(11-20-2016, 07:55 PM)Illumi Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah so i think i've gone past so much fear and self sabotage with DMSI the main focus now is become sexually irresistable, im always very very hungry and i could feel the aura projecting like mad. That or DMSI aura was slowly building up and growing stronger by now it have reached new heights.
My point is that V2.5 is now truly starting to shine, its at its prime.
I get the impression from various means that 2.5 is actually more powerful than we realize, and is the turning point. The 3.x branch is definitely going to end up blowing some people away.
(11-20-2016, 04:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]MIR v2.1 is available!
http://www.subliminal-shop.com/product/mir-v-2-1/
Are those of us that bought Maximum Immune Response 5G, which was great help by the way as my work sick days were getting out of hand, going to get a discount upgrade to Maximum Immune System Response 5.5G?
Thanks
(11-20-2016, 09:50 PM)Trend Wrote: [ -> ] (11-20-2016, 04:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]MIR v2.1 is available!
http://www.subliminal-shop.com/product/mir-v-2-1/
Are those of us that bought Maximum Immune Response 5G, which was great help by the way as my work sick days were getting out of hand, going to get a discount upgrade to Maximum Immune System Response 5.5G?
Thanks
There's no discount for upgrading single stage programs. Sorry.
No problem, thank you for doing such amazing work; I haven't gotten sick for the rest of the year after using MIR 5G; I am actually using my sick days in better, more productive/positive ways
(11-20-2016, 03:36 PM)freerad98 Wrote: [ -> ]Concerning MP3 vs FLAC:
There's probably not enough information yet to make this decision, but lets look at the advantages/disadvantages to each format:
FLAC:
Slightly more effective (somewhere Shannon mentioned, I believe, 5-10%)
but, 2-3 times larger files and not as widely supported.
MP3:
Smaller, widely supported, and hybrid format sounds like it is more than 5-10% more effective.
I vote for MP3.
Just my $0.02.
How about this: Create only FLAC files and leave instructions on how to properly encode them as mp3 (which bitrate to use etc) in case people want to. People can create the slightly less powerful mp3 from the FLACs, but not the other way around.
(11-20-2016, 11:17 PM)hsindermann Wrote: [ -> ] (11-20-2016, 03:36 PM)freerad98 Wrote: [ -> ]Concerning MP3 vs FLAC:
There's probably not enough information yet to make this decision, but lets look at the advantages/disadvantages to each format:
FLAC:
Slightly more effective (somewhere Shannon mentioned, I believe, 5-10%)
but, 2-3 times larger files and not as widely supported.
MP3:
Smaller, widely supported, and hybrid format sounds like it is more than 5-10% more effective.
I vote for MP3.
Just my $0.02.
How about this: Create only FLAC files and leave instructions on how to properly encode them as mp3 (which bitrate to use etc) in case people want to. People can create the slightly less powerful mp3 from the FLACs, but not the other way around.
There is a reason Shannon includes the hashes for the files, if it was just a music track then DIY encoding wouldn't be a big deal but if your shooting thousands of words with an intricate script to your subconscious it's best to control as many variables as possible.
(11-20-2016, 10:08 PM)Trend Wrote: [ -> ]No problem, thank you for doing such amazing work; I haven't gotten sick for the rest of the year after using MIR 5G; I am actually using my sick days in better, more productive/positive ways
I'm glad you found V1 useful. I certainly did. V2 whoops all over V1, though, and V2.1 whoops all over V2! I have been wanting to upgrade V1 for a long time for my own benefit. The new technology in it makes it, as of this moment, the single most advanced 5.5G sub (possibly alongside DMSI). I know I will be upgrading MIR again in the future, but not because it's not kicking butt on colds and flu. And it likely won't be any time soon, either.
(11-20-2016, 11:17 PM)hsindermann Wrote: [ -> ] (11-20-2016, 03:36 PM)freerad98 Wrote: [ -> ]Concerning MP3 vs FLAC:
There's probably not enough information yet to make this decision, but lets look at the advantages/disadvantages to each format:
FLAC:
Slightly more effective (somewhere Shannon mentioned, I believe, 5-10%)
but, 2-3 times larger files and not as widely supported.
MP3:
Smaller, widely supported, and hybrid format sounds like it is more than 5-10% more effective.
I vote for MP3.
Just my $0.02.
How about this: Create only FLAC files and leave instructions on how to properly encode them as mp3 (which bitrate to use etc) in case people want to. People can create the slightly less powerful mp3 from the FLACs, but not the other way around.
Putting a task that delicate and important into the hands of people who are not uniformly paying attention, using the same software, understand how delicate an operation that encoding is, etc. will result in many of them accidentally or otherwise unintentionally stripping out the subliminal audio, and leave me no way to know if they did or not. Which would make a mockery of my work and kill confidence in my subs... and my bottom line. That is, therefore, not an option.
(11-20-2016, 11:50 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (11-20-2016, 10:08 PM)Trend Wrote: [ -> ]No problem, thank you for doing such amazing work; I haven't gotten sick for the rest of the year after using MIR 5G; I am actually using my sick days in better, more productive/positive ways
I'm glad you found V1 useful. I certainly did. V2 whoops all over V1, though, and V2.1 whoops all over V2! I have been wanting to upgrade V1 for a long time for my own benefit. The new technology in it makes it, as of this moment, the single most advanced 5.5G sub (possibly alongside DMSI). I know I will be upgrading MIR again in the future, but not because it's not kicking butt on colds and flu. And it likely won't be any time soon, either.
I'm slightly under the weather lately and would use MIR if it weren't for the DMSI!
I would say MIR is significantly more important than DMSI!
(11-21-2016, 12:02 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I would say MIR is significantly more important than DMSI!
Hahah but a lot of us are on our DMSI journeys right now!
Another suggestion: what about offering the three MP3 tracks as standard and offering FLAC and hybrid as paid extra. Like $3 extra for FLAC and $3 extra for hybrid. Or offering all tracks as MP3 and all FLAC tracks for $5 extra. These are only examples. But you could handle tha costs for extra bandwidth and storage.
(11-21-2016, 12:24 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ]Another suggestion: what about offering the three MP3 tracks as standard and offering FLAC and hybrid as paid extra. Like $3 extra for FLAC and $3 extra for hybrid. Or offering all tracks as MP3 and all FLAC tracks for $5 extra. These are only examples. But you could handle tha costs for extra bandwidth and storage.
I will take this idea into consideration. So far though, as much as I don't like it, the solution I like best is... no change to how this is being done.
(11-21-2016, 01:42 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: [ -> ]Or set the price (114.95 dollars) for the limited time like EHPRA2. And then add slightly higher the price so features that brought by MIR2 can be considered worth it, not underpriced or "stupid" as you said. as Mr.Anderson said. Example: 114.95 dollars for7 days and then 154.95 dollar at the end of the time. Keep that all 5 mp3 and 5 flacs.
I have been quoted stating that aside from DMSI, all 5.5G programs would be and remain $114.95. I am bound to keep that promise. However, just so you know, I wasn't being literal when I said it was a stupid low price. It's a figure of speech used to emphasize how low the price is for the value imparted.