(04-17-2018, 09:30 AM)Fluffy Wrote: [ -> ] (04-17-2018, 04:56 AM)Determined Wrote: [ -> ] (04-17-2018, 02:41 AM)Fluffy Wrote: [ -> ]I have been a fighter for many years,My thinking was maybe for this personal loophole of mine, add/install into DMSI...new beliefs about releasing, orgasm, sexual intercourse with a person, that allows the perspective and experience of it to be an empowering, energising, uplifting, genuine positive experience that is helpful rather than hindering etc. in different styles and I definitely notice depletion energy/stamina wise, after sexual intercourse and releasing with a woman. Years ago I was not aware of it and it is only when I look back now because of what I am aware of now, that I see the connections. If I was competing now and had a fight coming up, there is no way I would have sex the night before, the week before, or even a month before.
Fighters do this for a reason. There is something to it. I don't care what mainstream says either, mainstream is a joke.
Maybe, but not everyone is a fighter and not everyone wants to live that lifestyle. If you make your living using your mind, you can be successful and enjoy your women too.
I don't see how this is got to do with anything I have said. Obviously not everyone wants to be a fighter and not everyone wants to live that lifestyle.
(04-17-2018, 06:07 AM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ]There were also historically some extremely good fighters (Ali, Morrison, tons of others probably, too) who actually did the opposite - they'd have extreme amounts of sex before fights.
It really depends on what brings out the beast in you, heh.
I am speaking of my personal experience, obviously. In relation to my personal experience with DMSI and thinking of my personal future loop holes. This is what this is about.
I think you are pulling them names out of thin air though to be honest. Especially Ali. Anyone can throw names out there.
Frank Bruno used to do the Limbo dance, before a fight. I just wrote this so it must be true about him.
Unless you fight, train and compete, you are just speaking about things you have heard through the media, which is not a trustworthy source nor is your lack of experience in fighting, training and competing. Personal experience is where it is at and common sense...and that comes with personal experience.
I am getting bored of this topic now. If this was useful for Shannon, great. If not, it don't matter. Just thought I would share.
My thinking was maybe for this personal loophole of mine, add/install into DMSI...new beliefs about releasing, orgasm, sexual intercourse with a person, that allows the perspective and experience of it to be an empowering, energising, uplifting, genuine positive experience that is helpful rather than hindering etc.
Don't forget this is my issue, so no one else will be having this issue. I thought Shannon wanted DMSI to work with a higher percentage of people, and I am a person and I want it to work with me, so I am sharing my issues with Shannon, in hopes of improving DMSI and my personal experience.
I have made note of this. There should be something universally useful and beneficial I can create for this.
(04-17-2018, 10:46 AM)samba99 Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
First I would like to thank you for having the courage to set a goal such as DMSI. This program is amazing. It really helps me in a variety of ways in my life. And I can clearly see now why you implemented PTPA and Anxiety relief.
Thanks for your appreciation.
Quote:Few pages back, you said there are many factors that determine attractiveness and you have a list of 100 or so factors in your notes. You also mentioned that most of these factors are still not in DMSI.
Hopefully we going to get some of these factors in 3.3, yes?
What are some major factors of that list you looking to put in 3.3? Any examples? Something that is not currently in 3.2. Maybe some of us already experiencing these factors as a result of TID
I said that there are well over 100 tumblers to the "lock" of female sexuality. I don't remember exactly how many I have discovered so far, but it's something between 130 and 150. These are all the things that a woman will consider and take into account before allowing herself to, and choosing to have sex.
Those factors are for the most part not yet in DMSI. I'm not sure how much of that will make it into 3.3, but 3.3 will be focusing on upgrading the auric modulation and effects.
What they are is not something I care to share. It's taken me over 15 years of constant work to discover these, tease them out of endless experiments and data. I don't want to just give that away. But I will tell you this. There are a lot of things a woman takes into account and considers that would never in a million years cross a man's mind as to his own sexual choices and actions. This is the primary sticking point for most men: they have no idea what she's really thinking and basing her sexual choices and actions on.
Keep in mind that completely unlocking the sexuality of a woman is still not within my grasp. Even after more than 15 years of work, I still can't do it. Women are extremely complex creatures, and they have an entirely different set of tumblers to their "lock" than males do. It also depends on their sexual orientation, as it does with men. So it may be that I never discover how to completely unlock this, and even if I do, how would I implement it? I don't know yet. I'll be going as far as I can safely go with DMSI, but in the end, we have to move on sooner or later, even if I cannot fully unlock human sexuality.
I'm sure you've noted that we are making progress with each release, though, and that DMSI 3.2 has achieved design spec on a number of occasions. The biggest issues we have right now are resistance from the user, and resistance from the affected. I'd say the former is much more dangerous to the ultimate success of the program than the latter.
(04-17-2018, 02:05 PM)Adrien Silva Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon when will the custom sub be completed?
When I finish it. Of course. It has been delayed and delayed and delayed and the reasons are more and more ridiculous every time we try to move forward. But the initial payment has been made and the program is being started today. I'm aiming to finish it in 4 weeks. During that time I'll be trying to release Disconnect From Negative Stress, at least, which is ready to build. Just been sick and loopy.
(04-17-2018, 10:36 PM)BreathlessDragon Wrote: [ -> ]Does Optimus Engine targets subconscious or conscious goals? I'm curious to know if I can get DMSI to accomplish specific things depending on what I consciously consider to be a part of maximum sexual irresistibility or if it's something already embedded into my subconscious.
Optimus Engine targets the program's goals, and gives this task to the subconscious mind to accomplish.
Quote:No, if he doesn't like how he feels after sex then that's a subjective thing. People have sex because it feels good. I have sex because it feels good. Abstaining from sex in this context is for the purposes of excelling at combat sports.
Yes, but that's in my opinion a reasonable motive. If one weights the pros and cons and find out that he's not winning, then abstaining for the purpose of keeping a good status quo doesn't seem absurd to me.
Anyway, just wanted to chime in about that Tantra stuff you said. It's good to nuance that there are differents school of thoughts.
(04-18-2018, 05:08 AM)DarkPlouf Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:No, if he doesn't like how he feels after sex then that's a subjective thing. People have sex because it feels good. I have sex because it feels good. Abstaining from sex in this context is for the purposes of excelling at combat sports.
Yes, but that's in my opinion a reasonable motive. If one weights the pros and cons and find out that he's not winning, then abstaining for the purpose of keeping a good status quo doesn't seem absurd to me.
Anyway, just wanted to chime in about that Tantra stuff you said. It's good to nuance that there are differents school of thoughts.
I think you're being unnecessarily verbose here as I can't decipher what you're trying to say.
Fair enough.
????
Now I am the confused one. I don't get what you do not understand.
(04-16-2018, 02:31 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (04-16-2018, 01:17 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon
How is Beast 16 testing going?
B16 isn't being tested yet because it hasn't been built yet. I don't have time to work on it much right now.
It is getting a trickle of attention, and I do expect to build it in a month or two, but for the time being, I am focused on building focusfires for IML and the custom.
Oh, and this proof of concept experimental I am working on for a new type of approach to some sticking points.
B15 has been the least tested of the beasts, because of various factors out of my hands that prevent testing. But it did achieve 9/10ths of design spec on the 3rd test. Since then, I have only been able to test it once, and for all intents and purposes, it isn't worth the trouble to try to test any Beast until the circumstances change. Which is why I have not prioritized Beast 16 more.
Ah I see. I am very much looking forward to how well B16 ends up testing. This could be the one.
(04-18-2018, 06:27 AM)DarkPlouf Wrote: [ -> ]????
Now I am the confused one. I don't get what you do not understand.
This entire paragraph lol
"Yes, but that's in my opinion a reasonable motive. If one weights the pros and cons and find out that he's not winning, then abstaining for the purpose of keeping a good status quo doesn't seem absurd to me."
I sleep less than I used to- whereas on the product page, it says I should be sleeping more. Is this some sort of resistance by my SubC for it not to clear stuff out through dreams?
(04-18-2018, 09:52 AM)kingpill Wrote: [ -> ]I sleep less than I used to- whereas on the product page, it says I should be sleeping more. Is this some sort of resistance by my SubC for it not to clear stuff out through dreams?
I've been sleeping a lot less for the last week and a half too.
(04-18-2018, 09:52 AM)kingpill Wrote: [ -> ]I sleep less than I used to- whereas on the product page, it says I should be sleeping more. Is this some sort of resistance by my SubC for it not to clear stuff out through dreams?
That is extremely unlikely.
(04-18-2018, 07:29 AM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (04-16-2018, 02:31 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (04-16-2018, 01:17 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon
How is Beast 16 testing going?
B16 isn't being tested yet because it hasn't been built yet. I don't have time to work on it much right now.
It is getting a trickle of attention, and I do expect to build it in a month or two, but for the time being, I am focused on building focusfires for IML and the custom.
Oh, and this proof of concept experimental I am working on for a new type of approach to some sticking points.
B15 has been the least tested of the beasts, because of various factors out of my hands that prevent testing. But it did achieve 9/10ths of design spec on the 3rd test. Since then, I have only been able to test it once, and for all intents and purposes, it isn't worth the trouble to try to test any Beast until the circumstances change. Which is why I have not prioritized Beast 16 more.
Ah I see. I am very much looking forward to how well B16 ends up testing. This could be the one.
This one or the next, based on what B15 did it can't possibly be far off now.
I've been on LTU for a week. I'm looking at going to DMSI in about 2 weeks since I was on UD, and 21 days I'm supposed to be off any 5.5 subs. Need I be off all subs before starting DMSI, or is it just 5.5 subs that I need a break from?