(02-08-2019, 08:33 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ] (02-08-2019, 02:59 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (02-08-2019, 10:28 AM)FluffyBunny Wrote: [ -> ]For DMSI 3.3.1v & Question for Shannon
Has anyone else noticed that on DMSI now that you turned into someone who is more caring?
For some reason, I am getting a genuine caring feeling for these girls that are in my life. Some I have laid some are just girls I've talked to for some time and some are just friends... But for some reason, I can feel it in my heart that I am feeling happy that I care about their well-being.
This description is one type of my personality but I think before it does not come out as often is due to fear of actually caring may turn the girls away. So I am guessing FRM might dissolve some of those fears so this side of my personality is surfacing more?
This feeling feels freer like I am just being myself. But I am not sure how what I described is helping me developing the maximizing sexual irresistibility side?
That is very possibly a significant part of becoming irresistibly attractive. Women want to have sex with men who love women in general, and who are comfortable to be that open to and vulnerable to. You have to think like a woman and from a woman's point of view on this.
Shannon, is this a necessary change that DMSI will have on the user? Do I need to care about/trust girls to have DMSI work?
DMSI is Self Optimizing Polymorphic Scripting. That means it gets into your head and adjusts for whatever you need to achieve the goals of the program. If for you, becoming sexually irresistible means becoming a more caring man, that is what will happen. If for you it means becoming more wealthy, that is what will happen. If for you it means becoming more dominant to the gender you prefer sex with, that is what will happen. If that means you need to look to a country where women think differently, that is what will happen. No two people are alike, so the programming takes that into account and creates the difference between what you are and what you want to be, so you can achieve that goal.
Whatever you need, DMSI will achieve, when you start executing.
(02-09-2019, 01:03 AM)AriGold Wrote: [ -> ]I want to repeat what geotrouvetout was saying in his own thread:
"[...] keep this sub sexual free. For sexual improvement there is DMSI [...]"
You have to have a plan or idea in which direction each subliminal it is going. Life Tune Up was always set up as a kind of softer allround subliminal.
If you want more dominance or more specified upon gender then go with alpha.
If you want it more sexual go with sex magnet or DMSI.
If you want it more playful and flirty go with woman magnet.
If you want it more business focussed go with BASE.
So really, if you put "improve your sex life" in LTU, you can also put it in the next BASE because which entrepreneur does not like that improved?
Keep it simple and focused!
There is a bit of confusion because I posted two different things, apparently. The goal that passes modeling is "improve your love life", not "improve your sex life". Love life can include sex, but primarily deals with your primary relationship(s). I have not quite finished strengthening the required modules (turns out to be four of them intertwined, not just one), and when I finish with that I will model what is best: do I add that or leave it out?
I'm not surprised that love life wins over sex life. I can also see for and against points for including it or leaving it out. So I will let the models guide me.
Whatever the case, the new version will have much better structural strength for handling the process of dealing with what E3 is doing.
(02-09-2019, 02:45 AM)Determined Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon, what's the go with AM7?
How close are we to achieving 6G technology?
As best I can tell, it will be Beast 19 that achieves design spec in approximately April, May or June of this year. Then I will start mining the technology from B19 and putting it in the 6G skeleton script. I estimate that will take me 4 to 6 months, so 6G should be coming out with the first program around October/November/December of 2019. Then I have the custom multi-stage program to build, and then we can get to AM7. So it will probably be sometime between May and July of next year that I start work on it, and it will probably take me 1 to 2 months to build.
Rough estimate: If I make AM7 the third 6G orogram I build it will probably be released sometime around June 2020 and September 2020.
(02-09-2019, 05:21 AM)samba99 Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
Is there are direct manifestation scripts included in DMSI? What would we manifestation with DMSI?
Yes, there are actually four different manifestation targets in DMSI, IIRC. They are aimed at manifesting the goals of DMSI and bringing into your life the people who will best result in those goal achievements.
Ok, then it was a misunderstanding. Thank you for clarifying.
@
Shannon
Any idea of a rough time frame for USLM4 release?
Thanks
(02-09-2019, 07:35 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (02-09-2019, 01:03 AM)AriGold Wrote: [ -> ]I want to repeat what geotrouvetout was saying in his own thread:
"[...] keep this sub sexual free. For sexual improvement there is DMSI [...]"
You have to have a plan or idea in which direction each subliminal it is going. Life Tune Up was always set up as a kind of softer allround subliminal.
If you want more dominance or more specified upon gender then go with alpha.
If you want it more sexual go with sex magnet or DMSI.
If you want it more playful and flirty go with woman magnet.
If you want it more business focussed go with BASE.
So really, if you put "improve your sex life" in LTU, you can also put it in the next BASE because which entrepreneur does not like that improved?
Keep it simple and focused!
There is a bit of confusion because I posted two different things, apparently. The goal that passes modeling is "improve your love life", not "improve your sex life". Love life can include sex, but primarily deals with your primary relationship(s). I have not quite finished strengthening the required modules (turns out to be four of them intertwined, not just one), and when I finish with that I will model what is best: do I add that or leave it out?
I'm not surprised that love life wins over sex life. I can also see for and against points for including it or leaving it out. So I will let the models guide me.
Whatever the case, the new version will have much better structural strength for handling the process of dealing with what E3 is doing.
I Love the idea of Improving one's Love Life over One's sex Life,in LTU! Im not even using LTU,yet,but at some point I wish to do so. I also Love the idea that the Upgraded version with have better structural strength for handling the processs of dealing with what all E3 is doing,which is kick ass advanced technology. Wow!! "Impressive Luke Skywalker !! Obie One, Has taught chew well !!"
(02-09-2019, 07:32 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]DMSI is Self Optimizing Polymorphic Scripting. That means it gets into your head and adjusts for whatever you need to achieve the goals of the program.
Whatever you need, DMSI will achieve, when you start executing.
Shannon,
The original Universal Detox used polymorphic scripting, and you put the entire program into LTU. Did you make all of LTU polymorphic?
That feature freed me of some core practices while using UD. If all of LTU were polymorphic, it would eliminate a lot of stress and wondering about outcomes, for it would hit my greatest personal needs, even if I am unaware or in denial of them. I'm waiting on my tax refund to pick it up.
To me it sounds like Improve your love life would fit in perfectly in LTU. Love and sex are both big things in our lifes, at least on the biological level. Improving on those a little should add up well with improving on the other areas LTU is working on, and the result is a big increase in total awesomeness.
Shannon mentioned needing to add something to USLM to preserve a normal healthy interest in sex. The DMSI sales page strongly advises against using it if in a relationship one would like to keep, ditto for SM. So these are not slightly more sexual - they're so far on the other end that its advised not to run them. So for a general sub like LTU, I think it'd be great to maintain a balance, and balance includes promoting love/sex with the other major areas.
AM is still a different thing; I don't think LTU is intended to be the opposite of AM. And the addition wouldn't have to be gender specific, as even DMSI is not.
(02-09-2019, 07:35 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (02-09-2019, 01:03 AM)AriGold Wrote: [ -> ]I want to repeat what geotrouvetout was saying in his own thread:
"[...] keep this sub sexual free. For sexual improvement there is DMSI [...]"
You have to have a plan or idea in which direction each subliminal it is going. Life Tune Up was always set up as a kind of softer allround subliminal.
If you want more dominance or more specified upon gender then go with alpha.
If you want it more sexual go with sex magnet or DMSI.
If you want it more playful and flirty go with woman magnet.
If you want it more business focussed go with BASE.
So really, if you put "improve your sex life" in LTU, you can also put it in the next BASE because which entrepreneur does not like that improved?
Keep it simple and focused!
There is a bit of confusion because I posted two different things, apparently. The goal that passes modeling is "improve your love life", not "improve your sex life". Love life can include sex, but primarily deals with your primary relationship(s). I have not quite finished strengthening the required modules (turns out to be four of them intertwined, not just one), and when I finish with that I will model what is best: do I add that or leave it out?
I'm not surprised that love life wins over sex life. I can also see for and against points for including it or leaving it out. So I will let the models guide me.
Whatever the case, the new version will have much better structural strength for handling the process of dealing with what E3 is doing.
Wait can you rephrase that, I'm not sure what that means.
(02-09-2019, 08:31 AM)terry44 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
Any idea of a rough time frame for USLM4 release?
Thanks
I'm guilty of estimating too optimistically, I think, so... a week or two? Theoretically it should be that LTU 4.1 gets released tomorrow and then it takes me 2-3 days to release USLM4, but things don't always go according to plan, as we know.
(02-09-2019, 10:08 AM)findingme Wrote: [ -> ] (02-09-2019, 07:32 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]DMSI is Self Optimizing Polymorphic Scripting. That means it gets into your head and adjusts for whatever you need to achieve the goals of the program.
Whatever you need, DMSI will achieve, when you start executing.
Shannon,
The original Universal Detox used polymorphic scripting, and you put the entire program into LTU. Did you make all of LTU polymorphic?
That feature freed me of some core practices while using UD. If all of LTU were polymorphic, it would eliminate a lot of stress and wondering about outcomes, for it would hit my greatest personal needs, even if I am unaware or in denial of them. I'm waiting on my tax refund to pick it up.
All of my scripts have been SOPS for a long time now. It's in everything, the self optimizing polymorphic scripting. It's the standard.
(02-09-2019, 10:26 AM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ] (02-09-2019, 07:35 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (02-09-2019, 01:03 AM)AriGold Wrote: [ -> ]I want to repeat what geotrouvetout was saying in his own thread:
"[...] keep this sub sexual free. For sexual improvement there is DMSI [...]"
You have to have a plan or idea in which direction each subliminal it is going. Life Tune Up was always set up as a kind of softer allround subliminal.
If you want more dominance or more specified upon gender then go with alpha.
If you want it more sexual go with sex magnet or DMSI.
If you want it more playful and flirty go with woman magnet.
If you want it more business focussed go with BASE.
So really, if you put "improve your sex life" in LTU, you can also put it in the next BASE because which entrepreneur does not like that improved?
Keep it simple and focused!
There is a bit of confusion because I posted two different things, apparently. The goal that passes modeling is "improve your love life", not "improve your sex life". Love life can include sex, but primarily deals with your primary relationship(s). I have not quite finished strengthening the required modules (turns out to be four of them intertwined, not just one), and when I finish with that I will model what is best: do I add that or leave it out?
I'm not surprised that love life wins over sex life. I can also see for and against points for including it or leaving it out. So I will let the models guide me.
Whatever the case, the new version will have much better structural strength for handling the process of dealing with what E3 is doing.
Wait can you rephrase that, I'm not sure what that means.
In E2, there is a module designed to make it easy to consciously handle the process of healing. The process is much more demanding in E3 because the power levels of the program are much higher, so the modules that make dealing with the process easy must be made to match or exceed the challenge E3's process presents. That is what I am doing.