(06-29-2018, 01:48 PM)Griffin Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon, I have a friend who has suffered a lot since he has psychosis, is there a sub that will help with this?
I hope to hear your answer!
cheers
If I was in that position, I might try E2. I don't know if that will help with psychosis, however.
(06-29-2018, 02:04 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon
Glad to hear the building for the custom will be underway. I did have a few question along with something to report tied to them.
1. Will you be working on 3.3 next after the custom or a focus fire sub of some sort?
After taking a few days off to rest, I plan on building a few focusfire subs and then working on 3.3.
Quote:2. Have you still decided on whether you are going to make the effects for the affected inescapable in 3.3? If so what were you planning on this looking like? Like a "wall" but for the affected?
I will have to look at that before I can answer. We can't take away free will in all this. So if there is a way to do it without taking away free will, then I will probably do that. Otherwise, probably not.
Quote:3. Have you come up with any idea along the way to deal with the fear of death if you execute thing that a few people have mentioned? I ask this one because I would like to report that recently again had a dream dealing with the same issue. Basically, some of part of my subconscious still believes if it executes it will be killed.
I believe that this "fear of death" is not literally a fear of dying, but a fear of change and becoming something different. What I have been working on is ways to defeat fear, any and all fear.
Quote:4. How is the testing for that second key to resistance you mentioned going? Is it still showing good promise on very resistant personalities?
Testing of the second key has not begun yet. That will most likely start when I build B17. B17 should be finished in late July or sometime in August. Unless you guys don't mind me adding it to 3.3 untested.
B16, however, even without the final keys, is doing extremely well on persuading even the most resistant personalities I can get to help me test. I am significantly impressed. Conditions for formal testing have been elusive, since they are so specific, but the myriad of informal tests I have done at this point have consistently produced exceptional results and the results get better and better with repeated exposure.
(06-29-2018, 02:29 PM)josh84 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon, just noticed something with my stereo speakers on computer using vlc on ultrasonic, i have been using a volume of 60% last couple of days and you dont hear anything like your meant to but if you put the volume at 90% or higher thats when the crackling noise appears like was mentioned above. As long as i dont go to 90% volume and stay around 60% the ultrasonic subliminal format should still work properly?
Thanks.
The subliminal will work fine when there is no crackling. The crackling is speaker distortion which is the result of pushing the speaker to produce sound that is too high pitched for it's specs, at the volume in question. Just reduce the volume until it's not crackling. I don't recommend you have it very loud, though. Calibrate it via audible stuff to a comfortable level, and then play it at that level or a little lower.
Quote:Unless you guys don't mind me adding it to 3.3 untested.
If your serious about that part would you still be modeling any phrases you put in 3.3 to implement the second key to see if it would be good to put them in? If the models would say they would be good additions I would be all for them being included in 3.3. I say the more we can help stop people from resisting the better. That's only me though, I don't know about anyone else. Also, means we can start more on focusing on the affected instead of user side, though I remember you said 3.3 will be more about the affected and tweaking the aura.
(06-29-2018, 03:41 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:Unless you guys don't mind me adding it to 3.3 untested.
If your serious about that part would you still be modeling any phrases you put in 3.3 to implement the second key to see if it would be good to put them in? If the models would say they would be good additions I would be all for them being included in 3.3. I say the more we can help stop people from resisting the better. That's only me though, I don't know about anyone else. Also, means we can start more on focusing on the affected instead of user side, though I remember you said 3.3 will be more about the affected and tweaking the aura.
I dont know what these "keys" are but I personally am happy to wait as long as it takes for 3.3 rather than have it be produced in haste for those wanting it quickly.
I rather wait until you 'Shannon' are happy that you have done all you want to, to 3.3 rather than have it released too soon.
This is same for 3.4 and onwards.
Quote:I will have to look at that before I can answer. We can't take away free will in all this. So if there is a way to do it without taking away free will, then I will probably do that. Otherwise, probably not.
@
Shannon But, what if it isn't possible? Wouldn't that make DMSI chase an impossible goal?
And wouldn't that mean there are some cases where DMSI would be totally useless, like with very shy women or women that simply don't know how to seduce or simply do not want to seduce for very valid reasons?
Wouldn't DMSI work on very strict conditions then? Having a woman willing to seduce blatantly is like having planets being aligned, well in many parts of the world.
What do you plan to do if DMSI still fails to deliver even at its last version because of societal programming and such?. Would you abandon that idea and re-follow most of what you have done with previous subs? Would you focus more on the user side rather than affected side?
Quote:Unless you guys don't mind me adding it to 3.3 untested.
It wouldn't bother me at all if it were added untested. After all isn't that what we are doing with DMSI... testing versions until it achieves it's goals. If it didn't work no worries maybe it could help you iron things out quicker.
(06-29-2018, 03:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]After taking a few days off to rest, I plan on building a few focusfire subs and then working on 3.3.
Hi Shannon,
Is it impossible to reverse that and do V3.3 BEFORE these focus fires, whatever they are? I'm concerned with what happened last time in this situation, they won't be "2-3 days per", and will take awhile. I don't begrudge you making them to make money at some point, even though we've also paid for this program. Most of us long ago now, and it's still obviously not there yet, of course. And also that, I mean, we've had one release for this program in well over a year.
After that, you have a few months to delve into B17, focus fires, whatever. As we'll need to have time to give feedback on V3.3 anyway.
(06-16-2018, 12:18 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-16-2018, 05:51 AM)Fluffy Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
What do you expect to achieve with DMSI? or hope to achieve?
I mean is it like walking outside our house, going to the supermarket and the people we find attractive will hit on us right there and then? And this happens everywhere we go, many times a week or day?
I am trying to achieve what the product description states, and I want it to be a regular and at least relatively frequent occurrence that a user will be approached, hit on and offered sex "right then and there". The sex would not necessarily take place "right then and there", but I want it to be offered within an hour or less of being exposed to the aura, and at least a few times a week.
How close that turns out to be to the end reality, I don't know yet. It may take more time than that - but that's what I'd like to see. Aim high, and make a good result regardless of what I hit basically.
(06-29-2018, 05:44 PM)JakeKennedy Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:Unless you guys don't mind me adding it to 3.3 untested.
It wouldn't bother me at all if it were added untested. After all isn't that what we are doing with DMSI... testing versions until it achieves it's goals. If it didn't work no worries maybe it could help you iron things out quicker.
I second that motion. Just throw it all in and see what happens. At this point it should be a improvement for 3.2
Quote:I bought a new car 2-3 weeks ago with the latest and best A/V system. You can connect you phone on the car via bluetooth.
So for the first time, I give the car AV system a try with DMSI Hybrid and for the first time ever, I started hearing very high pitch small chipping noises along with the ocean waves sound.
I concluded that those were the ultrasounds... that I have never heard before on my other listening devices....
Does that mean that I missed most of the subliminal load during all the listening where I wasn't hearing the ultrasounds because of not good enough sound systems??
That sounds like the subliminal audio, I hear that more on ultrasonic, can't say i've heard it on ocean surf.
Quote:Shannon if a woman is exposed to AM6 can her identity change from a woman to a man?
Err.. there is no possibility in reality that someone can change 'identity' to the other sex despite the bs going around in society saying you can identify as any old crap you want to. It takes alot of psychological damage for someone to want to do that, let alone actually think that. And society shouldn't encourage it by lying to them.
Still best not to use targeted programs for one sex with the other obviously.
(06-29-2018, 05:44 PM)JakeKennedy Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:Unless you guys don't mind me adding it to 3.3 untested.
It wouldn't bother me at all if it were added untested. After all isn't that what we are doing with DMSI... testing versions until it achieves it's goals. If it didn't work no worries maybe it could help you iron things out quicker.
Those were my thoughts. I mean Shannon does have testers he can go to for formal testing but , I hope I'm not off the mark assuming this, he would probably get a better pull of testers and be able to see how more different types react to the second key. Therefore with all that data he could more accurately see what loopholes are being exploited and be made aware of them a lot more quickly. Therefore, he could have this thing down by 3.4 hopefully.
Shannon,
Okay, so I have been using DMSI 3.2b for a month and 3.2a for two months, one loop a day, as prescribed. I have not consumed caffeine or alcohol whatsover during that period and lived a healthy lifestyle. No results, no affects, nada. I had been exposed to people online, offline daytime, at the gym at parties you name it, in Europe, South America and the US. I have even visited a fetish party where people have no inhibitions and everything can happen. Hardly ever an approach and if, it was from unwanted girls that aren't matching my standards. Like before, I had to do all the initial work, despite my looks. I am frustrated about this and have a hard time to believe it's got to do with (unconscius) resistance, since I am doing conscious affirmation work and meditation on top of DMSI on a daily basis since many months.
Please advise...
(06-29-2018, 11:48 PM)firsthelix Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
Okay, so I have been using DMSI 3.2b for a month and 3.2a for two months, one loop a day, as prescribed. I have not consumed caffeine or alcohol whatsover during that period and lived a healthy lifestyle. No results, no affects, nada. I had been exposed to people online, offline daytime, at the gym at parties you name it, in Europe, South America and the US. I have even visited a fetish party where people have no inhibitions and everything can happen. Hardly ever an approach and if, it was from unwanted girls that aren't matching my standards. Like before, I had to do all the initial work, despite my looks. I am frustrated about this and have a hard time to believe it's got to do with (unconscius) resistance, since I am doing conscious affirmation work and meditation on top of DMSI on a daily basis since many months.
Please advise...
For now, try increasing the number of loops.
For ver. A, people seem to be doing well with 5 or 7 loops. For ver. B, I dunno, really, but I really liked either 4 or 8.
Start increasing the number of loops gradually and then see what happens.
(06-29-2018, 03:41 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:Unless you guys don't mind me adding it to 3.3 untested.
If your serious about that part would you still be modeling any phrases you put in 3.3 to implement the second key to see if it would be good to put them in? If the models would say they would be good additions I would be all for them being included in 3.3. I say the more we can help stop people from resisting the better. That's only me though, I don't know about anyone else. Also, means we can start more on focusing on the affected instead of user side, though I remember you said 3.3 will be more about the affected and tweaking the aura.
I have a good idea what the phrasing should be for K2. I have it implemented in the B17 script. It's just going to be a while before I can finish B17 and test it.
I may put it in 3.3.