(01-21-2019, 06:40 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]DMSI is being uploaded. It will be released tomorrow, when I am not frazzled to a crisp mentally and emotionally with all the stupid shit going on right now. I still have to calculate the loops and ASRB2. Since last time I released before I had those you guys couldn't wait, I will wait until I have them to release this time.
(01-22-2019, 05:52 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: [ -> ]DMSI 3.03 'er somethin' ,the real new version:-) is finally released and available... now when Shannon isnt so frazzled to a crisp....the journey continues with Life Tune Up and all that that entails,then onto "The Rest of the Story" Paul Harvey. Good day!! Yes!!
But it's not (released and available). See Shannon's post about
not releasing it yet.
(01-21-2019, 10:23 PM)Voytek Wrote: [ -> ]Where can one download the newest version of DMSI?
The same place you can find the old version of it. It isn't available yet, but when it is, the links will change but they will still be in the same place.
(01-21-2019, 11:46 PM)dweller94 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
I believe I may have something called 'Molluscum Contagiosum', Still awaiting to see a specialist to confirm if it is that, would you say MIR is the best course of action to get rid of it or MHS ?
I know it maybe a grey area as you may not have feedback for this but I am willing to test.
If you choose to try to use a subliminal to deal with this, MIR is the only option that makes sense, as this is an infection. MHS is designed to deal with damaged flesh.
(01-22-2019, 05:53 AM)Greenduck Wrote: [ -> ]Hello there Shannon,
I have discovered a psychologist called Dr. Gabor Maté who I though about recommending to you as I know that you still start working on LTU and soon E3. The reason behind is that I recognize the way he reason about human behavior regarding emotional health and addiction with the logic I have seen in your posts over the years, so I think that you may find it valuable and interesting.
Him visiting Tim Ferris
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9B5mYfBPlY
Thanks. I'll take a look.
Hi @
Shannon! I saw you're online, and just wanted to know the latest news with V3.3.1's release.
Thank you.
(01-21-2019, 03:01 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ] (01-21-2019, 02:42 PM)Infinite Wrote: [ -> ]I must have missed the thread, so I apologize. What is 3.3.1 supposed to do?
It's going to have an updated fear removal module, Shannon said he would do this so he could test the new version of FRM.
Shannon said -
Quote:3.3.1-D has FRM 4.4, which optimizes the script of 4.1 and adds three new concepts to the mix. The total result should be that:
A) Sleep is now uninterrupted and fully refreshing.
B) The overall ease of and effectiveness of the fear removal process is much improved. The process should not be scary anymore.
C) The process should be significantly faster.
D) The FRM should be much more powerful towards and capable of achieving it's goals.
Thank you Ben, sounds awesome!
(01-21-2019, 03:36 PM)Oversoul Wrote: [ -> ] (01-21-2019, 02:47 PM)Infinite Wrote: [ -> ] (01-21-2019, 01:27 PM)Oversoul Wrote: [ -> ] (01-21-2019, 12:12 PM)Greenduck Wrote: [ -> ] (01-21-2019, 08:33 AM)Oversoul Wrote: [ -> ]Girls like me more when other guys hit on them now. lol
They maybe sense the other guys need to seek validation from them and see that you don't seek it out, and thus increasing your attractiveness in their eyes.
Most probably. But whats weirder is that THEY seem to feel bad for someone else flirting with them and basically take in that energy and bring it towards me. If that makes sense. And these are people I never spoken to before
Seems to me like they were hoping that you were the one that was hitting on them?
Partly maybe, but they looked at me all guilty for having someone else come talk to them/hit on them etc. And I barely know them.
They were almost saying sorry 
That is an odd reaction. It's almost as if in their minds they have bonded with you. Feelings of guilt when someone is hitting on you are usually reserved for someone who you're already in a committed relationship. lol
I was hoping 3.3.1 would be out by 12pm PST? I'm going on a date tonight lol. Should I just not wait, and use 3.3?
(01-22-2019, 09:03 AM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]I was hoping 3.3.1 would be out by 12pm PST? I'm going on a date tonight lol. Should I just not wait, and use 3.3?
I'm in EST. I'm currently in the process of calculating the ASRB2 and loops per day. And I would say something or someone does NOT want me to do this, because even with USLM3 playing on max volume looping right now, I am struggling to extract this information from the modeling runs I am doing. It's there, and it is being revealed, but it's much more challenging than it should be and taking much longer than it should.
So far I am finished calculating the "days on" part, and mostly finished disambiguating the "days off" part. Then it will be time for loops. Once I have that information, I'll publish it here and adjust the program description, and I will tell Ben to link 'em up.
At that point, it's just a matter of when Ben finishes.
I should be done within the next - oh wait, I always make this mistake of estimating and then being wrong. Nevermind.
(01-22-2019, 09:16 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (01-22-2019, 09:03 AM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]I was hoping 3.3.1 would be out by 12pm PST? I'm going on a date tonight lol. Should I just not wait, and use 3.3?
I'm in EST. I'm currently in the process of calculating the ASRB2 and loops per day. And I would say something or someone does NOT want me to do this, because even with USLM3 playing on max volume looping right now, I am struggling to extract this information from the modeling runs I am doing. It's there, and it is being revealed, but it's much more challenging than it should be and taking much longer than it should.
So far I am finished calculating the "days on" part, and mostly finished disambiguating the "days off" part. Then it will be time for loops. Once I have that information, I'll publish it here and adjust the program description, and I will tell Ben to link 'em up.
At that point, it's just a matter of when Ben finishes.
I should be done within the next - oh wait, I always make this mistake of estimating and then being wrong. Nevermind.
What or who is preventing you from calculating the loops?
(01-22-2019, 09:16 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I would say something or someone does NOT want me to do this, because even with USLM3 playing on max volume looping right now, I am struggling to extract this information from the modeling runs I am doing.
All of us on the board are on your side and rooting for you, if that helps to hear.
(01-22-2019, 09:22 AM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (01-22-2019, 09:16 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (01-22-2019, 09:03 AM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]I was hoping 3.3.1 would be out by 12pm PST? I'm going on a date tonight lol. Should I just not wait, and use 3.3?
I'm in EST. I'm currently in the process of calculating the ASRB2 and loops per day. And I would say something or someone does NOT want me to do this, because even with USLM3 playing on max volume looping right now, I am struggling to extract this information from the modeling runs I am doing. It's there, and it is being revealed, but it's much more challenging than it should be and taking much longer than it should.
So far I am finished calculating the "days on" part, and mostly finished disambiguating the "days off" part. Then it will be time for loops. Once I have that information, I'll publish it here and adjust the program description, and I will tell Ben to link 'em up.
At that point, it's just a matter of when Ben finishes.
I should be done within the next - oh wait, I always make this mistake of estimating and then being wrong. Nevermind.
What or who is preventing you from calculating the loops?
It seems most likely that it is some part of my own subconscious. I can't rule out other things, but that is the option I have evidence to support. And it may also be responsible for the chaos that has resulted in an 8 hour job taking a week now...
But this is going to happen, and I am done calculating the ASRB2. It is:
7 days on, 3 days off.
Now for loops.
(01-22-2019, 09:46 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (01-22-2019, 09:22 AM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (01-22-2019, 09:16 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (01-22-2019, 09:03 AM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]I was hoping 3.3.1 would be out by 12pm PST? I'm going on a date tonight lol. Should I just not wait, and use 3.3?
I'm in EST. I'm currently in the process of calculating the ASRB2 and loops per day. And I would say something or someone does NOT want me to do this, because even with USLM3 playing on max volume looping right now, I am struggling to extract this information from the modeling runs I am doing. It's there, and it is being revealed, but it's much more challenging than it should be and taking much longer than it should.
So far I am finished calculating the "days on" part, and mostly finished disambiguating the "days off" part. Then it will be time for loops. Once I have that information, I'll publish it here and adjust the program description, and I will tell Ben to link 'em up.
At that point, it's just a matter of when Ben finishes.
I should be done within the next - oh wait, I always make this mistake of estimating and then being wrong. Nevermind.
What or who is preventing you from calculating the loops?
It seems most likely that it is some part of my own subconscious. I can't rule out other things, but that is the option I have evidence to support. And it may also be responsible for the chaos that has resulted in an 8 hour job taking a week now...
But this is going to happen, and I am done calculating the ASRB2. It is:
7 days on, 3 days off.
Now for loops.
Oh ok.
I know DSMI has dragged on for awhile and I know you are ready to progress forward with 6G and make new stuff. I know I would be weary if I worked on the same thing for 2 1/2 years straight.
(01-22-2019, 09:52 AM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (01-22-2019, 09:46 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (01-22-2019, 09:22 AM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (01-22-2019, 09:16 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (01-22-2019, 09:03 AM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]I was hoping 3.3.1 would be out by 12pm PST? I'm going on a date tonight lol. Should I just not wait, and use 3.3?
I'm in EST. I'm currently in the process of calculating the ASRB2 and loops per day. And I would say something or someone does NOT want me to do this, because even with USLM3 playing on max volume looping right now, I am struggling to extract this information from the modeling runs I am doing. It's there, and it is being revealed, but it's much more challenging than it should be and taking much longer than it should.
So far I am finished calculating the "days on" part, and mostly finished disambiguating the "days off" part. Then it will be time for loops. Once I have that information, I'll publish it here and adjust the program description, and I will tell Ben to link 'em up.
At that point, it's just a matter of when Ben finishes.
I should be done within the next - oh wait, I always make this mistake of estimating and then being wrong. Nevermind.
What or who is preventing you from calculating the loops?
It seems most likely that it is some part of my own subconscious. I can't rule out other things, but that is the option I have evidence to support. And it may also be responsible for the chaos that has resulted in an 8 hour job taking a week now...
But this is going to happen, and I am done calculating the ASRB2. It is:
7 days on, 3 days off.
Now for loops.
Oh ok.
I know DSMI has dragged on for awhile and I know you are ready to progress forward with 6G and make new stuff. I know I would be weary if I worked on the same thing for 2 1/2 years straight.
Yes, but see now, we are actually making solid progress with each release concerning the root cause of the problem. That makes a big difference. I am willing to keep going because I am making progress. 3.4 will still be the end of the line for the 3.x branch, and I don't really have interest in developing 4.0 at this time, but we are making progress, so I'm at least fueled by that. 2.5 years of seemingly getting nowhere will wear down even a granite mountain. Now we have the key, and we just have to refine it until it is finished.