Subliminal Talk

Shannon, I saw your recent post in Dzemoo's journal and I could really use some advice.. Where do you draw the line between honesty and neediness? The oneitis I've mentioned prior, when we were hooking up everything was going fine until she had to cancel some plans and I got a little needy and asked her if she had lost interest. She said no and that she'd just been busy and stressed but it was the beginning of the end. Anyway last night I was at a party, first time seeing her after 4 months no contact. It went exactly how I wanted it to go, I was the life of the party (thank you dsmi), I flirted with other girls in front of her another girl was literally touching my abs when she looked over. Her and I ended up having a good flirty chat, and she's sent me a few snapchats since, nothing suggestive, but we were complete no contact before the party. This brings me to my original question.. if I was to be honest I would message her and say I missed her and want to see her, but that's the kind of needy thing that has pushed girls away from me in the past. In my experience the girls who have stuck around are the ones I haven't cared about and I was indifferent to. And certainly things were going great with this girl when I was chill and barely contacting her between meets but I was hiding my feelings, I wanted a relationship. So how honest can one really be, when past experience dictates that feigning indifference works better?

(09-23-2016, 07:11 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: [ -> ]16 + HOURS worth in 20 minutes. dang! in 2G it used ta take days..for things to start to show up...even back then SHannon's work was more effect than most of whats out there! Wow! Even Still,
Ultra Success 6G
Luck Magnifier 6G
Money Magnet 6G
("er ALL 3 combined and then some,plus tweaked scripts and related)

Dream your BEST Solution 6G
ALL are what I Have MY money bet on !! Fantastic Job Shannon, The Beast 8 Lives. amazing.
ITS ALIVE,ITS ALIVE!! (dr.frankun-steen:-)

BAMM 6g is gonna be a must buy sub with those specs. We can talk about DMSI, AM7 all day but imagine BAMM 6g. The goal of becoming a multi millionaire might be achievable in a lot less time.

Shannon, with those specs that you spoke about in 6g and with everything you know so far about 6g and if things remained what you know for now... what would you estimate would take BAMM to achieve the goal as compared to the current 5g version?

(09-24-2016, 09:32 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-24-2016, 08:04 AM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-24-2016, 07:37 AM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]Just wanted to put this here as well in case it wasn't seen in the other thread, Shannon. I think it's a really good suggestion that could make a very big difference for DMSI:

(09-23-2016, 09:42 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe Remove Negativity Within 4G would be a fantastic add-on for DMSI. Putting that program into DMSI should help remove a lot of doubt, negative, failure-based thinking, inhibiting results currently and in the future with new versions, too.

I think that could really help.

I already have something along these lines slated for addition.

I assume that was the EIP post I saw earlier?

I figured the negativity at times can be dealt with by implementing RNW 4G. Good to know we're thinking the same thing, cool.

I'm looking at adding EIP and Positive Thinking Positive Attitude scripting.

(09-24-2016, 10:41 PM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, is it okay if one of my speakers is louder than the other? Will it affect my results? If it's a big deal I will buy another pair because I take my listening seriously.

It will have an impact, it should be balanced if possible. Not gonna kill you, but it ideally should be equal.

(09-24-2016, 11:56 PM)ffaux Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-24-2016, 10:41 PM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, is it okay if one of my speakers is louder than the other? Will it affect my results? If it's a big deal I will buy another pair because I take my listening seriously.

I have a similar problem where, for no good reason, the left channel plays at ~-40db and the right channel plays at ~-30db on the ultrasonic track. Is this a big problem?

This is interesting, because I perform a group waveform normalize on the tracks before mixdown and then I interface them in a way that makes this impossible for it to be something on my end, as far as I know. Yet I'm reading about this being a common situation. I'll have to look into this.

Ideally, we want them to be equal in volume. It's not going to kill you if they're not, but still.

(09-25-2016, 02:52 PM)Shannon Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-24-2016, 10:41 PM)Frosted Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, is it okay if one of my speakers is louder than the other? Will it affect my results? If it's a big deal I will buy another pair because I take my listening seriously.

It will have an impact, it should be balanced if possible. Not gonna kill you, but it ideally should be equal.

Are you sure the channels are balanced in volume at the source? I'm asking only because there seems to be a few of us experiencing a difference in volume.

(09-25-2016, 10:13 AM)robstar Wrote: [ -> ]Shannon, I saw your recent post in Dzemoo's journal and I could really use some advice.. Where do you draw the line between honesty and neediness? The oneitis I've mentioned prior, when we were hooking up everything was going fine until she had to cancel some plans and I got a little needy and asked her if she had lost interest. She said no and that she'd just been busy and stressed but it was the beginning of the end. Anyway last night I was at a party, first time seeing her after 4 months no contact. It went exactly how I wanted it to go, I was the life of the party (thank you dsmi), I flirted with other girls in front of her another girl was literally touching my abs when she looked over. Her and I ended up having a good flirty chat, and she's sent me a few snapchats since, nothing suggestive, but we were complete no contact before the party. This brings me to my original question.. if I was to be honest I would message her and say I missed her and want to see her, but that's the kind of needy thing that has pushed girls away from me in the past. In my experience the girls who have stuck around are the ones I haven't cared about and I was indifferent to. And certainly things were going great with this girl when I was chill and barely contacting her between meets but I was hiding my feelings, I wanted a relationship. So how honest can one really be, when past experience dictates that feigning indifference works better?

You're thinking the world is black and white. It's not.

You always want to be honest, yes, but that doesn't mean you have to tell her everything you are thinking.

When I see a woman who is stunningly beautiful to me, do I run over and tell her she's stunningly beautiful to me? Hell no! I usually keep my mouth tightly shut on that until significantly after we have started dating and after we have started having sex, and if I comment on it (which is far from guaranteed), I will adjust the comment to what she will most benefit from hearing. If she is not very good looking, you can give her a bigger compliment than if she is, because the compliment has to match what she will believe and respect. Stunners usually get betas gushing about how hot they are, so she will associate that with a beta, and therefore, you want to calibrate to whatever she associates with how you want to be perceived. You might never compliment her at all, or you might say, "Yeah, that outfit looks alright," but you don't want to gush and be (or seem) needy.

If you're feeling something and you want to tell her, and you know she will perceive it as being insecure, beta, needy, etc... you always have the option to keep your mouth shut!

In other words...

You can always remain honest without having to say anything at all, unless by keeping your mouth shut you are lying by omission.

It's not so much about being honest, as knowing how much information to share. Too much information is just as bad as too little.

(09-25-2016, 01:02 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-23-2016, 07:11 PM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: [ -> ]16 + HOURS worth in 20 minutes. dang! in 2G it used ta take days..for things to start to show up...even back then SHannon's work was more effect than most of whats out there! Wow! Even Still,
Ultra Success 6G
Luck Magnifier 6G
Money Magnet 6G
("er ALL 3 combined and then some,plus tweaked scripts and related)

Dream your BEST Solution 6G
ALL are what I Have MY money bet on !! Fantastic Job Shannon, The Beast 8 Lives. amazing.
ITS ALIVE,ITS ALIVE!! (dr.frankun-steen:-)

BAMM 6g is gonna be a must buy sub with those specs. We can talk about DMSI, AM7 all day but imagine BAMM 6g. The goal of becoming a multi millionaire might be achievable in a lot less time.

Shannon, with those specs that you spoke about in 6g and with everything you know so far about 6g and if things remained what you know for now... what would you estimate would take BAMM to achieve the goal as compared to the current 5g version?

Anything I estimate would be a sheer guess at this point, because I have made no effort to figure this out yet, and I of course not done developing 6G or standardizing it.

But I can say that with the anti-resistance technologies, autopilot, and P4 alone, it should work significantly better and more quickly.

If, of course, you are approved to buy it.

Hi Shannon,

I saw you say you've put P4 into DMSI V3.0.1. Now, have you put P3 into that as well? Or did P3 morph into P4 in testing and development so P4 will be referenced and used now? P3 seemed to get the words per second count to infinity you said I think. I'm not sure how infinite words occur in a static amount of time as I thought it could only go up to a certain point within it.

Just wanted to have some juicy teaser about V3.0.1 basically, lol.

(09-25-2016, 04:04 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]Hi Shannon,

I saw you say you've put P4 into DMSI V3.0.1. Now, have you put P3 into that as well? Or did P3 morph into P4 in testing and development so P4 will be referenced and used now? P3 seemed to get the words per second count to infinity you said I think. I'm not sure how infinite words occur in a static amount of time as I thought it could only go up to a certain point within it.

Just wanted to have some juicy teaser about V3.0.1 basically, lol.

P4 is a layer on top of P3, and P3 is therefore a pre-requisite for P4. P3 makes the WPM effectively infinite, but P4 improves on that by making the rate of WPM automatically self adjusting for the optimal response for each person.

I say effectively infinite because there's no way to know for sure if the mind can do that. But on paper, if the instructions are executed exactly as stated, the result is mathematically infinite WPS.

I had the idea that this may actually be a variable that would work better if it was regulated for the individual and refreshed in terms of speed periodically, and P4 approximately triples or possibly quadruple the effectiveness of P3. I don't know if the end result is less than infinite WPS but optimal speed, or somehow the speed is adjusted and still remains infinite. I just know that P4 is a significant improvement on P3 for impact and effectiveness.

Wonderful news!

Okay NOW I understand, it's variable wps, *theoretically* hitting infinite, I knew there was a misunderstanding somewhere as a second is only a finite amount of time so there's only "so many" words that could be stuffed into it. I may have taken that too literal, I suspected something was amiss. Now I understand it better, so P4 is a wps version of SOS/HST, essentially. Gotcha.

On the one hand, these customisations to programs will allow people to go at the pace they can handle, but will cause variation in program performance. I think making that known in sales pages beforehand should dampen people's tendency to compare their results with others.

I am truly looking forward to V3.0.1. It sounds like it will be a definite step forward. What other concepts will be in it? What do you think the current issues are that are keeping the end goal from being easily achieved? Doesn't have to be definite as I know you need to test things etc. but some theories I mean.

(09-25-2016, 04:32 PM)CatMan Wrote: [ -> ]Wonderful news!

Okay NOW I understand, it's variable wps, *theoretically* hitting infinite, I knew there was a misunderstanding somewhere as a second is only a finite amount of time so there's only "so many" words that could be stuffed into it. I may have taken that too literal, I suspected something was amiss. Now I understand it better, so P4 is a wps version of SOS/HST, essentially. Gotcha.

Don't misunderstand. Theoretical infinite WPS is only theoretical because I have no way to actually measure what the mind is capable of doing with this instruction set. P3 is one hell of a jump in power, though. P4 is self optimizing, which implies maximum possible or maximum useful, instead of infinite. But both are hugely powerful technologies.

Quote:On the one hand, these customisations to programs will allow people to go at the pace they can handle, but will cause variation in program performance. I think making that known in sales pages beforehand should dampen people's tendency to compare their results with others.

I don't see variation in program performance in testing. What I see is that by allowing the optimal WPS to be determined, and tracked, and always be using that value, we get significantly more result than P3 was giving us - so it's been a significant and universal improvement.

Quote:I am truly looking forward to V3.0.1. It sounds like it will be a definite step forward. What other concepts will be in it?

I have a couple of pages of additions listed. Here is a few of the things I am planning to add. Far from a complete list, this is about 40% of the proposed additions alone. Some of them are so awesome that I seriously can't reveal them. Some are on my cell phone. Enjoy this list, but remember that there is no guarantee that these can or will be included on an individual basis. They are just proposed additions at the moment. And guys, I have more ideas than I can hope to implement already, so please don't try to add more.

turn everything sexual on both sides
generate and optimize natural sexual pheromones
neutralize expectations that might get in the way
kill concern for what others think, both directions
cause the aura to neutralize resistance and such from those being affected by it
take responsibility for your own choices and actions and beliefs, and their results and outcomes and effects concerning the program.
Deserve to have sex with affected, make them feel they deserve to have sex with user
congruence
positive thinking, positive attitude/can do/anything is possible
align user's goals with program goals
Cause the user to be perceived as being celebrity level status and social value.
Make sex inevitable.
Consider friends with benefits sex as an optional way to achieve the goal.
Get them to make time and space in their lives for unlimited sex on a regular and frequent basis with the user.
Make it perfectly normal for affected to initiate and have sex with user
increase how much energy is being ingested, transformed and projected, and how intense, obvious, effective and incredible it is.
increase how fast the user powers up
increase how fast and how obviously the aura achieves its goals.
increase how physically and sexually attractive the user becomes,
make the affected feel perfectly normal expressing their entire inner whore to the user.
Cause them to like, value and appreciate the user enough for them to fuck the user in response.
Interpret everything the user does as being an appropriate and acceptable invitation to initiate and have sex
charge yourself and your aura to exactly the right level of energy
Make voice, eye language, looks, attitude, movements, body language and choice of words maximally sexually irresistible
healing mask for the conscious mind
make them both enjoy the process of getting to sex, and then the sex itself.
Make affected people touch the user, and self seducing
have the aura magnify the animal sexual instinct of the affected
Make both user and receiver sexually opportunistic to whatever degree is necessary.
Make those affected crave sex with, and touching/being touched by the user.
Cause both sides to experience the right states and responses that result in sex
Use subconscious precognition to always make exactly the right choices which always and inevitably lead to as much sex as possible
Cause sexual and social value to be perceived at exactly the right levels to cause entire groups of responders to react at a time.
Auto-adjust to stay on track with and achieve the goals, regardless of everything else.
Get others to obviously and desperately throw themselves at the user sexually and literally, verbally beg for sex
Perceive the user as being the very highest levels of attractiveness and value the perceiver can successfully get and seduce into sex.
Get the program itself to guide the user in exactly when and how to use it, and for how many loops per day.
Make the aura sexually warm, safe, welcoming and inviting, and at the same time, as dark, mysterious, threatening and exciting as is useful
dissolve any and all fear, guilt, shame and concern about pregnancy, reputation, disease,
prevent the user from choosing or having sex with any person who is diseased
Make the user's sexual organs and fluids a grand prize for the affected.
Magnify how much the others enjoy giving the user sexual pleasure.
Wealth, fame, power, popularity, perfect genes, good looks, important, irreplaceable, rare, makes her look good to others to have sex with him. He's out of my league, curiosity/mysterious, attractive polarity of gender, crave sexual intimacy
cause the user to believe they are incredibly sexually attractive
cause user to have full confidence in their attractiveness
absolutely deserving of socialization, sex, etc.
consciously notice all of everything the responders do in response to the aura.

Quote:What do you think the current issues are that are keeping the end goal from being easily achieved? Doesn't have to be definite as I know you need to test things etc. but some theories I mean.

Depends on the person. I think there are a lot of potential variables that need to be tweaked and/or addressed.

Oh my. I think.

...
...
...

I think my dick just exploded.

@ chaos: me too lol.

@ Shannon: You said "kill concern for what others think, both directions" but I think I experienced this today. Was something like it already in DMSI?

EDIT: Oh, and this is awesome:

"Make the user's sexual organs and fluids a grand prize for the affected."

I've had that paradigm in mind since back in the Geodude days. I literally tried to tap that into reality lol.