(10-17-2018, 03:04 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-17-2018, 06:03 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-16-2018, 10:50 PM)Gotcha Wrote: [ -> ]Hey guys!
What’s the news on DMSI 3.3?
I am currently working on developing FRM v3 for it. I'm going to try to make DMSI 3.3 as successful as possible by doing so.
(10-17-2018, 08:23 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-17-2018, 06:38 AM)josh84 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon, just wondering about mhs, when you release it in 6g do you think it would be strong enough to repair damaged hearing to the point people may not need hearing aids.
I can't know that yet.
Quote:Ive been off dmsi for 2 months now, and i understand many things have come up in that time, if i was to use some hypnosis products while waiting for 3.3 to be released how much of a break do i need before moving onto 3.3 once its released, and do we have more than 35 days still away while frm is being tested to improve on before 3.3?
Thanks.
The instructions are posted in the FAQ for that.
I don't know how long we have until I release 3.3. I only know that I am focused on FRM3 right now, and I have a lot I want to add after that.
What other thing you consider putting in 3.3 besides the frm3. Also is frm3 significantly stronger than frm2?
I have pages of things that I have been gathering since releasing 3.2. If you guys have requested it, it might be in there.
(10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers.
I don't know if bluetooth speakers lose any quality or frequency, but others have reported they use them and it's been fine. You can also try the speaker test on them.
I've tried the speaker test and no problem.. I was more enquiring as to whether anyone knew whether the subliminal element would be affected through Bluetooth.. don't really know enough about the exact technical details as to bit transfer / loss etc.
As of the last time I checked , you may want to check again, but bluetooth transfers auido at 320kbps which is the quality of a cd. FLAC requires much more than that.
(10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers.
I don't know if bluetooth speakers lose any quality or frequency, but others have reported they use them and it's been fine. You can also try the speaker test on them.
I've tried the speaker test and no problem.. I was more enquiring as to whether anyone knew whether the subliminal element would be affected through Bluetooth.. don't really know enough about the exact technical details as to bit transfer / loss etc.
I don't know enough to be able to say if the bluetooth hardware will degrade the quality or not. I would imagine not, though.
(10-17-2018, 05:08 PM)Broski Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon cam the FRM really eliminate ALL fear from ones existence? I know its just based on my own limiting beliefs, but operating in the world with ZERO fear whatsoever just sounds too good to be true. If it truly allows one to do that it will be an incredible break through. I almost feel like with the complete removal of fear no other sub or anything else is really needed as fear is the number 1 thing stopping people from getting what they want in life, regardless of what it may be. Really excited to see who is the first to fully execute the FRM and what their experience is like.
First, remember that the FRM is a module. It is designed to remove whatever fear stands in your way of executing the subliminal and achieving its goal(s). Not every fear you have.
Now, if we were to make the goal of the program fear removal, it might go after all fears.
Right now we have v2 to work with, and I am working on v3. I will keep revising it until it does what I want it to do or I can't make it any better.
Is it going to result in people having zero fear? I don't know. I do know that when I finish making it do what I want, it is very likely to be a major game changer.
(10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers.
I don't know if bluetooth speakers lose any quality or frequency, but others have reported they use them and it's been fine. You can also try the speaker test on them.
I've tried the speaker test and no problem.. I was more enquiring as to whether anyone knew whether the subliminal element would be affected through Bluetooth.. don't really know enough about the exact technical details as to bit transfer / loss etc.
Well, i'm not sure, I don't know enough about that either unfortunately.
(10-17-2018, 06:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ] (10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers.
I don't know if bluetooth speakers lose any quality or frequency, but others have reported they use them and it's been fine. You can also try the speaker test on them.
I've tried the speaker test and no problem.. I was more enquiring as to whether anyone knew whether the subliminal element would be affected through Bluetooth.. don't really know enough about the exact technical details as to bit transfer / loss etc.
Well, i'm not sure, I don't know enough about that either unfortunately.
Not every company implemented support for lossless audio transfer. The only way to know it if not exactly mentioned in the product description is to ask the company about maximum bitrate and the way the audio is transferred.
If it's not lossless, it's useless.
I am not sure.but there should be some minimum standards for every bluetooth speakers. lossless will be in the standard
(10-17-2018, 09:44 PM)terry44 Wrote: [ -> ]I thought bluetooth was always lossy.
http://www.sereneaudio.com/blog/how-good...t-its-best
I remember reading there is also a lossfree standard, but as of the last time I've read about it (couple of years ago actually, so the situation today might be completely different) the lossless standard was used by only one or two companies. All others were using lossy ones, which means losing audio information. And as all these compression standards are based on psychoacoustic models, they get rid first of the information that we don't (consciously) hear, so exactly where the good stuff is in subliminal land.
(10-17-2018, 06:47 PM)Wharrgarbl Wrote: [ -> ] (10-17-2018, 04:03 PM)X88B88 Wrote: [ -> ] (10-17-2018, 03:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]FLAC in general is a little higher effectiveness, not sure why that would change with bluetooth speakers.
I don't know if bluetooth speakers lose any quality or frequency, but others have reported they use them and it's been fine. You can also try the speaker test on them.
I've tried the speaker test and no problem.. I was more enquiring as to whether anyone knew whether the subliminal element would be affected through Bluetooth.. don't really know enough about the exact technical details as to bit transfer / loss etc.
As of the last time I checked , you may want to check again, but bluetooth transfers auido at 320kbps which is the quality of a cd. FLAC requires much more than that.
Check this:
https://www.lifewire.com/what-to-know-ab...th-3134591
So bottomline. The phone decompress the FLAC audio and it is recompressed to fit into the available bluetooth bandwidth.
IOW, if you want the best possible audio, you should stay away from bluetooth headsets (unless your headset support FLAC decoding)...
Yes, i read few article, bluetooth is lossy. i will stop listening to sub from my bluetooth sleepphones.
I verified it using app spectral analyser.
Dumb thing, i listened to it for 2 day..will add 1.5 +1.5 DAYS.
https://www.reddit.com/r/audiophile/comm...bluetooth/
The latest one or two versions SUPPORT lossless transfer, but that doesn't mean the manufacturers have implemented that feature. I remember reading an test - but this was already two years ago or so - where all tested devices supported the latest standard which supported lossless transfer, but none of the tested devices had this feature implemented even if they supported the latest standard.