Subliminal Talk

Full Version: Shannon's Journal Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691
(11-07-2016, 09:50 AM)mat422 Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon, I asked you this in my journal but I figure I might catch you here. It's been a while since I've run AM and I'm thinking it would do me some good. I only have 5.0 at the moment, haven't been able to buy 6 yet. Having said that I'm taking a break from E2. What's your opinion on 5.0? I can't remember where you stood on it because 5.0 was supposed to be the last one. Anyway it was either that or ASC. I'm leaning more towards ASC to see if maybe it can help me land a better job and then from there buy AM6. But I wanted to know your opinion. Especially since I've grown so accustomed to the 5G tech.

I would not recommend 5.0 if you can afford 6.0, but not because it benefits me in any particular way; rather, it's because the advancement of technology is such that one is many times better than the other. Regardless of whatever anyone stuck on the "no pain, no gain" bullshit may say or think.

If you have 5.0 and you can't afford 6.0, 5.0 is better than ASC. But I would go for 6.0 if you can.
(11-07-2016, 10:37 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I don't mind you guys having access to V1, if Ben is willing to link it up as an add on to the current 2.5. I would actually like to see how you think it compares to 2.4/2.5.

I may be game. Any testing protocol or anything you're looking for in particular?
(11-07-2016, 11:00 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-07-2016, 10:37 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I don't mind you guys having access to V1, if Ben is willing to link it up as an add on to the current 2.5. I would actually like to see how you think it compares to 2.4/2.5.

I may be game. Any testing protocol or anything you're looking for in particular?

I don't really remember if we were doing a specific number of loops of V1. If we were, do that.

If not... well, I don't know what to tell you for how many loops to use it for... maybe use it for the same number of loops as 2.5 gets?
(11-07-2016, 11:16 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-07-2016, 11:00 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-07-2016, 10:37 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I don't mind you guys having access to V1, if Ben is willing to link it up as an add on to the current 2.5. I would actually like to see how you think it compares to 2.4/2.5.

I may be game. Any testing protocol or anything you're looking for in particular?

I don't really remember if we were doing a specific number of loops of V1. If we were, do that.

If not... well, I don't know what to tell you for how many loops to use it for... maybe use it for the same number of loops as 2.5 gets?

I would also be game for testing out V1. If Ben can link it, I would happily keep a journal for it with some of my experiences on it.
Shannon,

"I'd like to cause it to trigger them not just sexually, but in all the ways that person needs to respond by initiating and having sex with the user. I think this is a big issue right now - it's lopsided. Too much sexual and not enough of whatever else is needed and desired."

I think this is right on.

It seems that even if she feels disinhibited, and turned on, etc. there needed to be something else. I thought of it as comfort or safety or "appropriateness" but I couldn't quite articulate it.

Perhaps if the aura could guide the receivers' and the user's unconscious to do what is needed to create the conditions to achieve the goals of the program. I'm sure you can word it better, and I'm guessing it would have to be dynamic to the person, situation, etc.
If I could test v1 again I would gladly do that. That was the version where I really felt like a chick magnet, girls were really showing interest, staring blatantly, trying to rip my shirt off. However I also remember sweating like a pig feeling hot all the time. I'm not saying it was better than v2.5, don't get me wrong. But I haven't felt the attention from girls like on v1.
(11-07-2016, 10:37 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-07-2016, 08:36 AM)K-Train Wrote: [ -> ]Number 3, for those of us who purchased DMSI can we request one of the older versions talking specifically about V1)?

I don't mind you guys having access to V1, if Ben is willing to link it up as an add on to the current 2.5. I would actually like to see how you think it compares to 2.4/2.5.

Yay! That's great news. I've been using v2.4 and v2.5 and would love to be able to try v1. From what I've read here, it was probably the most successful version as far as achieving the program goals is concerned - with side effects, of course.

@Ben: Would you please do the honours when you get a chance? Thank you.
Just found my old AOSI journal. Looks like the protocol was two loops run back to back. Thinking about loading her up. My kiddo will be with her mom this weekend and I'm looking to get the old chocolateydiggitydoo wet.
I'd like feedback on how V1 compares to V2.4/2.5.

Ben, please link V1 as an add on to the downloads for V2.5, so that people can download either or both if they like.
Don't tell me twice Big Grin, V1 for tonight. Big Grin Let's see how powerful it is.
Just loaded it up. Running my two loops, then heading to boxing. After that, I'll cruise around the grocery store for a bit. If I recall, last time I went to Wal-Mart on v1, I had these women follow me around like puppies.
Here is what you said Shannon on the loop on V1:

Quote:Shannon Wrote:
Try 4 first. Spend some time at that level. Let's see if that makes a difference. So far the pattern from the models seems to be showing a progression of 1-2-4-8 hours of exposure being significant.

(06-15-2016 01:31 AM)Shannon Wrote:
According to the models in a conglomerate view, the results seem to decrease more than anything else doing more than 8 loops per day. And it is loops, not hours, since each run through is 75 minutes.
@Alpha360:

Good catch. Just dawned on me, I was only running 2 loops because I was running it with AM6. That means I'll be able up the loops now.
(11-07-2016, 12:33 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I'd like feedback on how V1 compares to V2.4/2.5.

Ben, please link V1 as an add on to the downloads for V2.5, so that people can download either or both if they like.

Hi Shannon,

Since we're requesting Ben to make the old version of dmsi available, do you think it'll be possible to have/buy the single stage version of BASE please? (the one which was made available for a limited time)

I have purchased BASE v2.1 (5G), but would like to run the single stager after DMSI.

I believe some other forum members had requested for single stager BASE to be made available again here (during last couple of weeks):
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-p...#pid138425

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-p...#pid138480

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-p...#pid138651
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691