(09-22-2016, 11:57 AM)robstar Wrote: [ -> ] (09-22-2016, 11:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]How about we remember what DMSI is for - giving THEM the "balls to act", not you!
I thought dmsi was about achieving as much sex as possible with attractive parties?
Regardless I think waiting for extremely obvious signs is unproductive, and holds many guys back from actually getting laid. A great sexual interaction is one where you don't even know who made the first move, it just happens like two magnets drawn together, and hoping that they'll make the move prevents you from allowing that.
The goal of DMSI is to get people you find sexually attractive to initiate and have as much sex as you allow. YOU are supposed to meet them half way, only because that maximizes the odds until we get the other part working. Until that point, we need to be active also.
You mention the 'safety' issue on 6th Generation Version; Is that concerning the user's safety: Physically and Psychologically ?
(09-22-2016, 12:05 PM)DisneylandUSA Wrote: [ -> ]You mention the 'safety' issue on 6th Generation Version; Is that concerning the user's safety: Physically and Psychologically ?
Quote:But, I don't want to give the advice to use DMSI as an aphrodisiac yet because I am not done determining what the safety effects are.
This refers to DMSI, which is currently the 5.5G flagship. It's working with energies and affecting others, and when two or more people come into contact with this influence at the same time, they cause a feedback loop which theoretically results in an exponential energy projection, with the exponent being how many people are being affected at once.
This could have adverse effects if someone was exposed to too much of this energy.
I have not finished testing how safe it is to expose others.
Shannon , i wS just a bit surprised to know that you will be experimenting witha new source of energy for v3 while i thought this issue was resolved since different source of energy were tried since V1. I was just thinking that v3 was the ultimate version that you are working on to seal the deal. Now with this trying of a new source of energy, it may of course work well but it might just go flat!
(09-22-2016, 01:01 PM)Light Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon , i wS just a bit surprised to know that you will be experimenting witha new source of energy for v3 while i thought this issue was resolved since different source of energy were tried since V1. I was just thinking that v3 was the ultimate version that you are working on to seal the deal. Now with this trying of a new source of energy, it may of course work well but it might just go flat!
3.0 is going to be a major upgrade. Anyone who has ever used the .0 version of anything knows, .0 is rarely the best version. It's usually .x, where x > 1. I'm going to aim to make 3.0 as mind blowing as I can, but I also know me: I'm going to want to make it better. That means I am very likely to tweak it and release one or more minor upgrade versions. I'm not easily satisfied.
As for the energy source, I think we got it right in 2.4, but we made a mistake in limiting it to just one source. We need multiple simultaneous sources to supply all the energy necessary. I think we are seeing issues in part because there's not enough energy available to actually do all of what the subconscious is trying to do. So I'm probably going to try to augment the energy sourcing to prevent undue hunger and take up whatever difference there is between the energy you get from food, and how much energy you really need to fully execute, in the moment, continuously.
(09-22-2016, 01:33 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]So I'm probably going to try to augment the energy sourcing to prevent undue hunger and take up whatever difference there is between the energy you get from food, and how much energy you really need to fully execute, in the moment, continuously.
Will it be the subtle energy sourcing from 2.1? It didn't always hit, but when it hit - dayum! Perhaps the physical/subtle source combo is just the ticket.
(09-22-2016, 01:48 PM)RTBoss Wrote: [ -> ] (09-22-2016, 01:33 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]So I'm probably going to try to augment the energy sourcing to prevent undue hunger and take up whatever difference there is between the energy you get from food, and how much energy you really need to fully execute, in the moment, continuously.
Will it be the subtle energy sourcing from 2.1? It didn't always hit, but when it hit - dayum! Perhaps the physical/subtle source combo is just the ticket.
I'm not sure yet. I think each energy source needs it's own statement in the script, though.
Will we be seeing a v2.5 since the single energy sourcing isn't completely suited for the goals of the program?
If you're changing or adding just one thing into the script (which rarely ever happens with you, but I'm very grateful it is that way:P) it shouldn't take long to make a 2.5, no?
(09-22-2016, 01:57 PM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: [ -> ]Will we be seeing a v2.5 since the single energy sourcing isn't completely suited for the goals of the program?
If you're changing or adding just one thing into the script (which rarely ever happens with you, but I'm very grateful it is that way
) it shouldn't take long to make a 2.5, no?
I have already contemplated a 2.5. If I have some extra time and motivation to build it, 2.5 would simply be 2.4 without the healing.
No guarantees that I will build it. I am contemplating it, but it seems unlikely.
Hey Shannon,
I just wanted to give a little bit of feed back on my experiences so far with 2.4 to try and make the next version better. I hope anything I say is taken as just plain complaining but as constructive criticism since I know you've been working hard and had to go through a lot of stress because of the recent moving of your work from your office to home. I was wondering if you could explain this Sniper effect I've been reading about a little bit more. I ask because I'm kinda of seeing a limiting of my results while on 2.4 and don't know if its due to this particular thing or something else. Mainly I'm finding that in person I'm only really attracting intelligent but plain looking women. Using my work as an example, on previous versions I would get hits from a variety of women at work (not limited to simply intelligent but also include women who were probably socially intelligent, or simply just liked having fun all the time). I have noticed since 2.4 this has only been narrowed down to two women in particular who rate high on intelligence but in the looks department are very, very plain looking. Don't get me wrong, because of their intelligence I've actually see them a little bit more attractive than usual but at the same time wouldn't mind having more universal results when it comes to attracting different women.
On the manifestation front its been something similar. I usually have a attraction to foreign women mainly because of things like better manners when dealing with people and once again a slight intelligence factor. What i noticed was that on previous versions I would manifest women wanting meet ups on both local accounts (POF) and a little bit on my foreign accounts. Since 2.4 manifestation has been solely on my international pen pal and dating accounts (That I had signed up on long ago and totally forgotten about until now). That's nice and all but the problem is: I don't exactly have the time and money (like i use to) to go half way across the globe, seduce a foreign woman, sleep with her a few nights, and then travel back here.
I still enjoy the results I'm getting but at the same time kinda of wish they weren't as limited on this version. I just would want the attraction to have more universal appeal like I was getting on previous versions. Once again don't know if this sniper effect has anything to do with it or not but it seems like my subconscious is only narrowing down the affects to a particular type of women. Maybe you can shed some light on this.
(09-22-2016, 02:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (09-22-2016, 01:57 PM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: [ -> ]Will we be seeing a v2.5 since the single energy sourcing isn't completely suited for the goals of the program?
If you're changing or adding just one thing into the script (which rarely ever happens with you, but I'm very grateful it is that way) it shouldn't take long to make a 2.5, no?
I have already contemplated a 2.5. If I have some extra time and motivation to build it, 2.5 would simply be 2.4 without the healing.
No guarantees that I will build it. I am contemplating it, but it seems unlikely.
We don't need a 2.5 I think it's better to focus on the 3.0.x at this point.
(09-22-2016, 02:23 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Shannon,
I just wanted to give a little bit of feed back on my experiences so far with 2.4 to try and make the next version better. I hope anything I say is taken as just plain complaining but as constructive criticism since I know you've been working hard and had to go through a lot of stress because of the recent moving of your work from your office to home. I was wondering if you could explain this Sniper effect I've been reading about a little bit more. I ask because I'm kinda of seeing a limiting of my results while on 2.4 and don't know if its due to this particular thing or something else. Mainly I'm finding that in person I'm only really attracting intelligent but plain looking women. Using my work as an example, on previous versions I would get hits from a variety of women at work (not limited to simply intelligent but also include women who were probably socially intelligent, or simply just liked having fun all the time). I have noticed since 2.4 this has only been narrowed down to two women in particular who rate high on intelligence but in the looks department are very, very plain looking. Don't get me wrong, because of their intelligence I've actually see them a little bit more attractive than usual but at the same time wouldn't mind having more universal results when it comes to attracting different women.
On the manifestation front its been something similar. I usually have a attraction to foreign women mainly because of things like better manners when dealing with people and once again a slight intelligence factor. What i noticed was that on previous versions I would manifest women wanting meet ups on both local accounts (POF) and a little bit on my foreign accounts. Since 2.4 manifestation has been solely on my international pen pal and dating accounts (That I had signed up on long ago and totally forgotten about until now). That's nice and all but the problem is: I don't exactly have the time and money (like i use to) to go half way across the globe, seduce a foreign woman, sleep with her a few nights, and then travel back here.
I still enjoy the results I'm getting but at the same time kinda of wish they weren't as limited on this version. I just would want the attraction to have more universal appeal like I was getting on previous versions. Once again don't know if this sniper effect has anything to do with it or not but it seems like my subconscious is only narrowing down the affects to a particular type of women. Maybe you can shed some light on this.
The sniper effect is based on the concept of focusing on specific attributes that you find attractive, and according to how attractive you find them. So when you come across a woman who has a stunning body, that's what will be the basis for the auric sniping. If she's plain, but has what you consider a sexy brain, then her brain will be the basis for the auric sniping. The more types of things about her that you find sexually attractive, and the more sexually attractive you find them, the more powerful the sniping effect becomes. It's not narrowing anything; all women get baseline aura effect. But a woman who has any trait you find attractive will get more for each such trait, and more according to how attractive it is to you.
This has nothing to do with the manifestation modules. Those are actually going to get a complete overhaul, since I want to get them to behave in a synergistic manner and aim more specifically to manifest sex.
(09-22-2016, 02:46 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ] (09-22-2016, 02:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (09-22-2016, 01:57 PM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: [ -> ]Will we be seeing a v2.5 since the single energy sourcing isn't completely suited for the goals of the program?
If you're changing or adding just one thing into the script (which rarely ever happens with you, but I'm very grateful it is that way) it shouldn't take long to make a 2.5, no?
I have already contemplated a 2.5. If I have some extra time and motivation to build it, 2.5 would simply be 2.4 without the healing.
No guarantees that I will build it. I am contemplating it, but it seems unlikely.
We don't need a 2.5 I think it's better to focus on the 3.0.x at this point.
Given that it is likely to take me 3 days to build Beast 8, I agree.
Awesome progress Shannon!!