P5 is a technology I have been using for a long time in the 6G prototype, which is particularly brilliant, but which is so far back in the development cycle that I didn't even realize it was one of the "P" series of technologies. Technically, it's P1 or maybe P2, but it gets designated P5 because I just realized what it does to the effects of P4 and P3.
What does it do?
P3 takes WPS to the maximum possible. P4 scales it back to whatever is your optimal WPS at that moment. P5 then makes this value higher and more powerful and effective than P3 or P4, while maintaining the optimal effectiveness that P4 introduced for P3.
It's very hard to explain without giving away what is being done to achieve this goal, and I would understand if you either think it makes no sense, or if you don't believe it. When I first had the idea for P5, it excited the hell out of me and made me laugh because it seemed so preposterous that I didn't think it would work...
But it does.
P4 will be in DMSI 3.0.1. P5? Maybe, depending on whether or not it is disruptive to anything else. P5 will be in MIR2, though.
(10-04-2016, 12:35 PM)Travis Wrote: [ -> ]I'm glad to hear Overcome Approach Anxiety will be adde to DMSI v2.4. I had bought it and used it a couple times before realizing how stupid it was to do both.
As others have said, the attraction is clearly there but some people need the extra emphasis on AA.
Some people also need a reminder that the goal of the program is to get them to approach you.
OAA will therefore be integrated in DMSI such that it affects both the user and the affected.
I'm so very happy that Overcome Approach Anxiety will be added to v2.4. I bought OAA and used it for two days before realizing how stupid it is to mess with the programming. Frustrating to see obvious
Shannon says AM6 and DMSI will produce the same results if you keep your nose to the grindstone (At least in terms of women). Very interesting to me.
(10-04-2016, 12:53 PM)Travis Wrote: [ -> ]I'm so very happy that Overcome Approach Anxiety will be added to v2.4. I bought OAA and used it for two days before realizing how stupid it is to mess with the programming. Frustrating to see obvious
Shannon says AM6 and DMSI will produce the same results if you keep your nose to the grindstone (At least in terms of women). Very interesting to me.
I do?
They're very different programs, and they have very different goals. The results with women will not be the same. Generally, women will be much less likely to act on their attraction without you initiating, from AM6. They'll be attracted and they'll want you, if you've achieved alpha male. But they'll also expect you to do the footwork most of the time. What the goal of DMSI is, is to take anyone - alpha or not - and make them their best most sexually irresistible self, and then make that so intense that others actually initiate and then have physical sex with you as much as you allow.
(10-04-2016, 01:12 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I do?
They're very different programs, and they have very different goals. The results with women will not be the same. Generally, women will be much less likely to act on their attraction without you initiating, from AM6. They'll be attracted and they'll want you, if you've achieved alpha male. But they'll also expect you to do the footwork most of the time. What the goal of DMSI is, is to take anyone - alpha or not - and make them their best most sexually irresistible self, and then make that so intense that others actually initiate and then have physical sex with you as much as you allow.
My fault, I thought you said something to this effect. I can't remember where and I can't find it.
No sweat. Just don't want misunderstandings, because they spread like wildfire.
(10-04-2016, 12:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]P3 takes WPS to the maximum possible. P4 scales it back to whatever is your optimal WPS at that moment. P5 then makes this value higher and more powerful and effective than P3 or P4, while maintaining the optimal effectiveness that P4 introduced for P3.
It's very hard to explain without giving away what is being done to achieve this goal, and I would understand if you either think it makes no sense, or if you don't believe it. When I first had the idea for P5, it excited the hell out of me and made me laugh because it seemed so preposterous that I didn't think it would work...
Yea this didn't make sense to me
How can you make an optimal value higher, yet have the end result be more powerful and effective? Wouldn't that mean that it wasn't optimal to begin with?
Any example that's more concrete than that? Or would that give away too much?
(10-04-2016, 12:53 PM)Travis Wrote: [ -> ]I'm so very happy that Overcome Approach Anxiety will be added to v2.4.
Technically, OAA will be in V3.0.1.
(10-04-2016, 01:57 PM)Blink Wrote: [ -> ] (10-04-2016, 12:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]P3 takes WPS to the maximum possible. P4 scales it back to whatever is your optimal WPS at that moment. P5 then makes this value higher and more powerful and effective than P3 or P4, while maintaining the optimal effectiveness that P4 introduced for P3.
It's very hard to explain without giving away what is being done to achieve this goal, and I would understand if you either think it makes no sense, or if you don't believe it. When I first had the idea for P5, it excited the hell out of me and made me laugh because it seemed so preposterous that I didn't think it would work...
Yea this didn't make sense to me How can you make an optimal value higher, yet have the end result be more powerful and effective? Wouldn't that mean that it wasn't optimal to begin with?
Any example that's more concrete than that? Or would that give away too much?
Two words for you. This is all I can say.
Reality bending.
Beyond that you'll just have to trust me on this...
Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/
(10-04-2016, 02:35 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/
There are various technologies that perform reality bending. They work together to form a greater influence.
You haven't noticed it because it's not supposed to be noticed in and of itself. And, you're also new to the game... most guys require a month on 2.4 to start seeing it.
Ask Chaos if he's noticed its effects yet
(10-04-2016, 02:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-04-2016, 02:35 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/
There are various technologies that perform reality bending. They work together to form a greater influence.
You haven't noticed it because it's not supposed to be noticed in and of itself. And, you're also new to the game... most guys require a month on 2.4 to start seeing it.
Ask Chaos if he's noticed its effects yet
B-but... I thought I was getting fast results?
jk. I understand.
Chaos, you're free to interject here, but am I correct to assume it was the sudden tinder and online dating interest?
(10-04-2016, 02:50 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ] (10-04-2016, 02:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-04-2016, 02:35 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/
There are various technologies that perform reality bending. They work together to form a greater influence.
You haven't noticed it because it's not supposed to be noticed in and of itself. And, you're also new to the game... most guys require a month on 2.4 to start seeing it.
Ask Chaos if he's noticed its effects yet
B-but... I thought I was getting fast results?
jk. I understand.
Chaos, you're free to interject here, but am I correct to assume it was the sudden tinder and online dating interest?
You are getting fast results, and ironically, part of that is because of reality bending. It's like autopilot, though: you won't see it at work until you're looking back at what it has done.
(10-04-2016, 02:52 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-04-2016, 02:50 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ] (10-04-2016, 02:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-04-2016, 02:35 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/
There are various technologies that perform reality bending. They work together to form a greater influence.
You haven't noticed it because it's not supposed to be noticed in and of itself. And, you're also new to the game... most guys require a month on 2.4 to start seeing it.
Ask Chaos if he's noticed its effects yet
B-but... I thought I was getting fast results?
jk. I understand.
Chaos, you're free to interject here, but am I correct to assume it was the sudden tinder and online dating interest?
You are getting fast results, and ironically, part of that is because of reality bending. It's like autopilot, though: you won't see it at work until you're looking back at what it has done.
Fair enough. And good to know.