(08-01-2016, 03:39 PM)bogdy Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon since i dont have a jurnal and i dont intend making one i will tell you my observation on dmsi 2.2 testing.
First of all i've started v2.2 after 5 days of 2.1 so i'm not valid.
What i have observed about 2.2 is that when you need something to heal you project no aura, you only heal , i never felt the aura or anything , i even run 5 loops and nothing. I think all the results i see from v2.2 are from the healing modules since i've had few deep conversation with girls, in the last 4 years i only had basic, meaningless conversation with girls , i feel more secure in myself around girls and i had a masive drop in neediness. The manifestation part is there and it's working , i've had girls interested in me but poor response from my part . I got stares , butt presentation , touching , smiles , and one girl talked with me about sex ,when I tried something with her , she withdraws.
One think i need to add , when you resist you are a ghost , every time i had resistance i was (and felt) like i'm invisible.
When you resist, you're trying to hide. Of course you feel invisible. Just keep going.
(08-01-2016, 08:10 PM)K-Train Wrote: [ -> ]Kicking the healing module may end up creating new issues such as guys not being able to capitalize on opportunities created due to guilt, shame, and fear. That said, without the healing module other shit may kick in from DMSI and this may increase the opportunities presented perhaps by a significant margin for most users.
Depending on how things work out, DMSI may have to operate on its own with the singular focus being on getting you sex, with healing being a goal reserved exclusively for E2. But we're entering into week 3 of DMSI for most people so we still have until late August/early September before most guys reach 6 weeks.
I'm thinking that maybe what we need to do is have two versions - one with, and one without the healing modules. Perhaps "Healing" and "Hunting". Or Stage 1 and 2.
But I still need to learn a few things before I'm sure what to do next. I do have a lot of interesting ideas though.
(08-01-2016, 08:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-31-2016, 07:23 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ] (07-29-2016, 05:47 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-29-2016, 11:39 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]I have a question about autopilot. Basically it's this: whenever I just act without thinking, I get bad results/reactions/everything. Whenever I consciously focus on what I';m doing, I get good results/reactions/everything. What's going on there? Is my subconscious faulty?
If memory serves, you are not using DMSI, correct?
If that is correct, then you're not going to get program induced autopiloting. You'll have times where you naturally experience the same phenomenon, but if it leads to negative outcomes, then it's because the "autopilot" (your subconscious) is running faulty programming. I.e., erroneous beliefs are being expressed.
Now if you are running DMSI, and you're still having this problem, then you've got a situation in which your old beliefs are trying to dominate your incoming beliefs and express themselves instead. It will take time.
Your subconscious is not faulty, but what it believes to be true is. You just need to change that.
I didn't see this till just now.
I'm not using DMSI, that is correct.
If what I'm believing is incorrect, then how can I believe otherwise, especially if a new belief won't "work" because I don't believe it?
Isn't that how it works? Beliefs only work if you believe them?
Beliefs only work if you believe them? Beliefs are what you believe. You cannot not believe them, because they are beliefs.
If what you are believing is incorrect, then as Chaos stated, the program code (belief) needs to be replaced with a new section of code. When this is done, it becomes the belief, and you execute it just as you did the previous section of code, and execution makes it real by acting on it and acting as if it is real in the ways that make it real, both internally and externally.
The purpose of subs, of course, is to rewrite sections of code in your "operating system" (subconscious), and in the equivalent of "userland programs" (conscious).
Well that's my point: If I believe X but am supposed to believe Y, how can I ever believe Y? X tells me that Y doesn't work, so whenever I try Y, Y doesn't work because I believe X does.
Furthermore, how come believing X doesn't make X happen?
I still don't understand apparently.
(08-01-2016, 10:40 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ] (08-01-2016, 08:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-31-2016, 07:23 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ] (07-29-2016, 05:47 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-29-2016, 11:39 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]I have a question about autopilot. Basically it's this: whenever I just act without thinking, I get bad results/reactions/everything. Whenever I consciously focus on what I';m doing, I get good results/reactions/everything. What's going on there? Is my subconscious faulty?
If memory serves, you are not using DMSI, correct?
If that is correct, then you're not going to get program induced autopiloting. You'll have times where you naturally experience the same phenomenon, but if it leads to negative outcomes, then it's because the "autopilot" (your subconscious) is running faulty programming. I.e., erroneous beliefs are being expressed.
Now if you are running DMSI, and you're still having this problem, then you've got a situation in which your old beliefs are trying to dominate your incoming beliefs and express themselves instead. It will take time.
Your subconscious is not faulty, but what it believes to be true is. You just need to change that.
I didn't see this till just now.
I'm not using DMSI, that is correct.
If what I'm believing is incorrect, then how can I believe otherwise, especially if a new belief won't "work" because I don't believe it?
Isn't that how it works? Beliefs only work if you believe them?
Beliefs only work if you believe them? Beliefs are what you believe. You cannot not believe them, because they are beliefs.
If what you are believing is incorrect, then as Chaos stated, the program code (belief) needs to be replaced with a new section of code. When this is done, it becomes the belief, and you execute it just as you did the previous section of code, and execution makes it real by acting on it and acting as if it is real in the ways that make it real, both internally and externally.
The purpose of subs, of course, is to rewrite sections of code in your "operating system" (subconscious), and in the equivalent of "userland programs" (conscious).
Well that's my point: If I believe X but am supposed to believe Y, how can I ever believe Y? X tells me that Y doesn't work, so whenever I try Y, Y doesn't work because I believe X does.
Furthermore, how come believing X doesn't make X happen?
I still don't understand apparently.
While X is dominant, Y will fail because X will derail it. In most people, simply listening to Y enough times will overwrite X. In some rare cases, the conscious mind is too invested in reinforcing X. This is likely why you have so much trouble.
5.5g/6G should significantly help with the process though.
(08-01-2016, 10:44 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-01-2016, 10:40 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ] (08-01-2016, 08:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-31-2016, 07:23 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ] (07-29-2016, 05:47 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]If memory serves, you are not using DMSI, correct?
If that is correct, then you're not going to get program induced autopiloting. You'll have times where you naturally experience the same phenomenon, but if it leads to negative outcomes, then it's because the "autopilot" (your subconscious) is running faulty programming. I.e., erroneous beliefs are being expressed.
Now if you are running DMSI, and you're still having this problem, then you've got a situation in which your old beliefs are trying to dominate your incoming beliefs and express themselves instead. It will take time.
Your subconscious is not faulty, but what it believes to be true is. You just need to change that.
I didn't see this till just now.
I'm not using DMSI, that is correct.
If what I'm believing is incorrect, then how can I believe otherwise, especially if a new belief won't "work" because I don't believe it?
Isn't that how it works? Beliefs only work if you believe them?
Beliefs only work if you believe them? Beliefs are what you believe. You cannot not believe them, because they are beliefs.
If what you are believing is incorrect, then as Chaos stated, the program code (belief) needs to be replaced with a new section of code. When this is done, it becomes the belief, and you execute it just as you did the previous section of code, and execution makes it real by acting on it and acting as if it is real in the ways that make it real, both internally and externally.
The purpose of subs, of course, is to rewrite sections of code in your "operating system" (subconscious), and in the equivalent of "userland programs" (conscious).
Well that's my point: If I believe X but am supposed to believe Y, how can I ever believe Y? X tells me that Y doesn't work, so whenever I try Y, Y doesn't work because I believe X does.
Furthermore, how come believing X doesn't make X happen?
I still don't understand apparently.
While X is dominant, Y will fail because X will derail it. In most people, simply listening to Y enough times will overwrite X. In some rare cases, the conscious mind is too invested in reinforcing X. This is likely why you have so much trouble.
5.5g/6G should significantly help with the process though.
That's good.
But what about the other issue? Why doesn't believing in X make X real?
shannon you never gave feedback on my product idea.
I wanted to know now that technology is better than 2011 can you now make a sub to:
win the lottery jackpot 5.5g/6g
or make a sub to see into the future for things like sports games so you can make bets and make bank. so something like:
view the future 5.5g/6g
or even make a sub like Luck Magnifier 5.5g/6g
please get back to me
(08-01-2016, 08:48 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ] (08-01-2016, 06:48 PM)bogdy Wrote: [ -> ]I did 208 days of E2 before DMSI
You must be including time with E1. E2 was only released in early March...
Yeah you actually right I did 116days :-) , sorry my bad.
(08-01-2016, 10:17 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-01-2016, 03:39 PM)bogdy Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon since i dont have a jurnal and i dont intend making one i will tell you my observation on dmsi 2.2 testing.
First of all i've started v2.2 after 5 days of 2.1 so i'm not valid.
What i have observed about 2.2 is that when you need something to heal you project no aura, you only heal , i never felt the aura or anything , i even run 5 loops and nothing. I think all the results i see from v2.2 are from the healing modules since i've had few deep conversation with girls, in the last 4 years i only had basic, meaningless conversation with girls , i feel more secure in myself around girls and i had a masive drop in neediness. The manifestation part is there and it's working , i've had girls interested in me but poor response from my part . I got stares , butt presentation , touching , smiles , and one girl talked with me about sex ,when I tried something with her , she withdraws.
One think i need to add , when you resist you are a ghost , every time i had resistance i was (and felt) like i'm invisible.
When you resist, you're trying to hide. Of course you feel invisible. Just keep going.
"If you're going through hell, keep going! ''
Thanks!
(08-02-2016, 02:23 AM)Hold007 Wrote: [ -> ]shannon you never gave feedback on my product idea.
I wanted to know now that technology is better than 2011 can you now make a sub to:
win the lottery jackpot 5.5g/6g
or make a sub to see into the future for things like sports games so you can make bets and make bank. so something like:
view the future 5.5g/6g
or even make a sub like Luck Magnifier 5.5g/6g
please get back to me
I can do a lot more than in 2011, but I don't think it will ever realistically be possible to make a sub that just wins you the lottery. And if it was, it would suddenly not be profitable for the house, and lotteries would disappear faster than lightning. They exist to make someone a profit, and it's not players.
Viewing the future might be possible, but I would have to do a lot of experimentation to see what is really possible. That takes a lot of time,which I don't have right now.
Luck Magnifier on the other hand, works on the difference in the perception of reality and time between the conscious and subconscious minds. I know I can make that, and as popular as it is, a 5.5 or 6g version is very likely.
(08-01-2016, 10:12 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-31-2016, 05:50 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon: I Know this was brougth up a while back ...but will BAMM be getting a 5.5/6g re-vamp,re-do and will it be LATER this year as in december sometime as a beginning of a re-do of BAMM in 6g or will that be next spring 2017 some time? forgive me coz Im know you've answered some such, two months ago,I forgot. sooo much has transpried and happened since then. thnx. Keith..
It will probably be re-done in 6G, sometime next year or in 2018.
That's sooner than I anticipated based off of your current workload
I'm really looking forward to it!!
How many 6G technologies do you anticipate being in BAMM 3.0?
also shannon why dont you make a sub to astral travel for us and yourself. I've tried loads of ways to astral travel and cant do it so maybe you can make a sub for it. You might be able to find the missing pieces for subs like dmsi. You could also add in protection and the ability to remember your astral travel experience.
Also please upgrade the eyesight sub, make it: restore eyesight back to 20/20 vision 5.5g/6g.
Thanks
(08-01-2016, 10:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I'm thinking that maybe what we need to do is have two versions - one with, and one without the healing modules. Perhaps "Healing" and "Hunting". Or Stage 1 and 2.
But I still need to learn a few things before I'm sure what to do next. I do have a lot of interesting ideas though.
If you make it two stage you should put something in the healing stage what lets you know when you are done with healing and can move on to stage 2.
(08-02-2016, 10:46 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ] (08-01-2016, 10:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I'm thinking that maybe what we need to do is have two versions - one with, and one without the healing modules. Perhaps "Healing" and "Hunting". Or Stage 1 and 2.
But I still need to learn a few things before I'm sure what to do next. I do have a lot of interesting ideas though.
If you make it two stage you should put something in the healing stage what lets you know when you are done with healing and can move on to stage 2.
I second here Anderson's, something that could tell us that we are done with the clearing and then move to the second stage which is all about the auras and scripting of sexual irresistability. I am quite content with version2.2 and thankful for it. But this new thought of two stages is a brilliant one Shannon and deserves a bit of your time.
