have a good time. At the least, adding in "fun" instead of going full-court-press on "baby rabies" seems like the better route to me.
I'm for whatever Shannon deems best after modeling the options.
Remember that DMSI is unisex, and women can use it to affect men too.
But I will be checking on the best option between focusing on the current goal, which seems to produce baby rabies; sex for fun; or some combination of the two.
(10-01-2018, 09:36 AM)Hatman Wrote: [ -> ] (10-01-2018, 08:41 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]UMOP is not included in USLM as a goal or subgoal. The motivation is a natural side effect of USLM.
Sorry, that wasn't a serious statement, hence why I used a meme. 
My motivation and productivity has been through the roof lately under USLM and it made me realize that I'll probably never run UMOP even though I have it. I rather have this motivation and focus it towards success rather have it just for the sake of it. Thanks for changing my mind lol
Sometimes I can't tell if it's serious or not, and if that is the case, I need to presume it is to keep others from becoming confused.
USLM and UMOP take different routes, but they both result in motivation that you enjoy when you execute.
(10-02-2018, 04:39 AM)cataleya Wrote: [ -> ] (10-02-2018, 03:06 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ]Quick question to all:
How would you get 11hours listening of a sub into your day if you had to or could?
Trying to figure it out and failing so asking you all which has always helped me in the past.
Thank you all.
Ps: without using a phone as its not the most effective.
I would get 4 hours in the evening when I`m chilling at home. And the remaining 7 hours while I sleep.
Thank you. I unfortunately cannot do that as the 11hours have to be continuous without any stoppage.
It seems 5hours may be still the most likely way for me even though I would love to do the 11.
(10-02-2018, 06:46 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-02-2018, 04:39 AM)cataleya Wrote: [ -> ] (10-02-2018, 03:06 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ]Quick question to all:
How would you get 11hours listening of a sub into your day if you had to or could?
Trying to figure it out and failing so asking you all which has always helped me in the past.
Thank you all.
Ps: without using a phone as its not the most effective.
I would get 4 hours in the evening when I`m chilling at home. And the remaining 7 hours while I sleep.
Thank you. I unfortunately cannot do that as the 11hours have to be continuous without any stoppage.
It seems 5hours may be still the most likely way for me even though I would love to do the 11.
New phones have decent speakers I think the diff in effictiveness will be really low. So if you want you can use your phone and play it 2-3 hours before you go to bed. By the time you wake up you may have 1 or 2 hours left only.
(10-02-2018, 06:46 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-02-2018, 04:39 AM)cataleya Wrote: [ -> ] (10-02-2018, 03:06 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ]Quick question to all:
How would you get 11hours listening of a sub into your day if you had to or could?
Trying to figure it out and failing so asking you all which has always helped me in the past.
Thank you all.
Ps: without using a phone as its not the most effective.
I would get 4 hours in the evening when I`m chilling at home. And the remaining 7 hours while I sleep.
Thank you. I unfortunately cannot do that as the 11hours have to be continuous without any stoppage.
It seems 5hours may be still the most likely way for me even though I would love to do the 11.
I'm the dork who'd walk around with a small bluetooth speaker everywhere I went. I'm gonna get my damn loops in, no matter what. UMOP is not a program that would be detrimental to expose certain people to, so...If you want to get it done, you'll get it done.
(10-02-2018, 06:51 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]I'm the dork who'd walk around with a small bluetooth speaker everywhere I went. I'm gonna get my damn loops in, no matter what. UMOP is not a program that would be detrimental to expose certain people to, so...If you want to get it done, you'll get it done.
Reminds me of the days I wore headphones all day long, then night stand speaker during sleep. To make sure I got my 21 hours a day of listening in during 5G. People thought I was nuts.
I am...lmao...but I just wanted that max listening time, haha.
It's so nice to not have to do insane hours anymore, lol.
If you want to do it, you'll make it happen, Jake. Exactly right.