(09-27-2018, 01:40 PM)Ricardo Wrote: [ -> ] (09-24-2018, 04:24 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ] (09-24-2018, 02:36 AM)Nox Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2018, 09:55 PM)Ricardo Wrote: [ -> ][quote='Shannon' pid='206245' dateline='1537723243']
[quote='Ricardo' pid='206218' dateline='1537694156']
This presupposes that there is only a yes or no variable to the sub. As there are many things happening with this sub and the fact that you are cutting this down to bare bones yes or no logic, as well as the passive aggressive insult, means that I'm pretty sure you're having a go.
Exactly Ricardo... you aren't even here for ages, and you come on and contribute nothing other than to come and try to have a go, just like the last few times.
Then you're called out in it and disappear.
I'm still here and I still stand by my assertions. I'm only trying to add perspective to the issue. The way any criticism is met with such hostility , especially from Shannon does rather prove my points I'm afraid.
I have demonstrated that your conclusions and assertions are based in faulty logic.
I am not giving you any more or less hostility than you are giving me.
And your "proof of your points" is, again, based in faulty logic.
You can't get snarky with me because I disagree with you and my points won't conveniently "just go away" and then claim I'm getting hostile with you when I return exactly the same tone and level of snark you gave me.
I'm not being hostile when I do that, I am trying to make you aware of what you are doing by giving you the same. It's entirely unnecessary to be snarky to me. We are adults. We can have a civil discourse.
I have explained in detail in my journal why you do not get results from DMSI, and why the logic that results in this state is faulty.
Given that, your core argument is therefore faulty and so are your conclusions drawn from it. Including this one:
Quote:The way any criticism is met with such hostility , especially from Shannon does rather prove my points I'm afraid.
Which, by the way, smacks of snark and superiority.
You don't want to see the reality I am creating with DMSI, slowly and surely. But it is there, and it is going to be grown into something much bigger, stronger and more obvious. Whether or not you are willing to admit it, see it, or get on board with it.
You cannot say DMSI doesn't work, when we have multiple times over multiple versions each now seen it work in ways that were without a doubt the user doing what DMSI was instructing them to do. At this point, the
only thing holding us back is fear based resistance.
Unfortunately some of you, including you, Ricardo, are so afraid of this change that you are simply refusing to see it.
You can't revise history with refusal to see what happened. It happened. It is what it is. And whether or not you personally get on board with it, or let it happen for you, it still has happened for multiple others, multiple times, with multiple versions. And DMSI is getting more and more powerful with each version.
These are facts. Not opinions. "It doesn't work" is an opinion based on refusal to accept and see the reality of what has actually taken place.
Denial is not just a river in Egypt, my friend. But I still hold out hope for even you to achieve the goals of DMSI.