Shannon I was excited to read that you are including approach anxiety in DMSI. People are getting IOIS and until the program is powerful enough to get people to approach that is no excuse for guys not taking action when it comes to IOIS. This will make the program more successful if guys lose their fear of approaching girls that are giving them those IOIS. There should be a balance where we also do some of the work when presented with IOIS and this is where approach anxiety comes in, even though the goal of the program should remain the same (getting women to approach).
It would seem strange to include overcome approach anxiety since Shannon stated the goal is to make the others approach you. So by adding this he would make people happy, but not achieve the goal of the program.
(10-30-2016, 09:04 AM)AriGold Wrote: [ -> ]It would seem strange to include overcome approach anxiety since Shannon stated the goal is to make the others approach you. So by adding this he would make people happy, but not achieve the goal of the program.
Nor necessarily, some men get anxious when women approach them. Women can detect that and it could be a turn off. In this case its inclusion would help
(10-30-2016, 09:37 AM)Snoop Wrote: [ -> ] (10-30-2016, 09:04 AM)AriGold Wrote: [ -> ]It would seem strange to include overcome approach anxiety since Shannon stated the goal is to make the others approach you. So by adding this he would make people happy, but not achieve the goal of the program.
Nor necessarily, some men get anxious when women approach them. Women can detect that and it could be a turn off. In this case its inclusion would help
No it wouldn't. That would be dealt with by using the version of the program with clearing enabled.
Now, if I can cause the aura to act as an OAA effect on those doing the approaching, that will be useful. Not sure that's possible.
(10-29-2016, 11:47 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-29-2016, 10:16 PM)heavysm Wrote: [ -> ] (10-29-2016, 02:29 PM)Multiworld Wrote: [ -> ]Also are there any plans to upgrade Max Learning Speed to 5.5
Thanks
I'm actually really curious to see what subs get upgraded to 5.5 and which get the full overhaul to 6G. Shannon already said that not all subs will fit with 6G tech, so it will be very interesting to see which subs get the upgrade to which level.
There are plans to upgrade MLS. I will probably upgrade it to 5.5G, but beyond that I don't know yet.
Shannon, so are you planning to work on 3.0 and 6G after finishing MIR2?
MIR2 sounds interesting. It's one of those programs no one thinks they need until they get sick
(10-30-2016, 11:03 AM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (10-29-2016, 11:47 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-29-2016, 10:16 PM)heavysm Wrote: [ -> ] (10-29-2016, 02:29 PM)Multiworld Wrote: [ -> ]Also are there any plans to upgrade Max Learning Speed to 5.5
Thanks
I'm actually really curious to see what subs get upgraded to 5.5 and which get the full overhaul to 6G. Shannon already said that not all subs will fit with 6G tech, so it will be very interesting to see which subs get the upgrade to which level.
There are plans to upgrade MLS. I will probably upgrade it to 5.5G, but beyond that I don't know yet.
Shannon, so are you planning to work on 3.0 and 6G after finishing MIR2?
MIR2 sounds interesting. It's one of those programs no one thinks they need until they get sick
Plans are to start working on MHS next, and I will be working on DMSI 3.0 slowly, and the 6G prototype slowly, and when I have gotten paid for the custom job, at least 3/4ths of my time will go to developing that.
MIR2 is something I have been wanting for a long time. It should be light years better than V1, but I don't know yet just how well it will work. Looking forward to having a more powerful version of MIR for myself, though, that's for sure.
Shannon, will you be releasing the custom job as a commercial sub?
(10-30-2016, 01:44 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-30-2016, 01:35 AM)jonathan4all Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon do you have any plan for MLS 5.5G sooner ? I know you have some side projects going on too. But MLS 5G seems non-productive so far. It will be immensely helpful for learners and students if you start to build it soon.
What I have had in mind for a while now was MIR2 > MHS > MLS.
Awesome...look forward to testing that
I'm very happy to see that MLS will be receiving attention in the coming weeks! That was definitely the subliminal I was most excited about.
MLS was another sub I didn't feel much/any difference from, but I would be very keen to try an improved version. Any reason this won't be 6g though?
I still want to give DMSI 2.4 more time to do its clearing though....
(10-30-2016, 03:39 PM)swisston Wrote: [ -> ]MLS was another sub I didn't feel much/any difference from, but I would be very keen to try an improved version. Any reason this won't be 6g though?
I still want to give DMSI 2.4 more time to do its clearing though....
Some people felt they got better results from MLS 4G than they did with MLS 5G. I never used the 4G version and was happy with the results I got from the 5G version.
Each build of 5.5G is making 6G a reality. Shannon just finished MIR2, next is MHS. As he improves each build of 5.5, Shannon is getting closer to 6G. Making these two titles after DMSI 2.5 will make DMSI 3.0 a better product, technologically speaking.
Shannon Wrote:Plans are to start working on MHS next, and I will be working on DMSI 3.0 slowly, and the 6G prototype slowly, and when I have gotten paid for the custom job, at least 3/4ths of my time will go to developing that.
Is FYPJ going to get updated. I don't recall any results from that either