(11-25-2016, 07:37 AM)robstar Wrote: [ -> ] (11-25-2016, 12:11 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (11-24-2016, 06:40 AM)Barba Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon can you explain what is your understanding of terms aura and charisma and how they're connected. You don't have aural programming in AM (no mention in AM instructions), probably as it's aimed at internal growth and not attraction, but there seems to be an increase in personal magnetism and charisma that others notice on a person who is doing AM. I've read these come from IDGAF self-centered attitude, but not everybody that is stand-offish comes across as alpha and commands attention. How does AM IDGAF translate to attractive, and is this charisma manifesting without aural programming?
Thanks.
Aura is your personal energy field. Charisma is how likeable and influential your personality is, and how effectively you can get others to do what you want them to with that trait. The two have little in common, unless you attune your aura to enhance your charisma.
No aura in AM, but the increase in charisma is the result of the self sufficiency resulting from AM. Lack of neediness, and basically creating a leader... which others will sense and want to follow... so it's sort of a natural side effect of the goals of AM.
Does dmsi aura have charisma enhancement? If not I feel that may be the missing ingredient for maximum results, it's designed to make us sexually attractive, but it needs more social attractiveness to really get women to produce us.
DMSI has charisma enhancing but it is not direct effect charisma enhancement. It is done through the effects of various modules interacting and overlapping effects therefrom. For example, the effect of adjusting the perception of the affected about the user will cause them to respond as if the user had much greater charisma.
(11-25-2016, 10:05 AM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
Today a thought occurred to me.
The reset effect in DMSI v3.0.1 seems imperative. So in a sense the affected resets and then puts the user in a category/role of ... let's say "must **** now and forever".
1) The reset might best be complementary based on the role/category, which could include a reset of the user in the mind of the affected, as well as the affected self-reseting to a compatible category that would be congruent with fulfilling the goals of the program repeatedly. In the words, the affected would re-categorize (redefine their role) themselves relative to the user.
2) Now what seems to me is that it would be important for the new category/role to be reinforced or reiterated. But I don't know how, other than by an every day object like the phone. Such as every time the affected sees their phone (or any phone for that matter), they feel impatient to engage in reciprocal/complementary roles with the user that are congruent with fulfilling the goals of the program repeatedly.
3) "The affected self-reseting themselves relative to the user." What also occurred to me is that the affected reset their role relative to the user. In other words, (I know it's supposed to be gender neutral) it's occurred to me that many people have some sort of top down processing that occurs when they put themselves into a role. It's like a meme. Defenses are by passed. Rather than individual behaviors explicated, the desired behaviors are implied by the role. Let's say the affected resets themselves (e.g., self-resets) to "significant other of the user". Now that would imply a series of behaviors. Perhaps it would vary from person to person, but there would be a common overlap based on cultural consensus of what the role/category is of a "significant other".
4) I'm not suggesting the affected self-reset to "significant other" rather that was just a concrete example to demonstrate. But there must be some sort of role/category that could be inserted that is complementary/reciprocal based on how the user is reset and cast into a category/role in the mind of the affected.
5) Such a reset effect may also be helpful for the user, in that the user self-resets their ideas of the affected, as well as themselves relative to the affected. In other words, suppose the healing isn't done and the user thinks a perfect 10 is out of their league. The reset could be done inside the user in such a way to effectively achieve the goals of the program repeatedly, where the user resets their role relative to the effected and the affected's role relative to the user. However I would think it would have to be done such that the user behaves in a socially appropriate and restrained manner to be effective and "stay out of trouble" while the effect is manifesting in external reality.
6) This reset/re-categorization/"casting into a new role" effect would also have to be compatible to other parts of the script. For example, the "sharing the user" module. The reset/re-categorization/"casting into a new role" would have to be accomplished so that the affected are accepting of (or perhaps even happy about) sharing the user, be it in that moment, with other people they know, with other people they don't know, etc.
Did you not realize that the script is already re-categorizing this way? It is not directly defining the new category, but it's not hard for them to figure out based on how everything fits together.
(11-25-2016, 10:05 AM)Steven Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,
Today a thought occurred to me.
The reset effect in DMSI v3.0.1 seems imperative. So in a sense the affected resets and then puts the user in a category/role of ... let's say "must **** now and forever".
1) The reset might best be complementary based on the role/category, which could include a reset of the user in the mind of the affected, as well as the affected self-reseting to a compatible category that would be congruent with fulfilling the goals of the program repeatedly. In the words, the affected would re-categorize (redefine their role) themselves relative to the user.
It seems like Shannon has that covered. I think he made it so the aura resets the user so the user is perceived as "the must have sex with" category to the affected.
Quote:2) Now what seems to me is that it would be important for the new category/role to be reinforced or reiterated. But I don't know how, other than by an everyday object like the phone. Such as every time the affected sees their phone (or any phone for that matter), they feel impatient to engage in reciprocal/complementary roles with the user that are congruent with fulfilling the goals of the program repeatedly.
He might have addressed the reinforcement of the new Catagory by putting in a module that makes the affected to be unable to stop fantasizing about the user in a sexual way.
The whole idea of resetting the user in the affected's eyes is very interesting to me as a way of consciously solidifying the identity of the user as a genuinely sexy human being and a person who is worthy of sex because the internal clearing modules can change the subconscious into believing that the user is sexy while the external aura validates user's idea. This can create a feedback loop that may enhance the belief of the user being sexy.
This makes me more impatient for DMSI v3.0.1 lol
(11-25-2016, 12:20 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: [ -> ]The whole idea of resetting the user in the affected's eyes is very interesting to me as a way of consciously solidifying the identity of the user as a genuinely sexy human being and a person who is worthy of sex because the internal clearing modules can change the subconscious into believing that the user is sexy while the external aura validates user's idea. This can create a feedback loop that may enhance the belief of the user being sexy.
THIS is exactly what I've spoken about for awhile on DMSI. It's great to fill your head with "I'm so sexy", but with no external results, it's just a lie in reality as nothing is backing that up. Since we aren't living alone on a mountain, and are using the sub to GET external results with others (read: sex), then external results are vital to the success of the sub. The external results may now be able to happen due to the power increase and clearing increase and other script changes. Allowing real world validation of what the sub is instilling.
I'm very excited for V3.0.1, it has 3 things VERY relevant to my situation, and I know other's. So this one should be a real step forward.
(11-25-2016, 11:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]DMSI has charisma enhancing but it is not direct effect charisma enhancement. It is done through the effects of various modules interacting and overlapping effects therefrom. For example, the effect of adjusting the perception of the affected about the user will cause them to respond as if the user had much greater charisma.
Lol, are we going to have the situation where women are laughing at non jokes and we just end up thinking that they are insane?
(11-25-2016, 12:56 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ] (11-25-2016, 12:20 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: [ -> ]The whole idea of resetting the user in the affected's eyes is very interesting to me as a way of consciously solidifying the identity of the user as a genuinely sexy human being and a person who is worthy of sex because the internal clearing modules can change the subconscious into believing that the user is sexy while the external aura validates user's idea. This can create a feedback loop that may enhance the belief of the user being sexy.
THIS is exactly what I've spoken about for awhile on DMSI. It's great to fill your head with "I'm so sexy", but with no external results, it's just a lie in reality as nothing is backing that up. Since we aren't living alone on a mountain, and are using the sub to GET external results with others (read: sex), then external results are vital to the success of the sub. The external results may now be able to happen due to the power increase and clearing increase and other script changes. Allowing real world validation of what the sub is instilling.
I'm very excited for V3.0.1, it has 3 things VERY relevant to my situation, and I know other's. So this one should be a real step forward.
Now if I can travel forward in time so I can get V3.0.1 already. Can't wait to get a banner from Chaos with V3.0.1.
I wonder how DMSI is going to affect super conservative girls.
(11-25-2016, 10:08 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: [ -> ]When is DMSI scheduled to be released ? A few days from now ?
I could not work on Thanksgiving.
I could not work today, because I have Fridays set up to force me not to work so I get a periodic break and don't burn out.
So in 1-2 more days I should be able to begin building it.
I expect build will take 1-2 days, and then I have to upload (10+ gigs), write the store page, etc.
So it will probably be out in 2 to 5 more days.
I figured you were taking time off, I didn't see any updates in your special journal thread for awhile.
I'm still holding out hope that it's out on the 27th, and not delayed
.
I'm certain it will be a step forward.
Shannon,
I'm glad to hear you were taking time off. I was going to encourage you to do so before you do a final proof of the script so you could do it when you felt rested.
(11-25-2016, 04:27 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]I figured you were taking time off, I didn't see any updates in your special journal thread for awhile.
I'm still holding out hope that it's out on the 27th, and not delayed .
I'm certain it will be a step forward.
I think it will be a significant step forward.
(11-25-2016, 04:09 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: [ -> ]I wonder how DMSI is going to affect super conservative girls.
I'm in China, the perfect place to test this.
(11-25-2016, 06:07 PM)RoaringLion Wrote: [ -> ] (11-25-2016, 04:09 PM)Aventus45 Wrote: [ -> ]I wonder how DMSI is going to affect super conservative girls.
I'm in China, the perfect place to test this.
In one form. Not all forms of conservative are Chinese style conservative, or motivated by the reasons the Chinese are for being conservative.
