Subliminal Talk

Make sure you're matching A for A, and B for B. Last night I was looking at B hash sums for A files and ended up deleting perfectly good files b/c I wasn't paying attention.

(12-02-2016, 12:59 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]Make sure you're matching A for A, and B for B. Last night I was looking at B hash sums for A files and ended up deleting perfectly good files b/c I wasn't paying attention.

Yeah I mismatched at first too, but then I matched and still nothing. I'll try Blink's links (heh) right now tho.

EDIT:
I think they match now. I was confused. Shannon, I request that you format the text file a bit better because I assumed the hash came AFTER the file name because they are all one word in the doc like so:

DMSI_V3_0_1_A_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).flac
d2fc790baec78386341a5a2b14e2bce3 <----------- Trickling Stream mp3 Hash
DMSI_V3_0_1_A_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).mp3
0e498441e8074a570233f4f4c41090c6 <----------- Different Hash

Like I said, it was confusing but the hash on top matched for my Trickling Stream mp3.

(12-02-2016, 02:05 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: [ -> ]"I now safely, comfortably and effortlessly bring myself to and safely,
comfortably and effortlessly maintain an ideal state of mind, body and emotions in which
I am now completely relaxed and comfortable with, and actually allowing myself to trust,
cooperate with and be positively, safely and helpfully influenced by, the subliminal program I am using, DMSI"

Edit: the last word I added.

Thanks man

For hashes, these worked better for me.

3.A. http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-1233-p...#pid144833

3.B. http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-1233-p...#pid144994

Quick question, I plan on using the Hybrid Trickling Stream Ultrasonic mp3 file. Is it safe to use headphones with this file? About the volume, do I just put it at a comfortable level?

(12-01-2016, 09:35 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-01-2016, 09:15 PM)Have at ye Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-01-2016, 09:11 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-01-2016, 09:01 PM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-01-2016, 08:39 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]Checking against the md5 hashes will tell you the answer you crave.

But yes, they use different ASRB ratios.

I'm embarrassed to say this but I don't know how to check against the md5 hashes. I don't know what to look for or how interpret them or what to compare them to.

Same here. Maybe Shannon can put a sticky somewhere.

If you guys are running Windows, here's an easy-to-use freeware checker: http://www.winmd5.com/

All instructions should be there.

I will try to remember to make a sticky tomorrow.

In case you forget Shannon

Should I be worried? I never checked this stuff i don't know how I been listening to subliminals from Shannon for a while. Could I have been doing this in vain?

actually never mind i learned how to do this on a mac.

I'm confused.

I'm currently running base stage 6 mp3. I checked the hash and the number I got for the mp3 is the number on the txt file for stage 6 flac not the mp3. Did the two numbers just get mixed up in the md5hash txt file that was put up for download to verify?

What should i do? my mac terminal is showing my mp3 as ending on the md5 6270

BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).flac
b335f6c7b569bd5db486b87c124c6270 BASE_V2.1_Stage_6_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).mp3
4613597460e3177439864d208173b051

I didn't feel any sort of euphoria or morphine drip from 3.0.1a. Does that mean I'm not executing the script?

(12-02-2016, 07:30 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: [ -> ]I didn't feel any sort of euphoria or morphine drip from 3.0.1a. Does that mean I'm not executing the script?

Resistance means that you don't execute the script.

hi Ben/Shannon
i just received a MySql error as i tried to open this page and the error information also included the plain sql query that is being run. this is very dangerous and is giving valuable information to a hacker who wants to attack the forum software and can lead to personal info being leaked to the attacker, besides many other things.
i am sure there is a way to disable detailed error messages and just give basic error response in forum settings or web server settings. i think that setting should be enabled to maximize security.

(12-02-2016, 07:30 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: [ -> ]I didn't feel any sort of euphoria or morphine drip from 3.0.1a. Does that mean I'm not executing the script?

It can be very subtle, at least it is to me.

When I started listening I felt more relaxed, an altered state, but to someone who never did hypnosis they may not notice it. But I feel it more obviously just before entering a deep sleep state. Just before loosing consciousness I felt confident, I felt in control of my life, I felt good like nothing bad can happen now. The half dreaming sensation felt very good to say the least, there was a sexy feeling too, I felt like I could seduce girls around me easily.
I believe this is the healing part (the feel good attitude) as I didn't feel that with 2.5 or V1 but I did with V2.4.

(12-02-2016, 09:18 AM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,

I'm catching up on the forum but while I'm thinking about it:

1) Did you also put in something in the program that will guide us to the optimum number of loops to listen to? I know you posted what they were on the advert page, but I thought you said you were putting in something to guide us to listen to our optimum number of loops.

No, it gives your subconscious the instructions to urge you higher or lower on the volume to achieve the best results.

Quote:2) I've downloaded DMSI v3.0.1 B flac zip 2 or 3 times and the md5 hashes are still not matching.

Nobody else is reporting this. Let me know if this is still the case, as I have been AFK all day.

(12-02-2016, 09:37 AM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,

I was wondering about the healing and clearing.

There was clearing/healing in v2.2 and v2.4 and this one. Now I was thinking that I would think each time there should be less healing or less intensity because wouldn't all the healing or clearing be cumulative?

So I started thinking about the layers of an onion analogy. But an analogy isn't proof, just an idea or explanation.

So then I started to wonder, is the healing or clear set up to resolve the content (such as the actual issue), and the processes that may have sustained or created the issue(s).

In other words, let's suppose I'm afraid of women who taller than me because when I was in first grade a teacher yelled at me so much I was afraid of that teacher and then my mind translated that into fearing all women who were taller than me. So there is the content of that fear (fear of tall women), but then there is also the processes that might have led to that being developed and sustained such as feeling helpless, thinking I can't protect myself, thinking no one would help me, feeling vulnerable, not being assertive, and so forth.

Now the fear of women who are taller than me may get resolved, but with all those other processes in play... what if a dog starts acting vicious towards me and charges me (but doesn't bite me)... there are still those processes (feeling helpless, thinking I can't protect myself, thinking no one would help me, feeling vulnerable, not being assertive, and so forth) that leave me open to developing a fear of dogs.

So to me it would seem important to clear or heal the processes that cause fears in the first place so no new fears develop so we don't need to keep healing endlessly. Eliminate the processes that create fears, and then no more fears are created and the remaining ones are picked off one by one... or eliminate what sustains the remaining fears and then they all collapse as a group.

I hope I'm making sense.

Does the healing or clearing in DMSI address both the processes and content of what needs to be healed?

The healing and clearing does whatever is necessary to achieve the goals of the program, within the parameters given to shield the conscious mind and emotions from any unpleasant effects of the process.

(12-02-2016, 01:01 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-02-2016, 12:59 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ]Make sure you're matching A for A, and B for B. Last night I was looking at B hash sums for A files and ended up deleting perfectly good files b/c I wasn't paying attention.

Yeah I mismatched at first too, but then I matched and still nothing. I'll try Blink's links (heh) right now tho.

EDIT:
I think they match now. I was confused. Shannon, I request that you format the text file a bit better because I assumed the hash came AFTER the file name because they are all one word in the doc like so:

DMSI_V3_0_1_A_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).flac
d2fc790baec78386341a5a2b14e2bce3 <----------- Trickling Stream mp3 Hash
DMSI_V3_0_1_A_Masked_Subliminal_(Trickling_Stream).mp3
0e498441e8074a570233f4f4c41090c6 <----------- Different Hash

Like I said, it was confusing but the hash on top matched for my Trickling Stream mp3.

I format the HASH files according to what my MD5sun calculator gives me. I'm sure it doesn't take a genius to figure out which part is the hash value to use.

The hash on top cannot match for your trickling stream. It's a mathematical impossibility.