3.2 is def the best so far for me. But maybe it's because it was in 3.2 when I started listening 7 loops a night. 3.1 I was only doing the recommended for testing amount.
(08-23-2018, 03:02 PM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: [ -> ] (08-23-2018, 02:06 PM)kingpill Wrote: [ -> ] (08-23-2018, 11:14 AM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: [ -> ]"...make us all successful and rich FAST"
For every overnight/fast success there is almost always years, if not decade(s) of hard (and smart) work being done that lead to that success which for outside lookers SEEM to be overnight/fast success (since they fail to see the work that was put in for that success to manifest).
Now, I´m not Shannon but I would guess that while he will be able to create a sub that will significantly cut the time that is required for riches and success to manifest, you will still need to do your part in the world...and success very rarely happens FAST. Depending on how you define being rich/successful of course.
If my memory serves me, Shannon has said that becoming millionaire/even billionaire is possible to be manifested FAST via extreme reality bending but the price/consequences of doing so is extremely risky and dangerous, and he will not go to such lengths with it since it´s not safe. Anyway, I would be interested to hear Shannon´s thoughts as well on what he thinks on how far he can push the limits while still keeping it safe.
What kind of risks would it entail?
You have to ask Shannon about that. I would like to hear as well, but for some reason I have a feeling that he won´t be awfully detailed if he chooses to answer.
I choose not to give details about the risks because it would give too much information on reality bending and result in assumptions as to what it is, which would be in error and cause problems for a lot of people as a result.
Suffice it to say that too much of a good thing is not a good thing.
Hey shannon
What will happen if i used 5.5g tech and go back to 5g without a break?
What will happen if i used uslm for 10 days and then jump to another 5.5g without a break?
Thank you in advance
(08-23-2018, 08:15 PM)thor2014 Wrote: [ -> ]Is it me or does SM seem to be alot more raw and masculine then DMSI ?. I appreciate DMSI is using more advanced technology however SM seems to really dig deep into your psyche and bring out that raw masculine side which I never experienced with DMSI.
Sex magnet is about pure sexual dominance and attraction. Raw sexual attraction that is intended specifically to build on the results and effects of the ALPHA MALE set.
It is, therefore, very focused through your masculinity in how it achieves it's goals.
DMSI does not specifically tell you to focus through your gender. It does not tell you this directly, because if it is necessary to achieve the design goal, then the Optimus Engine should take care of it.
On top of that, SM is attempting to develop, enhance and express a pure sexual energy of raw animality. It is a very polar "one trick pony" type deal. DMSI is doing a lot of things, and self adjusts the effects to the needs of the affected. So YOU may not experience the raw masculine side on DMSI, but if she needs to experience that from you for you to be irresistibly sexually attractive to her, then SHE will experience it as her perception of you.
It's like complaining that women don't like your cologne when you wore what you liked, not what they liked.
(08-23-2018, 08:30 PM)bits Wrote: [ -> ] (08-23-2018, 07:06 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]Pretty sure Dr. Strangelove requested that before, and it was shot down. Version C - unlikely. Also sure I remember Shannon poking all kinds of holes into that theory, then reopened V1 as a reminder (and V1 failed to impress...again).
I thought v1 was pretty impressive, didn't 3 guys lose their virginity on it in the first week or so?
If V1 was so impressive, we wouldn't have bothered with V2. or 2.x. Or 3.x.
(08-23-2018, 09:50 PM)eternity Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon @Andrew any plans on opening that affiliate program up?
Yes. But we are currently still dealing with a few issues.
(08-24-2018, 03:11 AM)samba99 Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
Whats new in reality bending 5.1? In other words, what's new from reality bending 5.0
RB 5.1 closes a loophole that existed in 5.0 which was allowing certain people to resist RB because they were able to interpret the safety mechanism as being an excuse to refuse execution out of fear, not any real need for the safety it was attempting to provide. 5.1 prevents that issue by adjusting the safeties in much the same way Key #1 corrected the general safeties. It is therefore significantly more effective in many cases.
(08-24-2018, 10:16 AM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (08-23-2018, 03:02 PM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: [ -> ] (08-23-2018, 02:06 PM)kingpill Wrote: [ -> ] (08-23-2018, 11:14 AM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: [ -> ]"...make us all successful and rich FAST"
For every overnight/fast success there is almost always years, if not decade(s) of hard (and smart) work being done that lead to that success which for outside lookers SEEM to be overnight/fast success (since they fail to see the work that was put in for that success to manifest).
Now, I´m not Shannon but I would guess that while he will be able to create a sub that will significantly cut the time that is required for riches and success to manifest, you will still need to do your part in the world...and success very rarely happens FAST. Depending on how you define being rich/successful of course.
If my memory serves me, Shannon has said that becoming millionaire/even billionaire is possible to be manifested FAST via extreme reality bending but the price/consequences of doing so is extremely risky and dangerous, and he will not go to such lengths with it since it´s not safe. Anyway, I would be interested to hear Shannon´s thoughts as well on what he thinks on how far he can push the limits while still keeping it safe.
What kind of risks would it entail?
You have to ask Shannon about that. I would like to hear as well, but for some reason I have a feeling that he won´t be awfully detailed if he chooses to answer.
I would imagine @Shannon could make you successful faster with BAMM 3.0 via reality bending but it would consume more energy. I recall Shannon saying a few weeks ago that a goal such as BAMM's would require vast amounts of energy to accomplish. Now BAMM 3.0 might make it easier and faster but the energy expenditure would still be significant. As for pushing reality bending, i'm not sure how much energy that would require but likely a lot. And of course before anything, it has to be safe.
It will be interesting to see how Shannon manages to accomplish this safely. +
BAMM 3.0 is, like BAMM 2.0, going to be designed to achieve the goals of the program in a realistic manner. When I say realistic, I mean, realistic according to the potentials of the technologies in use. V2 was aimed at achievement in 4 to 8 years, and I was fully expecting what happened with people slowly but surely giving up on it. People don't do well with sticking to a goal long term in a lot of cases. But the "why" of it was not expected.
In BAMM 3.0, I will be making a lot of adjustments and improvements and bringing a lot of tech to the forefront, and it will probably reduce the amount of time most people will need even more. But until I have it built, we won't know the specifics. Speculation is therefore useless.
(08-24-2018, 02:05 PM)worldpua Wrote: [ -> ]Hey shannon
What will happen if i used 5.5g tech and go back to 5g without a break?
What will happen if i used uslm for 10 days and then jump to another 5.5g without a break?
Thank you in advance
Going from a 5.5G sub to a 5G sub without a break will result in turbulence that will very likely dominate and destroy the effects of the 5G sub for a while.
Using two 5.5G subs back to back like that is likely to create turbulence which will cause confusion, exhaustion and a general failure of one or both programs for a while. It may also cause headaches, depending on the person.
(08-24-2018, 02:17 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-24-2018, 10:16 AM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (08-23-2018, 03:02 PM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: [ -> ] (08-23-2018, 02:06 PM)kingpill Wrote: [ -> ] (08-23-2018, 11:14 AM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: [ -> ]"...make us all successful and rich FAST"
For every overnight/fast success there is almost always years, if not decade(s) of hard (and smart) work being done that lead to that success which for outside lookers SEEM to be overnight/fast success (since they fail to see the work that was put in for that success to manifest).
Now, I´m not Shannon but I would guess that while he will be able to create a sub that will significantly cut the time that is required for riches and success to manifest, you will still need to do your part in the world...and success very rarely happens FAST. Depending on how you define being rich/successful of course.
If my memory serves me, Shannon has said that becoming millionaire/even billionaire is possible to be manifested FAST via extreme reality bending but the price/consequences of doing so is extremely risky and dangerous, and he will not go to such lengths with it since it´s not safe. Anyway, I would be interested to hear Shannon´s thoughts as well on what he thinks on how far he can push the limits while still keeping it safe.
What kind of risks would it entail?
You have to ask Shannon about that. I would like to hear as well, but for some reason I have a feeling that he won´t be awfully detailed if he chooses to answer.
I would imagine @Shannon could make you successful faster with BAMM 3.0 via reality bending but it would consume more energy. I recall Shannon saying a few weeks ago that a goal such as BAMM's would require vast amounts of energy to accomplish. Now BAMM 3.0 might make it easier and faster but the energy expenditure would still be significant. As for pushing reality bending, i'm not sure how much energy that would require but likely a lot. And of course before anything, it has to be safe.
It will be interesting to see how Shannon manages to accomplish this safely. +
BAMM 3.0 is, like BAMM 2.0, going to be designed to achieve the goals of the program in a realistic manner. When I say realistic, I mean, realistic according to the potentials of the technologies in use. V2 was aimed at achievement in 4 to 8 years, and I was fully expecting what happened with people slowly but surely giving up on it. People don't do well with sticking to a goal long term in a lot of cases. But the "why" of it was not expected.
In BAMM 3.0, I will be making a lot of adjustments and improvements and bringing a lot of tech to the forefront, and it will probably reduce the amount of time most people will need even more. But until I have it built, we won't know the specifics. Speculation is therefore useless.
With BAMM 2.0 I made progress but I was never able to resolve the deeper issues that prevented me from achieving the goal.
If those issues like fear of success were resolved then I think would have a better chance of achieving the goal within the 4-8 year time frame.
By the time the program is developed I imagine reality bending will be extremely advanced. Either way I’m excited by what @
Shannon is going to do with this program once it comes time.
(08-24-2018, 02:13 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-24-2018, 03:11 AM)samba99 Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
Whats new in reality bending 5.1? In other words, what's new from reality bending 5.0
RB 5.1 closes a loophole that existed in 5.0 which was allowing certain people to resist RB because they were able to interpret the safety mechanism as being an excuse to refuse execution out of fear, not any real need for the safety it was attempting to provide. 5.1 prevents that issue by adjusting the safeties in much the same way Key #1 corrected the general safeties. It is therefore significantly more effective in many cases.
That would actually explained a lot. On 3.1 I could very often feeling the RB working or when it was changing something. I got to 3.2 and I could feel the RB at all. I just assumed it was due to my "I don't care" attitude having some influence on it, which it might still have, but if it was using the safeties as a loophole that would make a lot of sense as well.
(08-24-2018, 07:06 AM)K-Train Wrote: [ -> ][quote='K-Train' pid='204264' dateline='1535085869']
[quote='kingpill' pid='204249' dateline='1535072674']
-SNIP
Most people are fearful of death and so at the end of their lives, the fear consumes them, hence making them weak. Not me. I wanna look death in the eye and laugh as I die. I wanna f*** lady death.
Executed like crazy right after this realization.
I've noticed the EXACT same thing. V3.2 generates/generated a lot of fear in me. My anxiety would ratchet up. I found that most of the fear in my life centered around death. I would sometimes visualizes myself holding lady death's hand and looking her in the eyes and saying "I'm not afraid of you". By releasing this fear of death I also found it easier to execute DMSI.
Quote:I believe the reason for this is because part of the subconscious for some people equates losing/relinquishing control to DMSI as dying. Almost EVERY person is wired to avoid death and survive but I believe that people who are "resistant" have this subconscious "survival program" running in overdrive. The reality is that death is unavoidable and a necessary step that all of us will eventually take. When the subconscious realizes this and begins treating death as something natural it relaxes so to speak and this is when DMSI is able to work its magic because the instructions are no longer seen as a threat.
I reserve the right for my opinion to be totally wrong!
Shannon in regards to this post from Kingpill's journal, does Key #1 or Key #2 address the subconscious identifying the relinquishing of control/compliance to DMSI's instrunctions with death? As someone who has had issues with "being told what to do" I can most certainly attest to sometimes equating "loss of control" with dying. My results with DMSI improved drastically when this was overcome and I believe it may hold an important key to improving the results for others.
Also sidebar question: Do you think that US/LM is having a positive benefit on your progress with DMSI? If yes could you please continue running it for the next year so we get more kickass subs? Thanks!
*This was a copy and paste from Kingpill's journal. This post was supposed to be here originally but I posted it in the wrong journal. Consider this a request for the return of the 'delete post' button.
hey @
Shannon not sure if you saw this...
@
Shannon
With Beast17 and all the new things that you are going to put into 3.3, how far do you think you are from removing resistance of all kinds once and for all and from reaching 6G?
I was reading today about a local guy to me, who has become one of the richest men in the country from his focus, desire, motivation and savviness in business.
I know you created BAMM which is old tech and therefore unlikely to ever work on me but would the 6G BAMM make us all successful and rich fast?
I see small successes on the forum with US/LM sub but nothing that shows huge leaps in success or luck so is a sub ever planned that can give all this and more?
You spoke eloquently of how making money is about energy which I also tonight realised could be equated with skill. The better the skills we have, the high income skills the more money we can or will make. Such as the entrepreneur I mentioned at the top, who I know had money to begin with to invest but there are many people out there that dont have money at all to be able to invest and multiply to become rich nor the skills to make money or develop and make money.
So is skills, the developement of skills, or the foresight to see an opportunity and take it something you have thought would be great in a sub such as BAMM, or success etc. I have wasted my life and not earned anything for it nor been able to see where or how I can make lots of money or what skills I already posses that can make me money.
My degree now is a good degree and I will be earning money from it once I graduate but I wont be earning what I consider would make me rich or can make me rich and successful.
Ive no idea how others have done it, some with unscrupulous means of cos and some with talent and some with pure hard work and luck, so is there such a thing as working smart not hard and yet achieving?
just a nightly rant lol
thanks bro!
(08-24-2018, 02:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-24-2018, 02:05 PM)worldpua Wrote: [ -> ]Hey shannon
What will happen if i used 5.5g tech and go back to 5g without a break?
What will happen if i used uslm for 10 days and then jump to another 5.5g without a break?
Thank you in advance
Going from a 5.5G sub to a 5G sub without a break will result in turbulence that will very likely dominate and destroy the effects of the 5G sub for a while.
Using two 5.5G subs back to back like that is likely to create turbulence which will cause confusion, exhaustion and a general failure of one or both programs for a while. It may also cause headaches, depending on the person.
I will share my personal experiences when mixing 5.5 and 5G subs. I was using DMSI over night and occasionally using the awakener 5G early mornings to wake me up. However after using the awakener I would immediately go back to DMSI and use 2 loops.
Now this might be a special case but it worked for me with a combination of these two specific subs. I am not trying to say Shannon is wrong I am just sharing my experiences.