Subliminal Talk

Full Version: Shannon's Journal Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691
(11-05-2016, 08:38 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-05-2016, 08:35 AM)Roy Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-04-2016, 09:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]It's in there. May not stay in there after 3.0... it's counter to the program's goals.

Why is NSFM counter to the program's goals?

It's putting the seduction work on the user. The program's goal is to get the other person to seduce you.

That being said, I think the addition of "eye" seduction and body language that assists the other person to do all of the initiation would be good.

Why not have both parties seduce each other? I'm moving forward and so is she. This is more ideal.

The people who are pushing for it to only be one way are treating this as a magic pill. Don't be lazy, guys. Learn to seduce women too.
(11-05-2016, 02:10 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-05-2016, 08:38 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-05-2016, 08:35 AM)Roy Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-04-2016, 09:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]It's in there. May not stay in there after 3.0... it's counter to the program's goals.

Why is NSFM counter to the program's goals?

It's putting the seduction work on the user. The program's goal is to get the other person to seduce you.

That being said, I think the addition of "eye" seduction and body language that assists the other person to do all of the initiation would be good.

Why not have both parties seduce each other? I'm moving forward and so is she. This is more ideal.

The people who are pushing for it to only be one way are treating this as a magic pill. Don't be lazy, guys. Learn to seduce women too.

What if i learned it already it already and i dont think the return on investment is worth it?

This is bigger than sex. this can fundamentally disable feminism and crash their the gynocentric system thus liberating all western men from the misery we're all trapped in.

this is why i invested in this product, because i know it can change the world.

If shannon alters what was the original prenise of this experiment then i'm requesting a refund.
I might not get it back, but i will ask for it if it does not work or is altered from its original premise.
(11-05-2016, 02:10 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-05-2016, 08:38 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-05-2016, 08:35 AM)Roy Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-04-2016, 09:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]It's in there. May not stay in there after 3.0... it's counter to the program's goals.

Why is NSFM counter to the program's goals?

It's putting the seduction work on the user. The program's goal is to get the other person to seduce you.

That being said, I think the addition of "eye" seduction and body language that assists the other person to do all of the initiation would be good.

Why not have both parties seduce each other? I'm moving forward and so is she. This is more ideal.

The people who are pushing for it to only be one way are treating this as a magic pill. Don't be lazy, guys. Learn to seduce women too.

It's the whole point of the sub. Go run SM3 if you want what you're talking about. Until Shannon says, "It can't be done," anyone who's looking for the program goals to be achieved as stated are within their right to do so.
(11-05-2016, 05:08 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-05-2016, 02:10 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-05-2016, 08:38 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-05-2016, 08:35 AM)Roy Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-04-2016, 09:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]It's in there. May not stay in there after 3.0... it's counter to the program's goals.

Why is NSFM counter to the program's goals?

It's putting the seduction work on the user. The program's goal is to get the other person to seduce you.

That being said, I think the addition of "eye" seduction and body language that assists the other person to do all of the initiation would be good.

Why not have both parties seduce each other? I'm moving forward and so is she. This is more ideal.

The people who are pushing for it to only be one way are treating this as a magic pill. Don't be lazy, guys. Learn to seduce women too.

It's the whole point of the sub. Go run SM3 if you want what you're talking about. Until Shannon says, "It can't be done," anyone who's looking for the program goals to be achieved as stated are within their right to do so.

The point of the sub is also to get quick sex, and don't have to go through a 6 stage sub to get there, which is why I'm here using it.
(11-05-2016, 04:12 PM)Dilettante Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-05-2016, 02:10 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-05-2016, 08:38 AM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-05-2016, 08:35 AM)Roy Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-04-2016, 09:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]It's in there. May not stay in there after 3.0... it's counter to the program's goals.

Why is NSFM counter to the program's goals?

It's putting the seduction work on the user. The program's goal is to get the other person to seduce you.

That being said, I think the addition of "eye" seduction and body language that assists the other person to do all of the initiation would be good.

Why not have both parties seduce each other? I'm moving forward and so is she. This is more ideal.

The people who are pushing for it to only be one way are treating this as a magic pill. Don't be lazy, guys. Learn to seduce women too.

What if i learned it already it already and i dont think the return on investment is worth it?

This is bigger than sex. this can fundamentally disable feminism and crash their the gynocentric system thus liberating all western men from the misery we're all trapped in.

this is why i invested in this product, because i know it can change the world.

If shannon alters what was the original prenise of this experiment then i'm requesting a refund.
I might not get it back, but i will ask for it if it does not work or is altered from its original premise.

To be honest with you, I don't think this goal can be accomplished with just an aura. unless theres like a friendliness aura combined with it, to get that door open.

When most men approach women, I don't think it's just because their attracted to the woman, it's because they feel it's what they should do when they see this women, it's a logical decision. The same goes for women, I'm sure if you were a rich playboy, women would be trying to open you up and pursue you, because it's the logical thing to do, not necessarily because they feel attracted to you. They may or may not be.

So, it has to be a logical decision, something supported and encouraged by the society they live in. It has to be the logical / acceptable thing to do.

But, I could be wrong.
I PM'ed ja but not about surgery but about natural healing solutions while utilizing Shannon's fantastic sub alike.

EDIT: For those PMing about surgery -- it's not an option. Not because I don't want to do it. Apparently, it doesn't work with the kind of pain I'm experiencing. Sad
[/quote]
(11-05-2016, 06:59 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: [ -> ]I PM'ed ja but not about surgery but about natural healing solutions while utilizing Shannon's fantastic sub alike.

EDIT: For those PMing about surgery -- it's not an option. Not because I don't want to do it. Apparently, it doesn't work with the kind of pain I'm experiencing. Sad
[/quote]

Yea, I saw it - thanks for that. Gonna get around to answering PMs soon. Past week has been hectic.
Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer.

I disagree with this, though I seem to be in the minority thinking this.

Despite the goal it's important to still be able to deal with the fears and stuff so you CAN talk to girls when you want and move it forward instead of being forced to be passive and wait for them to do it.

Or because of having a mentality of "they should be doing it with this program" that you're falling into. I've even seen it to the extreme of someone being like "Oh this woman come right next to me and smiled big at me but I did nothing because she's meant to do it with DMSI".

Maybe not exactly that but close.

Yes it would be cool having these attractive girls talk to me, I do get it occasionally. But I don't feel that the option to talk to them should be eliminated and it sounds like that is where some guys want it to head. Personally I don't, why not the ability for either.

As a side note, coincidentally from my experience as i've had less 'baggage' around initiating myself, for example when it just flows for me, or when some fear is cleared I actually have girls responding better and sometimes initiate with me without me having to. If you still have all the baggage and fear around initiating it also holds them back from initiating. Sounds weird I know, but i've found that's how it has worked.
(11-06-2016, 01:09 AM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer.

I disagree with this, though I seem to be in the minority thinking this.

Despite the goal it's important to still be able to deal with the fears and stuff so you CAN talk to girls when you want and move it forward instead of being forced to be passive and wait for them to do it.

Or because of having a mentality of "they should be doing it with this program" that you're falling into. I've even seen it to the extreme of someone being like "Oh this woman come right next to me and smiled big at me but I did nothing because she's meant to do it with DMSI".

Maybe not exactly that but close.

Yes it would be cool having these attractive girls talk to me, I do get it occasionally. But I don't feel that the option to talk to them should be eliminated and it sounds like that is where some guys want it to head. Personally I don't, why not the ability for either.

As a side note, coincidentally from my experience as i've had less 'baggage' around initiating myself, for example when it just flows for me, or when some fear is cleared I actually have girls responding better and sometimes initiate with me without me having to. If you still have all the baggage and fear around initiating it also holds them back from initiating. Sounds weird I know, but i've found that's how it has worked.

Well said! I feel like it is turning into this lazy route for many users. They see a girl hovering around and looking at them. "Oh I refuse to do anything, cause the goal of DMSI is supposed to get women to make a move on me." Are you really gonna cockblock yourself? Just make things easier for the both of you. Say hi to her. She is hoping you would, so make it happen.
Bloody hell, is anyone else who's doing DMSI going through a rollercoaster of emotions and moods? Some days I'm angry as hell, others miserable, today feeling great. Some days I even dislike who I am and feel I should be more of a 'man'. Still have that urge to try AM6 but going to persevere with this. I'm feeling more and more frustrated about my inability to be successful with women but today I am not and I'm feeling thankful that I have my freedom to do what I want and travel where I want, whereas all my friends are in their relationships. Really interesting and confusing times going through this and more so than previous versions perhaps. I'm even thinking it's bordering on depersonalisation but not the extremity of it. I've just moved to a new country, been here a month, and trying to integrate myself here without knowing the language etc so I think this also has a large part to play with it too.

Should really get a journal up and running.
Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer.
(11-06-2016, 01:09 AM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]I disagree with this, though I seem to be in the minority thinking this.

Despite the goal it's important to still be able to deal with the fears and stuff so you CAN talk to girls when you want and move it forward instead of being forced to be passive and wait for them to do it.

Or because of having a mentality of "they should be doing it with this program" that you're falling into. I've even seen it to the extreme of someone being like "Oh this woman come right next to me and smiled big at me but I did nothing because she's meant to do it with DMSI".

Maybe not exactly that but close.

Yes it would be cool having these attractive girls talk to me, I do get it occasionally. But I don't feel that the option to talk to them should be eliminated and it sounds like that is where some guys want it to head. Personally I don't, why not the ability for either.

As a side note, coincidentally from my experience as i've had less 'baggage' around initiating myself, for example when it just flows for me, or when some fear is cleared I actually have girls responding better and sometimes initiate with me without me having to. If you still have all the baggage and fear around initiating it also holds them back from initiating. Sounds weird I know, but i've found that's how it has worked.
(11-06-2016, 01:26 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ]Well said! I feel like it is turning into this lazy route for many users. They see a girl hovering around and looking at them. "Oh I refuse to do anything, cause the goal of DMSI is supposed to get women to make a move on me." Are you really gonna cockblock yourself? Just make things easier for the both of you. Say hi to her. She is hoping you would, so make it happen.

It's more than just 'refusing'. Sometimes there is that moment of 'awkward silence' and the guy is in his head 'overthinking things'.

I'm against OAA being in DMSI because the girl is supposed to approach you. As far as I'm concerned that part of DMSI has passed with flying colors!!

I'm all for NSFM being in DMSI, so the guy can have that 'nudge' to confidently move it to the next level. She has already approached... it's time to have a conversation. (think about it, if someone ignored you... you would walk away too)
(11-06-2016, 03:17 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer.
(11-06-2016, 01:09 AM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]I disagree with this, though I seem to be in the minority thinking this.

Despite the goal it's important to still be able to deal with the fears and stuff so you CAN talk to girls when you want and move it forward instead of being forced to be passive and wait for them to do it.

Or because of having a mentality of "they should be doing it with this program" that you're falling into. I've even seen it to the extreme of someone being like "Oh this woman come right next to me and smiled big at me but I did nothing because she's meant to do it with DMSI".

Maybe not exactly that but close.

Yes it would be cool having these attractive girls talk to me, I do get it occasionally. But I don't feel that the option to talk to them should be eliminated and it sounds like that is where some guys want it to head. Personally I don't, why not the ability for either.

As a side note, coincidentally from my experience as i've had less 'baggage' around initiating myself, for example when it just flows for me, or when some fear is cleared I actually have girls responding better and sometimes initiate with me without me having to. If you still have all the baggage and fear around initiating it also holds them back from initiating. Sounds weird I know, but i've found that's how it has worked.
(11-06-2016, 01:26 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ]Well said! I feel like it is turning into this lazy route for many users. They see a girl hovering around and looking at them. "Oh I refuse to do anything, cause the goal of DMSI is supposed to get women to make a move on me." Are you really gonna cockblock yourself? Just make things easier for the both of you. Say hi to her. She is hoping you would, so make it happen.

It's more than just 'refusing'. Sometimes there is that moment of 'awkward silence' and the guy is in his head 'overthinking things'.

I'm against OAA being in DMSI because the girl is supposed to approach you. As far as I'm concerned that part of DMSI has passed with flying colors!!

I'm all for NSFM being in DMSI, so the guy can have that 'nudge' to confidently move it to the next level. She has already approached... it's time to have a conversation. (think about it, if someone ignored you... you would walk away too)

I agree that it definitely must have NSFM. It's about putting you to ease right? Makes it easier for both people to have sex to happen. I've never used NSFM before, but I can imagine how useful it'll be on dates.
(11-06-2016, 03:17 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer.
(11-06-2016, 01:09 AM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]I disagree with this, though I seem to be in the minority thinking this.

Despite the goal it's important to still be able to deal with the fears and stuff so you CAN talk to girls when you want and move it forward instead of being forced to be passive and wait for them to do it.

Or because of having a mentality of "they should be doing it with this program" that you're falling into. I've even seen it to the extreme of someone being like "Oh this woman come right next to me and smiled big at me but I did nothing because she's meant to do it with DMSI".

Maybe not exactly that but close.

Yes it would be cool having these attractive girls talk to me, I do get it occasionally. But I don't feel that the option to talk to them should be eliminated and it sounds like that is where some guys want it to head. Personally I don't, why not the ability for either.

As a side note, coincidentally from my experience as i've had less 'baggage' around initiating myself, for example when it just flows for me, or when some fear is cleared I actually have girls responding better and sometimes initiate with me without me having to. If you still have all the baggage and fear around initiating it also holds them back from initiating. Sounds weird I know, but i've found that's how it has worked.
(11-06-2016, 01:26 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ]Well said! I feel like it is turning into this lazy route for many users. They see a girl hovering around and looking at them. "Oh I refuse to do anything, cause the goal of DMSI is supposed to get women to make a move on me." Are you really gonna cockblock yourself? Just make things easier for the both of you. Say hi to her. She is hoping you would, so make it happen.

It's more than just 'refusing'. Sometimes there is that moment of 'awkward silence' and the guy is in his head 'overthinking things'.

I'm against OAA being in DMSI because the girl is supposed to approach you. As far as I'm concerned that part of DMSI has passed with flying colors!!

I'm all for NSFM being in DMSI, so the guy can have that 'nudge' to confidently move it to the next level. She has already approached... it's time to have a conversation. (think about it, if someone ignored you... you would walk away too)

I often simply get stuck, so it goes even beyond overthinking.

I see why people don't want OAA and some even NSFM (by the way, I like the idea of NSFM being in 3.0). Because the goal of this sub is to get women to approach YOU. And we should give Shannon the time to figure it out. But at the end we are using the sub to get laid. So if the women-approach-you approach shouldn't work as desired I don't see any reason why we shouldn't turn this sub in some kind of Universal Seduction Aid, which tries to get woman to approach you but empowers the user also to approach them.
The design goal of DMSI is to get women to approach and seduce us. The final version should reflect that. Until we get to that point, however, there's no reason why we shouldn't have NSFM and OAA in the sub.

Think of it like this: We already know that aura works, to an extent (well, most of us). Anyone who used v1 has solid, definite evidence that the aura can AT LEAST attract a woman. Unfortunately, there's very little data on what happens after that, because most of us are resting on our laurels, refusing to talk to women.

We need to understand how DMSI is affecting your targets and yourself AFTER the initial attraction stage. If adding NSFM and OAA will help us get that vital research, we need to do it.

Come on, guys -- this revolutionary technology has only been in open testing for like.. 4-5 months. I feel like talking about refunds and the such at this point only adds unnecessary stress to an already tense situation.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691