Subliminal Talk

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566

I just realized how powerful telling yourself conciously to execute the script can be. Simply replacing every thought with "execute the script" has given me significantly more iois

Ive also noticed that I get a lot of interest from girls but if I show any sign of interest back, they seem to look pissed off or turned off, only to later give me iois again. Any reason for this?

You guys are killing me here. Can you please only quote one or two posts at a time instead of replying with a blue wall of old text? A quick edit to do so will ensure your post is understood and it helps to make things look clean and flow well.

(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-12-2018, 03:25 PM)kingpill Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, how would DMSI primed at relationships differ from DMSI now? Thanks

It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.

I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then Big Grin

Quote:Once again:

A has direct H&C turned on, and will attempt to either dissolve the mountain standing in your way (reasons for resistance/failure/resistance itself) or walk you around it to the other side.

B has the Optimus Engine, which will find a way to the goal through whatever stands in the way. In effect of there is no way for B to achieve the goal shy of dealing with that mountain, it will either destroy the mountain or shoot the target right through it.

One way or the other, you will get past that mountain to the goal if you are executing.

So wait A dissolves or walks around

B destroys said mountain or shoot through it.

Dissolve or destroy, not the same?

In my case im not fapping - better to stick with B or move to A when it lands to get more results, more execution and destroy any resistance? Hurray im not stonewalling Shannon Pirate

(03-13-2018, 09:02 AM)kingpill Wrote: [ -> ]I just realized how powerful telling yourself conciously to execute the script can be. Simply replacing every thought with "execute the script" has given me significantly more iois

Yes, involving the conscious mind and it's will is a powerful ally in creating change. That is in fact what I believe makes hypnosis and NLP so powerful and obvious when they are done successfully. They both involve the conscious mind, even at the deepest levels of state.

I am attempting to do it in reverse, which is challenging.

(03-13-2018, 09:16 AM)kingpill Wrote: [ -> ]Ive also noticed that I get a lot of interest from girls but if I show any sign of interest back, they seem to look pissed off or turned off, only to later give me iois again. Any reason for this?

There are a lot of potential explanations. I suggest you let them advance instead of returning interest, and see what happens.

(03-13-2018, 10:21 AM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-12-2018, 03:25 PM)kingpill Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, how would DMSI primed at relationships differ from DMSI now? Thanks

It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.

I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then

It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.

(03-13-2018, 10:24 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:Once again:

A has direct H&C turned on, and will attempt to either dissolve the mountain standing in your way (reasons for resistance/failure/resistance itself) or walk you around it to the other side.

B has the Optimus Engine, which will find a way to the goal through whatever stands in the way. In effect of there is no way for B to achieve the goal shy of dealing with that mountain, it will either destroy the mountain or shoot the target right through it.

One way or the other, you will get past that mountain to the goal if you are executing.

So wait A dissolves or walks around

B destroys said mountain or shoot through it.

Dissolve or destroy, not the same?

In my case im not fapping - better to stick with B or move to A when it lands to get more results, more execution and destroy any resistance? Hurray im not stonewalling Shannon

A is a gentle approach. B is a forced march. They will both achieve the goal if you execute, but not in the same way or at the same speed.

What you run when A comes out is up to you.

(03-13-2018, 10:24 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:Once again:

A has direct H&C turned on, and will attempt to either dissolve the mountain standing in your way (reasons for resistance/failure/resistance itself) or walk you around it to the other side.

B has the Optimus Engine, which will find a way to the goal through whatever stands in the way. In effect of there is no way for B to achieve the goal shy of dealing with that mountain, it will either destroy the mountain or shoot the target right through it.

One way or the other, you will get past that mountain to the goal if you are executing.

So wait A dissolves or walks around

B destroys said mountain or shoot through it.

Dissolve or destroy, not the same?

In my case im not fapping - better to stick with B or move to A when it lands to get more results, more execution and destroy any resistance? Hurray im not stonewalling Shannon

What worked for me for getting rid of fapping/tiredness is that after u realize what it is (a form of resistance) simply repeating "execute the script" using BOTH your mind and your emotions does wonders.

This can also be done for anything else that can be seen as resistance (looking at chicks on insta, daydreaming etc). Literally anything Shannon has said is a resistance has been easily bypassed with this (for me anyway)and led me to execute.

Maybe you should give it a go to see if it works for you?

Nah, what you really gotta do is start SCREAMING. Last night I got so angry at negative thoughts I set them on fire with my mind and sent out a mental wall of blue fire while screaming my head off. It was sort of like that movie Carrie. Maybe this will help you guys execute. I'm sure as hell not gay and don't even like women but that was pretty fun.

Btw, ever hear of the metagene? Wink

(03-13-2018, 10:33 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-13-2018, 10:21 AM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-12-2018, 03:25 PM)kingpill Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, how would DMSI primed at relationships differ from DMSI now? Thanks

It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.

I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then

It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.

Ok that's understandable. If I were to run it during a committed relationship, which aspects of it would help the relationship, if I consciously kept myself from seducing and flirting with other girls? I'm guessing the sexual performance modules would most likely... but what else?

(03-13-2018, 12:15 PM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-13-2018, 10:33 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-13-2018, 10:21 AM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-12-2018, 03:25 PM)kingpill Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, how would DMSI primed at relationships differ from DMSI now? Thanks

It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.

I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then

It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.

Ok that's understandable. If I were to run it during a committed relationship, which aspects of it would help the relationship, if I consciously kept myself from seducing and flirting with other girls? I'm guessing the sexual performance modules would most likely... but what else?

Define "it".

(03-13-2018, 12:48 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-13-2018, 12:15 PM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-13-2018, 10:33 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-13-2018, 10:21 AM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.

I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then

It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.

Ok that's understandable. If I were to run it during a committed relationship, which aspects of it would help the relationship, if I consciously kept myself from seducing and flirting with other girls? I'm guessing the sexual performance modules would most likely... but what else?

Define "it".

DMSI 3.2b, and maybe 3.2a if i feel i need it

Oversoul

Oversoul

Steve_

dissonance

Jake2015

Shannon

Shannon

Shannon

Shannon

Oversoul

RisingSon

dissonance

Shannon

dissonance