(12-02-2018, 02:33 PM)Smuggler Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 12:24 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]The way I use dreams in USLM, most of what your dreams are is going to be either processing the script, processing the changes made to you and/or your external circumstances as a result of executing the script, or experiencing some of the success you haven't yet gotten to in the "now".
I just remembered something significant. On my 4th night of USLM v3 I had a dream where we had split up. I was phoning and texting, she would not reply. 3 days later it happened. She has completely blocked me.
Was it resistance to the sub and I ended up manifesting it?
Your guess is as good as mine. Maybe you were dreaming a prophetic dream that showed up because you were afraid of that future, which did not cause it. Maybe that was inevitable regardless. Who knows.
@
Shannon I noticed you mentioned that the Anti-sniper will be off for DMSI 3.3
Please let there be an Anti-STD module in there at least.
(12-02-2018, 03:17 PM)DMSIuser78 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon I noticed you mentioned that the Anti-sniper will be off for DMSI 3.3
Please let there be an Anti-STD module in there at least.
Buy condoms and use them. Don't go down on strangers. There ya go.
(12-02-2018, 03:20 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 03:17 PM)DMSIuser78 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon I noticed you mentioned that the Anti-sniper will be off for DMSI 3.3
Please let there be an Anti-STD module in there at least.
Buy condoms and use them. Don't go down on strangers. There ya go.
But that takes away all the fun
(12-02-2018, 03:20 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 03:17 PM)DMSIuser78 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon I noticed you mentioned that the Anti-sniper will be off for DMSI 3.3
Please let there be an Anti-STD module in there at least.
Buy condoms and use them. Don't go down on strangers. There ya go.
I'd rather avoid women with STDs altogether.
Not being able to at least taste her pussy and to enjoy feeling, watching and hearing her respond to my mouth and tongue would decrease my enjoyment of sex.
Definitely should have something preventing STD also will the anti sniper and long range sniper be deactivated in 3.4?
I see Women with STD's as low quality. Like bread with mold.
Why eat moldy bread at all when you can eat fresh quality bread?
The Anti STD would at least prevent moldy bread from being on the table and allow only the higher quality tasty bread ready to be eaten, on the table.[/i]
(12-02-2018, 03:20 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 03:17 PM)DMSIuser78 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon I noticed you mentioned that the Anti-sniper will be off for DMSI 3.3
Please let there be an Anti-STD module in there at least.
Buy condoms and use them. Don't go down on strangers. There ya go.
And don't kiss or engage in oral sex with people with cold sores on their face, butt or genitals. Done.
(12-02-2018, 03:47 PM)DMSIuser78 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 03:20 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 03:17 PM)DMSIuser78 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon I noticed you mentioned that the Anti-sniper will be off for DMSI 3.3
Please let there be an Anti-STD module in there at least.
Buy condoms and use them. Don't go down on strangers. There ya go.
I'd rather avoid women with STDs altogether.
Not being able to at least taste her pussy and to enjoy feeling, watching and hearing her respond to my mouth and tongue would decrease my enjoyment of sex.
You know how you avoid women with STDs altogether?
Step 1: You avoid all women who are obviously going to be at high risk for having any STD.
Step 2: You ask her point blank, do you have any STDs?
Step 3: You show her your up-to-date papers proving you are STD free and require her to show you hers.
Step 4: You make sure to know the signs and symptoms of all known STDs and be observant concerning whether or not she shows any of them.
Step 5: You assume that she has an STD anyway (unless you can prove she hasn't had any contact with anyone since getting a full spectrum STD test proving her to be negative) and wear a condom, or, if you want to perform oral sex, use an oral sex barrier device.
Step 6: Enter a committed faithful relationship with her once you know she is STD free and make sure you are mutually sexually faithful.
There is no anti-sniper in DMSI 3.3. You will just have to take personal responsibility for your choices and actions, because the anti-sniper is staying turned off.
(12-02-2018, 04:09 PM)Roy Wrote: [ -> ]Definitely should have something preventing STD also will the anti sniper and long range sniper be deactivated in 3.4?
It's called personal responsibility and common sense. You guys are going to have to rely on that for the time being. In fact, you should always be relying on it anyway, since assuming that the anti-sniper would be infallible would likely give you a false sense of security in doing stupid things.
(12-02-2018, 05:12 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 04:09 PM)Roy Wrote: [ -> ]Definitely should have something preventing STD also will the anti sniper and long range sniper be deactivated in 3.4?
It's called personal responsibility and common sense. You guys are going to have to rely on that for the time being. In fact, you should always be relying on it anyway, since assuming that the anti-sniper would be infallible would likely give you a false sense of security in doing stupid things.
If I may ask a question, did you turn these off to limit number of variables or is there something more to it? I'm not against it, I'm just curious.
(12-02-2018, 05:21 PM)Mystic Pymp Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 05:12 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 04:09 PM)Roy Wrote: [ -> ]Definitely should have something preventing STD also will the anti sniper and long range sniper be deactivated in 3.4?
It's called personal responsibility and common sense. You guys are going to have to rely on that for the time being. In fact, you should always be relying on it anyway, since assuming that the anti-sniper would be infallible would likely give you a false sense of security in doing stupid things.
If I may ask a question, did you turn these off to limit number of variables or is there something more to it? I'm not against it, I'm just curious.
I did what the models indicated would produce the best possible results for execution.
(12-02-2018, 05:22 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 05:21 PM)Mystic Pymp Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 05:12 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 04:09 PM)Roy Wrote: [ -> ]Definitely should have something preventing STD also will the anti sniper and long range sniper be deactivated in 3.4?
It's called personal responsibility and common sense. You guys are going to have to rely on that for the time being. In fact, you should always be relying on it anyway, since assuming that the anti-sniper would be infallible would likely give you a false sense of security in doing stupid things.
If I may ask a question, did you turn these off to limit number of variables or is there something more to it? I'm not against it, I'm just curious.
I did what the models indicated would produce the best possible results for execution.
Im all for it Shannon. Thank you!!
Will version A of USLM be rebuilt? I mean with FRM and H&C.