(06-16-2016, 11:42 AM)Mystic Pymp Wrote: [ -> ]I've read this on Shannon's journal today:
Quote:Those dominant in emotional focus and have the corresponding physiology will be most receptive and responsive; those people who are most dominant in the physical/sensual focus and have the corresponding physiology will be second most receptive and responsive; those who focus through their passions and energy will be third most responsive, and those who will be the most difficult to affect will be those who focus mostly through their minds.
My question is how can I know which one of those I am? For example I would say I am both emotional and thinking, both in uneasy balance. Also if so what could I possibly do to make the auras more effective? Giving more to my emotional side? Can I control my emotion and restrain them or should I do the opposite, even then it hurts and just embrace it? Any thoughts?
I've already answered this. I use natal astrology for this. But that discussion is for the astrology thread. Alpha360 is likely to be able to help you with that further.
(06-16-2016, 01:16 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-16-2016, 06:59 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ] (06-15-2016, 02:15 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-15-2016, 01:18 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, How loud should you play the silent speaker test mp3 please?
I have a mac book pro 2015 laptop. I did play this at the volume id normally want to play the silent track and it worked without any hiccups.
For the past 8 days I've played the silent track again without any issue.
I used frequensee and it showed that my signal was around 19KHZ and about -50 to -30db from speaker to my ears and further behind.
Today however I played the track at full volume as I was away from my laptop and wanted to make sure if reached my ears. When I sat down at the laptop I then could hear crackling.
When I played the free silent testing mp3, at this loud volume (full volume both on my laptop and my iTunes player), then I could hear crackling very very low and only if I bring my ears to the speakers of the laptop. My apartment is super quiet and this is why I could hear this but its only when Im sat at the laptop.
Is there any issue with my laptop therefore playing silent tracks? i hope not now 
Play it at the same levels of audio you would anything else.
All you need to do is calibrate.
Thanks Shannon
Im using iTunes player which came pre-installed onto my mac book pro.
Ive turned the volume lower and the crackling has gone, but I'm worried that the volume is too low, especially for when I'm not sat at the laptop. I walk around my room and leave the laptop at the table that I'm sat at to get to the sink (same room).
So using frequensee this is what I got at the laptop itself. (see image attached)
What do you think?
The issue I have is whether this volume will reach me if I'm not sat around the laptop, so shall I use frequensee with the phone held next to my ear and walk around my apartment and see if how the graph changes? and if so what should I be looking for?
thanks
Play the trickling stream track. Set it, while you are sitting at your computer, to a comfortable volume. Now go to every point in the room, and listen. Just listen. And then to other areas where you will commonly be.
If you do that, you'll find that you can hear it at surprising distances from your laptop. I can hear it playing on my phone, in my bedroom, through the master bedroom, through the bathroom that leads to the hallway, down the hallway and in the living room in my house. And that's at the standard volume I use at night.
The subconscious is MUCH more sensitive to volume than the conscious mind is. I have done experiments where I played a test track only phone at a volume of 1/15 (minimum volume possible), with a lifeproof case on my phone. It still gets results. Not very far from the phone, probably within about 6 feet or about 2 meters, but they are still there. And consciously, for me to hear anything even from an audible track at that point, I need to have the speaker right up to my ear!
Just relax. Calibrate as instructed, then reduce the volume until there are no crackles if necessary, and you're done.
Wow thank you so much Shannon. I was panicked about this and really am grateful! its calmed me right down and I'm going to do this
much appreciated it Sir!!
Very Quickly please: Can I listen to masked while watch tv, music, etc? Or is that only with Silent Track?
(06-16-2016, 01:06 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-16-2016, 01:29 AM)terry44 Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon, is MIR2 going to be in 5.5G? Also, do you think it would help my mother, who has chronic Lyme disease (a nasty bacterial infection)? Or is it more designed for acute viral infections?
Yes. It is being built in 5.5G.
I cannot know if it will help her with Lyme disease until some people test it on that and I have evidence as to what it actually does over a number of trials in the real world.
But, this version is being designed to enable your immune system to be effective in detecting and removing bacterial infections, viral infections, fungal infections and yeast infections, as much as that is actually possible.
So all I can say is, it is designed to work against all types of infections except maybe parasitic, and it is designed to scale to whatever degree is necessary to enable your immune system to overcome and eradicate the infection. What it can actually do, and what is actually possible for your immune system to do, I do not yet know.
I would absolutely love some feedback on Lyme disease, though!
Modulating immune response has to be very delicate/calibrated as a little imbalance can result in auto immune problems/disease, so safety should trump maximum effectiveness if at cross purposes in some way.
Yeast is a type of fungus as well.
(06-16-2016, 04:11 PM)shaffk Wrote: [ -> ] (06-16-2016, 01:06 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (06-16-2016, 01:29 AM)terry44 Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon, is MIR2 going to be in 5.5G? Also, do you think it would help my mother, who has chronic Lyme disease (a nasty bacterial infection)? Or is it more designed for acute viral infections?
Yes. It is being built in 5.5G.
I cannot know if it will help her with Lyme disease until some people test it on that and I have evidence as to what it actually does over a number of trials in the real world.
But, this version is being designed to enable your immune system to be effective in detecting and removing bacterial infections, viral infections, fungal infections and yeast infections, as much as that is actually possible.
So all I can say is, it is designed to work against all types of infections except maybe parasitic, and it is designed to scale to whatever degree is necessary to enable your immune system to overcome and eradicate the infection. What it can actually do, and what is actually possible for your immune system to do, I do not yet know.
I would absolutely love some feedback on Lyme disease, though!
Modulating immune response has to be very delicate/calibrated as a little imbalance can result in auto immune problems/disease, so safety should trump maximum effectiveness if at cross purposes in some way.
Yeast is a type of fungus as well.
I am only giving the instruction set. "Maximize and enhance the immune system and make it maximally capable and effective against all current infections." The subconscious handles the specifics of how that is put into effect. But I have in every 5.5G program, out of necessity, a safety limiter that is invoked multiple times for every statement in the script. It is aimed at keeping 5.5/6G technology from overloading the user, but it is also designed to make sure that no goal of the program is executed in any manner that would be unsafe for the user of the program.
Obviously I agree with you 100%.
That is part of why we always follow the IML creed, Safe, useful and effective. If it's not safe, I don't care how useful or effective it is. It's not going out.
Very Quickly please: Can I listen to masked while watch tv, music, etc? Or is that only with Silent Track?
Yes, but you'll have better results using the ultrasonic in that case.
AOSI- this puppy is one serious peice sa work Shannon. IM soo deep into E2 , and how its unfolding, that even way down the road -Im not shure I even wanna go near this Monster titled AOSI.... whew!
you've done a helluva job though Shannon thats fer shure and its obvious and wildly so,this is just the begining of what is to come for 5.5-transtional technology into 6G FULL on! Wow.
I'm lookin' to change the world, buddy! We gots ta go straight to the top on that one.
Just added a new 6G technology to AOSI 2.0, which is known as PNIA. I'd love to brag about what it does, but... it's a secret. It's not a secret that you're gonna like what it does, though.
I also removed scripting to fall back on food as a source of energy, and I am trying to force all energy to come from external, safe, appropriate nonphysical sources. If this fails in testing, I'll put back the fallback scripting.
MIR2 is being developed alongside AOSI2, and it's getting confusing which one has what technology, since they both are developing new technologies as we go along.
I'm living vicariously through your updates shannon. I'm on BASE2.1 and I'm in it to win it, but your updates have me at the edge of my seat. You are changing the world, that's for sure. Helping us improve our lives goes on in turn to affect other people's lives, and the bigger picture is that the world is a better place because you dedicate your life to improving the lives of people by providing a product to people who are looking to grow themselves.
All of these classified 6g technologies are piquing my interest to say the least
(06-16-2016, 07:18 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I am trying to force all energy to come from external, safe, appropriate nonphysical sources.
Hi Shannon, congrats on PNIA! Looking forward to V2 when it's done, sounds interesting.
But, for awhile now, I've wondered about this "external, safe appropriate nonphysical source of energy". What exactly does that mean? It's hard for me to understand what that means. As if it isn't energy from your body like from fat or from drinks or food, I don't understand where this "energy" comes from.
Catman, the exact sources aren't clear to me either, but the subconscious will use whatever energy is available...
Most likely 'ambient energy' in your proximity... well that's what I understand anyway.
I like the sound of that Shannon, hopefully the non-physical energy sources work better than ever *fingers crossed*
I strongly feel this may possibly be a breakthrough for energy sourcing methods!