(10-08-2016, 08:44 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I have been thinking that given the extended time frame on building 3.0, I probably will build 2.5.
An additional energy source would be great in 2.5.
(10-08-2016, 09:00 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ]Two questions, Shannon.
1. Is there any kind of estimate of a DMSRI (Sexual and Romantic) release/testing phase in the forseeable future? I'd totally get this version if it was available within in the next 6 months, otherwise I'll just jump on DMSI.
DMSRI is not currently a definite for creation.
Quote:2. Will 2.5 just be 2.4 without healing or will it have some additions? And when do you plan on releasing it? Since I'm going to be on DMSI soon, I definitely want to purchase a version with healing.
Gracias, Shannon!
2.5 will be 2.4 without the clearing scripting activated. As to additions... the more of those I make, the longer it takes to create. Adding anything new means 3.0 takes longer to build. So there will probably not be any additions. I have not yet finalized my idea to build it, but it will be soon if I do.
(10-08-2016, 10:29 PM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: [ -> ]Anyway another thing that I really curious until now.
A wonder where did Shannon put his actual photo himself in this forum. Shannon just well said it that he already.
I don't remember. Someone will probably link you, though.
(10-08-2016, 11:55 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ] (10-08-2016, 08:44 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]I have been thinking that given the extended time frame on building 3.0, I probably will build 2.5.
An additional energy source would be great in 2.5.
It would also slow down development of 2.5 and 3.0, and deprive me of my ability to see the difference between with and without healing... probably not going to happen, even though I would like to.
Is seek the challenge part of DMSI or will it be in future versions?
Shannon, what are you working on at the moment (besides DMSI) and if/when next verions of AM, SM, WM can be expected?
Thanks.
Does anything in AM deal directly with giving myself unconditional approval and letting go of disapproval of myself and others?
When you say you're not going to add additional energy sources do you mean you're not going to seek out any additional energy sources that we haven't previously tried? Or that re-enabling the energy sources that were in versions 2.2 and 2.3 are difficult?
(10-08-2016, 10:29 PM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: [ -> ]Anyway another thing that I really curious until now.
A wonder where did Shannon put his actual photo himself in this forum. Shannon just well said it that he already.
There is a link in this thread (somewhere around page 65), but for some reason it doesn't work anymore.
(10-09-2016, 07:07 AM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: [ -> ]When you say you're not going to add additional energy sources do you mean you're not going to seek out any additional energy sources that we haven't previously tried? Or that re-enabling the energy sources that were in versions 2.2 and 2.3 are difficult?
They simply aren't going into 2.5 for reasons he mentioned above but into V3.
Aw bummer
I feel that not having all the necessary energy is causing the slower results, and I certainly can't see a subliminal with this big of an energy requirement able to source it all from food alone.
The results of a 2.5 test would be interesting but I know that for me personally I have a ways to go with the healing and would prefer to continue healing because it's caused such a large shift in every other area of my life. I just can't shake the feeling that energy sourcing would increase the effects of the aura and help us reach our goal much faster.
I would also like the extra energy source. But, hey, if it will slow down 3.0 development significantly than it is ok. And either way, I need the healing, too, before I really get results.
(10-09-2016, 12:56 AM)AriGold Wrote: [ -> ]Is seek the challenge part of DMSI or will it be in future versions?
No. It is not part of DMSI because it presumes the goal is that the user is seeking the affected, when in fact the goal is that the affected seek out the user. It would therefore seem to have little value in such a program.