Subliminal Talk

I've been running BIAWS the past 3+ weeks, and since I've been running it a gay friend of mine has been texting me every morning like clockwork. Pretty weird.

I'm for polyamory myself. The girls I meet, they would probably be the same in one way or another. That's why I don't wanna be restricted to just 'single women'. In reality, a huge percentage of women are already involved or seeing somebody - but at the same time still available. I've experienced it too much as I've been on numerous dates with girls who apparently have a bf.

(02-23-2016, 07:52 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: [ -> ]I'm for polyamory myself. The girls I meet, they would probably be the same in one way or another. That's why I don't wanna be restricted to just 'single women'. In reality, a huge percentage of women are already involved or seeing somebody - but at the same time still available. I've experienced it too much as I've been on numerous dates with girls who apparently have a bf.

Yeah I am too. Polyamory is the way to go.

I also think that since girls can be with multiple guys, and most are, Shannon should focus on eliminating the blockages to that. I don't know exactly what would be involved, but a lot of it has to do with girls thinking they will either be judged or found out by friends or family.

Since state transference is a thing, I imagine you could create a state where you feel totally safe, secure, and uninhibited which you would then pass on to everyone in your immediate vicinity, while somehow targeting the girls of your desires.

I've noticed a lot of weird stuff in regards to state transference. Specifically in sales. So I know the potential is there.

Something to watch out for, however, is that state transference can be transfered and then "stolen".

What I mean by that is, let's say I hit on a girl, and she has just enough self control to resist my advances. So she goes on her merry way. But now she's turned on, and needs a release, so she finds her beta BF/husband she never f*cks and rides him out of the blue. This is not uncommon and I noticed this kind of thing happened to me more than once (once with my brother talking with me about sex and then he lost his V shortly thereafter and now is an "alpha", another time I'm sure a guy I knew who had been talking about me with his GF got lucky with her)

So we need something in these subs that anchors US (the user) as the sole source of this state and it has to be very hard for other people to steal our thunder.

(02-22-2016, 11:00 PM)heavysm Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-22-2016, 10:43 PM)Trend Wrote: [ -> ]Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G should be the next update for BASE !!!

But you're likely to become good with money while using BASE, so do you really need a partner who is financially wealthy? As a BASE user, I don't need my partner to particularly be wealthy.

Also, wouldn't such a sub be most useful for others to use so they can attract BASE users into their lives? Lol

As an entrepreneur, it takes a lot of energy and costly mistakes before things are going in your favor; you're obviously not there yet, so you do need a wealthy partner

I think David DeAngelo or Dan Pena was mentioning that when two people are pursuing the same goal, it's the equivalent of your effort multiplied 5 times than if you'd be doing it by yourself; who would be better to have around getting you through your downfalls than the one person you trust being part of your life and such.

Then, after you have the $$$ and everybody's happy, you can go on a tangent ... large-breasted nymphomaniac lover, flat-chested with the midget kinky soul-mate and such.

Personally, if Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G is in the works, Shannon, I can forward you payment for the order right now, even before you get started on it so we can be clear that this is not a bu#!$#!t request.

Thanks.

(02-23-2016, 08:05 PM)Trend Wrote: [ -> ]Personally, if Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G is in the works, Shannon, I can forward you payment for the order right now, even before you get started on it so we can be clear that this is not a bu#!$#!t request.

Thanks.

Doesn't sound bad, I got a slight addition however: Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover Who Shares Her Money With You 5G

(02-23-2016, 08:13 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-23-2016, 08:05 PM)Trend Wrote: [ -> ]Personally, if Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G is in the works, Shannon, I can forward you payment for the order right now, even before you get started on it so we can be clear that this is not a bu#!$#!t request.

Thanks.

Doesn't sound bad, I got a slight addition however: Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover Who Shares Her Money With You 5G

+1 for the AYP sugar mama

(02-23-2016, 07:33 PM)essy Wrote: [ -> ]I'm all for having multiple lovers. Would I want them under one roof? I think not. The only point I want to make about your comments is the one-sidedness a lot of men have when it comes to polyamory. They want to have multiple women and yet they expect those women to stay 'loyal'. It's a two way street.

I´m not gonna read my whole original post since it was very long, but I would not want them under one roof either living together. That´s why its perfect sexual circle, not harem. Also, I definitely don´t expect all of them to be loyal for the rest of my/their life and if they start to desire different kind of set up I hook them up to circle of friends that fits their desire, often polyamory, and fill the funnel with new women to replace those who leave the circle. The purpose of polygyny is not to f around with women or for them to f around, but to f with them and those who are into polygyny they are happy to do that. That´s how the set up Im describing works.

All I´m saying that there definitely IS a lot of women who WANT to be in a POLYGYNY (not polyamory) relationship where they share only one man. These are mainly lesbian by their nature but who has also bi-interest to degree that they want one man to run the show. Again, like I said it sounds unbelievable to many men but I happen to know people who does this and like I said there is tons of people out there for every kind of arrangement so no, it´s not two way street in case of polygyny, it is based on consent of all adults involved and I was NOT talking about polyamory. By definition polygyny is on man and multiple women and the term exists because that kind of lifestyle exists. The purpose of the suggested program is to manifest YOUR perfect sexual circle. Since there is a lot of women who ARE interested to live in polygyny the program would seek and manifest those if that is what the user want. If he/she wants polyamory (which is what you did describe) or even polyandry kind of set up then the program would seek out for that.

(02-23-2016, 08:46 PM)AlphaRomeo Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-23-2016, 07:33 PM)essy Wrote: [ -> ]I'm all for having multiple lovers. Would I want them under one roof? I think not. The only point I want to make about your comments is the one-sidedness a lot of men have when it comes to polyamory. They want to have multiple women and yet they expect those women to stay 'loyal'. It's a two way street.

I´m not gonna read my whole original post since it was very long, but I would not want them under one roof either living together. That´s why its perfect sexual circle, not harem. Also, I definitely don´t expect all of them to be loyal for the rest of my/their life and if they start to desire different kind of set up I hook them up to circle of friends that fits their desire, often polyamory, and fill the funnel with new women to replace those who leave the circle. The purpose of polygyny is not to f around with women or for them to f around, but to f with them and those who are into polygyny they are happy to do that. That´s how the set up Im describing works.

All I´m saying that there definitely IS a lot of women who WANT to be in a POLYGYNY (not polyamory) relationship where they share only one man. These are mainly lesbian by their nature but who has also bi-interest to degree that they want one man to run the show. Again, like I said it sounds unbelievable to many men but I happen to know people who does this and like I said there is tons of people out there for every kind of arrangement so no, it´s not two way street in case of polygyny, it is based on consent of all adults involved and I was NOT talking about polyamory. By definition polygyny is on man and multiple women and the term exists because that kind of lifestyle exists. The purpose of the suggested program is to manifest YOUR perfect sexual circle. Since there is a lot of women who ARE interested to live in polygyny the program would seek and manifest those if that is what the user want. If he/she wants polyamory (which is what you did describe) or even polyandry kind of set up then the program would seek out for that.

I didn't even think that was possible. But if so, why not? Maybe I should consciously focus on manifesting that then.

Yea it´s possible my friend...I´m not saying that I ´m already living that kind of lifestyle but since I know people who DOES I know it´s possible. Ambitious? Sure. But doable? Yes. And with the help of Shannon´s superpowers it could be achievable indeed. It is important to know EXACTLY what you want and be 100% honest and open about it to yourself and to women/others from the get go...while realizing that this lifestyle does NOT happen over night. Even the master himself that I referred in my original post transitioned from polyamory to polygyny over several years. He also happens to be kind of man who has A LOT to offer for those women and people in his life in general. What Shannon is to subliminals, he is to his community, and then some. He is Giver with capital G, not taker, and you have to be one in order to create the kind of lifestyle I am talking about. Forget about playing video games at home, forget going clubs every weekend, forget 99.9% of PUA (He does things VERY differently. Blackdragon has a lot of good points tho in his blog and books, read Alpha Male 2 -Unchained Man and his book about open relationships...tho BD is into polyamory, not polygyny), forget what your friends does (unless they are an example like him), forget a lot of whatever things that many/most guys do and definitely forget of what 99,9% of societal programming would like you to do if you want to live the life he does. One has to grow to be a man of epic portions in order to achieve even half of what he has. Like everything else in life, there is price to pay for it.

Basically once you decide what kind of lifestyle you want and if it´s say pologyny you start to BUILD that from the get go and create a life that is so desirable that women want to be INVITED INTO YOUR WORLD (as opposed to what most guys does which is trying to be part of women´s world). It has to be so magnetic, desirable and different from their everyday life experience that those women who are into that kind of lifestyle would do pretty much anything to be part of it. Vast majority of women are NOT into polygyny, but it doesn´t matter; you are making your life attractive for yourself and for those who are. It´s about the journey, not the destination.

(02-23-2016, 08:05 PM)Trend Wrote: [ -> ]As an entrepreneur, it takes a lot of energy and costly mistakes before things are going in your favor; you're obviously not there yet, so you do need a wealthy partner

I think David DeAngelo or Dan Pena was mentioning that when two people are pursuing the same goal, it's the equivalent of your effort multiplied 5 times than if you'd be doing it by yourself; who would be better to have around getting you through your downfalls than the one person you trust being part of your life and such.

Then, after you have the $$$ and everybody's happy, you can go on a tangent ... large-breasted nymphomaniac lover, flat-chested with the midget kinky soul-mate and such.

Personally, if Attract Your Perfect Financially Wealthy Romantic Lover 5G is in the works, Shannon, I can forward you payment for the order right now, even before you get started on it so we can be clear that this is not a bu#!$#!t request.

Thanks.

Lol i guess you've never seen my BASE thread then. My monthly income goal is around $40k and I'm about a fifth there after first run of BASE. I'm really self reliant so I just don't need my partner to be wealthy, but i suppose a lot of other users here want that. To each his own, then.

I'm not at $40k a month, obviously, but I'm comfortable enough to not need wealth in my partner to be happy. That's all.

My larger point here, though...do the MYP subs work that well for committed / longer term relationships? I was under the impression that they work sort of haphazardly; you get multiple options and potentials for manifesting partners, but the results are more generalized. You aren't likely to manifest the woman of your dreams (whatever that means for you - or even multiple partners over time), but you might find lots of potential options who generally fit your preference, though not exactly.

I get that there are a ton of factors here, but the general idea is that the 'limit' of the MYP subs is that it can help you manifest lots of potential options for partners who sort of fit your preference (big boobs, but perhaps not as attractive face/ body) but it can't really bring in candidates you might have serious long term affinity with (at least it hasn't yet for any user i know of). Or am i wrong on that?

Shannon,

If I finish ASC and start AM 6.0, how much time off should I take between subs?

(02-24-2016, 02:54 AM)Kol Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon,

If I finish ASC and start AM 6.0, how much time off should I take between subs?

0 day no need to rest if you don't want to, he already answered it somewhere. I know because I was asking myself the same question at some point.

(02-24-2016, 12:01 AM)heavysm Wrote: [ -> ]Lol i guess you've never seen my BASE thread then. My monthly income goal is around $40k and I'm about a fifth there after first run of BASE. I'm really self reliant so I just don't need my partner to be wealthy, but i suppose a lot of other users here want that. To each his own, then.

I'm not at $40k a month, obviously, but I'm comfortable enough to not need wealth in my partner to be happy. That's all.

My larger point here, though...do the MYP subs work that well for committed / longer term relationships? I was under the impression that they work sort of haphazardly; you get multiple options and potentials for manifesting partners, but the results are more generalized. You aren't likely to manifest the woman of your dreams (whatever that means for you - or even multiple partners over time), but you might find lots of potential options who generally fit your preference, though not exactly.

I get that there are a ton of factors here, but the general idea is that the 'limit' of the MYP subs is that it can help you manifest lots of potential options for partners who sort of fit your preference (big boobs, but perhaps not as attractive face/ body) but it can't really bring in candidates you might have serious long term affinity with (at least it hasn't yet for any user i know of). Or am i wrong on that?

If you're only limiting yourself to $40k/month, it's ok then; misunderstanding on my part

(02-24-2016, 02:26 PM)Trend Wrote: [ -> ]If you're only limiting yourself to $40k/month, it's ok then; misunderstanding on my part

'Limiting' is a strong word to use in this case. I have selected $40k a month in profit as a business goal because it equates to roughly a half million in yearly profit. Once that is attained I just double the number and set my sights on making $80k a month, which would roughly make me a millionaire. I just wanted to clarify that the goal has meaning and definitely isn't an arbitrary number that just sounds nice.

I find it funny that reaching for a half million in profit for a startup business that's only been in operation for less than 6 months is referred to as 'limiting'. I know you didn't mean much by it, it just made me laugh lol