(09-23-2018, 06:41 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ]Your filename doesn't match. Instead of bracets you have got %28 and %29 in the filename. This is because of different charset. If you replace %28 with "(" and %29 with ")" your MD5 should match again, as filenames are part of the whole MD5 sum. If it then still doesn't match then the files are broken.
Just for the sake of completeness: the filename is independent of the md5sum. Or to make this more correct: The md5sum of a file is not influenced by its filename.
(09-23-2018, 05:11 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2018, 04:56 AM)Determined Wrote: [ -> ]If US/LM is in the new LTU 5.5G, would it be reasonable for customers of US/LM to receive a discount when purchasing LTU?
Otherwise we'd just be paying for the same thing twice.
I 2nd this and ask for those of us on UM/OP, if its indeed possible for the same too?
C`mon guys. The less you want to pay for the sub, the less you consciously value it (which kinda sets your expectations on how much you get from it as well). I´m not saying that it should be priced ridiculously high either...but ask yourself how much do you value that sub?
Several of other subs includes full blown smaller subs as well, but to my knowledge yet there is no discount for them for owners of those smaller sub(s) that are included in the "major" sub, why should it be the case now? Btw, I have UM/OP as well...but not asking for discount based on that (and I will buy LTU as well after 3 or 6 months of UM/OP).
EDIT: As for paying for the same thing twice. Not the case...there is great post by Shannon somewhat recently that I don´t have time to find now, where he states the differences between focus fire/small subs, and subs that has others subs in them.
(09-22-2018, 05:00 PM)findingme Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
I need to share something which has happened repeatedly on E2, it happened again tonight, and I'm wondering how to understand what is happening.
In addition to running E2 at home on US non-stop, I've been occasionally having opportunity to run it on my phone while at work. However, each time I've run it at work, I've been very sensitive to men being caustic, dismissive, or manipulative. 2 days ago at work I'd run it, and at the end of the day, I felt hurt since my boss hadn't acknowledged me for helping him right before I left. I carried this home, began to write on my E2 thread, but scrapped it knowing I just sought to be validated.
Then, tonight I had E2 running in my pocket, and I played the money game me and 2 guy friends play, and near the end I disagreed with one of them about a rule interpretation. I fought more with emotions than logic, determined to be validated, again. I'm still emotional (angry and determined) now, an hour later.
I'm seeking to understand what's happening. I'll share my middle brother was closest to me, and he left home when I was 12 or 13. He'd also been a loud bully. Am I fighting people who act similarly to him, and is this healthy? I know I'm going towards AM6 after E2, but E2 (to my understanding) doesn't aid in assertiveness. It does in me asserting myself for healing purposes, but I'm emotional now, not feeling too objective.
May I ask for some feedback on this?
I'll share also I PM'd a past E2 user today who'd done E2 for six months before starting AM6. I'm wondering if a longer run (than 3 months) would be better before going on AM6.
Thank you for all the work you put in here.
It's going to be that whatever you are currently working on and working through is going to make itself known at a conscious level through your feelings, choices, actions, reactions, etc.
(09-22-2018, 09:14 PM)Broski Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon,
The new LTU and all that will be included in it sounds frickin AMAZING! It covers pretty much everything I want to help me with my life goals. Considering this, and the fact that the upgraded E2, anti fear module, ARA, PTPA, ans negative stress relief may help me overcome my big fear issue ive been having while on US/LM, do you think this would be a good program for me? I realize i would then not be fully testing us/lm and lose any chance of a refund, but considering it is even better aligned with my life goals and could possibly better help me clear these fears/blocks I have, it would be worth it to me. If this is the case will LTU be out within 35 days and should I stop using US/LM now?
I'm telling you guys what I am TRYING to include in it. It may not be possible to include all that in one program. I therefore don't yet know what will end up being in it, and I can't make suggestions.
LTU is likely going to be out after DMSI 3.3.
(09-23-2018, 01:15 AM)Ricardo Wrote: [ -> ] (09-20-2018, 03:43 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ][quote='Roy' pid='206029' dateline='1537441279']
[quote='CatMan' pid='206023' dateline='1537432675']
I also don't really have a dog in the fight in the end, as I'm still not convinced the program will end up executing as the sales page conceptualises for the majority. Just seems like way too much of a leap from where things are now, to widespread results as conceptualised. Hard for me to get on board with until I see strongly encouraging results in line with it. I think I'll need a pretty large turnaround in results to believe in it. Just speaking about the history of AS and what he has said about what it may be doing, is all, done now. No interest in protracted walls of text. Whatever Shannon ends up going for is what we will have. I'm fine with it. I am not nearly as women focused as I used to be long ago, so it is definitely more of a side pursuit now. I do not know if that is some IDGAF, or just a counter reaction to failing to get traction with women. Either way, my interest has definitely fallen a great deal over the last year+. Which is good, I was too 'thirsty ' anyway and that is known to be a big turnoff. I felt low self respect for chasing like that too, so I view this new attitude as an improvement, regardless.
I have to echo this. When I look round in my daily life and see guys who just wouldn't be able to attract a fly, I wonder how DMSI could possibly work for them. The design goals are too ambitious. If DMSI works it would change mankind forever and Shannon would probably end up with more money than Soros and Bezos put together!
I think it would be more pragmatic to go with 5.5/6G AYP's.
Of course you have to echo this. You and CatMan have much the same issue and reasons for why you're still in the positions you find yourselves in, so you agree with each other. You can't get past your fears and the limiting beliefs that "protect you" from them (and hold those fears in place), so you conclude that the program is faulty, the design is faulty, it's too ambitious, etc.
We already know DMSI "works". It just does not work as intended yet. If it didn't work, nobody would have achieved the design goals.
(09-23-2018, 01:51 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
UM/OP seems to already be disrupting my sleep (wakes me usually within 1st loop of 3).
If I want to listen to the sub instead when awake perhaps anytime from 10am - 6pm, will this be a big concern? It goes against your protocol but that I understand was to prevent sleep disruption which I seem to have gotten from my first cycle.
thanks
I don't really care when you listen, as long as it's consistent and contiguous. But think about what it means that UMOP disrupts your sleep.
(09-23-2018, 04:56 AM)Determined Wrote: [ -> ]If US/LM is in the new LTU 5.5G, would it be reasonable for customers of US/LM to receive a discount when purchasing LTU?
Otherwise we'd just be paying for the same thing twice.
USLM being included in LTU doesn't change the fact that LTU is not USLM. It's got UMOP in it, but it's not UMOP. This program includes those titles, but is not those titles. It is something completely different.
You are not paying for the same thing twice. They are entirely different programs, and they do very different things.
(09-23-2018, 05:24 AM)Darwin Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon, it was great to read what’s intended for LTU. Just to reiterate, the cognitive enhancements from MLS are really useful. Overcoming resistance, working harder, learning the tools for development are all much harder when your brain is just not functioning/you’re a little too dumb to let unconscious instruction be executed.
Also if LTU is much more expensive it would be good to know whether there will be any discount for those who used the old LTU.
I have to verify that everything I want to put in it already, will actually work as a group of additions. I have some indications that I can't put all that in it and have it work.
I have to know what's going to make it in before I know what a reasonable price range is, and then I have to run the options within that range through the models.
As for a discount, I haven't gotten that far yet. I don't know.
(09-22-2018, 03:07 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: [ -> ] (09-22-2018, 01:09 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (09-22-2018, 12:43 PM)Wharrgarbl Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon
After watching the chaos of your current life, it is my sincere desire that you are the first person to benefit from LTU 5.5
That's the plan. 
But don't worry. This chaos of my life is going to end in the not too distant future. And when it does... watch out, cause I'm really tired of being caged.
For LTU due to the price change will you be giving us a heads up ahead of time (like a month or so) before you finish up the program so us of more less financial means will have time to save up money in anticipation for the release?
I don't know when it will be out. Probably after DMSI 3.3. That's all I know right now.
Quote:Also, for when you come out with 3.3 B side will you be putting in thing to help deal with the "scorch earth" response? I ask because that was the most horrible part when I ran 3.2 B. It was like everything that could go wrong in my life went wrong and my mental state was constantly one negative emotion after another with no let up. Just hoping something will be done about that.
I have plans to deal with that, yes.
(09-23-2018, 09:21 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2018, 01:51 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
UM/OP seems to already be disrupting my sleep (wakes me usually within 1st loop of 3).
If I want to listen to the sub instead when awake perhaps anytime from 10am - 6pm, will this be a big concern? It goes against your protocol but that I understand was to prevent sleep disruption which I seem to have gotten from my first cycle.
thanks
I don't really care when you listen, as long as it's consistent and contiguous. But think about what it means that UMOP disrupts your sleep.
awesome and awesome again cos I get it I think if im correct what it means is that its resistance thus give it time to work and it will hopefully break through my resistance
thanks mate
(09-23-2018, 06:48 AM)Raz Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2018, 06:41 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ]Your filename doesn't match. Instead of bracets you have got %28 and %29 in the filename. This is because of different charset. If you replace %28 with "(" and %29 with ")" your MD5 should match again, as filenames are part of the whole MD5 sum. If it then still doesn't match then the files are broken.
Just for the sake of completeness: the filename is independent of the md5sum. Or to make this more correct: The md5sum of a file is not influenced by its filename.
Hmm...that's strange, because I got the correct hash after renaming the file on my phone in the way I described.
(09-23-2018, 10:04 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2018, 06:48 AM)Raz Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2018, 06:41 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ]Your filename doesn't match. Instead of bracets you have got %28 and %29 in the filename. This is because of different charset. If you replace %28 with "(" and %29 with ")" your MD5 should match again, as filenames are part of the whole MD5 sum. If it then still doesn't match then the files are broken.
Just for the sake of completeness: the filename is independent of the md5sum. Or to make this more correct: The md5sum of a file is not influenced by its filename.
Hmm...that's strange, because I got the correct hash after renaming the file on my phone in the way I described.
It is possible to include external metadata like filename, timestamp, permissions, etc. into the hash calculation using the MD5
algorithm per se. If calculated that way changing the filename (or other metadata) would change the calculated hash value.
BUT: Shannon is using the
software md5sum (take a look at any hashvalue.txt for subliminals have near by - the content is a terminal printout showing the execution of a command with said software), which explicitly does not include external metadata of a file when calculating the hash value. Thus the hash values that Shannon provides us with don't change when we alter the metadata (filename, permissions, timestamps) of those files. Unless your software alters the file as well in some way. Which is why we get the hash values in the first place
edit: Container-specific metadata such as ID3 tags on the other hand are stored in the file itself, so I guess the hash values will change, when you edit this kind of metadata. But I haven't tested that myself, so this is more of an educated guess.
Thanks Shannon. LTU 5g alone was a life changing sub. Any upgrade will be undoubtedly worth while
(09-23-2018, 09:20 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2018, 01:15 AM)Ricardo Wrote: [ -> ] (09-20-2018, 03:43 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ][quote='Roy' pid='206029' dateline='1537441279']
[quote='CatMan' pid='206023' dateline='1537432675']
I also don't really have a dog in the fight in the end, as I'm still not convinced the program will end up executing as the sales page conceptualises for the majority. Just seems like way too much of a leap from where things are now, to widespread results as conceptualised. Hard for me to get on board with until I see strongly encouraging results in line with it. I think I'll need a pretty large turnaround in results to believe in it. Just speaking about the history of AS and what he has said about what it may be doing, is all, done now. No interest in protracted walls of text. Whatever Shannon ends up going for is what we will have. I'm fine with it. I am not nearly as women focused as I used to be long ago, so it is definitely more of a side pursuit now. I do not know if that is some IDGAF, or just a counter reaction to failing to get traction with women. Either way, my interest has definitely fallen a great deal over the last year+. Which is good, I was too 'thirsty ' anyway and that is known to be a big turnoff. I felt low self respect for chasing like that too, so I view this new attitude as an improvement, regardless.
I have to echo this. When I look round in my daily life and see guys who just wouldn't be able to attract a fly, I wonder how DMSI could possibly work for them. The design goals are too ambitious. If DMSI works it would change mankind forever and Shannon would probably end up with more money than Soros and Bezos put together!
I think it would be more pragmatic to go with 5.5/6G AYP's.
Of course you have to echo this. You and CatMan have much the same issue and reasons for why you're still in the positions you find yourselves in, so you agree with each other. You can't get past your fears and the limiting beliefs that "protect you" from them (and hold those fears in place), so you conclude that the program is faulty, the design is faulty, it's too ambitious, etc.
We already know DMSI "works". It just does not work as intended yet. If it didn't work, nobody would have achieved the design goals.
Hey in my free time i am reading some journals from the beginning. I was looking at BASE journals mainly and i have bookmarked/started some DMSI's Can you point out 1-2 male journals that you think people are executing the design goals? Thanks