Subliminal Talk

Full Version: Shannon's Journal Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691
(11-10-2016, 04:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 04:54 PM)Illumi Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 12:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 10:46 AM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, is it possible for a girl to recognize you as an ascendant alpha? What happens when she does?

Yes.

She will almost always decide she wants to be part of your inner circle - whether that is as a friend, lover, relational partner, etc. Depends on how your personalities mesh, and what you allow her to do.

It is also possible that she becomes a dedicated opponent, but that's rare, and typically only happens with insecure control freaks who are afraid of you for not being someone they can control.
That happened with a girl in my class. She complained about me twice and people just assumed she was right. She is very very hot and is always surronded by 3 or more orbiters. Since i have my own life and friends she was challenged or something.
Thank god she layed off me now.

People automatically believe females. The hotter they are, the more emphasis is placed on it. When I was in HS, I tried to help a really ugly girl with her depression by befriending her. She decided she wanted me to take her virginity, and when I would not, she told everyone that I had tried and failed because I was a lousy lover. The truth was, I was a damned virgin. But nobody even bothered to ask if what she said was true. Even my own friends automatically believed her story. Which was completely false.

That's just cruel, even through you had good intentions and tried to help her. She fakes a story so that she would feel better about being rejected. Oh well i guess we will have to deal with this too once V3 is out Smile

You might want to add this on the DMSI sales page : warrning! With your new maximised sexuall irresistability you might reject someone and they would get butthurt #sarcasm
Kids are cruel. Ugly horny kids are very cruel, what can I say.

I guess she was trying to get me before I got her.
(11-10-2016, 04:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 04:54 PM)Illumi Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 12:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 10:46 AM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, is it possible for a girl to recognize you as an ascendant alpha? What happens when she does?

Yes.

She will almost always decide she wants to be part of your inner circle - whether that is as a friend, lover, relational partner, etc. Depends on how your personalities mesh, and what you allow her to do.

It is also possible that she becomes a dedicated opponent, but that's rare, and typically only happens with insecure control freaks who are afraid of you for not being someone they can control.
That happened with a girl in my class. She complained about me twice and people just assumed she was right. She is very very hot and is always surronded by 3 or more orbiters. Since i have my own life and friends she was challenged or something.
Thank god she layed off me now.

People automatically believe females. The hotter they are, the more emphasis is placed on it. When I was in HS, I tried to help a really ugly girl with her depression by befriending her. She decided she wanted me to take her virginity, and when I would not, she told everyone that I had tried and failed because I was a lousy lover. The truth was, I was a damned virgin. But nobody even bothered to ask if what she said was true. Even my own friends automatically believed her story. Which was completely false.

This is what has happened to me with the girl I just broke up with. Not the details of course but just people believing everything she says and no one even asking me what my version of the story is. What gives? She's turned one of my friendship circle against me. What can I do in this situation? I feel so powerless.
(11-10-2016, 03:25 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 11:13 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 06:19 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 12:42 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]7. I'm a bit confused by this recent use of the AOSI term in your posts when the program was renamed DMSI awhile ago. I was just surprised to see that name again and didn't understand what was going on, even the term "AOSI tuning" I'm not familiar with.

"A" stands for "aura," which is the energetic field responsible for communicating a lot of information to other people, so I assume he's tuning the aura programming. Still an aura non-believer?

You misunderstood me, maybe reading too far into my words too.

All I wanted to know is why he is using the AOSI term again. That confused me, and with talks of him making spin-off programs I wanted to understand this.

I'm not sure I did, but whatever you say, dude. Seems Shannon's response was inline with my own - the last part, well, that's something I added, as I remember you saying as much in the past. But whatevs!

You must be reading into it, because it was a simple question about a name, that's it.

I asked why this "AOSI tuning" term was used in Shannon's journal, I thought it was called DMSI now. I just wanted to see why and if it meant another branch off program like what he's posted about in another thread for DMRI and DMSRI. That was a new term to me "AOSI tuning". It had nothing to do with my views on "auras" from awhile back that you brought up. It was a simple question about the NAME.

I guess this is one of those times text comes across so different than normal or something. It was LITERALLY a simple question about a name.

That's it, that's all. It wasn't some dig, or a troll, or some nonsense. It was a simple obvious normal question about differing names that I wanted clarified, that was completely normal to ask.

I hope it's clear now. I meant NOTHING by it, I asked about the name, that's it, pal.
(11-10-2016, 04:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]People automatically believe females. The hotter they are, the more emphasis is placed on it. When I was in HS, I tried to help a really ugly girl with her depression by befriending her. She decided she wanted me to take her virginity, and when I would not, she told everyone that I had tried and failed because I was a lousy lover. The truth was, I was a damned virgin. But nobody even bothered to ask if what she said was true. Even my own friends automatically believed her story. Which was completely false.

Hoo boy...my past is very similar as you know. I took more damage from my spurned girl. But I agree with females being default believed on everything, that's for sure. Even if you're exonerated, many will just think you "got off" somehow. Very scary at times, in this misandric western culture you can be character assassinated by women or worse very quick, even if you are completely innocent.
(11-10-2016, 06:13 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 03:25 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 11:13 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 06:19 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 12:42 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]7. I'm a bit confused by this recent use of the AOSI term in your posts when the program was renamed DMSI awhile ago. I was just surprised to see that name again and didn't understand what was going on, even the term "AOSI tuning" I'm not familiar with.

"A" stands for "aura," which is the energetic field responsible for communicating a lot of information to other people, so I assume he's tuning the aura programming. Still an aura non-believer?

You misunderstood me, maybe reading too far into my words too.

All I wanted to know is why he is using the AOSI term again. That confused me, and with talks of him making spin-off programs I wanted to understand this.

I'm not sure I did, but whatever you say, dude. Seems Shannon's response was inline with my own - the last part, well, that's something I added, as I remember you saying as much in the past. But whatevs!

I don't understand your hostility to me on something so small and irrelevant. You must be reading into it, because it was a simple question about a name, that's it. Period.

A simple question about a name. That's all it was.

I asked why this "AOSI tuning" term was used in Shannon's journal, I thought it was called DMSI now. I just wanted to see why and if it meant another branch off program like what he's posted about in another thread for DMRI and DMSRI...talk about making a mountain out of a mole hill. That was a new term to me "AOSI tuning". It had nothing to do with my views on "auras" from awhile back that you brought up. It was a simple question about the NAME, not some debate.

No reason for snark thrown at me twice today for zero reason.

I guess this is one of those times text comes across so different than normal or something. It was LITERALLY a simple question about a name.

A simple question about a name.

That's it, that's all. It wasn't some dig, or a troll, or some nonsense. It was a simple obvious normal question about differing names that I wanted clarified, that was completely normal to ask.

I hope it's clear now.

There was no hostility, and then you "called me out," for whatever reason - like it was my misunderstanding, rather your apparent inability to make yourself clear the first time. Then you go and tell me I'm reading into things, twice.

So it was a simple question, and I provided a simple answer. In my opinion, there was no snarkiness or hostility - perhaps you were "reading into it."

I've had a bad day, and maybe you're getting an unfair shake by me, but your original reply pissed me off, plain and simple.

Are we clear? Clear as mud.

PS - If you have another bone to pick with me, PM me.
(11-10-2016, 05:20 PM)ffaux Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 04:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 04:54 PM)Illumi Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 12:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 10:46 AM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, is it possible for a girl to recognize you as an ascendant alpha? What happens when she does?

Yes.

She will almost always decide she wants to be part of your inner circle - whether that is as a friend, lover, relational partner, etc. Depends on how your personalities mesh, and what you allow her to do.

It is also possible that she becomes a dedicated opponent, but that's rare, and typically only happens with insecure control freaks who are afraid of you for not being someone they can control.
That happened with a girl in my class. She complained about me twice and people just assumed she was right. She is very very hot and is always surronded by 3 or more orbiters. Since i have my own life and friends she was challenged or something.
Thank god she layed off me now.

People automatically believe females. The hotter they are, the more emphasis is placed on it. When I was in HS, I tried to help a really ugly girl with her depression by befriending her. She decided she wanted me to take her virginity, and when I would not, she told everyone that I had tried and failed because I was a lousy lover. The truth was, I was a damned virgin. But nobody even bothered to ask if what she said was true. Even my own friends automatically believed her story. Which was completely false.

This is what has happened to me with the girl I just broke up with. Not the details of course but just people believing everything she says and no one even asking me what my version of the story is. What gives? She's turned one of my friendship circle against me. What can I do in this situation? I feel so powerless.

Make people think instead of just go on their irrational desire to believe by default.

Ask them questions like... why do you believe her without ever having even asked for my side of the story? Does she have any incentive to lie? What would mine be?

Whatever questions force them to THINK and get it. And be demanding! Be loud! Get upset! And then explain that you are upset because you are being lied about, and nobody is even questioning her lies because she's female, and nobody is thinking at all. Ask them... how would you feel in my shoes?

The key is to get them to use more than one and a half brain cells. If they have that many. Get them to understand your point of view.
(11-10-2016, 06:36 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 06:13 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 03:25 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 11:13 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 06:19 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]"A" stands for "aura," which is the energetic field responsible for communicating a lot of information to other people, so I assume he's tuning the aura programming. Still an aura non-believer?

You misunderstood me, maybe reading too far into my words too.

All I wanted to know is why he is using the AOSI term again. That confused me, and with talks of him making spin-off programs I wanted to understand this.

I'm not sure I did, but whatever you say, dude. Seems Shannon's response was inline with my own - the last part, well, that's something I added, as I remember you saying as much in the past. But whatevs!

I don't understand your hostility to me on something so small and irrelevant. You must be reading into it, because it was a simple question about a name, that's it. Period.

A simple question about a name. That's all it was.

I asked why this "AOSI tuning" term was used in Shannon's journal, I thought it was called DMSI now. I just wanted to see why and if it meant another branch off program like what he's posted about in another thread for DMRI and DMSRI...talk about making a mountain out of a mole hill. That was a new term to me "AOSI tuning". It had nothing to do with my views on "auras" from awhile back that you brought up. It was a simple question about the NAME, not some debate.

No reason for snark thrown at me twice today for zero reason.

I guess this is one of those times text comes across so different than normal or something. It was LITERALLY a simple question about a name.

A simple question about a name.

That's it, that's all. It wasn't some dig, or a troll, or some nonsense. It was a simple obvious normal question about differing names that I wanted clarified, that was completely normal to ask.

I hope it's clear now.

There was no hostility, and then you "called me out," for whatever reason - like it was my misunderstanding, rather your apparent inability to make yourself clear the first time. Then you go and tell me I'm reading into things, twice.

So it was a simple question, and I provided a simple answer. In my opinion, there was no snarkiness or hostility - perhaps you were "reading into it."

I've had a bad day, and maybe you're getting an unfair shake by me, but your original reply pissed me off, plain and simple.

Are we clear? Clear as mud.

PS - If you have another bone to pick with me, PM me.

Gentlemen, how about we just take the high road and put this down as a miscommunication and drop it.
(11-10-2016, 06:36 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 06:13 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 03:25 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 11:13 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 06:19 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]"A" stands for "aura," which is the energetic field responsible for communicating a lot of information to other people, so I assume he's tuning the aura programming. Still an aura non-believer?

You misunderstood me, maybe reading too far into my words too.

All I wanted to know is why he is using the AOSI term again. That confused me, and with talks of him making spin-off programs I wanted to understand this.

I'm not sure I did, but whatever you say, dude. Seems Shannon's response was inline with my own - the last part, well, that's something I added, as I remember you saying as much in the past. But whatevs!

I don't understand your hostility to me on something so small and irrelevant. You must be reading into it, because it was a simple question about a name, that's it. Period.

A simple question about a name. That's all it was.

I asked why this "AOSI tuning" term was used in Shannon's journal, I thought it was called DMSI now. I just wanted to see why and if it meant another branch off program like what he's posted about in another thread for DMRI and DMSRI...talk about making a mountain out of a mole hill. That was a new term to me "AOSI tuning". It had nothing to do with my views on "auras" from awhile back that you brought up. It was a simple question about the NAME, not some debate.

No reason for snark thrown at me twice today for zero reason.

I guess this is one of those times text comes across so different than normal or something. It was LITERALLY a simple question about a name.

A simple question about a name.

That's it, that's all. It wasn't some dig, or a troll, or some nonsense. It was a simple obvious normal question about differing names that I wanted clarified, that was completely normal to ask.

I hope it's clear now.

There was no hostility, and then you "called me out," for whatever reason - like it was my misunderstanding, rather your apparent inability to make yourself clear the first time. Then you go and tell me I'm reading into things, twice.

So it was a simple question, and I provided a simple answer. In my opinion, there was no snarkiness or hostility - perhaps you were "reading into it."

I've had a bad day, and maybe you're getting an unfair shake by me, but your original reply pissed me off, plain and simple.

Are we clear? Clear as mud.

It's obvious you are having a bad day. I can tell that, I knew that with your first post to me. I'm sorry to hear that.

It was a simple question about a name, that's it.

I have no idea why my reply to you would piss you off. Your reply to me first, was unnecessary and antagonistic, I asked Shannon a question, about a name and if that meant a new spin off program like DMRI and DMSRI. I could tell then you were in a bad mood, but I didn't "call you out" at all. I simply gave more information about my completely normal question about a name, and was a bit surprised why you attacked me for nothing, twice. But instantly figuring out you either have resistance or a bad day going, which are the two most likely culprits here for reactions WAY out of proportion at times for all of us.

I asked why he used AOSI instead of DMSI...that's it. That's why I got snark thrown at me twice. Looking at that, I know you are having a bad day or resistance as you never do that, as the reaction to a simple naming question to Shannon set you off this way for some reason.

I meant nothing by it...I asked why he used AOSI instead of DMSI.

So yeah, I am getting a completely unfair shake. But you saying you're having a bad day makes me understand why. I understand. Sorry you're having a bad day. It's all good, bro.
(11-10-2016, 12:41 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 12:31 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 12:11 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 10:10 AM)hsindermann Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:What if just by running a subliminal, you could cause the people you find sexually attractive to be unable to stop having pornographic sexual fantasies about you?

I'd much prefer if it wasn't only fantasizing! Wink

The fantasizing is used as a way to get the affected to keep thinking about you, build interest and focus that interest in a sexual direction. It is not all that is being done or used to achieve action, to be sure, but a piece of the puzzle.

Yes Shannon, yes! This is exactly what I'm talking about! All the girls fantasizing about me and discussing my awesomeness with each other! Of course, doing their best to have sex w/me and be around me as well Wink

That is an interesting thing I had not thought about... influencing a group of women who are all friends... wonder what will happen, since its currently designed to get them to all cooperate, or at least disregard that you're the target of all of their interest all at once...

@maxx55

Once again, another awesome idea from you! I'm almost jealous I didn't think of this first.
(11-10-2016, 07:00 PM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 12:41 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 12:31 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 12:11 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 10:10 AM)hsindermann Wrote: [ -> ]I'd much prefer if it wasn't only fantasizing! Wink

The fantasizing is used as a way to get the affected to keep thinking about you, build interest and focus that interest in a sexual direction. It is not all that is being done or used to achieve action, to be sure, but a piece of the puzzle.

Yes Shannon, yes! This is exactly what I'm talking about! All the girls fantasizing about me and discussing my awesomeness with each other! Of course, doing their best to have sex w/me and be around me as well Wink

That is an interesting thing I had not thought about... influencing a group of women who are all friends... wonder what will happen, since its currently designed to get them to all cooperate, or at least disregard that you're the target of all of their interest all at once...

@maxx55

Once again, another awesome idea from you! I'm almost jealous I didn't think of this first.

I didn't even think I was giving an idea. That's just literally what I interpreted from what Shannon said! But glad I could help.
(11-10-2016, 07:00 PM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 12:41 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 12:31 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 12:11 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 10:10 AM)hsindermann Wrote: [ -> ]I'd much prefer if it wasn't only fantasizing! Wink

The fantasizing is used as a way to get the affected to keep thinking about you, build interest and focus that interest in a sexual direction. It is not all that is being done or used to achieve action, to be sure, but a piece of the puzzle.

Yes Shannon, yes! This is exactly what I'm talking about! All the girls fantasizing about me and discussing my awesomeness with each other! Of course, doing their best to have sex w/me and be around me as well Wink

That is an interesting thing I had not thought about... influencing a group of women who are all friends... wonder what will happen, since its currently designed to get them to all cooperate, or at least disregard that you're the target of all of their interest all at once...

@maxx55

Once again, another awesome idea from you! I'm almost jealous I didn't think of this first.
How about making them compete on which one gets you first or just take turns Big Grin
As long as they do NOT shove the ugliest one on you or decide just one of them will get you. Sharing is caring.
(11-10-2016, 07:46 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 07:41 AM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 07:05 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]It is aimed at being similar in effect to Allo-THDOC and others, in effect a subliminal result like that of the "reset" pheromone(s). It's aimed at triggering the affected brain to decide that their previous classification of you is in error, and change it to "must **** - NOW."

#3 aims to cause them to perceive you as being their ideal sexual choice and higher value than they are in terms of status.
#4 aims to add to #3 by getting them to perceive you as being everything they want and need sexually, and in a sexual partner.
And #5, which I have not started working on, will be aimed at causing a "celebrity" level status enhancement, and causing them to see it as being "no big deal" to approach because there is already a familiarity and level of comfort present that would result from having already had amazing sex with the user, and being comfortable with approaching and initiating, regardless of the stunning nature of their status and good looks. This one is going to be very hard to pull off because it is sort of a self contradiction, but I will try.

1) So we have the TAC effect and now the Allo-THDOC effect. Can you put in the 3ß-Androstanediol effect(s) too? (I think that was the secret ingredient in the raved about and legendary A314 versions.)

One step at a time, my friend. I'm working on it.

Quote:2) I think you also mentioned that there was a classification of "must **** - NOW and FOREVER". Is that still in there?

In the wording that won the modeling runs. Maybe not exactly like that...

Quote:3) In terms of the aims being contradictory, it seems to me women (and even many people) live in an inner world of contradictions so I would expect you could pull this off.

We are certainly going to try.

Quote:4) Seems all these aims are consistent with a woman being sexually motivated. Higher value than themselves in status. Everything they want and need sexually and as a sexual partner. Familiarity. Comfort. And the celebrity status (which I'm guessing includes feelings of awe and admiration). I know logically this may appear as contradictions, but I think sex has a logic of it's own, and I think this all fits well together.

I may have to adjust some of that to be polymorphic in the future to keep it truly gender unspecified in user base, but we will take it as it comes.

Quote:Besides I don't think a woman is going to say "Hey! Wait a minute! Why do I think of this guy like my favorite celebrity yet it just feels so natural and normal?" Even if she does wonder, I think she'll be "too busy wanting to hold on to and enjoy the feelings and reinforcing those feelings to effectively maintain them". But then again, perhaps that should be added too just to be safe.

The reactions I am triggering are below the threshhold of consciousness at first, and they are not coming through the neo-cortex. The parts of the rain processing these are not capable of logic. That's why you say "sex has a logic of it's own". What you're saying is that women (and men probably are too) are in large part irrational when it comes to sex.

I haven't heard anyone suggest this(forgive me if I've missed it), but is it possible to put some sort of 'don't attract women who might become obsessed and try to kill us if we no longer want them' coding? All this stuff is awesome, but usually repeated sex leads to some sort of psychological/emotional/spiritual attachment,possibly even relationships, and women would probably see you as the 'best thing ever' if this thing is working at max potential.

Any way to weed out the crazy ones so they aren't going insane if we gotta part ways?
(11-10-2016, 07:44 PM)Zeroxmachina Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 07:46 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 07:41 AM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-10-2016, 07:05 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]It is aimed at being similar in effect to Allo-THDOC and others, in effect a subliminal result like that of the "reset" pheromone(s). It's aimed at triggering the affected brain to decide that their previous classification of you is in error, and change it to "must **** - NOW."

#3 aims to cause them to perceive you as being their ideal sexual choice and higher value than they are in terms of status.
#4 aims to add to #3 by getting them to perceive you as being everything they want and need sexually, and in a sexual partner.
And #5, which I have not started working on, will be aimed at causing a "celebrity" level status enhancement, and causing them to see it as being "no big deal" to approach because there is already a familiarity and level of comfort present that would result from having already had amazing sex with the user, and being comfortable with approaching and initiating, regardless of the stunning nature of their status and good looks. This one is going to be very hard to pull off because it is sort of a self contradiction, but I will try.

1) So we have the TAC effect and now the Allo-THDOC effect. Can you put in the 3ß-Androstanediol effect(s) too? (I think that was the secret ingredient in the raved about and legendary A314 versions.)

One step at a time, my friend. I'm working on it.

Quote:2) I think you also mentioned that there was a classification of "must **** - NOW and FOREVER". Is that still in there?

In the wording that won the modeling runs. Maybe not exactly like that...

Quote:3) In terms of the aims being contradictory, it seems to me women (and even many people) live in an inner world of contradictions so I would expect you could pull this off.

We are certainly going to try.

Quote:4) Seems all these aims are consistent with a woman being sexually motivated. Higher value than themselves in status. Everything they want and need sexually and as a sexual partner. Familiarity. Comfort. And the celebrity status (which I'm guessing includes feelings of awe and admiration). I know logically this may appear as contradictions, but I think sex has a logic of it's own, and I think this all fits well together.

I may have to adjust some of that to be polymorphic in the future to keep it truly gender unspecified in user base, but we will take it as it comes.

Quote:Besides I don't think a woman is going to say "Hey! Wait a minute! Why do I think of this guy like my favorite celebrity yet it just feels so natural and normal?" Even if she does wonder, I think she'll be "too busy wanting to hold on to and enjoy the feelings and reinforcing those feelings to effectively maintain them". But then again, perhaps that should be added too just to be safe.

The reactions I am triggering are below the threshhold of consciousness at first, and they are not coming through the neo-cortex. The parts of the rain processing these are not capable of logic. That's why you say "sex has a logic of it's own". What you're saying is that women (and men probably are too) are in large part irrational when it comes to sex.

I haven't heard anyone suggest this(forgive me if I've missed it), but is it possible to put some sort of 'don't attract women who might become obsessed and try to kill us if we no longer want them' coding? All this stuff is awesome, but usually repeated sex leads to some sort of psychological/emotional/spiritual attachment,possibly even relationships, and women would probably see you as the 'best thing ever' if this thing is working at max potential.

Any way to weed out the crazy ones so they aren't going insane if we gotta part ways?

Maybe have something in the programming that makes any ":ending of things" by the user viewed as "temporary" by the girl where she believes eventually you'll get back together but is willing to wait for the user's interest, while gently testing things here and there (like a single text every few months or something).
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691