Subliminal Talk

Full Version: Shannon's Journal Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691
(10-10-2016, 06:06 AM)hunk Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:26 AM)Acmeisto Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:00 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-09-2016, 11:03 PM)NastyJ46 Wrote: [ -> ]Quick question out of curiosity:
i bought someone DMSI on their sub shop account. using my paypal. would that trigger the copy protection?
If that person has the only copies, and it is only used by that person, no. They can expose others to it without triggering APC, but only they can use it. One copy paid for, one copy under one person's control, should be all good.

Basically I am able to use ultrasonic while sleeping and at the same time a girl can sleep next to me without activating the copy protection?
:
But no, as Mr. Anderson said, that would not trigger copy protection. Now if she started using it for herself, or she had a copy that wasn't paid for... that could be another story.

Does DMSI have copy protection? Huh (I thought the copy protection debate got over with you saying you'd rather focus on advancing technology than worrying about copy protection)

I thought the debate was on the advancement of the copy protection tech. Shannon can still put existing anti piracy code into his subs.
(10-10-2016, 07:43 AM)eternitys_child Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 06:06 AM)hunk Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:26 AM)Acmeisto Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:00 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]If that person has the only copies, and it is only used by that person, no. They can expose others to it without triggering APC, but only they can use it. One copy paid for, one copy under one person's control, should be all good.

Basically I am able to use ultrasonic while sleeping and at the same time a girl can sleep next to me without activating the copy protection?
:
But no, as Mr. Anderson said, that would not trigger copy protection. Now if she started using it for herself, or she had a copy that wasn't paid for... that could be another story.

Does DMSI have copy protection? Huh (I thought the copy protection debate got over with you saying you'd rather focus on advancing technology than worrying about copy protection)

I thought the debate was on the advancement of the copy protection tech. Shannon can still put existing anti piracy code into his subs.

I don't think copy protection should be an issue as long as you purchased your copy of DMSI and are not sharing the files with anyone else.
is NSFM in 2.5 or do we have to wait for 3.0
(10-10-2016, 12:56 AM)Barba Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:53 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:32 AM)Barba Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-09-2016, 11:11 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-09-2016, 12:58 AM)Barba Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, what are you working on at the moment (besides DMSI) and if/when next verions of AM, SM, WM can be expected?

Thanks.

I am working on overcoming the oddly high level of exhaustion I feel all the time lately... trying to work on 6G prototype, DMSI, MIR2... not getting very far very fast. I wake up feeling like I need to go to sleep lately. I think this may be the aftermath of the chickenpox, but I don't know why that would be.

I hope you find your energy Shannon. Any thoughts on AM, SM, WM in 6G? Is phasing out for any of these likely?

Thanks.

I don't understand your question about phasing out, but they will be in 6G when I have finished developing 6G.

What I meant if something like DMSI will be aimed to replace SM in the future to make SM redundant (therefore not likely to be upgraded to 6G).

I haven't gotten that far yet, I don't know. It is probable that DMSI will not replace SM, since SM is designed to take the effects of AM and render them extremely sexual. Not the same goal.So more than likely, SM will be upgraded to 6G.
(10-10-2016, 12:57 AM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]I just had a thought. I know it may be done for 3.0 but how difficult would it be to just do a healing version of 2.5 without the aura?

I know I still need a fair bit of that. Though this could just be that E2 is getting a little frustrating at the moment so my mind is trying to get me to jump ship.

It would be flat out impossible. The healing script uses the main goal script as a guide to know what to heal in order to be able to execute the main goal script.
(10-10-2016, 05:15 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:57 AM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]I just had a thought. I know it may be done for 3.0 but how difficult would it be to just do a healing version of 2.5 without the aura?

I know I still need a fair bit of that. Though this could just be that E2 is getting a little frustrating at the moment so my mind is trying to get me to jump ship.

It would be probably easier to make a 2.5 version with healing and another one without than making a healing-only version as the 2.4 script gets upgraded first which already has healing inside. At least as far I understood the process.

Yes. And I'd rather not get too out of line trying to focus on 2.5 instead of 30.
(10-10-2016, 06:06 AM)hunk Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:26 AM)Acmeisto Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:00 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-09-2016, 11:03 PM)NastyJ46 Wrote: [ -> ]Quick question out of curiosity:
i bought someone DMSI on their sub shop account. using my paypal. would that trigger the copy protection?
If that person has the only copies, and it is only used by that person, no. They can expose others to it without triggering APC, but only they can use it. One copy paid for, one copy under one person's control, should be all good.

Basically I am able to use ultrasonic while sleeping and at the same time a girl can sleep next to me without activating the copy protection?
:
But no, as Mr. Anderson said, that would not trigger copy protection. Now if she started using it for herself, or she had a copy that wasn't paid for... that could be another story.

Does DMSI have copy protection? Huh (I thought the copy protection debate got over with you saying you'd rather focus on advancing technology than worrying about copy protection)

There is antipiracy scripting in DMSI. It's very short and very sweet and isn't the focus of my efforts. In four statements, it simply points out that piracy is illegal and is not the right thing to do, and it is urging you to not do that and correct your actions if you have.

When the final comes out, I may advance it further. For the time being, this is plenty good enough. I am not interested in spending my time trying to prevent piracy right now. The more powerful these programs become, the less complex and long the AP code needs to be. But knowing how tempting it will be in the future to pirate this program especially, yes, there is AP code in it. It accounts for 203 words in a script that is 15,404 words long in 2.5.
(10-10-2016, 06:11 AM)hunk Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:54 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:I have made a number of adjustments to DMSI 2.5. They include:

- Disabling all of the clearing modules.
- Tweaking the sniper.
- Tweaking the RIFX module.
- Tweaking the EGBX module.
- Implemented P4 (so we can add and test P4 now, and test P5 in 3.0 instead of 3.1.)

This should make the program more focused, more powerful and more effective to a noticeable degree. The sniper scripting, by the way, has been tweaked in a rather brilliant way. I'll reveal what it now does when we are done testing it.

Now I am exhausted, and I must rest before I start building. May have to wait for tomorrow. But it's ready to build, and almost all these adjustments will be ported to 3.0 to improve it also.

I am attempting to adjust the manifestation script for 2.4, but it is not working so far. I will try again after sleeping, but don't get your hopes up.

Will it be possible to do something about increasing the energy consumption? (so as to burn the energy faster) I've gained a bit of weight in last month or so on v2.4 and visibly so - around the waist Sad

Probably not. That would take me days to figure out. We are trying to have it built by the end of today. Which, given my 12 hours sleeping, is already at risk, given what all else I have to do today.
(10-10-2016, 10:15 AM)Rocket13 Wrote: [ -> ]is NSFM in 2.5 or do we have to wait for 3.0

NSFM is in 3.0.
(10-10-2016, 12:34 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 06:11 AM)hunk Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:54 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:I have made a number of adjustments to DMSI 2.5. They include:

- Disabling all of the clearing modules.
- Tweaking the sniper.
- Tweaking the RIFX module.
- Tweaking the EGBX module.
- Implemented P4 (so we can add and test P4 now, and test P5 in 3.0 instead of 3.1.)

This should make the program more focused, more powerful and more effective to a noticeable degree. The sniper scripting, by the way, has been tweaked in a rather brilliant way. I'll reveal what it now does when we are done testing it.

Now I am exhausted, and I must rest before I start building. May have to wait for tomorrow. But it's ready to build, and almost all these adjustments will be ported to 3.0 to improve it also.

I am attempting to adjust the manifestation script for 2.4, but it is not working so far. I will try again after sleeping, but don't get your hopes up.

Will it be possible to do something about increasing the energy consumption? (so as to burn the energy faster) I've gained a bit of weight in last month or so on v2.4 and visibly so - around the waist Sad

Probably not. That would take me days to figure out. We are trying to have it built by the end of today. Which, given my 12 hours sleeping, is already at risk, given what all else I have to do today.

I recall you writing several years ago that BAMM helped you multitask more efficiently without burning out. Is that still the case?

I feel that BAMM gives me a second wind at times but you have a lot more on your plate than me so I was just wondering.
(10-10-2016, 12:42 PM)THolt Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:34 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 06:11 AM)hunk Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:54 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:I have made a number of adjustments to DMSI 2.5. They include:

- Disabling all of the clearing modules.
- Tweaking the sniper.
- Tweaking the RIFX module.
- Tweaking the EGBX module.
- Implemented P4 (so we can add and test P4 now, and test P5 in 3.0 instead of 3.1.)

This should make the program more focused, more powerful and more effective to a noticeable degree. The sniper scripting, by the way, has been tweaked in a rather brilliant way. I'll reveal what it now does when we are done testing it.

Now I am exhausted, and I must rest before I start building. May have to wait for tomorrow. But it's ready to build, and almost all these adjustments will be ported to 3.0 to improve it also.

I am attempting to adjust the manifestation script for 2.4, but it is not working so far. I will try again after sleeping, but don't get your hopes up.

Will it be possible to do something about increasing the energy consumption? (so as to burn the energy faster) I've gained a bit of weight in last month or so on v2.4 and visibly so - around the waist Sad

Probably not. That would take me days to figure out. We are trying to have it built by the end of today. Which, given my 12 hours sleeping, is already at risk, given what all else I have to do today.

I recall you writing several years ago that BAMM helped you multitask more efficiently without burning out. Is that still the case?

I feel that BAMM gives me a second wind at times but you have a lot more on your plate than me so I was just wondering.

Yes, it is still true. The problem is, I have the equivalent of several novels to write and edit at the same time (these scripts are getting to the point of being ridiculous in complexity), plus several other very draining things in my personal life to deal with. Too much energy going out, in too many directions at once.
Shannon Wrote:Maybe this one should try the idea of sourcing energy from unwanted body fat, if I can make that work?

Hope this will be not the only energy source.
(10-10-2016, 12:52 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ]
Shannon Wrote:Maybe this one should try the idea of sourcing energy from unwanted body fat, if I can make that work?

Hope this will be not the only energy source.

I was referring to adding it to the current source, food.
(10-10-2016, 12:58 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-10-2016, 12:52 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: [ -> ]
Shannon Wrote:Maybe this one should try the idea of sourcing energy from unwanted body fat, if I can make that work?

Hope this will be not the only energy source.

I was referring to adding it to the current source, food.

If you manage to pull that off, I shall shower you in shekels.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691