(08-31-2016, 06:33 AM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]6) I think women are more likely to run long term scenarios through their minds about “what it would be like to be with a man”, imagining a future and how all that meshes with their life plans and other relationships.
I think this is very true. I've approached women before who talk about their relationship and even though I display that it doesn't bother me, she seems bothered by it.
I've had a few women say something along the lines of "it couldn't just be casual, eventually we'd sleep together and eventually we'd get attached". So it may be the girl is cockblocking herself while running scenarios in her head.
I've also thought there is an element of holding up society's facade of monogamy. Almost like the girl is feeling judged or put on the spot. lol, almost as if I work for society itself and she's saying "oh yeah, of course I wouldn't cheat! monogamy all the way!" in much the same way as underground agents in WW2 would, in public, support the nazis.
So there is some of that going on too.
If Shannon ends up releasing a 2 stager for DMSI, he should mostly ignore people who skip a stage and complain of lackluster results. There will always be people who don't follow directions but if 2 stages are needed for it to work, then so be it.
I'm only curious how the 2 stage process would work. For six stagers, it's 32 days per stage. Would it be the same for DMSI's 2 stages or would people be able to complete stage 1 and then run stage 2 indefinitely?
Shannon, what were the differences between 2.2 and 2.3 in all areas OTHER than the healing module removal?
Keith, thanks for that insight. Very worthwhile to read and consider, since I feel like I am about to die of exhaustion all the time lately.
(08-31-2016, 06:26 AM)bogdy Wrote: [ -> ] (08-30-2016, 08:57 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-30-2016, 08:35 PM)AriGold Wrote: [ -> ] (08-30-2016, 08:05 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]The 2.x series is finished. I just need to have a little time and energy to get started working on 3.0. The additions to 3.0 are many, though, so it's reasonable to think it may take 4 to 6 weeks to finish.
I'm not entirely sure if I understand correctly:
Does that mean, there won't be a DMSI 2.4?
You wrote before the DMSI 3.0 will not be a free upgrade, is that correct?
There will not be a 2.4 because it is better for me to simply start working on 3.0. And I had originally been wanting to reserve 3.0 for making money on, but 2.x is not good enough for me to know that 3.0 will be sufficiently effective. So I concluded that it is better to set aside trying to make money in the short term, for achieving the goal faster in the long term, without pissing off my customers.
So no, there will be no charge for 3.0 if you have a paid copy of 1.0 or 2.x.
Will v3.0 still be gender neutral?
It will be based on physical sources of energy?
And the end goal will remain the same?
It will include healing modules?
And thank you for your decision to make it a free upgrade!
3.0 will be gender non-specific. I have said this many times now, the only thing making it gender specific would do is make me more specifically able to describe what kind of sex, and that really isn't going to matter because not everyone wants to have sex with one specific body part all the time. Aside from that difference, it also removes from the equation gays, bisexuals and all females if I remove the gender non-specificity. In other words, all cost, no benefit.
It will be based on whatever source(s) of energy I can come up with that are better than what it's using now. If none, then I will keep what it's using now.
Same with the goal phrasing. Right now, the goal phrasing is not optimized. It's wide open, so I can see how well the general concept works. In the future, I want to make it more specific to a certain degree so that it hits harder on those people who you find significantly attractive, versus those you don't.
It will include whatever healing modules best balance the program to achieve the goal most successfully for the most possible people.
And yes, it will be a free upgrade.
(08-31-2016, 10:06 AM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ]If Shannon ends up releasing a 2 stager for DMSI, he should mostly ignore people who skip a stage and complain of lackluster results. There will always be people who don't follow directions but if 2 stages are needed for it to work, then so be it.
I'm only curious how the 2 stage process would work. For six stagers, it's 32 days per stage. Would it be the same for DMSI's 2 stages or would people be able to complete stage 1 and then run stage 2 indefinitely?
If I release a 2-stager, it will be designed for X weeks or months on stage 1 and the rest of the time using stage 2. I would have to figure out what the overall optimal amount of time for people to use stage 1 would be.
Or maybe they could alternate between them a month at a time or something.
(08-31-2016, 03:33 PM)dissonance Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, what were the differences between 2.2 and 2.3 in all areas OTHER than the healing module removal?
The only differences between 2.2 and 2.3 are:
1. There was 1 of 11 statements using the goal phrasing which slipped past me and did not have the goal phrasing from 2.2 in it. It still had the goal phrasing from 2.1. I corrected that in 2.3.
2. The healing from 2.2 was de-tagged and therefore not included in 2.3.
Those are the only differences between them.
I like the healing warship version. On to version 3.0 the next level
In reference to this section
"Then I'm going to spend September developing the foundation for future 6 stage sets in 5.5/6g. We'll observe what 2.4 does during September and build 3.0 as I have time."
Which six stages will be in 5.5G vs 6G?
I'm very glad we're getting 2.4.
I must ask though, how long will it take to build and release 2.4? I have a date this Saturday
Shannon,
Thank you for your dedication to our requests and happiness. I appreciate your consideration about DMSI v2.4 and v3.0.
Thank you!
(08-31-2016, 05:08 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]In reference to this section
"Then I'm going to spend September developing the foundation for future 6 stage sets in 5.5/6g. We'll observe what 2.4 does during September and build 3.0 as I have time."
Which six stages will be in 5.5G vs 6G?
My plans are to release nothing in 5.5G to the public as a six stage set. Everything released as a six stage set to the public will be in full 6G. That was not worded well.
(08-31-2016, 05:34 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (08-31-2016, 05:08 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]In reference to this section
"Then I'm going to spend September developing the foundation for future 6 stage sets in 5.5/6g. We'll observe what 2.4 does during September and build 3.0 as I have time."
Which six stages will be in 5.5G vs 6G?
My plans are to release nothing in 5.5G to the public as a six stage set. Everything released as a six stage set to the public will be in full 6G. That was not worded well.
Oh okay. Thanks for the clarification.
For some reason , I thought that was your plan all along. To release some in 5.5G while others in 6G
