Limitless is of course a good idea. Of course you would enjoy the benefit of having every women attracted to you. But would you love it if you have all your cousins want to sleep with you, and all gay guys pinching your butt very time tou walk by? It fuckin' grosses me out and quite regularly this happens.
I love women, but I don't want to attract my cousins. And I need to see them often each year, just like all of you need to see your family too. You cannot neglect realistic issues here. If you were talking about "free will", "make your own decisions", that sounds too good as if you have zero attachment with your family. it's funny how you all have this "limitless" mentality without focusing on realistic measures. I am simply saying that "make SM / AM filter out women who are close family members" , period. I don't give a shit if you sleep with random Cougars on the street.
(03-09-2016, 08:55 AM)Jakeb203 Wrote: [ -> ]Limitless is of course a good idea. Of course you would enjoy the benefit of having every women attracted to you. But would you love it if you have all your cousins want to sleep with you, and all gay guys pinching your butt very time tou walk by? It fuckin' grosses me out and quite regularly this happens.
I love women, but I don't want to attract my cousins. And I need to see them often each year, just like all of you need to see your family too. You cannot neglect realistic issues here. If you were talking about "free will", "make your own decisions", that sounds too good as if you have zero attachment with your family. it's funny how you all have this "limitless" mentality without focusing on realistic measures. I am simply saying that "make SM / AM filter out women who are close family members" , period. I don't give a shit if you sleep with random Cougars on the street.
I had a cousin attracted to me during AM 6, she even offered to spend a night in a hotel room. I said, "No." And that was that. If your cousins are attracted, or make you an offer, say no and continue your merry way. It is simple. It is your choice to let it bother you or not.
Is TLAM getting an upgrade to 5g ?
(03-09-2016, 08:55 AM)Jakeb203 Wrote: [ -> ]Limitless is of course a good idea. Of course you would enjoy the benefit of having every women attracted to you. But would you love it if you have all your cousins want to sleep with you, and all gay guys pinching your butt very time tou walk by? It fuckin' grosses me out and quite regularly this happens.
I love women, but I don't want to attract my cousins. And I need to see them often each year, just like all of you need to see your family too. You cannot neglect realistic issues here. If you were talking about "free will", "make your own decisions", that sounds too good as if you have zero attachment with your family. it's funny how you all have this "limitless" mentality without focusing on realistic measures. I am simply saying that "make SM / AM filter out women who are close family members" , period. I don't give a shit if you sleep with random Cougars on the street.
An attractive, self realized man is going to have to deal with those terrible first-world problems they have about being an attractive self realized man.
Limitless means you take responsibility for the freedoms you have. In this case, all you have to do is set a boundary, and you're done.
Take it as a compliment that they are attracted, but set your boundaries firmly and then hold your ground. Simple.
I would fuck a distant relative if shes hot and it doesnt come out.
How much more effective will future subliminals be at external manifestations ? Will manifesting friends, money, an amazing life, better body, etc....easier ? Most of our favorite subliminals are heavily focused on internal & self changes. I'd love to see some heavily focused on external ( reality, circumstances, lifestyle ) changes. Thats what we ultimately seek.
I personally don't like the thought of it limiting all kinds of things, where does the limitation stop? Is it that difficult not to fuck all your cousins? haha
(03-09-2016, 04:25 PM)Benjamin Wrote: [ -> ]I personally don't like the thought of it limiting all kinds of things, where does the limitation stop? Is it that difficult not to **** all your cousins? haha
Maybe he has a hot family.
(03-09-2016, 12:27 PM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: [ -> ]How much more effective will future subliminals be at external manifestations ? Will manifesting friends, money, an amazing life, better body, etc....easier ? Most of our favorite subliminals are heavily focused on internal & self changes. I'd love to see some heavily focused on external ( reality, circumstances, lifestyle ) changes. Thats what we ultimately seek.
That remains to be seen, doesn't it. I can't magically know ahead of time with enough accuracy to be able to say, "Oh, 173.985% more effective."
(03-08-2016, 03:47 AM)sushi521 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-07-2016, 10:56 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ] (03-07-2016, 09:43 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon do you think it would benefit me if I bought more high quality speakers? I'm already getting results so I know my speakers are working but they're laptop speakers from 2006 so Idk maybe I could do better lol.
Oh no, speakers from 2006? They must be out of date! Quick, get new ones!
Seriously? lol If you have speakers that pass the speaker test, you're fine.
Quote:And so that your answer can benefit more people: do better speakers make a difference in results? Or is it like, as long as its working then there's nothing beyond that point?
Higher frequency response on the top end is better at reproducing the ultrasonic audio with higher fidelity, and therefore gives you slightly better results. Slightly.
Quote:Also do different audio programs make a difference, ignoring effects you can toggle on or off? Edit: but also would any effects help results?
They do indeed. I use Audacity on my laptop. VLC also works well. I don't know any others, so I can't comment, but I can say that WMP (which I hear is deprecated in W10) was terrible for playing subliminals.
Effects help results? What effects? Reverb? You don't want reverb.
I've been using WMP the whole time.
So I downloaded Audacity, and it looks pretty complicated. Do you need to change any setting or you just play it?
Audacity is indeed at first glance looks a bit complicated. But the truth is as simple and easy as any other media player. The difference is in the Audacity audio plays using shortcuts rather than the mouse. Maybe it's to make easier for users, (perhaps) because actually Audacity is a sound editor. Try to read the manual on how to use Audacity to play audio. After using Audacity a few times it will become second nature to play audio using Audacity. I myself am a little surprised because it is very easy and simple.
The drawback is Audacity eat quite a lot of RAM and will lag on my computer. So I prefer to use VLC when I'm using Windows. I most often use Audacity when I'm using Linux. What I like about Audacity is due to differences in how to play the audio in Audacity and also due to some reasons.
VLC is great because it is multifunctional, as well as simple as Audacity, can be minimized to the system tray and also consumes less RAM than Audacity.
If you are using a computer that has a relatively low specification, try using Audacious. It is the default audio player in Lubuntu. Very light. I've tried it and so far so good. Its a bit I do not like is the part that I think the volume slider is less user-friendly. You can also install it on Windows. This audio player has never been tested by Shannon. So it's your own risk, to give it a try.
Anybody use iTunes for playback on a Mac?
Didn't hear any distortion in the speaker test off of built-in Mac speakers