Subliminal Talk

(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-12-2018, 03:25 PM)kingpill Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, how would DMSI primed at relationships differ from DMSI now? Thanks

It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.

(03-13-2018, 09:38 PM)eternity Wrote: [ -> ]Its really hard for me to muster up the strength to post this but the girl i was seeing for the past 6 months passed away yesterday. Life is too short. She was 24. If there is something i take away from this experience to share with yall.. its that life is too short to sit on the sidelines and let life pass you by. Every moment is precious.

(03-13-2018, 09:38 PM)eternity Wrote: [ -> ]Its really hard for me to muster up the strength to post this but the girl i was seeing for the past 6 months passed away yesterday. Life is too short. She was 24. If there is something i take away from this experience to share with yall.. its that life is too short to sit on the sidelines and let life pass you by. Every moment is precious.

(03-13-2018, 09:38 PM)eternity Wrote: [ -> ]Its really hard for me to muster up the strength to post this but the girl i was seeing for the past 6 months passed away yesterday. Life is too short. She was 24. If there is something i take away from this experience to share with yall.. its that life is too short to sit on the sidelines and let life pass you by. Every moment is precious.

(03-13-2018, 01:18 PM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-13-2018, 12:48 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-13-2018, 12:15 PM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-13-2018, 10:33 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-13-2018, 10:21 AM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then

It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.

Ok that's understandable. If I were to run it during a committed relationship, which aspects of it would help the relationship, if I consciously kept myself from seducing and flirting with other girls? I'm guessing the sexual performance modules would most likely... but what else?

Define "it".

DMSI 3.2b, and maybe 3.2a if i feel i need it

(03-13-2018, 02:08 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-13-2018, 10:32 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-13-2018, 09:02 AM)kingpill Wrote: [ -> ]I just realized how powerful telling yourself conciously to execute the script can be. Simply replacing every thought with "execute the script" has given me significantly more iois

Yes, involving the conscious mind and it's will is a powerful ally in creating change. That is in fact what I believe makes hypnosis and NLP so powerful and obvious when they are done successfully. They both involve the conscious mind, even at the deepest levels of state.

I am attempting to do it in reverse, which is challenging.

Well Ive said it 3times before starting to play the loop for today so lets hope it works.

However isnt the very act of purchasing and playing daily the conscious act we need to prove to the subconscious we mean it to execute?

Stating it aloud seems more like were using affirmations which then requires more effort and thus not what we wanted hence why we use subliminal programming.

(03-13-2018, 03:20 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]

Quote:It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.

I'm not sure about this in the normal DMSI. Because then it has the potential to take you more towards 'monogomy' especially since that is the dominant programming in society and we are mostly programmed towards that in our upbringing. One thing I want DMSI to do (I may use it again eventually) is to clear out that baggage, not buy into it.

Quote:It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.

Ok I hasn't read this far when I replied. So it'll be a seperate program, cool.

(03-13-2018, 05:06 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, I'm thinking of staying on track B regardless. You said B is like marching through with brute force. Does that mean it would reach the goals faster?

I feel like now, I'm half executing. I haven't edged not even once since I started B (18 days ago). I've been on semen retention for 116 days now, but for the majority of my duration, I had this bad edging habit. But yeah, all that is killed, and no more desire to do so. I uninstalled instagram during the TID days and now have no urges to look at female pics (nude or non-nude). I've been going out like 4 times a week now. Getting at least 20 looks a day, way more than I ever did in the past, and a lot of these girls are solid 10s who would never notice me before. Also girls on dates keep bringing up to hang out again, although no sex yet. But I feel like I might be close and the dam could burst at any moment.

(03-13-2018, 05:38 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-12-2018, 03:28 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, Is goal is still for the those affected by your aura to initiate things with you?

Yes.

Affected do 100% of the work to make it happen?