(11-23-2016, 12:43 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-23-2016, 12:24 PM)pakr93 Wrote: [ -> ]So ... it seems that Shannon is confident in DMSI 3.0.1-X enough that he is doubling the price for newcomers.
That kinda makes me feel confident in the sub as well 
Let's see if it will accomplish its goals!
He's not really doubling the price. It's still $115 per version of the program. He's just choosing to sell them as a bundle instead of separate.
But still, it is a bit of a bold move!
Since it is a bundle, I'd like to know if you can switch between the two with out a rest period?
(11-23-2016, 01:07 PM)Dutchman610 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-23-2016, 12:43 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-23-2016, 12:24 PM)pakr93 Wrote: [ -> ]So ... it seems that Shannon is confident in DMSI 3.0.1-X enough that he is doubling the price for newcomers.
That kinda makes me feel confident in the sub as well Let's see if it will accomplish its goals!
He's not really doubling the price. It's still $115 per version of the program. He's just choosing to sell them as a bundle instead of separate.
But still, it is a bit of a bold move!
Since it is a bundle, I'd like to know if you can switch between the two with out a rest period?
Wasn't 2.3 the same as 2.2 but without healing? If it was fine to switch back then I'd guess it'd be fine for 3.0.1.
(11-23-2016, 01:44 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-23-2016, 01:07 PM)Dutchman610 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-23-2016, 12:43 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-23-2016, 12:24 PM)pakr93 Wrote: [ -> ]So ... it seems that Shannon is confident in DMSI 3.0.1-X enough that he is doubling the price for newcomers.
That kinda makes me feel confident in the sub as well Let's see if it will accomplish its goals!
He's not really doubling the price. It's still $115 per version of the program. He's just choosing to sell them as a bundle instead of separate.
But still, it is a bit of a bold move!
Since it is a bundle, I'd like to know if you can switch between the two with out a rest period?
Wasn't 2.3 the same as 2.2 but without healing? If it was fine to switch back then I'd guess it'd be fine for 3.0.1.
If I remember correctly it was from 2.4 to 2.5 that Shannon asked to go on without a rest period in between to test that out. I don't know what it will be for 3A and B.
(11-23-2016, 01:44 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-23-2016, 01:07 PM)Dutchman610 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-23-2016, 12:43 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-23-2016, 12:24 PM)pakr93 Wrote: [ -> ]So ... it seems that Shannon is confident in DMSI 3.0.1-X enough that he is doubling the price for newcomers.
That kinda makes me feel confident in the sub as well Let's see if it will accomplish its goals!
He's not really doubling the price. It's still $115 per version of the program. He's just choosing to sell them as a bundle instead of separate.
But still, it is a bit of a bold move!
Since it is a bundle, I'd like to know if you can switch between the two with out a rest period?
Wasn't 2.3 the same as 2.2 but without healing? If it was fine to switch back then I'd guess it'd be fine for 3.0.1.
Switching from 2.4 to 2.5 was the first time Shannon didn't recommend a break, and was also a test to see how badly people encountered turbulence. Every version has had at least some tweaking and changes, and 2.3 was different from 2.2 (it wasn't exactly the same program with healing modules disabled).
(11-23-2016, 06:04 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]PUA isn't what you want to aim for, methinks.
Shannon what do you think about PUA community?
It does more harm than good to a man?
Quote:" He" is not trolling.
"He" may have aspergers and if that's the case, "he" may have to be sexless his entire life because of some stupid miscommunication issue that "he" has no control over.
I also don't appreciate being assumed I'm a troll CO stantly when I have real concerns. That's just ignorant and disrespectful.
Furthermore, if Shannon isn't willing to make the sub work with a person's flaw (my reason for making the suggestion) then perhaps he should step up the socializing aspect of his subs, because after however many years I've been doing them I have nothing to show for it yet in that area.
Clearly something is missing in the programs.
Sorry Sarge, I actually meant Risingson with these suggestions hes been making for DMSI along with what he wrote in the other thread.
Didn't even think that it had quoted what you wrote too.
(11-23-2016, 02:45 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:" He" is not trolling.
"He" may have aspergers and if that's the case, "he" may have to be sexless his entire life because of some stupid miscommunication issue that "he" has no control over.
I also don't appreciate being assumed I'm a troll CO stantly when I have real concerns. That's just ignorant and disrespectful.
Furthermore, if Shannon isn't willing to make the sub work with a person's flaw (my reason for making the suggestion) then perhaps he should step up the socializing aspect of his subs, because after however many years I've been doing them I have nothing to show for it yet in that area.
Clearly something is missing in the programs.
Sorry Sarge, I actually meant Risingson with these suggestions hes been making for DMSI along with what he wrote in the other thread.
Didn't even think that it had quoted what you wrote too.
I appreciate that Ben, thank you.
Sarge, even if we both have Asperger and are possible trolls it's OK. We are going to make it through this.
With our highly intuitive male minds we shall continue to observe and hint at female nature until the subliminal is effective or until I give up.
(some say autism and stuff like that is due to hypermasculinized brains, but whatever)
I can see how I get branded as a troll because my views are so radical. Well, guess why? I studied female manipulation/social behavior/biology/history for years while on AM6. And almost fell into the abyss... Also, I'm sort of an ivory tower intellectual and don't have social (female) pressures constantly placed on me to make me conform and be a 'good boy' with politically correct views so I can come across as so shocking it induces cognitive dissonance.
Still, I'm excited and really impressed at the fine nuances these subs and Shannon are able to articulate. Just needs a little more uuummmpphhhhhh.
Or more like the brakes taken off.
(11-23-2016, 12:00 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: [ -> ]E3 is going to be light years different than E2. <----SHannon's comment...Mine: How so will it be light years different? as in all the new bell and whistles,along the umpah's and bumpah's( think dr.suess's Grinch lines)???
It's going to have all the technological additions since E2, of course.
(11-23-2016, 12:24 PM)pakr93 Wrote: [ -> ]So ... it seems that Shannon is confident in DMSI 3.0.1-X enough that he is doubling the price for newcomers.
That kinda makes me feel confident in the sub as well Let's see if it will accomplish its goals!
Not changing the price, just releasing A and B versions of it as one package. This will keep the script consistent between both and allow for easier switching between them.
(11-23-2016, 01:07 PM)Dutchman610 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-23-2016, 12:43 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-23-2016, 12:24 PM)pakr93 Wrote: [ -> ]So ... it seems that Shannon is confident in DMSI 3.0.1-X enough that he is doubling the price for newcomers.
That kinda makes me feel confident in the sub as well Let's see if it will accomplish its goals!
He's not really doubling the price. It's still $115 per version of the program. He's just choosing to sell them as a bundle instead of separate.
But still, it is a bit of a bold move!
Since it is a bundle, I'd like to know if you can switch between the two with out a rest period?
Part of the point is to minimize script differences so you can switch between them with little to no rest between.
(11-23-2016, 02:12 PM)bogdy Wrote: [ -> ] (11-23-2016, 06:04 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]PUA isn't what you want to aim for, methinks.
Shannon what do you think about PUA community?
It does more harm than good to a man?
I think it's a group of guys who are trying to achieve their genetic directive of getting laid. Beyond that, there are a lot of differing points of view, and some are harmful and some are helpful. I don't think any one group or ideology has it all right. And since I don't pay much attention to it, beyond that, I can't really comment.
(11-23-2016, 02:34 PM)Happylife01 Wrote: [ -> ]so us who using 2.5 will be eligible for free update? thanks shannon, you are the best. you showing us how the real world is. what a powerful advantage we got
Updates ad upgrades are free until the program does what satisfies me that it is achieving the goals sufficiently. So anyone who has purchased a copy of 1.x through 2.5 will get 3.0.1 for free.