I noticed that when the ultrasonic part turns off for a moment the perceived volume of the trickling stream goes up quite a bit. Then quiets back down once the ultrasonic kicks back in
(12-01-2016, 10:32 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]Oh, did I forget to mention, it will now autocorrect volume by telling you if it's too loud or not loud enough?
Your subconscious will guide you. Follow those urges.
Ah that's good. I was concerned about the fact that the ultrasonic part of the hybrid track is the same as in the silent version, so I was wondering how I'd prevent ear damage if I listened to it on headphones. Since afaik you said that ultrasonic should only be played on speakers.
Hey Shannon,
I recall you giving someone on the forum a phrase they could repeat daily that could possibly help with resistance but cant remember exactly what it was. Something along the lines of "I allow myself to fully accept this programming" I believe. Would you mind repeating said phrase?
"I now safely, comfortably and effortlessly bring myself to and safely,
comfortably and effortlessly maintain an ideal state of mind, body and emotions in which
I am now completely relaxed and comfortable with, and actually allowing myself to trust,
cooperate with and be positively, safely and helpfully influenced by, the subliminal program I am using, DMSI"
Edit: the last word I added.
yo shannon the download title says version A and B but when you download it only downloads version A. Please sort this.
Also I didn't see any disclaimer when I downloaded. Can someone please post the disclaimer here. Thanks
Look at the last part, the first part is the title of the page, A and B. The end is the link. All of version A links are first, then B links.
Develop Maximum Sexual Irresistibility Ver. 3.0.1 A and B (5.5g - Type A/B/D Hybrid - Test Release) – DMSI_V3_0_1_A_Subliminal_flac.zip
(12-02-2016, 02:57 AM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]Look at the last part, the first part is the title of the page, A and B. The end is the link. All of version A links are first, then B links.
Develop Maximum Sexual Irresistibility Ver. 3.0.1 A and B (5.5g - Type A/B/D Hybrid - Test Release) – DMSI_V3_0_1_A_Subliminal_flac.zip
the first 2 dmsi links at the top say v3 track A and B. First says flac and the other say mp3.
So i assume that both A and B will download together??? which is not. its only downloading A.
Also I don't see any file to download B separately?? I only see single B files
@
Shannon
I have a question regarding the Anti-Piracy code:
After running my loops of DMSI, I remembered something a while back my dad was ill so I told him to run MIRv1, it was purchased for my mother to help her with a gum infection. He used her copy for like 20minutes and then stopped he stayed ill for another week or so.
I remembered this now with clarity, I didn't think nothing of it in regards to fair use, I personally don't think he gained much or anything from using it but I thought if it helps him I'd purchase, clearly forgot to do so.
So now I am wondering since I know he won't be using that copy, ever, will I have to purchase this copy for him even though I know he won't use it in the future he won't follow the instructions and would want it to work in 1 loop so pointless for me to get this for him..
So I was thinking if getting MIRv1 for myself would it de-activate the AP Code (if triggered), since I'd be paying for letting him use it that one time.
What are your thoughts, I pay for all my stuff, I don't even know why I let him use it for 20mins. Time to make it right, I don't want anything to interfere with my DMSI results.
Which one of the following would fix the issue:
Would paying for a copy of MIRv1 (for myself) resolve it?
Getting him a copy?
I know he won't be using it, even if I do purchase it for him, or would it have to be for him?
What are my options here, I could do with MIR 2.1 ..
(12-02-2016, 03:04 AM)dweller94 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
I have a question regarding the Anti-Piracy code:
After running my loops of DMSI, I remembered something a while back my dad was ill so I told him to run MIRv1, it was purchased for my mother to help her with a gum infection. He used her copy for like 20minutes and then stopped he stayed ill for another week or so.
I remembered this now with clarity, I didn't think nothing of it in regards to fair use, I personally don't think he gained much or anything from using it but I thought if it helps him I'd purchase, clearly forgot to do so.
So now I am wondering since I know he won't be using that copy, ever, will I have to purchase this copy for him even though I know he won't use it in the future he won't follow the instructions and would want it to work in 1 loop so pointless for me to get this for him..
So I was thinking if getting MIRv1 for myself would it de-activate the AP Code (if triggered), since I'd be paying for letting him use it that one time.
What are your thoughts, I pay for all my stuff, I don't even know why I let him use it for 20mins. Time to make it right, I don't want anything to interfere with my DMSI results.
Which one of the following would fix the issue:
Would paying for a copy of MIRv1 (for myself) resolve it?
Getting him a copy?
I know he won't be using it, even if I do purchase it for him, or would it have to be for him?
What are my options here, I could do with MIR 2.1 ..
Option A: You have the option of doing nothing, since he is not currently committing any breech of copyright law, and see if that works. If you remembered this after running DMSI, you likely will need to use option B:
Option B: Or you can purchase one or more copies of MIR 2.1 and then do with it/them whatever would correct the situation.
And 2.1 leaves 1.0 in the dust, so it;s nothing lost regardless.
(12-02-2016, 04:20 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: [ -> ]I still don't understand why I have an urge to run ASC while on AM6, but at the same time I heard a whisper that I must still go on AM6. Urges from two directions.
Any ideas?
Part A: "We need to run ASC, because then I won't have to deal with my fears."
Part B: "We need to run AM6 so you will have to deal with your fears, Part A."
(12-02-2016, 04:10 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2016, 03:04 AM)dweller94 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
I have a question regarding the Anti-Piracy code:
After running my loops of DMSI, I remembered something a while back my dad was ill so I told him to run MIRv1, it was purchased for my mother to help her with a gum infection. He used her copy for like 20minutes and then stopped he stayed ill for another week or so.
I remembered this now with clarity, I didn't think nothing of it in regards to fair use, I personally don't think he gained much or anything from using it but I thought if it helps him I'd purchase, clearly forgot to do so.
So now I am wondering since I know he won't be using that copy, ever, will I have to purchase this copy for him even though I know he won't use it in the future he won't follow the instructions and would want it to work in 1 loop so pointless for me to get this for him..
So I was thinking if getting MIRv1 for myself would it de-activate the AP Code (if triggered), since I'd be paying for letting him use it that one time.
What are your thoughts, I pay for all my stuff, I don't even know why I let him use it for 20mins. Time to make it right, I don't want anything to interfere with my DMSI results.
Which one of the following would fix the issue:
Would paying for a copy of MIRv1 (for myself) resolve it?
Getting him a copy?
I know he won't be using it, even if I do purchase it for him, or would it have to be for him?
What are my options here, I could do with MIR 2.1 ..
Option A: You have the option of doing nothing, since he is not currently committing any breech of copyright law, and see if that works. If you remembered this after running DMSI, you likely will need to use option B:
Option B: Or you can purchase one or more copies of MIR 2.1 and then do with it/them whatever would correct the situation.
And 2.1 leaves 1.0 in the dust, so it;s nothing lost regardless.
You say currently, does the AP code only account for what's currently taking place, since this was in the past and isn't currently breeching any copyright law I could do nothing.
But if the AP Code is being triggered would option B me purchasing 1 copy fix the situation that's what came to my mind, get it for myself and use when need be or even gift it to someone who may need it, as long as I get 1 copy.
Yeah that's what I was thinking regarding 2.1, save it for the future.
Quote:the first 2 dmsi links at the top say v3 track A and B. First says flac and the other say mp3.
So i assume that both A and B will download together??? which is not. its only downloading A.
Also I don't see any file to download B separately?? I only see single B files
I'm not really following. ALL the links say A and B at the start as it's the title of the page, the last part is the file you're downloading as I said. They aren't together which is why I said A was first then B.
14 files down it goes to B.
(12-02-2016, 04:35 AM)dweller94 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2016, 04:10 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2016, 03:04 AM)dweller94 Wrote: [ -> ]@Shannon
I have a question regarding the Anti-Piracy code:
After running my loops of DMSI, I remembered something a while back my dad was ill so I told him to run MIRv1, it was purchased for my mother to help her with a gum infection. He used her copy for like 20minutes and then stopped he stayed ill for another week or so.
I remembered this now with clarity, I didn't think nothing of it in regards to fair use, I personally don't think he gained much or anything from using it but I thought if it helps him I'd purchase, clearly forgot to do so.
So now I am wondering since I know he won't be using that copy, ever, will I have to purchase this copy for him even though I know he won't use it in the future he won't follow the instructions and would want it to work in 1 loop so pointless for me to get this for him..
So I was thinking if getting MIRv1 for myself would it de-activate the AP Code (if triggered), since I'd be paying for letting him use it that one time.
What are your thoughts, I pay for all my stuff, I don't even know why I let him use it for 20mins. Time to make it right, I don't want anything to interfere with my DMSI results.
Which one of the following would fix the issue:
Would paying for a copy of MIRv1 (for myself) resolve it?
Getting him a copy?
I know he won't be using it, even if I do purchase it for him, or would it have to be for him?
What are my options here, I could do with MIR 2.1 ..
Option A: You have the option of doing nothing, since he is not currently committing any breech of copyright law, and see if that works. If you remembered this after running DMSI, you likely will need to use option B:
Option B: Or you can purchase one or more copies of MIR 2.1 and then do with it/them whatever would correct the situation.
And 2.1 leaves 1.0 in the dust, so it;s nothing lost regardless.
You say currently, does the AP code only account for what's currently taking place, since this was in the past and isn't currently breeching any copyright law I could do nothing.
But if the AP Code is being triggered would option B me purchasing 1 copy fix the situation that's what came to my mind, get it for myself and use when need be.
Yeah that's what I was thinking regarding 2.1, save it for the future.
I am interested in stopping and preventing the piracy of my IP so I make the money I deserve to make from it, but at the same time, I am not trying to punish anyone or hold grudges. The AP code is scripted in the present tense. So if the infraction is no longer happening, one of two things will happen.
1. The AP code does not trigger.
2. The subconscious decides you need to correct this on moral grounds, and you trigger the AP code anyway.
Since you have apparently followed patch #2, you can try doing nothing, but your subconscious may not let you rest until you have corrected it.
No matter what, purchasing it will solve the problem. But I'm not using the AP code as a way to force sales. Just prevent illegal activity.