Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3

[Oversoul]

I just realized how powerful telling yourself conciously to execute the script can be. Simply replacing every thought with "execute the script" has given me significantly more iois

[Oversoul]

Ive also noticed that I get a lot of interest from girls but if I show any sign of interest back, they seem to look pissed off or turned off, only to later give me iois again. Any reason for this?

[Steve_]

You guys are killing me here. Can you please only quote one or two posts at a time instead of replying with a blue wall of old text? A quick edit to do so will ensure your post is understood and it helps to make things look clean and flow well.

[dissonance]

Shannon, how would DMSI primed at relationships differ from DMSI now? Thanks

It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.

I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then

[Jake2015]

Once again:

A has direct H&C turned on, and will attempt to either dissolve the mountain standing in your way (reasons for resistance/failure/resistance itself) or walk you around it to the other side.

B has the Optimus Engine, which will find a way to the goal through whatever stands in the way. In effect of there is no way for B to achieve the goal shy of dealing with that mountain, it will either destroy the mountain or shoot the target right through it.

One way or the other, you will get past that mountain to the goal if you are executing.

So wait A dissolves or walks around

B destroys said mountain or shoot through it.

Dissolve or destroy, not the same?

In my case im not fapping - better to stick with B or move to A when it lands to get more results, more execution and destroy any resistance? Hurray im not stonewalling Shannon

[Shannon]

I just realized how powerful telling yourself conciously to execute the script can be. Simply replacing every thought with "execute the script" has given me significantly more iois

Yes, involving the conscious mind and it's will is a powerful ally in creating change. That is in fact what I believe makes hypnosis and NLP so powerful and obvious when they are done successfully. They both involve the conscious mind, even at the deepest levels of state.

I am attempting to do it in reverse, which is challenging.

[Shannon]

Ive also noticed that I get a lot of interest from girls but if I show any sign of interest back, they seem to look pissed off or turned off, only to later give me iois again. Any reason for this?

There are a lot of potential explanations. I suggest you let them advance instead of returning interest, and see what happens.

[Shannon]

Shannon, how would DMSI primed at relationships differ from DMSI now? Thanks

It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.

I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then

It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.

[Shannon]

Once again:

A has direct H&C turned on, and will attempt to either dissolve the mountain standing in your way (reasons for resistance/failure/resistance itself) or walk you around it to the other side.

B has the Optimus Engine, which will find a way to the goal through whatever stands in the way. In effect of there is no way for B to achieve the goal shy of dealing with that mountain, it will either destroy the mountain or shoot the target right through it.

One way or the other, you will get past that mountain to the goal if you are executing.

So wait A dissolves or walks around

B destroys said mountain or shoot through it.

Dissolve or destroy, not the same?

In my case im not fapping - better to stick with B or move to A when it lands to get more results, more execution and destroy any resistance? Hurray im not stonewalling Shannon

A is a gentle approach. B is a forced march. They will both achieve the goal if you execute, but not in the same way or at the same speed.

What you run when A comes out is up to you.

[Oversoul]

Once again:

A has direct H&C turned on, and will attempt to either dissolve the mountain standing in your way (reasons for resistance/failure/resistance itself) or walk you around it to the other side.

B has the Optimus Engine, which will find a way to the goal through whatever stands in the way. In effect of there is no way for B to achieve the goal shy of dealing with that mountain, it will either destroy the mountain or shoot the target right through it.

One way or the other, you will get past that mountain to the goal if you are executing.

So wait A dissolves or walks around

B destroys said mountain or shoot through it.

Dissolve or destroy, not the same?

In my case im not fapping - better to stick with B or move to A when it lands to get more results, more execution and destroy any resistance? Hurray im not stonewalling Shannon

What worked for me for getting rid of fapping/tiredness is that after u realize what it is (a form of resistance) simply repeating "execute the script" using BOTH your mind and your emotions does wonders.

This can also be done for anything else that can be seen as resistance (looking at chicks on insta, daydreaming etc). Literally anything Shannon has said is a resistance has been easily bypassed with this (for me anyway)and led me to execute.


Maybe you should give it a go to see if it works for you?

[RisingSon]

Nah, what you really gotta do is start SCREAMING. Last night I got so angry at negative thoughts I set them on fire with my mind and sent out a mental wall of blue fire while screaming my head off. It was sort of like that movie Carrie. Maybe this will help you guys execute. I'm sure as hell not gay and don't even like women but that was pretty fun.

Btw, ever hear of the metagene?

[dissonance]

Shannon, how would DMSI primed at relationships differ from DMSI now? Thanks

It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.

I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then

It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.

Ok that's understandable. If I were to run it during a committed relationship, which aspects of it would help the relationship, if I consciously kept myself from seducing and flirting with other girls? I'm guessing the sexual performance modules would most likely... but what else?

[Shannon]

Shannon, how would DMSI primed at relationships differ from DMSI now? Thanks

It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.

I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then

It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.

Ok that's understandable. If I were to run it during a committed relationship, which aspects of it would help the relationship, if I consciously kept myself from seducing and flirting with other girls? I'm guessing the sexual performance modules would most likely... but what else?

Define "it".

[dissonance]

It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.

I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then

It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.

Ok that's understandable. If I were to run it during a committed relationship, which aspects of it would help the relationship, if I consciously kept myself from seducing and flirting with other girls? I'm guessing the sexual performance modules would most likely... but what else?

Define "it".

DMSI 3.2b, and maybe 3.2a if i feel i need it