Subliminal Talk

Oh, definitely thought you meant the girls weren't attractive.

(10-22-2016, 04:02 PM)Banksy Wrote: [ -> ]Oh, definitely thought you meant the girls weren't attractive.

Oh ok, yeah they were attractive but clunky and TOO subtle in their interactions with me.

Btw Shannon, I believe that if you could make it so that the women we desire are validated (temporarily) by having sex with the dmsi user (and pleasing him) and are invalidated by not having sex with or not pleasing the dmsi user you would be onto something powerful. Everyone wants to feel validated and like they belong to something.

(10-22-2016, 03:25 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Banksy Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-22-2016, 12:34 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-22-2016, 12:26 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-21-2016, 10:32 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ]It's normal that you're gonna have impatient people, Shannon. Don't let it discourage you. Although I am sure you will use it as fuel to achieve greatness. I'd like to thank you for working so hard on this subliminal. It's definitely helped so much. It's massively speeding up my progress and I can see myself reaching the end goal in the near future!

How are they being "impatient" when they genuinely aren't getting results? Aren't they supposed to report what results they are actually getting? If people get criticized for not reporting actual results, then it creates a groupthink atmosphere that discourages people from reporting their results

For me I'd like to see reports of what people ARE getting. It would help us understand what's going on more. Plus, sometimes people don't think anything's happening when it is. I've been approached twice by women while on DMSI. Both times were so subtle it would be missed by 99% of guys unless you understand how a girl "approaches".

Granted they weren't what we're after, but they were results.

I think this is a perfect example of how subjective these "results" can be. First of all how attractive are these girls to begin with, everyone has their own standards, and is in their own league.

They were both very attractive to me. Just had to clarify.

(10-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Banksy Wrote: [ -> ]For example, if you're like super attractive, a non-attractive girl may ignore you or treat you bad because she sees you as above her league, while an attractive girl can be giving you all the signals. The reverse is true too, if you're not attractive a non-attractive girl may have more confidence towards you, and an attractive girl may ignore you. And then there may be a DMSI user who doesn't believe himself to be in a certain league, and get confused by these results. This is a very real dynamic.

Of course but the goal of DMSI is to make women we find attractive offer themselves to us sexually. For example, I find Megan Fox to be very attractive. A solid 9 for me personally.

Theoretically, DMSI should make her approach me for sex if we were in the same venue and we interacted with each other.

At least, that's my understanding of how it should work.

(10-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Banksy Wrote: [ -> ]Then there's approach, when I say approach I mean like a girl walking up to you and starting a conversation / flirting with you. As a shy kid I remember an older (cute face nice ass 9.5/10) girl asking me to join a group where basically I could **** a bunch of girls no string attached. Basically no effort. (I turned it down) And I wouldn't consider myself necessarily an alpha male back then although I think I was pretty cool. Those are the kind of results I think DMSI is aiming for, and it happened for me when I was a shy non-aggressive kid. Although quite handsome. I don't think I would get that kind of result with my current attitude, even though I might be more attractive. [i]There's something to being shy. There may even be power in it.[/i]

Yes, I totally agree. I've been shy many times and had girls come on to me. I've also had girls come on to me when i was being hateful as I've mentioned countless times before.

But i think it's in line with being non-threatening. Same in sales. You can't go far in sales if your threatening. And you can't catch fish by jumping in the water and splashing around. You gotta let them come to you.

So yeah, perhaps we should go down that route more or at least explore it.

Megan fox from 5 years ago or now, Sarge?

Let's not forget that DMSI is still EXPERIMENTAL and until Shannon brings out the first full working version we shouldn't whinge too much about not getting the exact results. It's something that we keep forgetting, that it's experimental. I'm of the view that the goals won't even be close until we are into version 3.x, even then a few tweaks may be required. If Shannon throws the towel in and says it's not going to happen, for whatever reason then remember that through all this, you haven't wasted your time or money as the process has at least produced some great sexual healing and healing in general stuff. So those versions that have come out are worth it in their own right.
I think Shannon gets an unfair rap on these boards when it's not called for.

(10-22-2016, 09:20 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-22-2016, 04:02 PM)Banksy Wrote: [ -> ]Oh, definitely thought you meant the girls weren't attractive.

Oh ok, yeah they were attractive but clunky and TOO subtle in their interactions with me.

Btw Shannon, I believe that if you could make it so that the women we desire are validated (temporarily) by having sex with the dmsi user (and pleasing him) and are invalidated by not having sex with or not pleasing the dmsi user you would be onto something powerful. Everyone wants to feel validated and like they belong to something.

Validation is planned for 3.0, but perhaps not the way you might expect.

(10-23-2016, 04:02 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-22-2016, 09:20 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-22-2016, 04:02 PM)Banksy Wrote: [ -> ]Oh, definitely thought you meant the girls weren't attractive.

Oh ok, yeah they were attractive but clunky and TOO subtle in their interactions with me.

Btw Shannon, I believe that if you could make it so that the women we desire are validated (temporarily) by having sex with the dmsi user (and pleasing him) and are invalidated by not having sex with or not pleasing the dmsi user you would be onto something powerful. Everyone wants to feel validated and like they belong to something.

Validation is planned for 3.0, but perhaps not the way you might expect.

self validation?

(10-23-2016, 03:42 AM)Ricardo Wrote: [ -> ]Let's not forget that DMSI is still EXPERIMENTAL and until Shannon brings out the first full working version we shouldn't whinge too much about not getting the exact results. It's something that we keep forgetting, that it's experimental. I'm of the view that the goals won't even be close until we are into version 3.x, even then a few tweaks may be required. If Shannon throws the towel in and says it's not going to happen, for whatever reason then remember that through all this, you haven't wasted your time or money as the process has at least produced some great sexual healing and healing in general stuff. So those versions that have come out are worth it in their own right.
I think Shannon gets an unfair rap on these boards when it's not called for.

Well when the program certainly wasn't experimental when people were having results but now they are questioning the program all of sudden the experimental aspect of it is being emphasized. If the program is getting results, say it. If it isn't then say that too. This will be beneficial to V3 development.

(10-23-2016, 02:57 AM)FREAK4LIFE Wrote: [ -> ]Megan fox from 5 years ago or now, Sarge?

There's a difference?

(10-23-2016, 04:02 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-22-2016, 09:20 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-22-2016, 04:02 PM)Banksy Wrote: [ -> ]Oh, definitely thought you meant the girls weren't attractive.

Oh ok, yeah they were attractive but clunky and TOO subtle in their interactions with me.

Btw Shannon, I believe that if you could make it so that the women we desire are validated (temporarily) by having sex with the dmsi user (and pleasing him) and are invalidated by not having sex with or not pleasing the dmsi user you would be onto something powerful. Everyone wants to feel validated and like they belong to something.

Validation is planned for 3.0, but perhaps not the way you might expect.

Oh?

Well at the very least, hope I gave you some ideas.

I'm way ahead of you.

(10-23-2016, 08:10 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I'm way ahead of you.

As always lol.

EDIT: Oh btw, don't know if I mentioned this or if you've thought of it, but some randomization to the validation and whatever else the girl is getting from DMSI would be good too. to keep things interesting for her with the user things can't be too predictable.

Is it possible to make a special request for BASE 4G? It's no longer in the store.

Just wanted to point something out.

I had DMSI 2.4 playing via VLC for iPhone and I noticed the volume would drop every minute or so and then slowly return to what it was already at. I thought maybe Shannon used some kind of new masked volume differencing. But when I played it on VLC on the computer, the volume stayed constant.

It sounded weird to me, but it might be "normal" for those who never noticed. Just wanted to point it out. I'm returning to using TuneShell for iPhone and FileMaster where I never had that issue.

(10-23-2016, 09:27 AM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ]Just wanted to point something out.

I had DMSI 2.4 playing via VLC for iPhone and I noticed the volume would drop every minute or so and then slowly return to what it was already at. I thought maybe Shannon used some kind of new masked volume differencing. But when I played it on VLC on the computer, the volume stayed constant.

It sounded weird to me, but it might be "normal" for those who never noticed. Just wanted to point it out. I'm returning to using TuneShell for iPhone and FileMaster where I never had that issue.

Yes I noticed the same thing! Must just be VLC.

Maybe DMSI doesnt work for most of us is because we only listen to it for 3 loops. Should be more