(12-01-2016, 07:53 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2016, 07:49 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2016, 07:43 PM)dE3k Wrote: [ -> ]Thank you for your amazing work Shannon!
You're welcome. Now if only I could stop screwing things up...
Not to add to it, but I noticed on the DMSI 3.0.1 product page it says the Optimus Engine is 3.0. It's 3.2 now, no?
Yes, and thank you. But I think I'll hold off on... "correcting that"... after just undoing all the links Ben just put up trying to "correct" something else.
Shannon,
I'm confused. I thought I downloaded v3.0.1 but I'm seeing posts that might indicate v2.5 was linked there instead. Could you please post the file sizes for v3.0.1 I'm guessing they are different sizes than the v2.5 files correct?
Hi Shannon, this got buried before, I know there's a lot of posts in the thread right now:
I noticed that the hybrids seem to have the ultrasonic at a pretty loud level, and the masked much less. I think I remember you saying that -60db is the minimum you want to run maskeds at to have any kind of effect. Because the subliminal audio in it is at a much lower volume, of course. If I could get any clarification on this that would be awesome. Maybe for the future, balancing it so the ultrasonic is the same volume as the masked portion would be best so we can set volume evenly.
Thanks Shannon! I got some heat sensations during this in my first loop. Halfway through my second now, I'm sure this one will be a step forward for DMSI, and myself!
Good work, Shannon!
(12-01-2016, 08:06 PM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
I'm confused. I thought I downloaded v3.0.1 but I'm seeing posts that might indicate v2.5 was linked there instead. Could you please post the file sizes for v3.0.1 I'm guessing they are different sizes than the v2.5 files correct?
You can use a free MD5 sum checker to check your file's MD5 sum compared to what's in Shannon's journal.
I checked mine and they match up perfectly.
I guess you may also be able to check the length of the track. It's 69 minutes for A. And of course if you have a hybrid track, it can only be 3.0.1A since it didn't exist for 2.5. I downloaded all my files before 9pm and all of them are 3.0.1A
Barely finished the first loop and my head already feels like it's about to EXPLODE!!!
(12-01-2016, 08:07 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon, this got buried before, I know there's a lot of posts in the thread right now:
I noticed that the hybrids seem to have the ultrasonic at a pretty loud level, and the masked much less. I think I remember you saying that -60db is the minimum you want to run maskeds at to have any kind of effect. Because the subliminal audio in it is at a much lower volume, of course. If I could get any clarification on this that would be awesome. Maybe for the future, balancing it so the ultrasonic is the same volume as the masked portion would be best so we can set volume evenly.
Thanks Shannon! I got some heat sensations during this in my first loop. Halfway through my second now, I'm sure this one will be a step forward for DMSI, and myself!
Good work, Shannon!
The volumes for masked and ultrasonic in the hybrids are the same as always, with perhaps a 1-2 dB boost at most from additive mixing without compensation. Just calibrate the audible part and then lower it a click or two if that's too loud.
And you're welcome. I hope it is.
No idea thought you might be able to fill me in...
I feel heat through my face, head and hands, especially in my ears and am also developing a nice headache.
hi Shannon
wanted to ask you this question while DMSI is still fresh in your memory and before you move on to something else.
in the light of what the current DMSI is doing, how do you compare it to SM3.0 in terms of technology and the objectives that are achieved?
i am already halfway 4th stage of SM30 and want to ask
1. you had made the remark that DMSI and SM3.0 is almost opposite to eachother and SM3.0 would be a better choice for permanent evolution (so to say). are your thoughts still the same on this?
2. considering i have purchased DMSI and have access to the working version, would running DMSI after SM3.0 have any adverse effects, or running SM3.0 another round still a feasible option in the light of what is in DMSI?
(12-01-2016, 08:20 PM)KingDavid93 Wrote: [ -> ]No idea thought you might be able to fill me in...
I feel heat through my face, head and hands, especially in my ears and am also developing a nice headache.
Is it an ultrasonic/overload headache or a resistance headache, or are you triggering AP code?
I would like to use the hybrid masked trickling stream track. Am a bit concerned since there is also the ultrasonic track in there. If I play it through in ear headphones, can I play it as loud as is comfortable for me or should I turn down the volume so that I can barely hear the track?
