Ahhhh Yes UFO ready for boarding...to the other side of the Galaxy for futher enlightenment,thrills and
awareness please check DAOSI V2 for continous connectivity created!! Yowza !!
PS: As a courtesy reminder,ladies and Gents,there is NO smoking while on board,unless of course its YOU,in which case well...Have at it !!
6/24/16
Now I have an interesting issue. The ASRB ratio is going to force this program to be different than hat you're used to. Either I can have the masked tracks be contiguous, but not use vocoding (just volume differencing), or I can use vocoding, but have the masked tracks disappear every 5 minutes for 2 minutes.
Either one will work, but if you want masked instead of ultrasonic, one is going to be a lot less easy to listen to.
(06-24-2016, 01:55 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]The DAOSI V2 will have an ASRB ratio of 5:2.
So for every 20 minutes of subliminal there will be 8 minutes of silence, correct?
(06-24-2016, 02:08 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]Now I have an interesting issue. The ASRB ratio is going to force this program to be different than hat you're used to. Either I can have the masked tracks be contiguous, but not use vocoding (just volume differencing), or I can use vocoding, but have the masked tracks disappear every 5 minutes for 2 minutes.
Either one will work, but if you want masked instead of ultrasonic, one is going to be a lot less easy to listen to.
In that case, it seems contigious is likely the most practical. Otherwise, that could be annoying, people could be woken up often when the tracks restart. I remember that's why you purposely have had the masked tracks continue on during ASRB breaks.
(06-24-2016, 02:10 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ] (06-24-2016, 01:55 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]The DAOSI V2 will have an ASRB ratio of 5:2.
So for every 20 minutes of subliminal there will be 8 minutes of silence, correct?
Every 5 minutes, there will be 2 minutes of silence, a total of 7 minutes of track. So in 21 minutes there will be three instances of silence, and that would be 6 minutes. Each hour of audio will therefore take 1 hour, 24 minutes to deliver.
But I have figured out how to do this without making masked tracks annoying.
(06-24-2016, 02:13 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ] (06-24-2016, 02:08 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]Now I have an interesting issue. The ASRB ratio is going to force this program to be different than hat you're used to. Either I can have the masked tracks be contiguous, but not use vocoding (just volume differencing), or I can use vocoding, but have the masked tracks disappear every 5 minutes for 2 minutes.
Either one will work, but if you want masked instead of ultrasonic, one is going to be a lot less easy to listen to.
In that case, it seems contigious is likely the most practical. Otherwise, that could be annoying, people could be woken up often when the tracks restart. I remember that's why you purposely have had the masked tracks continue on during ASRB breaks.
Yes, and the solution is simple, I was just having a brain fart moment. It takes a LOT of mental energy to do the calculation and disambiguation of the ASRB, so even though I just got here an hour or two ago, I already need caffeine.
take Two!! :
Ahhhh Yes UFO ready for boarding...to the other side of the Galaxy for futher enlightenment,thrills and
awareness please check DAOSI V2 for continous connectivity created!! Yowza !!
PS: As a courtesy reminder,ladies and Gents,there is NO smoking while on board,unless of course its YOU,in which case well...Have at it !!
6/24/16
Now vocoding both masked tracks. ETA: 14 minutes and counting.
Now I'm doing the audio verification, making any necessary adjustments, and encoding the audio.
(06-24-2016, 01:41 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]The only thing you need is enough emotional passion and focus. It can be pleasurable or terrifying, but if you have enough emotional passion (read: energy concentration input) and focus, it will work, as long as the rest of the variables are also done correctly.
This is why people succeed in manifesting their worst fears much more often than what they really wish they had.
lol, you're being ahead of your time again, Shannon.
In the particular discipline of mental alchemy that I study (the one referenced in my username), practitioners are JUST NOW (seriously, like in the last few months) starting to openly acknowledge that you can use any kind of emotion -- pleasurable or terrifying -- to charge and send off an intent. Before, they either ignored the role of emotion or relied on positive feelings (laughter and comedy) to handle everything.
I was in a huge argument with a colleague last year because I was experimenting with charging... pictorial depictions of affirmations (trying not to break rule #4 if that even applies) with negative emotions and she almost lost her sh*t. Told me the universe was going to explode or some crap. Recently, when I told her that the manifestation came to pass AND it seemed more profound, she outright called me a liar.
(06-24-2016, 03:16 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: [ -> ] (06-24-2016, 01:41 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]The only thing you need is enough emotional passion and focus. It can be pleasurable or terrifying, but if you have enough emotional passion (read: energy concentration input) and focus, it will work, as long as the rest of the variables are also done correctly.
This is why people succeed in manifesting their worst fears much more often than what they really wish they had.
lol, you're being ahead of your time again, Shannon.
In the particular discipline of mental alchemy that I study (the one referenced in my username), practitioners are JUST NOW (seriously, like in the last few months) starting to openly acknowledge that you can use any kind of emotion -- pleasurable or terrifying -- to charge and send off an intent. Before, they either ignored the role of emotion or relied on positive feelings (laughter and comedy) to handle everything.
Here's an interesting story:
I was in a huge argument with a colleague last year because I was experimenting with charging... pictorial depictions of affirmations (trying not to break rule #4 if that even applies) with negative emotions and she almost lost her sh*t. Told me the universe was going to explode or some crap. Recently, when I told her that the manifestation came to pass AND it seemed more profound, she outright called me a liar.
It's actually very ancient knowledge. Just not common knowledge, because it's only relatively recently that this knowledge is being released to the general public. It's time for it to be public. But I was trained in this more than 2 decades ago, and its origins trace back into and gets lost in the mists of time. The furthest back any of my instructors could trace it was to between approximately 6,000 and 10,000 years ago. You just have to have had access to those "in the know". They are not exactly very common - yet.
I think you are misunderstanding something. You can use negative emotions etc. to power causality manipulation and get a positive result, but it is much less desirable to do so. Just because you did it once and it does not seem to have had any negative impact means nothing. Causality manipulation does not play by normal rules of time and space. The strictures on using negative energy are there because of literally thousands of years of experience, passed down from Master to Apprentice, and of course every apprentice tries to break the rules.
The "way it works" is not always easily observable or easily understood. Your actions, even when the energy you are manipulating is neutral or positive, can have negative end results. Negative energy can have positive results. It's not just the polarity of energy you use to power it, it's also how you control the rest of the manipulation and achieve your goals with it.
I cannot recommend enough avoiding negative energy and emotions as an engine for your causality manipulations. But of course just because my first instructor told me not to do it, doesn't mean I didn't have to learn why the hard way, just like every other apprentice.
I just hope you don't make the mistakes I made before I really understood. They were very, very costly. I have seen a number of people win the Darwin award using causality manipulation in negative ways without a real understanding of what they are doing and the rules and laws they are interacting with.
My advice: avoid negatives.
Encode: Check
Verify: Check
Tag: Check
Hash values:
[shannon@localhost Arena]$ md5sum *
b397db527c92e2c0a99f0b97cdc19749 Develop_An_Aura_Of_Sexual_Irresistibility_V2_Masked_Subliminal_(Ocean_Surf).flac
e41d4d91a5b05e56d3f9ad1372dbcfc5 Develop_An_Aura_Of_Sexual_Irresistibility_V2_Masked_Subliminal_(Ocean_Surf).mp3
e7fb55b4927a67cc7e42379a8fe4ec8f Develop_An_Aura_Of_Sexual_Irresistibility_V2_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).flac
b21bdc0bc62082c62c399dc5a019952d Develop_An_Aura_Of_Sexual_Irresistibility_V2_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).mp3
b571ce644300757d2282dd46791a4519 Develop_An_Aura_Of_Sexual_Irresistibility_V2_Ultrasonic_Subliminal_(Silent).flac
8d6c6e1f1b3467501cd6440030b7e6c8 Develop_An_Aura_Of_Sexual_Irresistibility_V2_Ultrasonic_Subliminal_(Silent).mp3
[shannon@localhost Arena]$
Commence upload.
(06-24-2016, 03:31 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-24-2016, 03:16 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote: [ -> ] (06-24-2016, 01:41 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]The only thing you need is enough emotional passion and focus. It can be pleasurable or terrifying, but if you have enough emotional passion (read: energy concentration input) and focus, it will work, as long as the rest of the variables are also done correctly.
This is why people succeed in manifesting their worst fears much more often than what they really wish they had.
lol, you're being ahead of your time again, Shannon.
In the particular discipline of mental alchemy that I study (the one referenced in my username), practitioners are JUST NOW (seriously, like in the last few months) starting to openly acknowledge that you can use any kind of emotion -- pleasurable or terrifying -- to charge and send off an intent. Before, they either ignored the role of emotion or relied on positive feelings (laughter and comedy) to handle everything.
Here's an interesting story:
I was in a huge argument with a colleague last year because I was experimenting with charging... pictorial depictions of affirmations (trying not to break rule #4 if that even applies) with negative emotions and she almost lost her sh*t. Told me the universe was going to explode or some crap. Recently, when I told her that the manifestation came to pass AND it seemed more profound, she outright called me a liar.
It's actually very ancient knowledge. Just not common knowledge, because it's only relatively recently that this knowledge is being released to the general public. It's time for it to be public. But I was trained in this more than 2 decades ago, and its origins trace back into and gets lost in the mists of time. The furthest back any of my instructors could trace it was to between approximately 6,000 and 10,000 years ago. You just have to have had access to those "in the know". They are not exactly very common - yet.
I think you are misunderstanding something. You can use negative emotions etc. to power causality manipulation and get a positive result, but it is much less desirable to do so. Just because you did it once and it does not seem to have had any negative impact means nothing. Causality manipulation does not play by normal rules of time and space. The strictures on using negative energy are there because of literally thousands of years of experience, passed down from Master to Apprentice, and of course every apprentice tries to break the rules.
The "way it works" is not always easily observable or easily understood. Your actions, even when the energy you are manipulating is neutral or positive, can have negative end results. Negative energy can have positive results. It's not just the polarity of energy you use to power it, it's also how you control the rest of the manipulation and achieve your goals with it.
I cannot recommend enough avoiding negative energy and emotions as an engine for your causality manipulations. But of course just because my first instructor told me not to do it, doesn't mean I didn't have to learn why the hard way, just like every other apprentice.
I just hope you don't make the mistakes I made before I really understood. They were very, very costly. I have seen a number of people win the Darwin award using causality manipulation in negative ways without a real understanding of what they are doing and the rules and laws they are interacting with.
My advice: avoid negatives.
One question. How does one learn causality manipulation?