(04-24-2016, 01:57 AM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]My ipod is fine now that I don't use itunes. Apple is ***** retarded with their shit, I used to be able to just drag and drop and it would copy it as is on there. Now they have a sync thing that deletes everything then replaces it or something dumb and you can't simply drag and drop. It makes zero sense how they have it set up.
Get copytrans controlcentre and install copytransmanager and all fixed. You can drag and drop without all their bs.
Thanks Ben for recommending that software, I just downloaded it and deleted all my subliminals. Re downloaded them and transferred them over to my iPod through the software you mentioned. So, now I am going to see if I might get better results with EPRHA 2.0.
What about the downloader app? Is it not as good for playing sub? I use EDownloader with earphones.
Quote:Thanks Ben for recommending that software, I just downloaded it and deleted all my subliminals. Re downloaded them and transferred them over to my iPod through the software you mentioned. So, now I am going to see if I might get better results with EPRHA 2.0.
All good man. I can't say if Itunes normally recodes these days as I used it years ago before they did all the sync crap.
Quote:What about the downloader app? Is it not as good for playing sub? I use EDownloader with earphones.
Is that for iphone/ipod? That's just what i'm talking about, having a program to drag and drop instead of syncing everything like it normally does.
(04-24-2016, 09:00 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon, why are some people saying the AOS+BIATBWS 5.5G combo would be more powerful than the SM3? SM3 should have more, no? What's your opinion? Since I've already purchased the SM3 in advance, and it's something I plan to run soon, I don't want to switch to a future AOS+BIATBWS when it comes out and it happens to be less effective. Thanks. 
Speculation is just that. It's not built yet, and therefore it is nothing more than speculation. Who said AOS+BIATBWS was coming out?
(04-25-2016, 01:02 PM)TheGreatAttractor Wrote: [ -> ] (04-23-2016, 03:07 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (04-23-2016, 08:09 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, just a few questions if you don't mind.
1. It would be really appreciated not just by me but by everyone if you would make a repair hearing loss/improve hearing subliminal in 6g and hopefully you make that one free for your customers. I know you have an experimental one already out now but i'm sure it would be much more powerful in 6g. Listening to the ultrasonics or even just using headphones for long hours there is bound to be some effects to our hearing, and to have a subliminal that can counteract these effects would be a positive thing.
Maybe if you could find a way to make this a subliminal you can listen to along with other 6g subliminals. You mentioned how you were hoping to make subliminals so powerful we only had to listen to them once a day for an hour. If there was a way we could listen to our other 6g subliminals and still be able to listen to this one for an hour. Maybe figure out a way to make a health related subliminal so that we can listen to it on the same day as non health related subliminals.
Best case scenario like a hearing tune up 6g we could listen a few times a week to heal our hearing or listen to it when we have any ear pain etc. Although the hope would be for something that would repair hearing loss and make our hearing as good as ever.
Listening to ultrasonics for hours on end doesn't cause or speed up hearing loss or damage any faster than listening to any other form of audio. It's not magically louder than or more damaging than any other audio. It does have to be used in the same sort of reasonable manner as any other audio, though. Other than listning too loudly, it's just the same with or without subs or headphones for your ears.
6G isn't finished being developed yet, so I don't fully know how it interacts with 5G/5.5G/6G yet. I also don't know how long per day will be "enough" or "too much". That is largely based on how much energy it takes to run the program.
The vision/hearing aids, however, are on my list.
Quote:2. In the base 2.1 description pdf you mention that the original base script is included which we can find at the script page. I was wondering in what stage or stages is the original base script in base 2.1?
It's found in all of them.
Quote:3. Will you be making attract your perfect wife/husband/perfect oriental/japanese romantic lover any time soon in 5g?
That depends on how things pan out in the future. Right now I am trying to build Maximum Healing Speed, trying to build General Pain Relief Prototype 12 for itself and to add to MHS, trying to develop 6G, trying to create a sub to help Andrew, trying to create an active manifestation sub prototype, and trying to create a "Manifest Your Perfect Vehicle" sub based on that. I'm literally working till I drop every day lately. Last I left the office, I was thinking about just sleeping here because I wasn't sure I could drive home. It's like that.
Since every time I make plans or a list, something comes along and detours me, I am really not all that big on lists anymore.
Shannon - just wondering if it is possible to extend the scope of the new MHS to include restoring vision and hearing to optimal levels, and removing scars on and inside the body?
As it stands, these issues fall into a kind of grey area and the subconscious might not interpret them as things which involve healing. Successfully adding these functions to MHS (by specifically mentioning them in the script) would definitely "kill many birds with one sub"
.
Now, there might be some concern that adding extra functionality to the sub will detract from the healing speed or focus. For example, in a person with bad eyesight who is also injured - the healing of the injury might take more time. However this can be solved by adding a "prioritization module" which directs the subconscious to focus, and stay focused, on rapid healing where it is needed most (I believe the subconscious knows best).
I hope you consider all this.
The plan is to make MHS affect all things that can be healed, whether or not healing has stopped. The prioritization is pretty much standard practice at this point.
Quote:HyperCompression Technology #1: This backport 6G technology allows the program to achieve word-per-minute rates that average about 650% of standard 5G, meaning each hour of listening is the equivalent of listening to about 6.5 hours of a standard 5G program.
Looking at this I am wondering if the 8-hour-minimum-rule really applies for EPRHA 2.0. I notice, that I am not that exhausted like with the 5G's, but even with 6 hours listening, it is like my brain is processing the sub for another 8 hours or so afterwards.
(04-27-2016, 09:39 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:HyperCompression Technology #1: This backport 6G technology allows the program to achieve word-per-minute rates that average about 650% of standard 5G, meaning each hour of listening is the equivalent of listening to about 6.5 hours of a standard 5G program.
Looking at this I am wondering if the 8-hour-minimum-rule really applies for EPRHA 2.0. I notice, that I am not that exhausted like with the 5G's, but even with 6 hours listening, it is like my brain is processing the sub for another 8 hours or so afterwards.
Exactly how much time is the minimum for this new technology format is not yet certain. I figured you guys would prefer that I release it when I did, instead of spending three to six months figuring it out. But the technologies in 6G are even further in this direction, which is why I said I don't know how much more than three hours a day it will require for 6G. I'm actually getting relatively good results (considering) with people I am testing with who get exposed for one hour a week.
So we shall see. I'm thinking 2-3 hours a day for 6G seems reasonable, and more is optional. But time will tell.
(04-27-2016, 11:54 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (04-27-2016, 09:39 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:HyperCompression Technology #1: This backport 6G technology allows the program to achieve word-per-minute rates that average about 650% of standard 5G, meaning each hour of listening is the equivalent of listening to about 6.5 hours of a standard 5G program.
Looking at this I am wondering if the 8-hour-minimum-rule really applies for EPRHA 2.0. I notice, that I am not that exhausted like with the 5G's, but even with 6 hours listening, it is like my brain is processing the sub for another 8 hours or so afterwards.
Exactly how much time is the minimum for this new technology format is not yet certain. I figured you guys would prefer that I release it when I did, instead of spending three to six months figuring it out. But the technologies in 6G are even further in this direction, which is why I said I don't know how much more than three hours a day it will require for 6G. I'm actually getting relatively good results (considering) with people I am testing with who get exposed for one hour a week.
So we shall see. I'm thinking 2-3 hours a day for 6G seems reasonable, and more is optional. But time will tell.
Yeah, I am glad you did realease it. At this time it feels like even 6 hours are far beyond 8 hours 5G. But my energy levels are pretty low right now in general, have to find my sweet spot.
(04-27-2016, 12:21 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ] (04-27-2016, 11:54 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (04-27-2016, 09:39 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:HyperCompression Technology #1: This backport 6G technology allows the program to achieve word-per-minute rates that average about 650% of standard 5G, meaning each hour of listening is the equivalent of listening to about 6.5 hours of a standard 5G program.
Looking at this I am wondering if the 8-hour-minimum-rule really applies for EPRHA 2.0. I notice, that I am not that exhausted like with the 5G's, but even with 6 hours listening, it is like my brain is processing the sub for another 8 hours or so afterwards.
Exactly how much time is the minimum for this new technology format is not yet certain. I figured you guys would prefer that I release it when I did, instead of spending three to six months figuring it out. But the technologies in 6G are even further in this direction, which is why I said I don't know how much more than three hours a day it will require for 6G. I'm actually getting relatively good results (considering) with people I am testing with who get exposed for one hour a week.
So we shall see. I'm thinking 2-3 hours a day for 6G seems reasonable, and more is optional. But time will tell.
Yeah, I am glad you did realease it. At this time it feels like even 6 hours are far beyond 8 hours 5G. But my energy levels are pretty low right now in general, have to find my sweet spot.
You've only met HCT1. Wait till you meet all three at once. lol
(04-27-2016, 01:34 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, do you think you will keep the 5G 6-stagers up after you release the 6G ones?
How do you think you will do the discounts on 6G six-stagers? 50% off or minus the price of the 5G six stagers perhaps?
Generally, we do not keep older technologies available for a particular title after a newer version of that same title has been released. However, given the increasing costs of these programs, I may. It will depend on a number of factors I have not yet calculated.
The discounts on the 6 stage 6G programs will follow the convention we have used for a long time: if you have purchased a copy of the previous version, you get 50% off. This seems just a fair and reasonable to me now as the day we initially started doing it. We want you to keep upgrading, and that is a great way to give you incentive.
This time, however, I think what I build in 6G is likely to be the end-of-line for those programs. As in, I should finally be able to stop developing the tech and rebuilding the same damned titles over and over again. Which should in turn give me more time and freedom to build new things in 5/6G. So you'll get to get off the upgrade mill just like I will.
But I'm not going to build everything in 6G. For some things, it's just overkill.
(04-24-2016, 08:51 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (04-24-2016, 07:35 AM)AlphaReal Wrote: [ -> ]Quick question - Is semen retention healthy and good over the long run versus ejaculation? I really want a definitive answer. Experts themselves are quite divided. Shannon, anyone else having a deep know how?
Your body is designed from the ground up to produce semen and orgone - the sexual energy that accompanies it - and to regularly express them. While it is possible to transmute your orgone, it is not so simple with semen. Over time, your body will become saturated with it and you will even begin to smell like it in your sweat. While this can take years without release, it still is a pretty good indicator to me, all told, that you are better off expressing it - at the very least, occasionally.
What about SM3 programming on this matter. I read that it prevent wet dream. Until now I didn't notice it (Almost finished stage 2). I'm looking forward to that because it seems like a waste when I have a wet dream. Until now I noticed the opposite effect, I have more wet dream than I used to have before.
I still had wet dreams in sm3
I'm using EHPRA 2.0 8 to 10 hours a day and today is the 28th day. And, Shannon, I have something to say.
First of all thank you for making EHPRA 2.0 for it ease my life in away it's easing the way I see myself. This is something I didn't get when using AM5 and AM6. I'm vulnerable, as in able to be who I am really is by minimizing the self-denying factor. I'm open to myself and people responded well. I couldn't believe how people open up their thoughts and feelings to me so easily. I just can't imagine how I will be when I'm finished with EHPRA 2.0. I could be a sage LOL.
But there is a drawback. I couldn't use EHPRA 2.0 without feeling tired and feeling the need to rest or at least lay down in my bed. I'm so relaxed or forced to be so relax in my everyday life. At some degree yes, I had enjoyable sleep, but most of the time, the time when I need to focus the most, I couldn't be optimal. So, would I decrease my exposure to 3 to 5 hours a day?
**My experience might help on making 5.5G instruction in the future.
PS: Get well soon Shannon!
Shannon i need your advice. I run am6 one time and i am more than happy with the result. I am running sm3 (stage 4)and having real sex in my life besides other more important goodies. I am not sure i can reach all the goals of sm3( i know the sub is a monster)
. Would a second and third run of sm3 help me better reach more goals and cement my results or would you suggest to alternate it with am6 again? I mean like i finish this run of sm3 and then back to am6 and then sms3 again!