(11-19-2016, 12:59 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (11-19-2016, 09:07 AM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
November 21 2016 is almost here.
I had some ideas for DMSI v3.0.1 and I know some of this might seem nonsensical or illogical, but so are sexual decisions. So to me, it seems to fit right in.
Hey, Steve, thanks for the suggestions. I know you're trying to help. Just have the issue that the list is already so long I can't keep track of it, and I'm three days behind schedule now building MIR 2.1, still have to upgrade and build GPR14, and of course add a ton of stuff to DMSI from what is already in the list.
So at this point, I'll give you a metaphor. What happens when you our coffee in a coffee cup when it's full? 
This is why I said so long ago, no more additions and suggestions. I can't keep up, and then they get lost.
In fact things have been so bad that I am likely going to have to either stop adding after the 21st or release later than expected for DMSI 3.0.1. So I'll copy and paste your suggestions into the list, but I won't be reading them until after I have built 3.0.1, and then we'll see what is what. I appreciate your efforts to help, but I just have too much to do right now to add more to it.
Quote:1) The responders miss the user even if they haven't met the user
2) The responders are searching for and seeking out the user even if they don't know what they're looking for or what they're wanting
3) The longer they go with out sex with the user, the more the responders want to have sex with the user.
4) They wonder where the user is and what the user is doing.
5) They look at their phone and wonder what's taking the user so long to contact them.
6) They plan things they want to sexually do with the user.
7) Their minds keep defaulting back to thoughts of the user.
8) They feel warm when they think of the user or when something reminds them of the user.
9) They put the user in all their sexual fantasies
10) They substitute the user in all their pleasant sexual memories in place of the people they had sex with because they wish the user was the only sexual partner they ever had.
11) Every orgasm they have with the user is even more intense and longer lasting than the previous one.
12) Each orgasm they have with the user is easier to achieve than the previous one.
13) They can easily be on the cusp of orgasm (edging) for extended periods of time when they have sex with the user
14) When they masturbate, the most satisfying and fulfilling feelings and orgasms are those that include the user.
15) (I don't know how to best phrase this) The responders effectively deal with (nullify, assuage, etc.) all potential social and emotional barriers to having sex with the user, such as worries about what her friends think, fear of her reputation being sullied, fear of losing status, fears of being judged, inconsistent follow through, forgetfulness, life chaos, her work schedule, lack of motivation on her part, worries that she's not pretty enough, fear of rejection, etc. and they do so in such a way that it results in actual physical sex with the responders and the user.
16) The responders are actively searching for and seeking out the user even if they don't know the user
17) The responders have a feeling of destiny regarding the user and having sex with the user repeatedly
18) The responders have the "where have you been for all of my (sex) life" feeling about the user
19) The responders feel like everything they know and everything they have experienced points directly at having sex with the user repeatedly, like everything in their life has been leading up to it
20) The responders feel like having sex with the user is the most liberating experience ever and that it re-enforces their sense of independence and self-acceptance.
21) The responders crave the experience of feeling surrendered to the user, and actively seek it out and facilitate it.
22) The responders feel grateful about having sex with the user.
23) The responders can't imagine better sex than the sex with the user
24) The user fulfills and satisfies sexual needs, wants, and desires that the responders didn't even know they had and/or didn't even imagine were possible.
25) The responders desire sex with the user and only the user. All else just feel like second best.
I'm sure you could word them much better, but the concepts are there.
shannon these are excellent ideas by steven. I don't care if i have to wait till new years. Please put these in dmsi if possible
thanks
(11-19-2016, 02:35 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ] (11-19-2016, 01:25 PM)Dmitry Wrote: [ -> ]NSFM is excellent sub, indeed. It made me awake all my seduction knowledge in just one, smooth flow stream. If DMSI V3.0.1 is equipped with NSFM... well, we have an Oscar nominee here, gentlemen! Let just rename it to Natural Seduction Aid
I feel like I need NSFM as it is the missing ingredient in my arsenal right now. It'll make a huge difference to my results.
NSFM is easily one of my favorites. You'll love it Wolverine. It did pretty much everything Dmitry stated. Hoping that it gets included in V3.01. Theoretically, if the V3 sniper module works correctly and NSFM is also working correctly, it should translate to more capitalization on the user's part.
Only... NSFM is directly contradicting the rest of the DMSI program...
(11-19-2016, 03:24 PM)posh Wrote: [ -> ] (11-19-2016, 12:59 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (11-19-2016, 09:07 AM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
November 21 2016 is almost here.
I had some ideas for DMSI v3.0.1 and I know some of this might seem nonsensical or illogical, but so are sexual decisions. So to me, it seems to fit right in.
Hey, Steve, thanks for the suggestions. I know you're trying to help. Just have the issue that the list is already so long I can't keep track of it, and I'm three days behind schedule now building MIR 2.1, still have to upgrade and build GPR14, and of course add a ton of stuff to DMSI from what is already in the list.
So at this point, I'll give you a metaphor. What happens when you our coffee in a coffee cup when it's full?
This is why I said so long ago, no more additions and suggestions. I can't keep up, and then they get lost.
In fact things have been so bad that I am likely going to have to either stop adding after the 21st or release later than expected for DMSI 3.0.1. So I'll copy and paste your suggestions into the list, but I won't be reading them until after I have built 3.0.1, and then we'll see what is what. I appreciate your efforts to help, but I just have too much to do right now to add more to it.
Quote:1) The responders miss the user even if they haven't met the user
2) The responders are searching for and seeking out the user even if they don't know what they're looking for or what they're wanting
3) The longer they go with out sex with the user, the more the responders want to have sex with the user.
4) They wonder where the user is and what the user is doing.
5) They look at their phone and wonder what's taking the user so long to contact them.
6) They plan things they want to sexually do with the user.
7) Their minds keep defaulting back to thoughts of the user.
8) They feel warm when they think of the user or when something reminds them of the user.
9) They put the user in all their sexual fantasies
10) They substitute the user in all their pleasant sexual memories in place of the people they had sex with because they wish the user was the only sexual partner they ever had.
11) Every orgasm they have with the user is even more intense and longer lasting than the previous one.
12) Each orgasm they have with the user is easier to achieve than the previous one.
13) They can easily be on the cusp of orgasm (edging) for extended periods of time when they have sex with the user
14) When they masturbate, the most satisfying and fulfilling feelings and orgasms are those that include the user.
15) (I don't know how to best phrase this) The responders effectively deal with (nullify, assuage, etc.) all potential social and emotional barriers to having sex with the user, such as worries about what her friends think, fear of her reputation being sullied, fear of losing status, fears of being judged, inconsistent follow through, forgetfulness, life chaos, her work schedule, lack of motivation on her part, worries that she's not pretty enough, fear of rejection, etc. and they do so in such a way that it results in actual physical sex with the responders and the user.
16) The responders are actively searching for and seeking out the user even if they don't know the user
17) The responders have a feeling of destiny regarding the user and having sex with the user repeatedly
18) The responders have the "where have you been for all of my (sex) life" feeling about the user
19) The responders feel like everything they know and everything they have experienced points directly at having sex with the user repeatedly, like everything in their life has been leading up to it
20) The responders feel like having sex with the user is the most liberating experience ever and that it re-enforces their sense of independence and self-acceptance.
21) The responders crave the experience of feeling surrendered to the user, and actively seek it out and facilitate it.
22) The responders feel grateful about having sex with the user.
23) The responders can't imagine better sex than the sex with the user
24) The user fulfills and satisfies sexual needs, wants, and desires that the responders didn't even know they had and/or didn't even imagine were possible.
25) The responders desire sex with the user and only the user. All else just feel like second best.
I'm sure you could word them much better, but the concepts are there.
shannon these are excellent ideas by steven. I don't care if i have to wait till new years. Please put these in dmsi if possible
thanks
Forget NSFM, just put in these brilliant suggestions by Steven!!!!!
Shannon, don't waste time putting NSFM in with DMSI. It's totally contradictory and if people want to use NSFM then they can do so as a stand alone if they want to
Guys, if Shannon says NSFM is contradictory, it's contradictory. Let's not do this begging for NSFM so he that he feels the need to build a version including it just to prove that it will fail and shut everyone up. It's a waste of everyone's time. Let's allow him to focus on the billion other additions he has planned.
(11-19-2016, 04:16 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]Guys, if Shannon says NSFM is contradictory, it's contradictory. Let's not do this begging for NSFM so he that he feels the need to build a version including it just to prove that it will fail and shut everyone up. It's a waste of everyone's time. Let's allow him to focus on the billion other additions he has planned.
There are several users here who have not developed basic flirting skills. For them (and i consider myself included) it would be very beneficial.
Not everybody here lost their virginity in a threesome RT, some are still virgins and still very undeveloped in that department
If a situation presents itself were to take advantage of it the user needs to take some charge and make at least a little bit 'happen' then NSFM will be useful.
It contradicts the goal? maybe the goal needs to be refocused. IMHO the goal is sex abundance with high value partners. We should strive to reach it and not be 'anal' about the way we reach it
You guys are so focused on one goal and one way to it, it's no wonder you have these issues.
DMSI goal is to get others to approach and initiate. In the end, that is the goal and it's not changing unless I have no choice. I have that choice, because I know I can achieve that goal. Maybe not in 3.0, but I can and I will.
Even if NSFM can be added in a way that would enhance instead of detract, which may be possible, it is still training wheels for guys who are stuck in the paradigm that got them where they are now. It almost certainly won't be included in the final no matter what for that reason.
So if I can find a way to add it and enhance DMSI, I will try. If I run out of time, it may get passed over. There are several other much more important things to add still.
(11-19-2016, 05:02 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]You guys are so focused on one goal and one way to it, it's no wonder you have these issues.
DMSI goal is to get others to approach and initiate. In the end, that is the goal and it's not changing unless I have no choice.
If you don't like the goals of DMSI as Shannon intends or they don't fit your perceptions then don't use it. Why would anyone want to make things more difficult in the dating game than they need be?
Shannon, I have a problem using persuasion and I'm not very charismatic. I want to be able to be really good at communication. AM6 has made me more dominant and able to walk away from situations I don't like, but I'm not very good at leading interactions skillfully into a direction I want. I don't know if that will come with more AM6, but I was wondering if there was a sub that would help me achieve this? Maybe BASE?
(11-19-2016, 05:12 PM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, I have a problem using persuasion and I'm not very charismatic. I want to be able to be really good at communication. AM6 has made me more dominant and able to walk away from situations I don't like, but I'm not very good at leading interactions skillfully into a direction I want. I don't know if that will come with more AM6, but I was wondering if there was a sub that would help me achieve this? Maybe BASE?
What about WM? At least if it is related to women.
Wm is too go with the flow, I'm looking to direct the energy not be directed by it.
I want to be more like Shannon's vibe vs a party guy who has no center.
Edit: btw Shannon, where did you get your speaking style from? Did you have it before or did you get it from BASE and AM?
I'm down with whatever works. If adding NSFM makes it work, cool. If not adding NSFM makes DMSI work, cool with that too. I'm sure nobody is going to complain if bombshells are directly soliciting them for sex.
(11-19-2016, 04:44 PM)ImFreeman Wrote: [ -> ] (11-19-2016, 04:16 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]Guys, if Shannon says NSFM is contradictory, it's contradictory. Let's not do this begging for NSFM so he that he feels the need to build a version including it just to prove that it will fail and shut everyone up. It's a waste of everyone's time. Let's allow him to focus on the billion other additions he has planned.
There are several users here who have not developed basic flirting skills. For them (and i consider myself included) it would be very beneficial.
Not everybody here lost their virginity in a threesome RT, some are still virgins and still very undeveloped in that department
If a situation presents itself were to take advantage of it the user needs to take some charge and make at least a little bit 'happen' then NSFM will be useful.
It contradicts the goal? maybe the goal needs to be refocused. IMHO the goal is sex abundance with high value partners. We should strive to reach it and not be 'anal' about the way we reach it
Couldn't have said it any better. In the end, we can all agree we want sexual abundance. Whatever it takes to get there, let's be more flexible about it. If NSFM helps us get there faster, Shannon will decide in his experimentations. If not, so be it.
People are so obsessed with the idea of women having to all the work (the entire approach to seduction thing), that they're being so narrow-minded regarding the addition of things like NSFM, that could potentially assist us. Remember guys, sex is a two-way effort.
If NFSM doesn't get added to 3.0.1, I would even consider switching to it for a month or so, to enhance my flirting and seduction skills (I don't know when, but some time down the track).