Subliminal Talk

That's a good point. I didn't really compute that if I had already done WM, just had it in my head straight after AM. But ok cool, that means it's been 6 months.

(03-14-2016, 06:21 PM)maxx55 Wrote: [ -> ]I'm excited about the manifestation advancements Shannon! Would active manifestation be reserved solely for 6G or for example, could we see Actively Manifest Your Perfect Platinum Blonde Girlfriend 5.5G in the coming months?

Active manifestation does not require 6G, or even 5.5G. It can be done quite well in standard 5G format. In fact, for best results, you probably wouldn't even want it in 6G format. Why? Because 6G is defined as being basically 5G, plus more than 42 different technologies I developed for 6G. Those technologies are not aimed at manifestation improvement; the majority of them would not even make sense for that. So unless I find some way to change that, remember that generation format does not mean newer is better in all cases. The format is developed to deal with a specific focus, and 6G was not designed to focus on simple issues like manifestation, which can be done with a single properly worded statement. It's designed to deal effectively with very complex, very challenging issues and strong resistance.

I was planning to have the active manifestations be in 5.5G, or maybe 5G, depending on what I find produces the best results.

(03-14-2016, 08:07 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon if I was to do a second run of WM after this should I do AM refresher for 32 days first? I know this needs to be done if you take a while off after AM but I don't remember anyone doing WM twice in a row.

Answered.

(03-13-2016, 06:59 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-13-2016, 06:53 PM)Why So Serious? Wrote: [ -> ]Hey, if you don't mind Shannon what is a transcendent AF or your deifinition? I've been trying to figure that out for the longest.

Amusingly, I just created this link to the post that explains it in detail.

It's here:

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7310.html

EDIT: Oops, I didn't see that... AF. Well I would say it's much the same as a TAM, but female. Ultimately, it's about self mastery, self realization and being able to take care of, provide for and do for oneself. Being the best self you can be, and of course... alphas are usually leaders, whether by choice or necessity or simply because others choose to follow their lead.

There is something that need clarification in my mind here. Alpha Female vs Alpha male. I understand that a female can also be an alpha and I have no problem with that. But I understand alpha as a leader, and when a female is a leader she is using her male side. Like when a man is very social, he is using his female side.

So that's where I think the female counter part of alpha male is counter intuitive. If there is someone that is an Alpha Male, if he is dominant, then there is a need for someone that receive on the other end. Like in a company there is a boss and there is the employee.

So ultimately if there is someone dominant, there is someone submissive. Problem is that a lot of people have given a wrong connotation to the word submissive and they see it as weak.
A female goal would go more toward the submissive role, on the receiving hand. Her goal would be more a social role, and if they can't stand the work submissive they can use the term "socially dominant". For men it will be harder to be socially dominant, as men are generally less social than women and women are generally more social, more submissive.

So I have nothing against a women being alpha or dominant. Men can also be social and submissive. We all have a female and male side.

Also their goal would tend to be more about emotional freedom, emotional health. So it would be more similar to Ephra.
So I'm wondering how the AF sub is scripted, is it a more on the leadership part, her male side and more on her female side?

Alpha females can be leader under women my sis is an alpha female but gets dominated when she is with me, my ex is also alpha under her friends but submissive towards me, alpha females need stronger domination than normal women

Shannon, do you think you could add "physical, mental and emotional relaxation to maximize and benefit healing" module to MAXIMUM HEALING SPEED 5.5 G - the sub you wrote about in you journal?

It's going to be an instant purchase for me as soon as this sub is available in the shop.

(03-14-2016, 11:06 PM)Alpha360 Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-13-2016, 06:59 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-13-2016, 06:53 PM)Why So Serious? Wrote: [ -> ]Hey, if you don't mind Shannon what is a transcendent AF or your deifinition? I've been trying to figure that out for the longest.

Amusingly, I just created this link to the post that explains it in detail.

It's here:

http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7310.html

EDIT: Oops, I didn't see that... AF. Well I would say it's much the same as a TAM, but female. Ultimately, it's about self mastery, self realization and being able to take care of, provide for and do for oneself. Being the best self you can be, and of course... alphas are usually leaders, whether by choice or necessity or simply because others choose to follow their lead.

There is something that need clarification in my mind here. Alpha Female vs Alpha male. I understand that a female can also be an alpha and I have no problem with that. But I understand alpha as a leader, and when a female is a leader she is using her male side. Like when a man is very social, he is using his female side.

So that's where I think the female counter part of alpha male is counter intuitive. If there is someone that is an Alpha Male, if he is dominant, then there is a need for someone that receive on the other end. Like in a company there is a boss and there is the employee.

So ultimately if there is someone dominant, there is someone submissive. Problem is that a lot of people have given a wrong connotation to the word submissive and they see it as weak.
A female goal would go more toward the submissive role, on the receiving hand. Her goal would be more a social role, and if they can't stand the work submissive they can use the term "socially dominant". For men it will be harder to be socially dominant, as men are generally less social than women and women are generally more social, more submissive.

So I have nothing against a women being alpha or dominant. Men can also be social and submissive. We all have a female and male side.

Also their goal would tend to be more about emotional freedom, emotional health. So it would be more similar to Ephra.
So I'm wondering how the AF sub is scripted, is it a more on the leadership part, her male side and more on her female side?

Leadership is not a male, dominant quality. Men just think it is.

Simple yin and yang philosophy. A man usually sees leadership as dominance and exerting ones will, but all leadership is is getting other people to do what you want.

Subtle and mindful manipulation of a dominant alpha male by an alpha female is very easy to understand. Dude thinks he's dominant, he does what he thinks he wants, and the entire time there is a submissive and passive woman mindfully and naturally "giving into" and "submitting" to the man while perfecting manipulating him into what her goal is.

Males spend a lot of time beating their chests, but ultimately all that matters is who gets what they want when it comes to leadership. It just so happens that the best leaders get everyone what everyone wants. Small scale "alphas" usually are not mindful of this. Giving in to smaller demands to fulfill greater goals usually makes more sense to feminine personas.

As the official alpha male of this forum, I agree.

(03-15-2016, 03:15 AM)Nox Wrote: [ -> ]Males spend a lot of time beating their chests, but ultimately all that matters is who gets what they want when it comes to leadership. It just so happens that the best leaders get everyone what everyone wants. Small scale "alphas" usually are not mindful of this. Giving in to smaller demands to fulfill greater goals usually makes more sense to feminine personas.

(emphasis mine)

The above should be quote of the year. That's true leadership, make legitimate effort to satisfy as many as possible in as viable and constructive ways as possible. It's a shame I find myself acquainting with more shortsighted poseurs than real deals for some reason (maybe I'm subconsciously trying to perpetuate a "big fish in a small pond" mindset?).

Be mindful of this when doing self-improvement work, make sure that you aren't (un-)intentionally trying to self-sabotage.

Shannon will you make the new mhs at limited price just as you did with e2?

Will max healing speed include the work that's been done on the brain/body balancer?

(03-15-2016, 08:14 AM)apollolux Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-15-2016, 03:15 AM)Nox Wrote: [ -> ]Males spend a lot of time beating their chests, but ultimately all that matters is who gets what they want when it comes to leadership. It just so happens that the best leaders get everyone what everyone wants. Small scale "alphas" usually are not mindful of this. Giving in to smaller demands to fulfill greater goals usually makes more sense to feminine personas.

(emphasis mine)

The above should be quote of the year. That's true leadership, make legitimate effort to satisfy as many as possible in as viable and constructive ways as possible. It's a shame I find myself acquainting with more shortsighted poseurs than real deals for some reason (maybe I'm subconsciously trying to perpetuate a "big fish in a small pond" mindset?).

Be mindful of this when doing self-improvement work, make sure that you aren't (un-)intentionally trying to self-sabotage.

Yeah man, its tough. On one hand we gotta work our way up the ladder. Can't take care of others without taking care of our own stuff first, but when do we stop using that as a tool for progress? Are we actually lessening ourselves? Using a crutch? Trapped in fear? It gets pretty scary sometimes.

(03-12-2016, 09:22 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-11-2016, 01:09 PM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: [ -> ]WHO WANTS BIATBW & AOS UPGRADED TO 5G OR 6G FIRST !!??? MEEEEEEE !!!!!! So Shannon will you ?

Eventually.

That seems like it's going to be years from now but it's worth waiting for. When I get the money, I'll ask for a custom sub of that. Maybe you'll want to make it for me if it's a custom order.

I also want to recommend building a " gorgeous aura/energy " sub into the long-awaited DAOS & BIATBWS combo. So it will be DAOS + BIATBWS + Gorgeous Aura into one sub. Beauty is important too. Gorgeous aura is designed to give you an extremely gorgeous aura of energy around your entire body which womem wil notice and physically see you as attactive/gorgeous/good-looking whatever word they will use.

(03-15-2016, 01:28 PM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-12-2016, 09:22 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-11-2016, 01:09 PM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: [ -> ]WHO WANTS BIATBW & AOS UPGRADED TO 5G OR 6G FIRST !!??? MEEEEEEE !!!!!! So Shannon will you ?

Eventually.

That seems like it's going to be years from now but it's worth waiting for. When I get the money, I'll ask for a custom sub of that. Maybe you'll want to make it for me if it's a custom order.

I also want to recommend building a " gorgeous aura/energy " sub into the long-awaited DAOS & BIATBWS combo. So it will be DAOS + BIATBWS + Gorgeous Aura into one sub. Beauty is important too. Gorgeous aura is designed to give you an extremely gorgeous aura of energy around your entire body which womem wil notice and physically see you as attactive/gorgeous/good-looking whatever word they will use.

It's an interesting idea, but is there such a thing as gorgeous energy? If so, I think it'd go along well.