(11-06-2018, 11:15 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2018, 10:33 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote: [ -> ]https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Men-s...#pid209453
[quote='Shannon' pid='209441' dateline='1541519197']
USLM3b
Primary ASRB: 120 (60 minutes audio, 0 minutes silence)
Secondary ASRB: 6:2 (6 days on, 2 days off)
Loops/day: 5
Sorry if this seems dumb, but whats the 120 mean for the Primary ASRB? I thought primary was usually the number of minutes of audio : the number of minutes of silence.
So the 120 has confused me a little and hopefully my asking this helps anyone else.
thanks and congrats to you USLM2 listeners...cant wait for you all to get started!
My shimmering glass sphere tells me it's a typo.
(11-06-2018, 11:33 AM)Paul1131 Wrote: [ -> ]I apologize if I missed it, but is USLM3 uploaded yet?
Not yet.
Hi Shannon,
You mentioned before that the big ASRB for USLM2 is an indication of increased effectiveness. Also I notice every new sub has ASRB now. So what might be the explanation for the models suggesting no ASRB at all this time? It does mean in practice that this tech is not in use at all for USLM3?
Cheers.
(11-06-2018, 12:09 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2018, 11:41 AM)Raz Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2018, 11:15 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2018, 10:33 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote: [ -> ]https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Men-s...#pid209453
[quote='Shannon' pid='209441' dateline='1541519197']
USLM3b
Primary ASRB: 120 (60 minutes audio, 0 minutes silence)
Secondary ASRB: 6:2 (6 days on, 2 days off)
Loops/day: 5
Sorry if this seems dumb, but whats the 120 mean for the Primary ASRB? I thought primary was usually the number of minutes of audio : the number of minutes of silence.
So the 120 has confused me a little and hopefully my asking this helps anyone else.
thanks and congrats to you USLM2 listeners...cant wait for you all to get started!
My shimmering glass sphere tells me it's a typo.
(11-06-2018, 11:33 AM)Paul1131 Wrote: [ -> ]I apologize if I missed it, but is USLM3 uploaded yet?
Not yet.
It's not a typo.
120: 1 TO 0 : 1:0
The primary ASRB ratio value is notated as X2Y internally because the character : can cause problems with certain things. So I use 120 to represent 1:0, and 6021 means 60:1, and 3022 would be 20:2, etc.
I am doing tag, bag and verify right now.
(11-06-2018, 12:20 PM)Lowe Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon,
You mentioned before that the big ASRB for USLM2 is an indication of increased effectiveness. Also I notice every new sub has ASRB now. So what might be the explanation for the models suggesting no ASRB at all this time? It does mean in practice that this tech is not in use at all for USLM3?
Cheers.
The three finalists were 1:0, 30:2 and 10:10. The winner was 1:0. The fact that 10:10 was one of the finalists and that 1:0 was one of the finalists is unheard of in both directions. This tells me that this program is extremely powerful, but that the FRM is causing a split in the options.
I theorize that 1:0 won because it gives less opportunity to fight the FRM during the rest periods. I have never before seen a 10 minute rest indicated.
We have been using a primary ASRB for a long time now as standard operating procedure.
Yezus, USLM 3 is already uploading!!! BEN!!! Get linking maaaa!!
I’ve been struggling on 2 very much looking forward to seeing what happens with 3 before I settle into LTU
Shannon,
Any idea when that All-in-one sub will come out,or when you will start working on that?
Thanks,
(11-06-2018, 02:33 PM)rumi5 Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
Any idea when that All-in-one sub will come out,or when you will start working on that?
Thanks,
He's said recently that he will work on DMSI 3.3 and LTU 5.5G simultaneously after UMOP is updated and released with FRM3.2.
He's planning on having them both released within the next month.
USLM3 should help boost his productivity and efficiency. Who knows, maybe it'll be sooner!?
Tomorrow I start work on UMOP2. Most of the time consuming stuff was done with USLM3, and I can just copy and paste, so it should be done either the 7th or the 8th. From there I will be working on DMSI 3.3 and LTU simultaneously until a clear path emerges for which one should be built first to produce the best overall outcome. The models seem to be indicating that the future is significantly unstable on that point right now.
Can it be that DMSI's 'aura stealing' I experienced was because some part of the sub-concious wanted to help the said person and 'gave or allowed them to take' the aura somehow?
Come on Ben, are the USLM3 links done yet?
[spoiler]You better go check.[/spoiler]
Downloading it now. Glad I didn't ask "will we know if it's version 2 or version 3?"
Its on Man!! USLM3 downloading NOW!! thanks IML!!
