Subliminal Talk

Why you think it is bad idea to implement celeb effect in uslm?

(02-16-2019, 12:20 AM)blth Wrote: [ -> ]Why you think it is bad idea to implement celeb effect in uslm?

I think because it's not needed. Success has different definition for different people.

Some people wants money, status, recognition. For those type of goals, celebrity effect could be useful. I certainly want it in UMS.

But we are talking about USLM.

How about people who wants committed, deep and meaningful relationship? Or better health/physical fitness? Or become great father/mother/family person? Or even become more spiritual? I think celebrity effect could be annoying and counter-productive.

(02-15-2019, 07:06 AM)Darwin Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-15-2019, 06:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-15-2019, 03:56 AM)Darwin Wrote: [ -> ]hey Shannon, i hate to add to the stream of basic questions but i'm finding with LTU, when i'm off it, it's like there's a tide of negativity from outside and from within. On my days off i'm needing to put it on for like an hour just to get though the harshest parts. Do you think this will have a significant impact on the efficacy of the program?

I'm more and more beginning to think that we are approaching a situation where you guys may benefit from guiding yourselves on says on/days off. So let's do that as an experiment, and see how it goes. If you find that you want to use the program more than the instructions, go ahead and do it, and we will consider it an experiment.

Sweet- i was really thinking one day off was good enough.

Same for DMSI? I've been a bit tempted to try 8:2 instead of 7:3.

(02-16-2019, 12:34 AM)Nara Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-16-2019, 12:20 AM)blth Wrote: [ -> ]Why you think it is bad idea to implement celeb effect in uslm?

I think because it's not needed. Success has different definition for different people.

Some people wants money, status, recognition. For those type of goals, celebrity effect could be useful. I certainly want it in UMS.

But we are talking about USLM.

How about people who wants committed, deep and meaningful relationship? Or better health/physical fitness? Or become great father/mother/family person? Or even become more spiritual? I think celebrity effect could be annoying and counter-productive.

The celebrity effect is a modulation of a group of systems of different modules in DMSI. To add the celebrity effect to something else would require turning on all of those systems, all of which are heavily optimized for DMSI. They are also entirely unnecessary for other things, as is the celebrity effect. Celebrity effect is going to remain in DMSI unless maybe I create a stand alone, but that seems pretty unlikely.

It also has nothing to do with achieving ultra success, making yourself luck, or achieving ultra monetary success.

(02-16-2019, 03:32 AM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-15-2019, 07:06 AM)Darwin Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-15-2019, 06:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-15-2019, 03:56 AM)Darwin Wrote: [ -> ]hey Shannon, i hate to add to the stream of basic questions but i'm finding with LTU, when i'm off it, it's like there's a tide of negativity from outside and from within. On my days off i'm needing to put it on for like an hour just to get though the harshest parts. Do you think this will have a significant impact on the efficacy of the program?

I'm more and more beginning to think that we are approaching a situation where you guys may benefit from guiding yourselves on says on/days off. So let's do that as an experiment, and see how it goes. If you find that you want to use the program more than the instructions, go ahead and do it, and we will consider it an experiment.

Sweet- i was really thinking one day off was good enough.

Same for DMSI? I've been a bit tempted to try 8:2 instead of 7:3.

As long as you're not obviously trying to self sabotage by using it less, etc. why not see how it works?

Hi Shannon, im thinking of trying to use the phone with ultrasonic for dmsi 3.3.1, ive been using computer speakers with hybrid and currently masked but situations might be changing for a few weeks where i might need to start the loops a lot earlier at night then i currently do which makes using the phone best to continue to get all 8 loops in.

below are some details i found regarding my phone, from these details i shouldnt have any issues using the phone?

SOUND Loudspeaker Yes
3.5mm jack Yes
- Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic

Loudspeaker Voice 62dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 77dB
Audio quality Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -94.4dB

Thanks.

I just had a dream that my mother told me that she was pregnant. I was sad and i had some tears in my eyes because i didnt want to have 30 years difference from my third sibling

What could this possibly mean from DMSI point of view? Any chance that can be TID reaction from new USLM as there is a chance i might run it? If so what it could mean from USLM perspective?

(02-16-2019, 07:27 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-16-2019, 03:32 AM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-15-2019, 07:06 AM)Darwin Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-15-2019, 06:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-15-2019, 03:56 AM)Darwin Wrote: [ -> ]hey Shannon, i hate to add to the stream of basic questions but i'm finding with LTU, when i'm off it, it's like there's a tide of negativity from outside and from within. On my days off i'm needing to put it on for like an hour just to get though the harshest parts. Do you think this will have a significant impact on the efficacy of the program?

I'm more and more beginning to think that we are approaching a situation where you guys may benefit from guiding yourselves on says on/days off. So let's do that as an experiment, and see how it goes. If you find that you want to use the program more than the instructions, go ahead and do it, and we will consider it an experiment.

Sweet- i was really thinking one day off was good enough.

Same for DMSI? I've been a bit tempted to try 8:2 instead of 7:3.

As long as you're not obviously trying to self sabotage by using it less, etc. why not see how it works?

OK. I'll see what my gut says once the 2ndry ASRB break comes.

(02-16-2019, 07:26 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-16-2019, 12:34 AM)Nara Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-16-2019, 12:20 AM)blth Wrote: [ -> ]Why you think it is bad idea to implement celeb effect in uslm?

I think because it's not needed. Success has different definition for different people.

Some people wants money, status, recognition. For those type of goals, celebrity effect could be useful. I certainly want it in UMS.

But we are talking about USLM.

How about people who wants committed, deep and meaningful relationship? Or better health/physical fitness? Or become great father/mother/family person? Or even become more spiritual? I think celebrity effect could be annoying and counter-productive.

The celebrity effect is a modulation of a group of systems of different modules in DMSI. To add the celebrity effect to something else would require turning on all of those systems, all of which are heavily optimized for DMSI. They are also entirely unnecessary for other things, as is the celebrity effect. Celebrity effect is going to remain in DMSI unless maybe I create a stand alone, but that seems pretty unlikely.

It also has nothing to do with achieving ultra success, making yourself luck, or achieving ultra monetary success.

Celebrity effect is really awesome, best subs in the world. Shannon are you going to upgrade the anti fear mod in dmsi to 4.5 and up the auric shielding in 3.3.2D?

(02-16-2019, 07:39 AM)josh84 Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon, im thinking of trying to use the phone with ultrasonic for dmsi 3.3.1, ive been using computer speakers with hybrid and currently masked but situations might be changing for a few weeks where i might need to start the loops a lot earlier at night then i currently do which makes using the phone best to continue to get all 8 loops in.

below are some details i found regarding my phone, from these details i shouldnt have any issues using the phone?

SOUND Loudspeaker Yes
3.5mm jack Yes
- Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic

Loudspeaker Voice 62dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 77dB
Audio quality Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -94.4dB

Thanks.

Just run the free speaker test audio.

(02-16-2019, 08:33 AM)Shadow2200 Wrote: [ -> ]Celebrity effect is really awesome, best subs in the world. Shannon are you going to upgrade the anti fear mod in dmsi to 4.5 and up the auric shielding in 3.3.2D?

I would think, since he's using DMSI to test upgrades to FRM, that he would wait until there was an actual upgrade to the FRM that would include a new feature (or features). 4.5 is an adjustment to the 4.4 FRM so that it is attuned to the completed Magnus Engine. He should be getting plenty of feedback for how that performs in LTU 5.0, USLM4, E3, and UMS.

That said, I look forward to the possibility of upgraded auric shielding, the completed Magnus Engine, and a new FRM to test in a potential DMSI 3.3.2.

(02-16-2019, 07:53 AM)blth Wrote: [ -> ]I just had a dream that my mother told me that she was pregnant. I was sad and i had some tears in my eyes because i didnt want to have 30 years difference from my third sibling

What could this possibly mean from DMSI point of view? Any chance that can be TID reaction from new USLM as there is a chance i might run it? If so what it could mean from USLM perspective?

Mother is the core of "where I come from" and thus "what I am". Pregnant means that something new is being created and formed. This is a significant change. Tears because of the percieved difference is your current self mourning the perceived difference between it and what is coming, because it sees the difference, and not the commonality.

It sounds to me like DMSI is creating a "new you" and your current self is afraid of being left behind/ignored as a result. But they're both you, and the "old self" is becoming the "new self". There is no difference between them except what is perceived to be true.

That's how I would interpret it.

(02-16-2019, 08:33 AM)Shadow2200 Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-16-2019, 07:26 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-16-2019, 12:34 AM)Nara Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-16-2019, 12:20 AM)blth Wrote: [ -> ]Why you think it is bad idea to implement celeb effect in uslm?

I think because it's not needed. Success has different definition for different people.

Some people wants money, status, recognition. For those type of goals, celebrity effect could be useful. I certainly want it in UMS.

But we are talking about USLM.

How about people who wants committed, deep and meaningful relationship? Or better health/physical fitness? Or become great father/mother/family person? Or even become more spiritual? I think celebrity effect could be annoying and counter-productive.

The celebrity effect is a modulation of a group of systems of different modules in DMSI. To add the celebrity effect to something else would require turning on all of those systems, all of which are heavily optimized for DMSI. They are also entirely unnecessary for other things, as is the celebrity effect. Celebrity effect is going to remain in DMSI unless maybe I create a stand alone, but that seems pretty unlikely.

It also has nothing to do with achieving ultra success, making yourself luck, or achieving ultra monetary success.

Celebrity effect is really awesome, best subs in the world. Shannon are you going to upgrade the anti fear mod in dmsi to 4.5 and up the auric shielding in 3.3.2D?

I already have FRM 4.5 in LTU 5. Finished that yesterday. But why would I up the auric shielding? It is what it is supposed to be. Is it not good enough somehow?

Think this has been answered already but when LTU 5.0 comes out it'll be the $600 price tag correct?, and those who purchased v4 will get a free upgrade?...asking because I'm making financial plans based around this, assuming that v5 will be released within the next 7 days.