Subliminal Talk

LOL, oh please not the "omg this will make me bang my cousins" thing again. That was insane how deep that view ran.

Nothing is an Axe commercial guys. No worries.

(11-29-2016, 07:32 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]Nothing is an Axe commercial guys. No worries.

But DMSI is trying to achieve the "Axe Commerical" effect is it not? LOL

Quote:not having sex with your relatives is your responsibility.

Hahaha I don't know why I laughed at this so much.

What about Stifflers mum?

(11-29-2016, 07:37 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]

Quote:not having sex with your relatives is your responsibility.

Hahaha I don't know why I laughed at this so much.

It's funny because it's true!

(11-29-2016, 07:35 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-29-2016, 07:32 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]Nothing is an Axe commercial guys. No worries.

But DMSI is trying to achieve the "Axe Commerical" effect is it not? LOL

I don't know about that, but I do know you won't be "forced" to have sex with cousins, it's still your choice bottom line so there's responsibility to take. That went on and on, I can't believe people were so deeply concerned about that. Let's get it working so that girls we know or strangers aggressively pursue us for sex, before this cousin thing is a serious issue...lol...so silly to obsess over that is all.

Hey Shannon!

How is V3.0.1 coming along today?

(11-29-2016, 07:39 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-29-2016, 07:35 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-29-2016, 07:32 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]Nothing is an Axe commercial guys. No worries.

But DMSI is trying to achieve the "Axe Commerical" effect is it not? LOL

I don't know about that, but I do know you won't be "forced" to have sex with cousins, it's still your choice bottom line so there's responsibility to take. That went on and on, I can't believe people were so deeply concerned about that. Let's get it working so that girls we know or strangers aggressively pursue us for sex, before this cousin thing is a serious issue...lol...so silly to obsess over that is all.

not the cousins part I meant the whole attracting women like moths to a light part.

(11-29-2016, 07:26 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-29-2016, 06:24 PM)Broski Wrote: [ -> ]Is there anything in dmsi for preventing the program working on people you are related to? Like what if when you were younger you had a crush on one of your older cousins and you consciously want nothing to happen but your subconscious says otherwise? That would be a BIG no no...

We'll had this conversation several versions ago... not having sex with your relatives is your responsibility.

Lol I get that, but im sure you can understand how having such a powerful program potentially pushing towards such a thing as being slightly worrisome. Even if id never act on it id rather not a past attraction from my youth sprouting up and them being affected by it. Itd be a little tough explaing to ol grams why my cuz is relentlessly trying to seduce me at the dinner table on Christmas Eve

(11-29-2016, 08:20 PM)Broski Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-29-2016, 07:26 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-29-2016, 06:24 PM)Broski Wrote: [ -> ]Is there anything in dmsi for preventing the program working on people you are related to? Like what if when you were younger you had a crush on one of your older cousins and you consciously want nothing to happen but your subconscious says otherwise? That would be a BIG no no...

We'll had this conversation several versions ago... not having sex with your relatives is your responsibility.

Lol I get that, but im sure you can understand how having such a powerful program potentially pushing towards such a thing as being slightly worrisome. Even if id never act on it id rather not a past attraction from my youth sprouting up and them being affected by it. Itd be a little tough explaing to ol grams why my cuz is relentlessly trying to seduce me at the dinner table on Christmas Eve

I think that before any "filters" are added to DMSI, it should be producing results across the board first. Only then should filters start being considered.

Make some servitors to help keep you on your a game!! =)

(11-29-2016, 08:39 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-29-2016, 08:20 PM)Broski Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-29-2016, 07:26 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-29-2016, 06:24 PM)Broski Wrote: [ -> ]Is there anything in dmsi for preventing the program working on people you are related to? Like what if when you were younger you had a crush on one of your older cousins and you consciously want nothing to happen but your subconscious says otherwise? That would be a BIG no no...

We'll had this conversation several versions ago... not having sex with your relatives is your responsibility.

Lol I get that, but im sure you can understand how having such a powerful program potentially pushing towards such a thing as being slightly worrisome. Even if id never act on it id rather not a past attraction from my youth sprouting up and them being affected by it. Itd be a little tough explaing to ol grams why my cuz is relentlessly trying to seduce me at the dinner table on Christmas Eve

I think that before any "filters" are added to DMSI, it should be producing results across the board first. Only then should filters start being considered.

I'm not adding filters. You will have to accept that you are an adult, and take responsibility for whatever you choose to do.

For full disclosure, I was one of the original people who voiced this concern and had people coming at me accusing me of some bullshit. I really don't want to go down this road again but I'll try to keep it brief.

#1: No nerfing DMSI in any way. If relatives are trying to get at you, then you gotta handle it.

#2: Catman I'll speak ONLY for myself here. You stated the following:

Quote:I don't know about that, but I do know you won't be "forced" to have sex with cousins, it's still your choice bottom line so there's responsibility to take. That went on and on, I can't believe people were so deeply concerned about that. Let's get it working so that girls we know or strangers aggressively pursue us for sex, before this cousin thing is a serious issue...lol...so silly to obsess over that is all.

Yeah I agree man its silly to obsess over it especially since DMSI hasn't shown any true consistency over the past few months to warrant that level of concern. However, that situation went on and on because people people like me who were NOT obsessing over it... were acussed of obsessing over it and because some people assumed me and LionKing were trying to get DMSI nerfed. I simply wanted to know if such a thing could be addressed but I also was more than happy to risk having a legal-of-age cousin trying to grab my balls if it meant having some gorgoues women exchanging orgasms with me.

#3: Broski, I understand your concern but once again, see #1. I think in the grand scheme of things Maxx55 has a point. DMSI hasn't even proven it can work consistently yet. Until it does, the whole relative thing is a non-issue. But once again, I fully understand your concern man.

And just to make sure people don't (once again) misread my intentions I'm going to offer Shannon a simple Legal Disclaimer he can put on the DMSI page:

Congratulations! You've just purchased the (soon to be) most powerful attraction subliminal on the planet! By purchasing this subliminal you accept full responsibility for WHAT you get into,WHO YOU GET INTO, and who you ALLOW to GET INTO YOU (if you're female).

EDIT: Had to clean some of those sentences up.

(11-29-2016, 08:39 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-29-2016, 08:20 PM)Broski Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-29-2016, 07:26 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-29-2016, 06:24 PM)Broski Wrote: [ -> ]Is there anything in dmsi for preventing the program working on people you are related to? Like what if when you were younger you had a crush on one of your older cousins and you consciously want nothing to happen but your subconscious says otherwise? That would be a BIG no no...

We'll had this conversation several versions ago... not having sex with your relatives is your responsibility.

Lol I get that, but im sure you can understand how having such a powerful program potentially pushing towards such a thing as being slightly worrisome. Even if id never act on it id rather not a past attraction from my youth sprouting up and them being affected by it. Itd be a little tough explaing to ol grams why my cuz is relentlessly trying to seduce me at the dinner table on Christmas Eve

I think that before any "filters" are added to DMSI, it should be producing results across the board first. Only then should filters start being considered.

You may be right. I personally havent seen much in terms of results thus far so I may be getting ahead of myself

Shannon, when you have the time, can you explain exactly why outliers was faulty logic? This is a forum about life and progress after all, I'd like the conversations to be more cantered around that.

Also I have a question about sub listening: let's say I'm playing 2 subs, sub A and sub B, if I listen to sub A for 6 hours, and then listen to sub B for 8 hours, which sub is going to be ingrained and executed first? Should I switch them around depending on which ones more important?

Also, I remember you once mentioned that fear of failure had some sort of significance when it came to cognition or emotion, if you remember that concept, what was it? I'd like to know more about it.