(07-13-2016, 03:40 AM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
Would you please discuss the differences between DMSI 2.1 and DMSI 2.2?
What are the similarities and differences?
"2.2 major goal changes were
1. to change the power source from non-physical only (2.1) to all "available optimal sources of physical and non-physical energy that are safe and appropriate" and
2. to change the goal phrasing. (Currently secret.)
Other changes include:
Major upgrade to PPVS module.
Major upgrade to APSX module.
Several minor tweaks to the script in general.
Added a feedback loop designed to trigger those of the approriate gender to develop the qualities that make them fit the goal phrasing, which is intended to significantly expand the number of responsive people."
ALSO
"From E2, I have added two modules.
1. Self forgiveness, and forgiveness of others, let go of the past and move on from it
This one is aimed at getting rid of any hate, anger, grudges, etc. you may have that is aimed at women in general, which would otherwise prevent you from achieving maximum possible success with the program.
2. Healing & Regenerating.
This one is aimed at healing and regenerating yourself mentally, emotionally and sexually in all of the ways you need to heal and regenerate in order to get maximum success from the program. Basically aiming at clearing out past traumas that might otherwise prevent success."
If I'm missing anything, Shannon can touch upon it here if he sees this.
@yeah!
I appreciate your post and I think that is an excellent question. I like how you're planning things out.
I also wanted to mention when I was looking at AM, I realized how similar it seemed to BASE.
What are your thoughts on BASE, yeah!
@yeah!
I used to have bad luck more often than I cared for. So I ran Luck Magnifier and I do believe it works well. I ran it for months and months.
I'm also looking forward to the DMSI v2.2 release.
I use subs in addition to active self-help things.
I plan to use BASE and Weight Loss in the future, too. Do you have a long term plan mapped out? If so and you're willing to share, please do so.
(07-13-2016, 12:45 PM)yeah! Wrote: [ -> ]I'm almost afraid to ask this, but,
Shannon, di you have a very loose eta on AM7? Even a rough educated guess of 1 to 3 years as an example.
I have some strange physical and time based boundaries that I have to plan around is all.
Regards.
Most likely 2nd half of 2017, possibly first half of 2018.
Just read the DMSI 2.2 additions on the description page! I already said it before, but the module in there focused on getting past traumas and resistance to the goal of the program is awesome! Improved energy flooding sounds great as well.
I'm really wondering about the new goal script, but I'm guessing it won't be revealed until after a sufficient amount of testing. If 2.2 actually ends up accomplishing the goal, I don't think anyone will have a problem waiting for V3
(07-13-2016, 02:11 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2016, 12:45 PM)yeah! Wrote: [ -> ]I'm almost afraid to ask this, but,
Shannon, di you have a very loose eta on AM7? Even a rough educated guess of 1 to 3 years as an example.
I have some strange physical and time based boundaries that I have to plan around is all.
Regards.
Most likely 2nd half of 2017, possibly first half of 2018.
That's actually pretty good considering all of the things you have on your plate.
Any 6G title will be worth the wait.
Can't wait!!
Sorry guys, it's annoying they links didn't update automaticaly, not fun going through so many orders and granting access. It should be okay now, it works in my account so should for others. If not pm or email.
The links worked for me Ben, thank you!
Well guys, looking forward to seeing what you think
3 loops per day for this version Shannon , or just in the first week?
3/day until I can determine if that is playing it too safe.
For Shannon...hate to sound like a broken record on this but...
[Shannon, do you think it'd be more effective to rotate AM6 and E2 (6 months)? Or do you think it would be more effective to run E2 for a long time like a year and then just run AM6 after that for awhile?
Do you think it's a good thing to let a program have a solid focus for a long time to go deeper or do you think it's good to just rotate every so often so things don't get too stale and also to not let things become unbalanced?
Edit: also this question could be posed for SM3 and AM6. Should you run AM6 for a long time and then work on SM3 for a long time? Or should you rotate them and work on them together?
[/quote]
Good question for the BASE users as well. If it is best to do 6 months BASE 1 month E 2, and do that over and over then I'd definitely be up for that.