Subliminal Talk

Full Version: Shannon's Journal Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691
2.4 with healing is awesome. Way to go shannon.
@ Shannon: Most people had the best results with v1.0 (strongest aura). Guys who didn't have results with v1.0 also don't have results with 2.1, 2.2, 2.3. (e.g. Swisston)

So why not a version with v1.0 scripting + healing modules? Wouldn't it be good to work with the 1.0 scripting again if that was the best in terms of results (even if it used food only)?
(09-01-2016, 02:48 PM)Vincent_Vega Wrote: [ -> ]@ Shannon: Most people had the best results with v1.0 (strongest aura). Guys who didn't have results with v1.0 also don't have results with 2.1, 2.2, 2.3. (e.g. Swisston)

So why not a version with v1.0 scripting + healing modules? Wouldn't it be good to work with the 1.0 scripting again if that was the best in terms of results (even if it used food only)?

For me also. V1 had the strongest reactions from the women. I got a little from V2.1, but non-existant from 2.2 and 2.3.
(08-31-2016, 09:31 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-31-2016, 09:20 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-31-2016, 08:27 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-31-2016, 07:53 PM)ffaux Wrote: [ -> ]How does the ego balancer work in AM6? I seem to crash every time I run AM6 after a bout of self/over-confidence. It's like I'm afraid of the repercussions of being confident.

It works by telling you to balance your ego with humility. Which, it would appear, you are interpreting differently than was intended. It was intended to be interpreted as being a constant effect, not a set of cycles between the two. I will make note of this for correction in the next version.

I've had this. I didn't know it was because of the sub, thought it was just my own issue to be honest.

It happens in sales a lot when I get on a roll I suddenly start to feel really bad for doing so well.

I also have it happen when things are going good for me and I suddenly decide to stop or keep myself from progress.

I thought it was fear like I said but what you explained Shannon is exactly what's been happening. Cycles.

Cycles of confidence, of (false) ego vs humility? Because they are very different things. Cycles of confidence happens as you ascend to a state of mastery, which is where your confidence stabilizes. The cycles of false ego (arrogance, etc.) vs humility is what happens when you are trying to balance the false ego and doing it binarily instead of steadily.

Theoretically, what might happen if you are afraid of being confident (or rather afraid of the consequences of being confident)? Is it possible that the ego balancer might kick in when it's inappropriate? Or could the fear alone be enough to undermine the confidence?

I realised through reflection that my self-confidence tanked right after peaking. It peaked when I decided one night last week that I wanted to spend time with my friends and didn't feel like having sex with the girl I've been seeing. It then tanked the next day when I suddenly became afraid that I was going to lose the girl over this decision.

I've noticed also that before this fear kicked in I was totally cool and indifferent to women because I didn't want anything from them (I was satisfied and didn't care about sex) but now after the fear has kicked in I'm looking for approval and have consequently gone back to my old pattern of wanting sex from women again.

Prior to tanking I also noticed myself being a little bit testy with my friends and saying things that are mean (thinking "why did I say that?" after saying it) and also being challenged by my friends.

What do you make of all of this Shannon?
Quote:Theoretically, what might happen if you are afraid of being confident (or rather afraid of the consequences of being confident)? Is it possible that the ego balancer might kick in when it's inappropriate? Or could the fear alone be enough to undermine the confidence?

Is it even possible to be afraid of being confident for reasons other than fear of the results or consequences of being confident? I don't think it is.

The ego balancer is there to prevent false ego. It's there to prevent you from becoming an arrogant, egotistical overblown self centered asshole - not because that is bad for someone else, but because it is bad for you, and makes you blind in ways that tend to destroy success. Has nothing to do with confidence other than to keep your confidence levels from going off into the stratosphere when you don't have real reason for them to be there, and you can't actually back that up with results if you need to.

Quote:I realised through reflection that my self-confidence tanked right after peaking. It peaked when I decided one night last week that I wanted to spend time with my friends and didn't feel like having sex with the girl I've been seeing. It then tanked the next day when I suddenly became afraid that I was going to lose the girl over this decision.

Growth creates cycles. The first cycle is becoming unhappy with stagnation. Then you seek growth. Then you deal with the fears that kept you stagnant in the first place. Then you grow some more, and back and forth until the fears have been outgrown and no longer exist. But again, this has nothing to do with the ego balancer. It's a natural part of growing.

Quote:I've noticed also that before this fear kicked in I was totally cool and indifferent to women because I didn't want anything from them (I was satisfied and didn't care about sex) but now after the fear has kicked in I'm looking for approval and have consequently gone back to my old pattern of wanting sex from women again.

Translation:

I've noticed also that before this fear kicked in [the part of me that was dominant at the time] was totally cool and indifferent to women because it didn't want anything from them (it was satisfied and didn't care about sex) but now the fearful part of me has become uncomfortable and has taken control, and it is looking for approval and has consequently gone back to my old pattern of wanting sex from women again.

Quote:Prior to tanking I also noticed myself being a little bit testy with my friends and saying things that are mean (thinking "why did I say that?" after saying it) and also being challenged by my friends.

What do you make of all of this Shannon?

It's called growth. It's not always fun or easy. But it's normal and natural.
(09-01-2016, 02:48 PM)Vincent_Vega Wrote: [ -> ]@ Shannon: Most people had the best results with v1.0 (strongest aura). Guys who didn't have results with v1.0 also don't have results with 2.1, 2.2, 2.3. (e.g. Swisston)

So why not a version with v1.0 scripting + healing modules? Wouldn't it be good to work with the 1.0 scripting again if that was the best in terms of results (even if it used food only)?

I had that idea too. But it won't work because it undoes a lot of the work on the skeleton script, and it also fails repeatedly in the models.
Hey Shannon! It's awesome that you're getting out DMSI 2.4 before you get super busy this month. I sure hope it performs the way you want it.

Regardless, I'm sure it'll be useful for you to get data from people that test it this month so that v3 can be even that much more awesome!

I will say that I am definitely curious what the new tech is that you're adding that made you think it will perform well. But, if you don't wanna tell us okay Tongue
(09-01-2016, 04:11 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon! It's awesome that you're getting out DMSI 2.4 before you get super busy this month. I sure hope it performs the way you want it.

Regardless, I'm sure it'll be useful for you to get data from people that test it this month so that v3 can be even that much more awesome!

I will say that I am definitely curious what the new tech is that you're adding that made you think it will perform well. But, if you don't wanna tell us okay Tongue

I have made a few changes to the script that should focus it in ways that produce better results. We shall see.
(09-01-2016, 04:11 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ]I will say that I am definitely curious what the new tech is that you're adding that made you think it will perform well. But, if you don't wanna tell us okay Tongue

Once the people testing v2.4 figure out the new technology or guess what the surprise is... I'm sure Shannon will confirm it and explain it in more detail.
(09-01-2016, 03:31 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-01-2016, 02:48 PM)Vincent_Vega Wrote: [ -> ]@ Shannon: Most people had the best results with v1.0 (strongest aura). Guys who didn't have results with v1.0 also don't have results with 2.1, 2.2, 2.3. (e.g. Swisston)

So why not a version with v1.0 scripting + healing modules? Wouldn't it be good to work with the 1.0 scripting again if that was the best in terms of results (even if it used food only)?

I had that idea too. But it won't work because it undoes a lot of the work on the skeleton script, and it also fails repeatedly in the models.

So using the 1.0 script is like going back in technology? Isn't it possible to somehow upgrade the old script or something like that?
Another thing: how can v1.0 fail in the models if it already worked in the past? Or do the models mean that it is not as good as another option?
(09-01-2016, 05:07 PM)Vincent_Vega Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-01-2016, 03:31 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-01-2016, 02:48 PM)Vincent_Vega Wrote: [ -> ]@ Shannon: Most people had the best results with v1.0 (strongest aura). Guys who didn't have results with v1.0 also don't have results with 2.1, 2.2, 2.3. (e.g. Swisston)

So why not a version with v1.0 scripting + healing modules? Wouldn't it be good to work with the 1.0 scripting again if that was the best in terms of results (even if it used food only)?

I had that idea too. But it won't work because it undoes a lot of the work on the skeleton script, and it also fails repeatedly in the models.

So using the 1.0 script is like going back in technology? Isn't it possible to somehow upgrade the old script or something like that?
Another thing: how can v1.0 fail in the models if it already worked in the past? Or do the models mean that it is not as good as another option?

Yes, it is using fewer technologies. As to upgrading the old script... what do you suppose I was doing when I made 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3...? The key isn't just upgrading, it's making all the variables point to the same goal in ways that are effective. We haven't finished figuring out how to do that yet.

I didn't say V1.0 fails in the models. I said using those particular pieces of scripting from 1.0 would not be as effective as using the same pieces from 2.3. The newer wordings are better in all cases.
Shannon,

I know you said you were going to build it now (v2.4), but I feel compelled to ask... did you put P4 in there?
Is there a glossary for all the tech Shannon is mentioning?
(09-01-2016, 07:09 PM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,

I know you said you were going to build it now (v2.4), but I feel compelled to ask... did you put P4 in there?

No, that sort of thing is going in 3.0.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691