(10-10-2016, 06:06 AM)hunk Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:26 AM)Acmeisto Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:00 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-09-2016, 11:03 PM)NastyJ46 Wrote: [ -> ]Quick question out of curiosity:
i bought someone DMSI on their sub shop account. using my paypal. would that trigger the copy protection?
If that person has the only copies, and it is only used by that person, no. They can expose others to it without triggering APC, but only they can use it. One copy paid for, one copy under one person's control, should be all good.
Basically I am able to use ultrasonic while sleeping and at the same time a girl can sleep next to me without activating the copy protection?
:
But no, as Mr. Anderson said, that would not trigger copy protection. Now if she started using it for herself, or she had a copy that wasn't paid for... that could be another story.
Does DMSI have copy protection? 
(I thought the copy protection debate got over with you saying you'd rather focus on advancing technology than worrying about copy protection)
I thought the debate was on the advancement of the copy protection tech. Shannon can still put existing anti piracy code into his subs.
(10-10-2016, 07:43 AM)eternitys_child Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 06:06 AM)hunk Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:26 AM)Acmeisto Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:00 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]If that person has the only copies, and it is only used by that person, no. They can expose others to it without triggering APC, but only they can use it. One copy paid for, one copy under one person's control, should be all good.
Basically I am able to use ultrasonic while sleeping and at the same time a girl can sleep next to me without activating the copy protection?
:
But no, as Mr. Anderson said, that would not trigger copy protection. Now if she started using it for herself, or she had a copy that wasn't paid for... that could be another story.
Does DMSI have copy protection? (I thought the copy protection debate got over with you saying you'd rather focus on advancing technology than worrying about copy protection)
I thought the debate was on the advancement of the copy protection tech. Shannon can still put existing anti piracy code into his subs.
I don't think copy protection should be an issue as long as you purchased your copy of DMSI and are not sharing the files with anyone else.
is NSFM in 2.5 or do we have to wait for 3.0
(10-10-2016, 12:56 AM)Barba Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:53 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:32 AM)Barba Wrote: [ -> ] (10-09-2016, 11:11 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-09-2016, 12:58 AM)Barba Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, what are you working on at the moment (besides DMSI) and if/when next verions of AM, SM, WM can be expected?
Thanks.
I am working on overcoming the oddly high level of exhaustion I feel all the time lately... trying to work on 6G prototype, DMSI, MIR2... not getting very far very fast. I wake up feeling like I need to go to sleep lately. I think this may be the aftermath of the chickenpox, but I don't know why that would be.
I hope you find your energy Shannon. Any thoughts on AM, SM, WM in 6G? Is phasing out for any of these likely?
Thanks.
I don't understand your question about phasing out, but they will be in 6G when I have finished developing 6G.
What I meant if something like DMSI will be aimed to replace SM in the future to make SM redundant (therefore not likely to be upgraded to 6G).
I haven't gotten that far yet, I don't know. It is probable that DMSI will not replace SM, since SM is designed to take the effects of AM and render them extremely sexual. Not the same goal.So more than likely, SM will be upgraded to 6G.
(10-10-2016, 12:57 AM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]I just had a thought. I know it may be done for 3.0 but how difficult would it be to just do a healing version of 2.5 without the aura?
I know I still need a fair bit of that. Though this could just be that E2 is getting a little frustrating at the moment so my mind is trying to get me to jump ship.
It would be flat out impossible. The healing script uses the main goal script as a guide to know what to heal in order to be able to execute the main goal script.
(10-10-2016, 05:15 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:57 AM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]I just had a thought. I know it may be done for 3.0 but how difficult would it be to just do a healing version of 2.5 without the aura?
I know I still need a fair bit of that. Though this could just be that E2 is getting a little frustrating at the moment so my mind is trying to get me to jump ship.
It would be probably easier to make a 2.5 version with healing and another one without than making a healing-only version as the 2.4 script gets upgraded first which already has healing inside. At least as far I understood the process.
Yes. And I'd rather not get too out of line trying to focus on 2.5 instead of 30.
(10-10-2016, 06:06 AM)hunk Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:26 AM)Acmeisto Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:00 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-09-2016, 11:03 PM)NastyJ46 Wrote: [ -> ]Quick question out of curiosity:
i bought someone DMSI on their sub shop account. using my paypal. would that trigger the copy protection?
If that person has the only copies, and it is only used by that person, no. They can expose others to it without triggering APC, but only they can use it. One copy paid for, one copy under one person's control, should be all good.
Basically I am able to use ultrasonic while sleeping and at the same time a girl can sleep next to me without activating the copy protection?
:
But no, as Mr. Anderson said, that would not trigger copy protection. Now if she started using it for herself, or she had a copy that wasn't paid for... that could be another story.
Does DMSI have copy protection? (I thought the copy protection debate got over with you saying you'd rather focus on advancing technology than worrying about copy protection)
There is antipiracy scripting in DMSI. It's very short and very sweet and isn't the focus of my efforts. In four statements, it simply points out that piracy is illegal and is not the right thing to do, and it is urging you to not do that and correct your actions if you have.
When the final comes out, I may advance it further. For the time being, this is plenty good enough. I am not interested in spending my time trying to prevent piracy right now. The more powerful these programs become, the less complex and long the AP code needs to be. But knowing how tempting it will be in the future to pirate this program especially, yes, there is AP code in it. It accounts for 203 words in a script that is 15,404 words long in 2.5.
(10-10-2016, 06:11 AM)hunk Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:54 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:I have made a number of adjustments to DMSI 2.5. They include:
- Disabling all of the clearing modules.
- Tweaking the sniper.
- Tweaking the RIFX module.
- Tweaking the EGBX module.
- Implemented P4 (so we can add and test P4 now, and test P5 in 3.0 instead of 3.1.)
This should make the program more focused, more powerful and more effective to a noticeable degree. The sniper scripting, by the way, has been tweaked in a rather brilliant way. I'll reveal what it now does when we are done testing it.
Now I am exhausted, and I must rest before I start building. May have to wait for tomorrow. But it's ready to build, and almost all these adjustments will be ported to 3.0 to improve it also.
I am attempting to adjust the manifestation script for 2.4, but it is not working so far. I will try again after sleeping, but don't get your hopes up.
Will it be possible to do something about increasing the energy consumption? (so as to burn the energy faster) I've gained a bit of weight in last month or so on v2.4 and visibly so - around the waist 
Probably not. That would take me days to figure out. We are trying to have it built by the end of today. Which, given my 12 hours sleeping, is already at risk, given what all else I have to do today.
(10-10-2016, 12:34 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 06:11 AM)hunk Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:54 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:I have made a number of adjustments to DMSI 2.5. They include:
- Disabling all of the clearing modules.
- Tweaking the sniper.
- Tweaking the RIFX module.
- Tweaking the EGBX module.
- Implemented P4 (so we can add and test P4 now, and test P5 in 3.0 instead of 3.1.)
This should make the program more focused, more powerful and more effective to a noticeable degree. The sniper scripting, by the way, has been tweaked in a rather brilliant way. I'll reveal what it now does when we are done testing it.
Now I am exhausted, and I must rest before I start building. May have to wait for tomorrow. But it's ready to build, and almost all these adjustments will be ported to 3.0 to improve it also.
I am attempting to adjust the manifestation script for 2.4, but it is not working so far. I will try again after sleeping, but don't get your hopes up.
Will it be possible to do something about increasing the energy consumption? (so as to burn the energy faster) I've gained a bit of weight in last month or so on v2.4 and visibly so - around the waist
Probably not. That would take me days to figure out. We are trying to have it built by the end of today. Which, given my 12 hours sleeping, is already at risk, given what all else I have to do today.
I recall you writing several years ago that BAMM helped you multitask more efficiently without burning out. Is that still the case?
I feel that BAMM gives me a second wind at times but you have a lot more on your plate than me so I was just wondering.
(10-10-2016, 12:42 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:34 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 06:11 AM)hunk Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:54 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:I have made a number of adjustments to DMSI 2.5. They include:
- Disabling all of the clearing modules.
- Tweaking the sniper.
- Tweaking the RIFX module.
- Tweaking the EGBX module.
- Implemented P4 (so we can add and test P4 now, and test P5 in 3.0 instead of 3.1.)
This should make the program more focused, more powerful and more effective to a noticeable degree. The sniper scripting, by the way, has been tweaked in a rather brilliant way. I'll reveal what it now does when we are done testing it.
Now I am exhausted, and I must rest before I start building. May have to wait for tomorrow. But it's ready to build, and almost all these adjustments will be ported to 3.0 to improve it also.
I am attempting to adjust the manifestation script for 2.4, but it is not working so far. I will try again after sleeping, but don't get your hopes up.
Will it be possible to do something about increasing the energy consumption? (so as to burn the energy faster) I've gained a bit of weight in last month or so on v2.4 and visibly so - around the waist
Probably not. That would take me days to figure out. We are trying to have it built by the end of today. Which, given my 12 hours sleeping, is already at risk, given what all else I have to do today.
I recall you writing several years ago that BAMM helped you multitask more efficiently without burning out. Is that still the case?
I feel that BAMM gives me a second wind at times but you have a lot more on your plate than me so I was just wondering.
Yes, it is still true. The problem is, I have the equivalent of several novels to write and edit at the same time (these scripts are getting to the point of being ridiculous in complexity), plus several other very draining things in my personal life to deal with. Too much energy going out, in too many directions at once.
Shannon Wrote:Maybe this one should try the idea of sourcing energy from unwanted body fat, if I can make that work?
Hope this will be not the only energy source.
(10-10-2016, 12:52 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon Wrote:Maybe this one should try the idea of sourcing energy from unwanted body fat, if I can make that work?
Hope this will be not the only energy source.
I was referring to adding it to the current source, food.
(10-10-2016, 12:58 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2016, 12:52 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon Wrote:Maybe this one should try the idea of sourcing energy from unwanted body fat, if I can make that work?
Hope this will be not the only energy source.
I was referring to adding it to the current source, food.
If you manage to pull that off, I shall shower you in shekels.