(07-11-2016, 02:33 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-11-2016, 02:32 PM)swisston Wrote: [ -> ] (07-11-2016, 02:13 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]That is taken care of by the Optimus Engine, which basically says, "Hey, subconscious mind! Everything you know will make me sexier? Let's do that."
Does that require an initial understanding of what makes us sexy though? If I've never felt sexy or desirable before, does my subconscious actually know what to do? Can I educate myself somehow?
It already knows or has access to everything you need to know. Believe it.
hi Shannon,
i tried to search for SM 3.0 in the thread but the system found it too short!! of a term to search for.
i wanted to learn how this new DMSI relates to SM 3.0. i am in the fifth stage of AM 6 and starting the last stage 5 days later (the change is unbelievable, btw.).
i was thinking of purchasing the SM 3.0 set for afterwards, however this new program caught my attention, mostkly because of the new methods you are using in it. i was prepared to purchase the sm 3.0 so, without regards to the price, what should be the next step? is it possible to use DMSI 2.2 along with SM 3.0, maybe one or two loops a day (which the answer will probably be no, but i did not come across with a discussion of this in the 30+ pages i browsed)?
i hope i have not asked a question that was asked before, but did not find anything related in the last 30 or so pages i went back.
(07-11-2016, 02:44 PM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ] (07-11-2016, 02:15 PM)Kurohawk Wrote: [ -> ]Since we are all opening up let me share my first sexual experiance. It was at one of the first parties i've ever went on because i was very shy and did not know how to deal with people but inspite of that i was very alpha in my core i just could not bring it out, after getting drunk i was the center of the party my confidence and humor are unparrareld when im drunk. So one Polish girl got very interisted in me and kept following me around. I was so drunk i just grabbed her and started to make out, then immediatly i took her by the hand to the shower room and we did it there, i was so drunk i kept """" her but could not orgasm. honestly speaking all i remember are 2D memories and its so long ago.
So yeah alcohol did help me lose my v card, then i stopped taking women as seriously as i did before.
Yeah and all my life i thought i had a small d but the next day apperantly she told everyone all the girls at the party what happend and that i have a huge d. So yeah that was it i guess.
Edit: forgot to mention the next day she wanted to do it again but i was so scared i pretended that she is not hot enough for me , she was tho actually
lmao how old were you? and how old are you now?
I was 19 back then , im 21 now!
(07-11-2016, 03:05 PM)Hercules Wrote: [ -> ] (07-11-2016, 02:16 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-11-2016, 02:14 PM)Hercules Wrote: [ -> ]Going back to Soul mates I'll elaborate on what Shannon means by twin flames. Twin Flames are 2 halves of soul where one is the masculine polarity and the other is the feminine. It is the exact opposite of you and you won't meet your twin flame without significant spiritual growth.
Hercules, you have to remember that that is one point of view on the matter. Other points of view state that there is no "masculine and feminine" for the soul, because the soul is not a body and does not require gender for reproductive purposes.
According to that point of view, "twin flames" are, depending on who you ask, two fragments of the same original soul, or two souls who were "created to be together".
But we don't have any real way of knowing what or how much of this is accurate.
The Universal law of Gender cannot be broken so anothing in creation must have a Masculine and Feminine polarity.
I would have to disagree, my friend. There are exceptions.
(07-11-2016, 03:05 PM)alphabeta35 Wrote: [ -> ] (07-11-2016, 02:33 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-11-2016, 02:32 PM)swisston Wrote: [ -> ] (07-11-2016, 02:13 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]That is taken care of by the Optimus Engine, which basically says, "Hey, subconscious mind! Everything you know will make me sexier? Let's do that."
Does that require an initial understanding of what makes us sexy though? If I've never felt sexy or desirable before, does my subconscious actually know what to do? Can I educate myself somehow?
It already knows or has access to everything you need to know. Believe it.
hi Shannon,
i tried to search for SM 3.0 in the thread but the system found it too short!! of a term to search for.
i wanted to learn how this new DMSI relates to SM 3.0. i am in the fifth stage of AM 6 and starting the last stage 5 days later (the change is unbelievable, btw.).
i was thinking of purchasing the SM 3.0 set for afterwards, however this new program caught my attention, mostkly because of the new methods you are using in it. i was prepared to purchase the sm 3.0 so, without regards to the price, what should be the next step? is it possible to use DMSI 2.2 along with SM 3.0, maybe one or two loops a day (which the answer will probably be no, but i did not come across with a discussion of this in the 30+ pages i browsed)?
i hope i have not asked a question that was asked before, but did not find anything related in the last 30 or so pages i went back.
You absolutely cannot use them together. They definitely and very strongly conflict, and they will severely damage each other's programming.
Remember that SM3 is designed specifically to extend the effects of AM6 into a primal, sexual alpha. DMSI is designed to take a person and get them laid.
They both have the goal of getting you laid, and they both use auras, but they have very different ways of getting you there.
SM3 will grow you and make you a better man. DMSI will heal you to the extent that you need healing to express and act out it's program. Otherwise, no growth.
One is trying to make a huge change in you as a being; one is only trying to get you to project sexualized energy and then act on any sexual results.
Which one you pick is up to you.
(07-11-2016, 01:49 PM)ALI6NMENT Wrote: [ -> ]Muscles is a big one for me, I only strength train because it makes me feel good, which makes me feel more attractive, which makes me feel more confident which attracts certain type of women.
If I decided one-day I don't want to do this no more then what the women found attractive about me in the first place won't be there, so what's the point doing it in the first place.
I want to be my pure basic self and be OK with being that, then no matter where I go or what I do, I always have my self as I am. I won't need a gym, I won't need to eat enough, I won't feel less confident or less attractive, because I am attractive, confident as I am, my pure basic self.
I want to cut out all the added things, that can easily be lost. If I am confident, attractive and OK as I am, I will never need anything outside of myself and to me that is my genuine self.
If you only do something because of external validation, then it's a good idea to get rid of it. But if you like the gym and the feeling after a session, why stop it? Yes, you're more attractive to women, but you don't do it exclusively for them.
And a women won't stay with you for a long time just because you have a good body, so don't worry about her leaving you when you stop training.
(07-11-2016, 03:18 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]You absolutely cannot use them together. They definitely and very strongly conflict, and they will severely damage each other's programming.
Remember that SM3 is designed specifically to extend the effects of AM6 into a primal, sexual alpha. DMSI is designed to take a person and get them laid.
They both have the goal of getting you laid, and they both use auras, but they have very different ways of getting you there.
SM3 will grow you and make you a better man. DMSI will heal you to the extent that you need healing to express and act out it's program. Otherwise, no growth.
One is trying to make a huge change in you as a being; one is only trying to get you to project sexualized energy and then act on any sexual results.
Which one you pick is up to you.
i got my answer, and i wanted to keep in the direction of the AM 6 program. so it is obviously SM 3.0 that i will be going for. having the mindset is more important to me than physicality at this point.
once i am finished with the SM 3.0, i might be asking for your advice for the best way to continue considering the new products that will be available at that time.
now that you have the new generation out, i am sure there will be some interesting tangents to take in the very near future
(07-11-2016, 03:46 PM)Hercules Wrote: [ -> ] (07-11-2016, 03:13 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-11-2016, 03:05 PM)Hercules Wrote: [ -> ] (07-11-2016, 02:16 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-11-2016, 02:14 PM)Hercules Wrote: [ -> ]Going back to Soul mates I'll elaborate on what Shannon means by twin flames. Twin Flames are 2 halves of soul where one is the masculine polarity and the other is the feminine. It is the exact opposite of you and you won't meet your twin flame without significant spiritual growth.
Hercules, you have to remember that that is one point of view on the matter. Other points of view state that there is no "masculine and feminine" for the soul, because the soul is not a body and does not require gender for reproductive purposes.
According to that point of view, "twin flames" are, depending on who you ask, two fragments of the same original soul, or two souls who were "created to be together".
But we don't have any real way of knowing what or how much of this is accurate.
The Universal law of Gender cannot be broken so anothing in creation must have a Masculine and Feminine polarity.
I would have to disagree, my friend. There are exceptions.
Any examples??
Sure. In one case, there is the perfect balance of the two. in the other case, there is the situation in which they negate each other and form something beyond gender that is both and neither at once.
(07-11-2016, 03:40 PM)alphabeta35 Wrote: [ -> ] (07-11-2016, 03:18 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]You absolutely cannot use them together. They definitely and very strongly conflict, and they will severely damage each other's programming.
Remember that SM3 is designed specifically to extend the effects of AM6 into a primal, sexual alpha. DMSI is designed to take a person and get them laid.
They both have the goal of getting you laid, and they both use auras, but they have very different ways of getting you there.
SM3 will grow you and make you a better man. DMSI will heal you to the extent that you need healing to express and act out it's program. Otherwise, no growth.
One is trying to make a huge change in you as a being; one is only trying to get you to project sexualized energy and then act on any sexual results.
Which one you pick is up to you.
i got my answer, and i wanted to keep in the direction of the AM 6 program. so it is obviously SM 3.0 that i will be going for. having the mindset is more important to me than physicality at this point.
once i am finished with the SM 3.0, i might be asking for your advice for the best way to continue considering the new products that will be available at that time.
now that you have the new generation out, i am sure there will be some interesting tangents to take in the very near future
Most definitely. We are boldly going where no one has gone before!
Alright, we are getting close to finished with the primary audio processing, at which time I will be taking a dinner break and then come back and calculate and implement the ASRB ratio, and then the audio will be ready for encoding. May or may not do encoding, verification, tagging, upload today. ATM, we have three more short steps for the audio processing.
@ Shannon: completely different topic: Did you read 'reality transsurfing' by Vadim Zeland? If yes, what do you think about it?
(07-11-2016, 04:17 PM)Vincent_Vega Wrote: [ -> ]@ Shannon: completely different topic: Did you read 'reality transsurfing' by Vadim Zeland? If yes, what do you think about it?
Have not read that one. Rather highly backlogged on reading lately, with all this new stuff going on.
Shannon,
Are you ever going to build a subliminal of aura/energy/vibe of love, joy & gratitude ? That would be a great sub
(07-11-2016, 04:39 PM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
Are you ever going to build a subliminal of aura/energy/vibe of love, joy & gratitude ? That would be a great sub
Probably. Make it an endo/exo, and blow the world away.