Subliminal Talk

Quote:I now manifest into my life all the positive things that I consciously want to have and experience.

Yeah this is what I was looking forward the most. But if I am not mistaking, Shannon said a while back that the LM will not be about manifestation. He was answering Tholt.

@"Cyanide" Looks like this time we didn't get a mail announcing the new release. That was a good idea.

Good work Shannon.

I will get it eventually and if it works for me I will be redevable to you my whole life. That's the kind of program I can use for years.

(07-30-2018, 03:48 PM)DarkPlouf Wrote: [ -> ]

Quote:I now manifest into my life all the positive things that I consciously want to have and experience.

Yeah this is what I was looking forward the most. But if I am not mistaking, Shannon said a while back that the LM will not be about manifestation. He was answering Tholt.

@"Cyanide" Looks like this time we didn't get a mail announcing the new release. That was a good idea.

Good work Shannon.

I will get it eventually and if it works for me I will be redevable to you my whole life. That's the kind of program I can use for years.

I thought this program would have manifestation features to it since basically he just merged the two programs.

I think he said that manifestation will not be all that the program does but a good portion will be

Either way i am very excited

Quote:I would stick to natural methods. I have heard that Tongkat Ali can have the same effect than synthetic TRT. That is your natural T production can become dependent on taking outside substances.

Unfortunately the realy problem with Tongkat Ali is that it doesn't work. I wasted $100 each for 2 bottles and it made me constipated and gave me a few pimples on my upper arm.

None of the promised benefits. Actually the first time I used it I stopped because it made me feel sick.

(07-30-2018, 04:12 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-30-2018, 03:48 PM)DarkPlouf Wrote: [ -> ]

Quote:I now manifest into my life all the positive things that I consciously want to have and experience.

Yeah this is what I was looking forward the most. But if I am not mistaking, Shannon said a while back that the LM will not be about manifestation. He was answering Tholt.

@"Cyanide" Looks like this time we didn't get a mail announcing the new release. That was a good idea.

Good work Shannon.

I will get it eventually and if it works for me I will be redevable to you my whole life. That's the kind of program I can use for years.

I thought this program would have manifestation features to it since basically he just merged the two programs.

I think he said that manifestation will not be all that the program does but a good portion will be

Either way i am very excited

The current version uses the script of LM, upgraded to 5.5G, and adds new scripting on that to be more specific about what it is doing and how. US us using both the module in the skeleton script and an entirely new key script for US, which is custom blended with a LM key script that is also entirely new for this program.

Manifestation is a part of the program, but LM does not rely on it except as it (manifestation) appears in the skeleton script.

(07-29-2018, 06:31 AM)findingme Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,

I got an email from a writer/therapist who shared some accurate info on procrastination. When I read that people who procrastinate are highly self-critical, it floored me. I know you're close to publishing the OP/UM sub (from what I've read), but I thought I'd pass this on.

For me berating myself is actually the core of why I procrastinate in most areas of life. IML subs offer solutions, and this has some nuggets in it.

http://powerofted.com/procrastination-ma...y-problem/

Thank you, that is helpful.

(07-30-2018, 06:57 AM)Dmitry Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-29-2018, 07:37 AM)thor2014 Wrote: [ -> ]I have stopped DMSI for now and plan to run SM. A few years ago I did begin to run it however at the time I felt I lacked the maturity to use it. Another thing is i am keen to given it a run as i feel alot more grounded now and feel I can take full advantage of its capabilities. Plus i feel SM will change you into a sexy masculine from the ground up.

Thor, I think if you run SM3 after DMSI you will be disappointed by far less intensity and clearing. I ran SM3 refresher with 3(!) subliminal programs from other vendor at the same time with NO tiredness at all. But even then I felt that DMSI do more than that, instruction-violating usage format.

Maybe you stick with DMSI but use 1:1 ASRB as MLS? As I already said DMSI is overwhelming subC, I’m now 100% sure.

And you are 100% sure based on what evidence again?

Can we have testosterone and supplement discussions in separate thread(s)? Those topics pops up often enough and in different threads (and often in totally unrelated ones, like this one) that in my opinion it would be a good idea to have a dedicated thread for them, thanks.

Hmmmmmm So, US/LM or UM/OP....

What will help me achieve success faster? How do I choose what is best for me?

(07-30-2018, 04:39 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-30-2018, 04:12 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-30-2018, 03:48 PM)DarkPlouf Wrote: [ -> ]

Quote:I now manifest into my life all the positive things that I consciously want to have and experience.

Yeah this is what I was looking forward the most. But if I am not mistaking, Shannon said a while back that the LM will not be about manifestation. He was answering Tholt.

@"Cyanide" Looks like this time we didn't get a mail announcing the new release. That was a good idea.

Good work Shannon.

I will get it eventually and if it works for me I will be redevable to you my whole life. That's the kind of program I can use for years.

I thought this program would have manifestation features to it since basically he just merged the two programs.

I think he said that manifestation will not be all that the program does but a good portion will be

Either way i am very excited

The current version uses the script of LM, upgraded to 5.5G, and adds new scripting on that to be more specific about what it is doing and how. US us using both the module in the skeleton script and an entirely new key script for US, which is custom blended with a LM key script that is also entirely new for this program.

Manifestation is a part of the program, but LM does not rely on it except as it (manifestation) appears inthe skeleton script.

Shannon

So will the program still bring about what you consciously focus on and desire as the older program did?

(07-30-2018, 04:52 PM)Fluffy Wrote: [ -> ]Hmmmmmm So, US/LM or UM/OP....

What will help me achieve success faster? How do I choose what is best for me?

I say it depends on what you're doing actually, your roadmaps and how much you are procrastinating on them.
In my case for instance, I am already allocating nearly all my available time working on my projects. So using UM/OP would be useless as motivation isn't an issue. I am putting the necessary efforts, so US/LM would complete nicely and help me avoid unwanted synchronicities that are outside of the conscious scope.
If putting the initial effort towards your goal is the issue then you should rather pick UM/OP.

(07-30-2018, 05:12 PM)DarkPlouf Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-30-2018, 04:52 PM)Fluffy Wrote: [ -> ]Hmmmmmm So, US/LM or UM/OP....

What will help me achieve success faster? How do I choose what is best for me?

I say it depends on what you're doing actually, your roadmaps and how much you are procrastinating on them.
In my case for instance, I am already allocating nearly all my available time working on my projects. So using UM/OP would be useless as motivation isn't an issue. I am putting the necessary efforts, so US/LM would complete nicely and help me avoid unwanted synchronicities that are outside of the conscious scope.
If putting the initial effort towards your goal is the issue then you should rather pick UM/OP.

Yeah, that is some good points.

I do need to take more action and actually get stuff done, I do procrastinate a lot, I can't really wait for the perfect synchronicity to come about.

But on the other hand, I do wish the universe had my back in the actions I do take. As I do know you can take lots of action but the universe not having your back in the "out of my conscious control, behind the scenes", which can make the action ineffective, even if you take more action.

My main goal is to get a new job, so i can eat, continue my hobbies etc

I also need to study in evenings come September, so I can get onto a certain course next year, so I can do a bachelors degree the year after.

Quote:Yes, that's right, all your dreams are coming true. I have created the Ultra Success/Luck Magnifier program, and it is now available in the store.

It is designed in A/B format, with A having and clearing and B not. Most of you will NOT need A side, so we are offering them as separate purchases. PLEASE USE B SIDE FIRST! You should ONLY purchase A side if after 3 months of use according to the instructions, you find that you have fears and resistances to success that B side is unable to overcome.

Also please be advised that to be eligible for a refund, you must have purchased A side, used it for three months according to the instructions, AND purchased B side, and used it for 3 months according to the instructions, AND had both fail to produce significant results for you. A side is designed to get you past whatever blockages you may have to allowing and accepting success, but most people will not have those blockages.

Get your copy here. Have fun!

Well, I now know what I'm going to be running and guess I will have to change my thread title again. This is originally what I stopped using 3.2 for and it's here. Actually really excited to see how the LM portion will work in 5.5G and with less resistance than I was getting from DMSI 3.2. If it can at the least let me succeed in getting my Online course done within 3 months or so I will be more than happy with the purchase. Thanks a lot Shannon for working on this. This is exactly what I needed right now to get stuff done.

(07-30-2018, 04:47 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-30-2018, 06:57 AM)Dmitry Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-29-2018, 07:37 AM)thor2014 Wrote: [ -> ]I have stopped DMSI for now and plan to run SM. A few years ago I did begin to run it however at the time I felt I lacked the maturity to use it. Another thing is i am keen to given it a run as i feel alot more grounded now and feel I can take full advantage of its capabilities. Plus i feel SM will change you into a sexy masculine from the ground up.

Thor, I think if you run SM3 after DMSI you will be disappointed by far less intensity and clearing. I ran SM3 refresher with 3(!) subliminal programs from other vendor at the same time with NO tiredness at all. But even then I felt that DMSI do more than that, instruction-violating usage format.

Maybe you stick with DMSI but use 1:1 ASRB as MLS? As I already said DMSI is overwhelming subC, I’m now 100% sure.

And you are 100% sure based on what evidence again?

I’v done experimental Structural constellation group. Used human representantatives for different dmsi (and other subs). What that proccess revealed:

1. Each newer version DMSI induced more chaos in subC of the user. I guess thats why using personal usage format helped me to overcome some major resistance. And, yes, Shannon: DMSI is 3.2 REALLY works! It helped me to uncover such blocks and issues to light but failed clear it. Thats why I think that H&C must be seriosly revised to be not harder but smarter.

2. Experiment showed that DMSI and E2 combo usage somehow helped to clear something that DMSI failed to do stand-alone. Quite suprising, since DMSI is far superior as H&C, right?

3. A few a representatives (yes, I used a few people to literally “become” DMSI) showed that they: a getting in one way, then stop, go another way, confusion and so on. Of course, they can show my own reactions to DMSI but I don’t think of myself as a resister.

4. Another experiment. “Head”, “Heart”, “Gut” structural elements are losing coherence with each other then DMSI is used. Need more details about that.

5. Using simplier subs from Shannon and other vendors then used before DMSI somehow helped to frame my mind and get DMSI execute better.
Using some other subs helped DMSI to use that information for execution?

Thats all for now I like doing blind experiments.

(07-30-2018, 10:04 PM)Dmitry Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-30-2018, 04:47 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-30-2018, 06:57 AM)Dmitry Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-29-2018, 07:37 AM)thor2014 Wrote: [ -> ]I have stopped DMSI for now and plan to run SM. A few years ago I did begin to run it however at the time I felt I lacked the maturity to use it. Another thing is i am keen to given it a run as i feel alot more grounded now and feel I can take full advantage of its capabilities. Plus i feel SM will change you into a sexy masculine from the ground up.

Thor, I think if you run SM3 after DMSI you will be disappointed by far less intensity and clearing. I ran SM3 refresher with 3(!) subliminal programs from other vendor at the same time with NO tiredness at all. But even then I felt that DMSI do more than that, instruction-violating usage format.

Maybe you stick with DMSI but use 1:1 ASRB as MLS? As I already said DMSI is overwhelming subC, I’m now 100% sure.

And you are 100% sure based on what evidence again?

I’v done experimental Structural constellation group. Used human representantatives for different dmsi (and other subs). What that proccess revealed:

1. Each newer version DMSI induced more chaos in subC of the user. I guess thats why using personal usage format helped me to overcome some major resistance. And, yes, Shannon: DMSI is 3.2 REALLY works! It helped me to uncover such blocks and issues to light but failed clear it. Thats why I think that H&C must be seriosly revised to be not harder but smarter.

2. Experiment showed that DMSI and E2 combo usage somehow helped to clear something that DMSI failed to do stand-alone. Quite suprising, since DMSI is far superior as H&C, right?

3. A few a representatives (yes, I used a few people to literally “become” DMSI) showed that they: a getting in one way, then stop, go another way, confusion and so on. Of course, they can show my own reactions to DMSI but I don’t think of myself as a resister.

4. Another experiment. “Head”, “Heart”, “Gut” structural elements are losing coherence with each other then DMSI is used. Need more details about that.

5. Using simplier subs from Shannon and other vendors then used before DMSI somehow helped to frame my mind and get DMSI execute better.
Using some other subs helped DMSI to use that information for execution?

Thats all for now I like doing blind experiments.

Thanks for sharing your insights and personal experiences.