Subliminal Talk

Full Version: Shannon's Journal Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691
The scripting is as done as it needs to be for my purpose of figuring out what is what beyond the two things that have been major issues in 2.1. I need them dealt with before I can see what else it needs done.

By the way, v3 is several months away, not years.
(07-10-2016, 10:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]The scripting is as done as it needs to be for my purpose of figuring out what is what beyond the two things that have been major issues in 2.1. I need them dealt with before I can see what else it needs done.

By the way, v3 is several months away, not years.

This is surprising to hear. I thought V3 would be the 6G version, WAY down the road.

Does this mean V3 will be 5.5G? Or that 6G research is much further along than I thought, and that MSI will be the first 6G in a few months?
I really hope ASC is the first 6G product.
(07-10-2016, 11:03 PM)lokko Wrote: [ -> ]I really hope ASC is the first 6G product.

Yeah I thought it would be, too.

But since this program is being developed with 5.5G and a big part of the skeleton script for 6G over time, it may be more logical to build it in 6G first.

We'll see, just the thought of V3 only months away surprised me, so I wanted to clarify.
(07-10-2016, 10:56 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]
(07-10-2016, 10:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]The scripting is as done as it needs to be for my purpose of figuring out what is what beyond the two things that have been major issues in 2.1. I need them dealt with before I can see what else it needs done.

By the way, v3 is several months away, not years.

This is surprising to hear. I thought V3 would be the 6G version, WAY down the road.

Does this mean V3 will be 5.5G? Or that 6G research is much further along than I thought, and that MSI will be the first 6G in a few months?

It means that, while I have other things I need to do also, I an fascinated by the potential this program and technology (energy flooding) has. I want to continue to develop it.

Developing anything in 5.5g is developing the 5.5g skeleton script, and advancing it to the 6g skeleton script. But 6g isn't finished being developed itself and I haven't been working on it since I have to get this right.

6g is still looking like late this year or sometime next year. The first 6g program is still most likely going to be ASC.
(07-10-2016, 11:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]It means that, while I have other things I need to do also, I an fascinated by the potential this program and technology (energy flooding) has. I want to continue to develop it.

Developing anything in 5.5g is developing the 5.5g skeleton script, and advancing it to the 6g skeleton script. But 6g isn't finished being developed itself and I haven't been working on it since I have to get this right.

6g is still looking like late this year or sometime next year. The first 6g program is still most likely going to be ASC.

Okay, things are as I thought then. That's cool, no worries. This program sounds intriguing, I look forward to using it. ASC 6G, and 6G itself, will be awesome. I figured 2017-2018 for any chance of AM7/SM4 anyway.

So V3 will be in 5.5G, wow. To be a new version series, it must be a substantial update. Seeing as how much is already in there, that's fascinating to me as well.
(07-10-2016, 11:31 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]
(07-10-2016, 11:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]It means that, while I have other things I need to do also, I an fascinated by the potential this program and technology (energy flooding) has. I want to continue to develop it.

Developing anything in 5.5g is developing the 5.5g skeleton script, and advancing it to the 6g skeleton script. But 6g isn't finished being developed itself and I haven't been working on it since I have to get this right.

6g is still looking like late this year or sometime next year. The first 6g program is still most likely going to be ASC.

Okay, things are as I thought then. That's cool, no worries. This program sounds intriguing, I look forward to using it. ASC 6G, and 6G itself, will be awesome. I figured 2017-2018 for any chance of AM7/SM4 anyway.

So V3 will be in 5.5G, wow. To be a new version series, it must be a substantial update. Seeing as how much is already in there, that's fascinating to me as well.

I have a laundry list of updates to make to it and improvements as well including new technologies and new things for it to be doing so it definitely will deserve the version 3.0 upgrade status.
(07-10-2016, 11:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I have a laundry list of updates to make to it and improvements as well including new technologies and new things for it to be doing so it definitely will deserve the version 3.0 upgrade status.

Haha, I'm already excited for 3.0.

It sounds like it will be worth the purchase for me, 100%. Fantastic.
(07-10-2016, 11:51 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]
(07-10-2016, 11:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I have a laundry list of updates to make to it and improvements as well including new technologies and new things for it to be doing so it definitely will deserve the version 3.0 upgrade status.

Haha, I'm already excited for 3.0.

It sounds like it will be worth the purchase for me, 100%. Fantastic.

I think it would be best if you waited until I do create version 3 before you use it not only for the extra time on E2 but because I'm going to try to make version 3 deals specifically with the sort of reasons why you and guys like you have trouble with women and of course the same thing for women with guys. I think version 3 would be much more effective for you for that reason. I don't know how many months away it's going to be that will depend on how long it takes me to do the other stuff in the meantime and build it of course but I think that's the wisest course of action for you.
(07-10-2016, 11:54 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I think it would be best if you waited until I do create version 3 before you use it not only for the extra time on E2 but because I'm going to try to make version 3 deals specifically with the sort of reasons why you and guys like you have trouble with women and of course the same thing for women with guys. I think version 3 would be much more effective for you for that reason. I don't know how many months away it's going to be that will depend on how long it takes me to do the other stuff in the meantime and build it of course but I think that's the wisest course of action for you.

Oh?

I purchased this program already before as I promised.

It'd be a shame to not use it. I was thinking that I'd try 2.2 perhaps when it debuts. I've seen some changes in the area of women, and would like a more focused approach to get me making progress. I've had decreased motivation to write in my journal for awhile, and I'm told that's typical of users on this program.

Also, I understand that you have other things on the go, and potentially it can be several months before V3 debuts. And of course, the free upgrades only cover 2.x, so I'd be buying the program twice. Which I'd have no trouble with, as long as I used both. This news of V3 coming soonish is a bit of a surprise. A good one overall of course. I guess it goes to show how well R&D is progressing, which is amazing news for us all.
(07-11-2016, 12:11 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]
(07-10-2016, 11:54 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I think it would be best if you waited until I do create version 3 before you use it not only for the extra time on E2 but because I'm going to try to make version 3 deals specifically with the sort of reasons why you and guys like you have trouble with women and of course the same thing for women with guys. I think version 3 would be much more effective for you for that reason. I don't know how many months away it's going to be that will depend on how long it takes me to do the other stuff in the meantime and build it of course but I think that's the wisest course of action for you.

Oh?

I purchased this program already before as I promised.

It'd be a shame to not use it. I was thinking that I'd try 2.2 perhaps when it debuts. I've seen some changes in the area of women, and would like a more focused approach to get me making progress. I've had decreased motivation to write in my journal for awhile, and I'm told that's typical of users on this program.

Also, I understand that you have other things on the go, and potentially it can be several months before V3 debuts. And of course, the free upgrades only cover 2.x, so I'd be buying the program twice. Which I'd have no trouble with, as long as I used both. This news of V3 coming soonish is a bit of a surprise. A good one overall of course. I guess it goes to show how well R&D is progressing, which is amazing news for us all.

That is true, I forgot you bought it already. Alright, then, I'll add that module to 2.2 for you so you can use 2.2 and get the most out of what you paid for.
(07-11-2016, 12:35 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]That is true, I forgot you bought it already. Alright, then, I'll add that module to 2.2 for you so you can use 2.2 and get the most out of what you paid for.

I knew E2 first was best for me as you recommended, so I stuck with it. Regardless of how much I pined for AOSI.

However, I also promised I'd support you by buying AOSI, so I kept my word, knowing full well I wouldn't even be able to use it for awhile.

That really warms my heart, Shannon. Thank you for the extra gesture in return.

One entrepreneur, to another.
(07-11-2016, 12:44 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]
(07-11-2016, 12:35 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]That is true, I forgot you bought it already. Alright, then, I'll add that module to 2.2 for you so you can use 2.2 and get the most out of what you paid for.

I knew E2 first was best for me as you recommended, so I stuck with it. Regardless of how much I pined for AOSI.

However, I also promised I'd support you by buying AOSI, so I kept my word, knowing full well I wouldn't even be able to use it for awhile.

That really warms my heart, Shannon. Thank you for the extra gesture in return.

One entrepreneur, to another.

No problem. Smile It's going to take an extra day or so to implement, but we have the time.

I just really need to get the goal phrasing and energy sourcing right. There may end up being a 2.3 if this doesn't do what I want for the 2.x branch.

But the overcoming resistance programming is definitely also important and I'm not interested in disappointing.
That's great news for a lot of us who are inexperienced. Thank you Shannon.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691