Subliminal Talk

Full Version: Shannon's Journal Discussion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691
I've been running BIAWS the past 3+ weeks, and since I've been running it a gay friend of mine has been texting me every morning like clockwork. Pretty weird.
I'm for polyamory myself. The girls I meet, they would probably be the same in one way or another. That's why I don't wanna be restricted to just 'single women'. In reality, a huge percentage of women are already involved or seeing somebody - but at the same time still available. I've experienced it too much as I've been on numerous dates with girls who apparently have a bf.
(02-23-2016, 07:52 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ]I'm for polyamory myself. The girls I meet, they would probably be the same in one way or another. That's why I don't wanna be restricted to just 'single women'. In reality, a huge percentage of women are already involved or seeing somebody - but at the same time still available. I've experienced it too much as I've been on numerous dates with girls who apparently have a bf.

Yeah I am too. Polyamory is the way to go.

I also think that since girls can be with multiple guys, and most are, Shannon should focus on eliminating the blockages to that. I don't know exactly what would be involved, but a lot of it has to do with girls thinking they will either be judged or found out by friends or family.

Since state transference is a thing, I imagine you could create a state where you feel totally safe, secure, and uninhibited which you would then pass on to everyone in your immediate vicinity, while somehow targeting the girls of your desires.

I've noticed a lot of weird stuff in regards to state transference. Specifically in sales. So I know the potential is there.

Something to watch out for, however, is that state transference can be transfered and then "stolen".

What I mean by that is, let's say I hit on a girl, and she has just enough self control to resist my advances. So she goes on her merry way. But now she's turned on, and needs a release, so she finds her beta BF/husband she never f*cks and rides him out of the blue. This is not uncommon and I noticed this kind of thing happened to me more than once (once with my brother talking with me about sex and then he lost his V shortly thereafter and now is an "alpha", another time I'm sure a guy I knew who had been talking about me with his GF got lucky with her)

So we need something in these subs that anchors US (the user) as the sole source of this state and it has to be very hard for other people to steal our thunder.
(02-22-2016, 11:00 PM)heavysm Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-22-2016, 10:43 PM)Trend Wrote: [ -> ]Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G should be the next update for BASE !!!

But you're likely to become good with money while using BASE, so do you really need a partner who is financially wealthy? As a BASE user, I don't need my partner to particularly be wealthy.

Also, wouldn't such a sub be most useful for others to use so they can attract BASE users into their lives? Lol

As an entrepreneur, it takes a lot of energy and costly mistakes before things are going in your favor; you're obviously not there yet, so you do need a wealthy partner Tongue

I think David DeAngelo or Dan Pena was mentioning that when two people are pursuing the same goal, it's the equivalent of your effort multiplied 5 times than if you'd be doing it by yourself; who would be better to have around getting you through your downfalls than the one person you trust being part of your life and such.

Then, after you have the $$$ and everybody's happy, you can go on a tangent ... large-breasted nymphomaniac lover, flat-chested with the midget kinky soul-mate and such.

Personally, if Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G is in the works, Shannon, I can forward you payment for the order right now, even before you get started on it so we can be clear that this is not a bu#!$#!t request.

Thanks.
(02-23-2016, 08:05 PM)Trend Wrote: [ -> ]Personally, if Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G is in the works, Shannon, I can forward you payment for the order right now, even before you get started on it so we can be clear that this is not a bu#!$#!t request.

Thanks.


Doesn't sound bad, I got a slight addition however: Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover Who Shares Her Money With You 5G

Big Grin
(02-23-2016, 08:13 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-23-2016, 08:05 PM)Trend Wrote: [ -> ]Personally, if Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G is in the works, Shannon, I can forward you payment for the order right now, even before you get started on it so we can be clear that this is not a bu#!$#!t request.

Thanks.


Doesn't sound bad, I got a slight addition however: Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover Who Shares Her Money With You 5G

Big Grin

+1 for the AYP sugar mama Tongue
(02-23-2016, 07:33 PM)essy Wrote: [ -> ]I'm all for having multiple lovers. Would I want them under one roof? I think not. The only point I want to make about your comments is the one-sidedness a lot of men have when it comes to polyamory. They want to have multiple women and yet they expect those women to stay 'loyal'. It's a two way street.

I´m not gonna read my whole original post since it was very long, but I would not want them under one roof either living together. That´s why its perfect sexual circle, not harem. Also, I definitely don´t expect all of them to be loyal for the rest of my/their life and if they start to desire different kind of set up I hook them up to circle of friends that fits their desire, often polyamory, and fill the funnel with new women to replace those who leave the circle. The purpose of polygyny is not to f around with women or for them to f around, but to f with them and those who are into polygyny they are happy to do that. That´s how the set up Im describing works.

All I´m saying that there definitely IS a lot of women who WANT to be in a POLYGYNY (not polyamory) relationship where they share only one man. These are mainly lesbian by their nature but who has also bi-interest to degree that they want one man to run the show. Again, like I said it sounds unbelievable to many men but I happen to know people who does this and like I said there is tons of people out there for every kind of arrangement so no, it´s not two way street in case of polygyny, it is based on consent of all adults involved and I was NOT talking about polyamory. By definition polygyny is on man and multiple women and the term exists because that kind of lifestyle exists. The purpose of the suggested program is to manifest YOUR perfect sexual circle. Since there is a lot of women who ARE interested to live in polygyny the program would seek and manifest those if that is what the user want. If he/she wants polyamory (which is what you did describe) or even polyandry kind of set up then the program would seek out for that.
(02-23-2016, 08:46 PM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-23-2016, 07:33 PM)essy Wrote: [ -> ]I'm all for having multiple lovers. Would I want them under one roof? I think not. The only point I want to make about your comments is the one-sidedness a lot of men have when it comes to polyamory. They want to have multiple women and yet they expect those women to stay 'loyal'. It's a two way street.

I´m not gonna read my whole original post since it was very long, but I would not want them under one roof either living together. That´s why its perfect sexual circle, not harem. Also, I definitely don´t expect all of them to be loyal for the rest of my/their life and if they start to desire different kind of set up I hook them up to circle of friends that fits their desire, often polyamory, and fill the funnel with new women to replace those who leave the circle. The purpose of polygyny is not to f around with women or for them to f around, but to f with them and those who are into polygyny they are happy to do that. That´s how the set up Im describing works.

All I´m saying that there definitely IS a lot of women who WANT to be in a POLYGYNY (not polyamory) relationship where they share only one man. These are mainly lesbian by their nature but who has also bi-interest to degree that they want one man to run the show. Again, like I said it sounds unbelievable to many men but I happen to know people who does this and like I said there is tons of people out there for every kind of arrangement so no, it´s not two way street in case of polygyny, it is based on consent of all adults involved and I was NOT talking about polyamory. By definition polygyny is on man and multiple women and the term exists because that kind of lifestyle exists. The purpose of the suggested program is to manifest YOUR perfect sexual circle. Since there is a lot of women who ARE interested to live in polygyny the program would seek and manifest those if that is what the user want. If he/she wants polyamory (which is what you did describe) or even polyandry kind of set up then the program would seek out for that.

I didn't even think that was possible. But if so, why not? Maybe I should consciously focus on manifesting that then. Smile
Yea it´s possible my friend...I´m not saying that I ´m already living that kind of lifestyle but since I know people who DOES I know it´s possible. Ambitious? Sure. But doable? Yes. And with the help of Shannon´s superpowers it could be achievable indeed. It is important to know EXACTLY what you want and be 100% honest and open about it to yourself and to women/others from the get go...while realizing that this lifestyle does NOT happen over night. Even the master himself that I referred in my original post transitioned from polyamory to polygyny over several years. He also happens to be kind of man who has A LOT to offer for those women and people in his life in general. What Shannon is to subliminals, he is to his community, and then some. He is Giver with capital G, not taker, and you have to be one in order to create the kind of lifestyle I am talking about. Forget about playing video games at home, forget going clubs every weekend, forget 99.9% of PUA (He does things VERY differently. Blackdragon has a lot of good points tho in his blog and books, read Alpha Male 2 -Unchained Man and his book about open relationships...tho BD is into polyamory, not polygyny), forget what your friends does (unless they are an example like him), forget a lot of whatever things that many/most guys do and definitely forget of what 99,9% of societal programming would like you to do if you want to live the life he does. One has to grow to be a man of epic portions in order to achieve even half of what he has. Like everything else in life, there is price to pay for it.

Basically once you decide what kind of lifestyle you want and if it´s say pologyny you start to BUILD that from the get go and create a life that is so desirable that women want to be INVITED INTO YOUR WORLD (as opposed to what most guys does which is trying to be part of women´s world). It has to be so magnetic, desirable and different from their everyday life experience that those women who are into that kind of lifestyle would do pretty much anything to be part of it. Vast majority of women are NOT into polygyny, but it doesn´t matter; you are making your life attractive for yourself and for those who are. It´s about the journey, not the destination.
(02-23-2016, 08:05 PM)Trend Wrote: [ -> ]As an entrepreneur, it takes a lot of energy and costly mistakes before things are going in your favor; you're obviously not there yet, so you do need a wealthy partner Tongue

I think David DeAngelo or Dan Pena was mentioning that when two people are pursuing the same goal, it's the equivalent of your effort multiplied 5 times than if you'd be doing it by yourself; who would be better to have around getting you through your downfalls than the one person you trust being part of your life and such.

Then, after you have the $$$ and everybody's happy, you can go on a tangent ... large-breasted nymphomaniac lover, flat-chested with the midget kinky soul-mate and such.

Personally, if Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G is in the works, Shannon, I can forward you payment for the order right now, even before you get started on it so we can be clear that this is not a bu#!$#!t request.

Thanks.

Lol i guess you've never seen my BASE thread then. My monthly income goal is around $40k and I'm about a fifth there after first run of BASE. I'm really self reliant so I just don't need my partner to be wealthy, but i suppose a lot of other users here want that. To each his own, then.

I'm not at $40k a month, obviously, but I'm comfortable enough to not need wealth in my partner to be happy. That's all.

My larger point here, though...do the MYP subs work that well for committed / longer term relationships? I was under the impression that they work sort of haphazardly; you get multiple options and potentials for manifesting partners, but the results are more generalized. You aren't likely to manifest the woman of your dreams (whatever that means for you - or even multiple partners over time), but you might find lots of potential options who generally fit your preference, though not exactly.

I get that there are a ton of factors here, but the general idea is that the 'limit' of the MYP subs is that it can help you manifest lots of potential options for partners who sort of fit your preference (big boobs, but perhaps not as attractive face/ body) but it can't really bring in candidates you might have serious long term affinity with (at least it hasn't yet for any user i know of). Or am i wrong on that?
Shannon,

If I finish ASC and start AM 6.0, how much time off should I take between subs?
(02-24-2016, 02:54 AM)Kol Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,

If I finish ASC and start AM 6.0, how much time off should I take between subs?

0 day no need to rest if you don't want to, he already answered it somewhere. I know because I was asking myself the same question at some point.
(02-24-2016, 12:01 AM)heavysm Wrote: [ -> ]Lol i guess you've never seen my BASE thread then. My monthly income goal is around $40k and I'm about a fifth there after first run of BASE. I'm really self reliant so I just don't need my partner to be wealthy, but i suppose a lot of other users here want that. To each his own, then.

I'm not at $40k a month, obviously, but I'm comfortable enough to not need wealth in my partner to be happy. That's all.

My larger point here, though...do the MYP subs work that well for committed / longer term relationships? I was under the impression that they work sort of haphazardly; you get multiple options and potentials for manifesting partners, but the results are more generalized. You aren't likely to manifest the woman of your dreams (whatever that means for you - or even multiple partners over time), but you might find lots of potential options who generally fit your preference, though not exactly.

I get that there are a ton of factors here, but the general idea is that the 'limit' of the MYP subs is that it can help you manifest lots of potential options for partners who sort of fit your preference (big boobs, but perhaps not as attractive face/ body) but it can't really bring in candidates you might have serious long term affinity with (at least it hasn't yet for any user i know of). Or am i wrong on that?

If you're only limiting yourself to $40k/month, it's ok then; misunderstanding on my part Smile
(02-24-2016, 02:26 PM)Trend Wrote: [ -> ]If you're only limiting yourself to $40k/month, it's ok then; misunderstanding on my part Smile

'Limiting' is a strong word to use in this case. I have selected $40k a month in profit as a business goal because it equates to roughly a half million in yearly profit. Once that is attained I just double the number and set my sights on making $80k a month, which would roughly make me a millionaire. I just wanted to clarify that the goal has meaning and definitely isn't an arbitrary number that just sounds nice.

I find it funny that reaching for a half million in profit for a startup business that's only been in operation for less than 6 months is referred to as 'limiting'. I know you didn't mean much by it, it just made me laugh lol Tongue
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691