Quote:Hey man, cant log into the site via the home page. I cant attached a screenshot of what comes up for some reason, so thats not working for me and it is a jpg image of only 359kb.
So ill just copy and paste what comes up....see end of message.
Is it still doing it? I just went to the site and it's working fine for me.
(06-13-2018, 09:43 PM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting I skimmed over it but couldn't find the answer to the question I asked. Still waiting for Shannon's input.
A sexual's have romantic relationships without a sexual component. I would have thought that would have been clear from the existence of that category. Their relationships are primarily relationships of "companionship".
So yes, they can be romantically attracted to someone they deem "amazing" without needing to be sexually attracted. Shannon will probably tell you the same thing.
(06-13-2018, 12:14 PM)Determined Wrote: [ -> ] (06-13-2018, 08:36 AM)thor2014 Wrote: [ -> ] (06-12-2018, 11:44 PM)Determined Wrote: [ -> ] (06-12-2018, 09:06 PM)thor2014 Wrote: [ -> ]Day 18 - DMSI 3.2 A 7 Loops
Had a dream of me being a child. I watched a group of girls dancing around giggling holding hands. Then the girls shouted "hey Thor come and join us come and dance". For some reason in my mind I thought to myself thats so g*y to dance with a group of girls like that. I shouted "nooo" and walked away.
The second dream I was in a house. It was dark and cloudy outside I walked into my room. The room was so untidy full of garbage everywhere. I got angry and broke down then I heard my father coming. I pleaded for him to stay out of my life then the dream ended.
No external results so far.
The funny thing about the "that's so gay" meme (a meme in the truest sense of the word is an idea that behaves like a gene) is that it's designed to cock block guys from getting with girls. So if I introduce that to you, by decreasing your evolutionary fitness, I'm indirectly increasing my own.
If you combine both those dreams, DMSI is pointing you towards the blocks you have that are preventing you from getting to the design goals.
Always nice to hear your wisdom matey. If you can share any possible ways to overcome these blocks it would be appreciated.
I've always found NLP and/or hypnosis to be great tools for organising the mind, though it is frowned upon here with sub work and it does void your warranty.
Some therapists are actually pretty good at helping a person to process the obsolete patterns they may still be carrying around with them, though the quality of therapists varies widely.
Your first dream is only a mild limiting belief compared to your second dream. That second dream really highlights some of the deeper workings preventing you from having the DMSI success you dream of. Pay close attention to the amount of trash that was present.
Most people are barely aware of what kind of stuff they're carrying around with them, they're content to just plod along in their lives. I've been on the clearing journey for a while now and only recently have I gotten a competent team around me to help me clear the deeper stuff that's been holding me back.
I'll revisit this question for you in 3 months just because I have a few items of healing and clearing that I'm working on, and if the methods I'm using prove to be successful, I'll be in a better position to give you a definitive answer.
Thanks mate I am always delighted to hear your constructive input. As per Shannon's instructions, I have decided to carry on listening but only upto day 32. If I still do not see any results will stop the subliminal and look at alternate ways of overcoming these limiting beliefs.
Day 19 - DMSI 3.2 A 7 Loops
Nothing to report, I was out and about in the city socialising, went shopping not had any external results from women around me.
(06-12-2018, 10:18 PM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ] (06-12-2018, 09:22 PM)Devilz-attorney Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
Believe the audio to silence ratio in version B is 20:5.
The length of the audio is 70 minutes.
So if someone listens to multiple loops of version B back to back, will it not affect the ASRBas the person would be then have 40 minutes of continuous data input without a break.
Would that not have detrimental effects?
It is actually 30 to 5. So there's "silence" at the end of the track, too. 
The primary ASRB is designed so that there is a rest period before a loop repetition takes place, thus placing it at the end of the loop. It is also designed so that it works for whatever the instructions say to do. In some cases, a ratio of 60:1 is used because that is what the models say to use; 60 minutes of continuous data is the maximum possible, and it is not a problem as long as it balances such that that works.
We use what works, and that is why we calculate the primary ASRB for each and every release. Even A and B side get their own primary ASRBs.
(06-13-2018, 03:48 PM)Mischief Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, here’s my report for the day that was pulled from my journal. I was hoping for a successful breakthrough with my target but it didn’t happen.
Day 15 - DMSI 3.2B (Usually running four loops masked in the afternoon and four loops masked overnight) Midday Report: I finally had the chance to meet up with the lady I like and we chatted for about 30 minutes to catch up on things. The perplexing thing I have is the sniper didn’t work on her and we were very close to each other. The anti-sniper has been turned off in 3.2 so I don’t understand it.
Post Morten Report: I felt rather horny on the drive home but it has subsided now that I am home. It's sexual frustration, especially since what I was wanting to happen, didn't happen (activation of the sniper and build up of the aura). Also wanting to watch porn and masturbate right now. I won't do it. I haven't masturbated for about a month now and will not give in. Thinking things through this had to be self sabotage. . . .and that self sabotage was the return of an ex-girlfriend in my life that messaged me the night before. That woman is the past and I need to push her back there. "S" is what is in front of me and the universe is giving me the opportunity to make the most of it. But this also goes back to the universe will give you exactly what you want, and then send you a distraction to see if you will screw it up. All is not lost. I just need to focus on what is in front of me and keep the past in the past.
Throughout the day I didn't feel as effective. I got a few looks from ladies but it wasn't like the previous days. Things got a little better as I was leaving the office. A lady (4/10) was in the elevator with me and when I opened her in conversation, she reacted very enthusiastically and was talking a mile a minute (celebrity effect).
I'll abandon the single morning loop (the first time I did this was today) and stay with afternoon concentration of loops. I run the loops through my iPhone and headphones. It didn't dawn on me until now to put my phone in airplane mode so I will not get interrupted. Aww well, you live and learn. The subconscious is resisting and it threw one hell of a curve ball at me today. Four loops right now and four more tonight as I sleep.
The universe will give you exactly what you ASK FOR. Nothing more, nothing less. It doesn't care what you want. It cares what you ASK FOR. It is supremely efficient, so no "distractions to see if you screw things up". Anything along those lines is WHAT YOU ASKED FOR. That would seem to be self sabotage.
(06-13-2018, 06:04 PM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon is it possible to be romantically attracted to someone if you're not sexually attracted to them? Is sexual attraction a prerequisite to romantic attraction?
Absolutely. Purely romantic attraction, purely sexual attraction and a mix of the two are not only possible, but common.
In some people, sexual attraction is a pre-requisite for romantic attraction, but that is actually rare and it is a programmed response. (Typically programmed in by what society now teaches males to do through social interactions, PUA, etc.)
The natural way of things is that you can respond on a scale of 0 to 100% to someone romantically and sexually at the same time, and of course in such a case, 0% sexual and 100% romantic, and the reverse, are absolutely options.
(06-13-2018, 04:12 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:Hey man, cant log into the site via the home page. I cant attached a screenshot of what comes up for some reason, so thats not working for me and it is a jpg image of only 359kb.
So ill just copy and paste what comes up....see end of message.
Is it still doing it? I just went to the site and it's working fine for me.
hey @
Benjamin and @"Cyanide"
Yeah bro same thing and this is the url it takes me to...
https://subliminal-talk.com/cgi-sys/defaultwebpage.cgi
(06-14-2018, 03:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-13-2018, 06:04 PM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon is it possible to be romantically attracted to someone if you're not sexually attracted to them? Is sexual attraction a prerequisite to romantic attraction?
Absolutely. Purely romantic attraction, purely sexual attraction and a mix of the two are not only possible, but common.
In some people, sexual attraction is a pre-requisite for romantic attraction, but that is actually rare and it is a programmed response. (Typically programmed in by what society now teaches males to do through social interactions, PUA, etc.)
The natural way of things is that you can respond on a scale of 0 to 100% to someone romantically and sexually at the same time, and of course in such a case, 0% sexual and 100% romantic, and the reverse, are absolutely options.
I tend to be attracted to a girls face, if that is pretty to me then the rest doesnt really matter, its hard to explain since I dont have a type its just whatever touches my soul I guess and therefore im attracted to girls more on a romantic level and way rather than sexually.
I seldomly see women as sexual types on tv etc unless its porn ie where they are naked etc but usually in real life im attracted to a girl romantically and hardly ever sexually.
To me the sex is what is natural if who you find attractive kisses and gets intimate with you...then my sexual energy kicks into play.
I dont see that as weird but yeah I have guy mates that only ever speak about girls sexually, speaking about how they think her Ass is hot or her breasts are etc and tbh unless shes wearing yoga pants im not always seeing it.
doubt that makes me weird.
Question for @
Shannon and others...
How much does 'humour' play a role in attraction then?
I always make girls laugh around me, they love my wit and humour.
That never seems to be enough though.
I think humour does play a role in attraction. Having said that I believe every girl is different I have dated girls who were into me simply because of my looks, others because of my sense of humour or loved my passion for certain subjects.
(06-14-2018, 06:57 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ]Question for @Shannon and others...
How much does 'humour' play a role in attraction then?
I always make girls laugh around me, they love my wit and humour.
That never seems to be enough though.
(06-14-2018, 06:57 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ]Question for @Shannon and others...
How much does 'humour' play a role in attraction then?
I always make girls laugh around me, they love my wit and humour.
That never seems to be enough though.
This may not be your situation and I'm not Shannon but I have a good friend who is hilarious and Sparks all kinds of attraction with women but never converts any of it. He Sparks the attraction with humor but is unable to escalate the attraction from there.
(06-14-2018, 07:37 AM)JakeKennedy Wrote: [ -> ] (06-14-2018, 06:57 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ]Question for @Shannon and others...
How much does 'humour' play a role in attraction then?
I always make girls laugh around me, they love my wit and humour.
That never seems to be enough though.
This may not be your situation and I'm not Shannon but I have a good friend who is hilarious and Sparks all kinds of attraction with women but never converts any of it. He Sparks the attraction with humor but is unable to escalate the attraction from there.
Your friend sounds like the version of me a few years ago.