(10-28-2018, 04:11 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
Hey mate
After my 2 days break, ive missed 7 days due to our communication and my understanding that I was to fail the 5 loops.
Ill get back onto UMOP, so do I restart the count as day 1 or shall I continue, and this is so that if the sub doesnt work then I get the money back - and of course if it works it gives you fresh data?
Get back on it, and at the end of three months we'll assess whether or not you want a refund. Under normal circunstances, this would have invalidated you, but there are a couple of factors in play that make this a special case, so I'm willing to be flexible in this specific case.
Quote:I am up for jumping on DMSI 3.3 but you said FRM v3 will be included in UMOP so after the full 90 days I can then decide on how to move next based on what subs are available.
All I care about is executing and as you know I have done that in the past with 3.2 at 1 loop. Not at more than 1 loop. So hope you can figure out why i did then and not now.
Only variable was that then I was using headphones.
thanks
(10-28-2018, 05:26 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon I'm glad I could help in some way with my reporting on that. There was something I wanted to ask you regarding This:
Quote:SOPS module
I think this was the second time you mentioned this. Am I to gather that the SOPS will act "sort" of like OE except it will deal even more directly with doing what needs to be done to reach the goal? Like in DMSI it will try to get you to be attracted on all those 130+ metrics you mentioned without them being directly mentioned? In LTU it might increase your cognitive abilities if that is needed in order to get your studies done to "tune up" your life as it were? If so, I will definitely be running LTU for a while then to get my IT stuff done if that is that is the case.
The specific metrics that are being considered by a woman will not always include all 130+ of the metrics I have found. Most of them are universal, some are not. Likewise, they are not the same number or type that straight men have, and may not be the same for gay men, gay women, bisexuals, etc. So to make them effective, we need to set up the program to act on only those metrics that are effective, for each specific case.
So if you're a straight man running DMSI and trying to attract a straight woman, there will be a different set of metrics than if you were looking to attract a bisexual woman. Likewise, each woman has her own unique subset of metrics, and each metric has a unique set of configurations necessary for each woman.
So DMSI is seeking to trigger exactly the right metrics and configure them exactly the right way, no matter who you are as the user, and no matter who they are as the affected, as long as they meet the criteria that you are attracted to sexually.
This specific module would not be included in LTU, because it is too specific in focus. It wouldn't make sense. What you are referring to is covered by OE and other things in LTU.
@
Shannon I know you have been working on DSMI full blast but have there been any new developments about what will go into LTU 5.5G?
US/LM 2 Update- Day 19(Start of 3rd cycle of 6 days)
So had a brief time frame this weekend when I was out and I felt pretty awesome! Was flowing in the moment, witty as ever, and feeling more relaxed then normal. This only lasted around an hour or so though. The rest of the time lately has mostly been spent frustrated and stuck in my head. Haven't noticed any "lucky" things happen to me as of yet. Success based thinking is also definitely not there yet. Been feeling kind of down and demotivated. Sleep has been pretty trash lately. Maybe FRM2 is still working on things and just bringing some stuff up while it processes it. Will continue going forward with the program and report back later with any new findings and updates.
Hey Shannon,
Also had a question if you don't mind...
If one of ones goals is to expand their consciousness/awareness/being more present, more in touch with truth(whatever you want to refer to it as) can US/LM2 help with that? I know that obviously US/LM is designed to help achieve whatever your goals may be in life, but the reason I ask is because expanding ones consciousnesses is such a unique thing, and ultimately involves transcending the mind at higher levels
Shannon, if possible, please make dmsi 3.3 run on as minimal loops as possible. I love uslm1 because only with one loop, the result are amazing, uslm2 I believe is stronger than v1, but me personally can't stand the loops if it is a must doing it back to back (if we could divide the loops there and there of course that could be very neat). Thanks a bunch Shannon, will always support ya!
(10-29-2018, 05:28 PM)Dilectione Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, if possible, please make dmsi 3.3 run on as minimal loops as possible. I love uslm1 because only with one loop, the result are amazing, uslm2 I believe is stronger than v1, but me personally can't stand the loops if it is a must doing it back to back (if we could divide the loops there and there of course that could be very neat). Thanks a bunch Shannon, will always support ya!
I don't think he "makes" any of the subs run on a particular number of loops. I think he just runs the models on what amount of loops will be most effective, then prescribes whatever number they tell him will work best.
(10-29-2018, 05:35 PM)Broski Wrote: [ -> ] (10-29-2018, 05:28 PM)Dilectione Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, if possible, please make dmsi 3.3 run on as minimal loops as possible. I love uslm1 because only with one loop, the result are amazing, uslm2 I believe is stronger than v1, but me personally can't stand the loops if it is a must doing it back to back (if we could divide the loops there and there of course that could be very neat). Thanks a bunch Shannon, will always support ya!
I don't think he "makes" any of the subs run on a particular number of loops. I think he just runs the models on what amount of loops will be most effective, then prescribes whatever number they tell him will work best.
True, that's why I said if possible, I prefer subs with as minimum usage as possible, because in my experience, Shannon subs are very good that brain need time to processing and executing it, and now it's 5.5G, I believe it's way more 'transcoded' than 5G and brain need more time to rest and adjust accordingly.
Still, if possible, 1 loop dmsi gonna be popular
Shannon mentioned somewhere that sequentially all subs will be 1 loop
(10-29-2018, 09:46 AM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon I know you have been working on DSMI full blast but have there been any new developments about what will go into LTU 5.5G?
No. All focus is on DMSI 3.3 and/or advancing the skeleton script.
I am pretty sure what is already set for inclusion will be at or even a little beyond the limit of what I can add. We shall see when the time comes that I can continue working on it.
(10-29-2018, 01:47 PM)Broski Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon,
Also had a question if you don't mind...
If one of ones goals is to expand their consciousness/awareness/being more present, more in touch with truth(whatever you want to refer to it as) can US/LM2 help with that? I know that obviously US/LM is designed to help achieve whatever your goals may be in life, but the reason I ask is because expanding ones consciousnesses is such a unique thing, and ultimately involves transcending the mind at higher levels
USLM1 and 2 are both designed to take as your conscious goals the direction of and for the program and the focus of its efforts to make you successful.
(10-29-2018, 05:28 PM)Dilectione Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, if possible, please make dmsi 3.3 run on as minimal loops as possible. I love uslm1 because only with one loop, the result are amazing, uslm2 I believe is stronger than v1, but me personally can't stand the loops if it is a must doing it back to back (if we could divide the loops there and there of course that could be very neat). Thanks a bunch Shannon, will always support ya!
I am doing what I can, but my level of skill and knowledge at this time is going to limit me to whatever is possible according to that. We shall see what the necessary loops are after I have created it.
Does USLM have scripting for an aura?
I've been wondering that since one may project themselves as successful, but I'm unsure if this is from one's changing beliefs or something else entirely. I don't understand how subliminals manifest auras, to be honest.
I also ask since the 4G US script has these messages in it, which may (?) produce an aura:
My body language now says I am ultra-successful.
I now act like I am ultra-successful, and I automatically become ultra-successful.
I looked in the glossary and found nothing on it, and the FAQ section mentioned auras, but assumed understanding of them. Explanations weren't given. I'll take correction if I missed it. I know they are an energy projected, but I'm not understanding how subs create them. Is it scripting or energy sourcing?
(10-30-2018, 01:03 PM)findingme Wrote: [ -> ]Does USLM have scripting for an aura?
I've been wondering that since one may project themselves as successful, but I'm unsure if this is from one's changing beliefs or something else entirely. I don't understand how subliminals manifest auras, to be honest.
I also ask since the 4G US script has these messages in it, which may (?) produce an aura:
My body language now says I am ultra-successful.
I now act like I am ultra-successful, and I automatically become ultra-successful.
I looked in the glossary and found nothing on it, and the FAQ section mentioned auras, but assumed understanding of them. Explanations weren't given. I'll take correction if I missed it. I know they are an energy projected, but I'm not understanding how subs create them. Is it scripting or energy sourcing?
According to the script library for DAOS 4G,
“I now develop and project an extremely intense, powerful, obvious and effective aura of sexiness”
It seems this is the kind of statement / suggestion that programs the subconscious mind to generate an aura.
I’ve read that deeply held beliefs also affect the aura / personal energies that one has within and around one’s physical body.
It would be interesting to get a Shannon perspective on this subject / question.